« first day (1938 days earlier)      last day (3379 days later) » 

user174558
23:00
@morphic Rotman wrote lots of algebra books, and it seems he combines bits and pieces into his grad algebra text, omitting some parts and some proofs here and there.
:>
Think I'll shower now.
Night, @Owatch.
The bathroom I share is a former public one.
And is also kept at outside temps.
Yikes!
That being, about 5 degrees C.
user174558
23:01
@morphic But what I like about his abstract algebra book is that he proves the cubic and quartic formulas in full. Not that many care about them, but this is extremely rare nowadays.
Waiting for the hot water seems to be endless.
Oh well.
I have more stories about that place for later.
See you all! Thanks a lot for helping me Ted!
You're welcome, @Owatch.
@JasperLoy have you watched the one below (motivational video)?
@TedShifrin Dennis Sullivan is teaching an advanced algebraic topology course here next semester
He's fantastic, but it'll surely be very advanced and indecipherable :)
23:05
Yea I read the syllabus and it's super hard
What are the main topics?
hi @TedShifrin
Something about generalized homology/cohomology theories and axioms
@JasperLoy watch all the series by Mateusz M, it's very nice.
Yeah, that's like a third-year grad course, @morphic.
hi Karim
23:08
OK, time to finish a paper.
BBL
so I have been doing some algebraic topology for my project
I wanted to ask you a question @TedShifrin
can you classify the topological spaces that have the fundmental group being abelian ?
i am sorry
topological spaces *
We are learning about the homology functor in class these days
@MikeM may have a good answer for you. He's the topologist :)
alright
True for any topological group or H-space, Karim, but I don't know if there is a classification.
23:11
Hi all
Hi @DanRust. Actually, Karim, Dan may know the answer to your question.
yeah I was thinking for example for a square if we identify opposite sides of the square
You said topological spaces, Karim. That's super general. If you restrict to compact surfaces (2-manifolds), then it's well known.
then it will give a two circles that are glued together
It's a good question but my intuition is that it's unlikely.... there's just too many abelian groups
23:13
No, no, the square is filled in, Karim.
yeah for filled in one
yeah I was thinking if we don't fill it in
then it will not be abelian
So the 1-skeleton is two circles. But they're not filled in the way you think.
I se
I see
I actually came to ask a question of my own which isn't too disimilar
Does anyone know of a torsion-free group (finitely presentable) whose abelianisation has torsion?
equivalently, a CW complex whose fundamental group is torsion-free, but first homology has torsion
That sounds impossible, but if you think about presentations, it seems plausible that you could have $a,b$ that don't commute and have some complicated relations, but when you make them commute you get something like $a^2=1$.
23:17
yes, my attempt found a good candidate, but I can't show it's torsion-free
what does it mean torsion free group ?
Yeah, that seems challenging. Page @anon. :)
$\langle a,b,c \mid a^2 = bcb'c' \rangle$
torsion-free means there are no elements of finite order
if anyone can show that group is torsion-free I'd be happy :P
what is abelianisation?
is it the commutator ?
I think such things are hard, @DanR.
23:19
the abelianisation is the quotient of G by its commutator subgroup
Yeah I know @Ted .... :(
Perhaps @MikeM or @PVAL have some topological ideas ...
I see nice question
Or @Balarka ... but he's in conference and not around ...
If an example exists, it'd debunk a paper which recently went on arxiv... but I have my doubts the paper is correct
I gotta go study I will see you guys :D
23:21
My immediate instinct was to say no, @DanR. A real algebraist should know this immediately.
Bubye, Karim.
see you
what is $b'$ and $c'$
inverses of $b$ and $c$
I found a nice example of a group which is isomorphic to a familiar group in a 'non-obvious way' in my search
This reminds me of a ring theory question I stumbled over long ago: Can two elements in a commutative ring generate the same ideal without being associates?
the subgroup of $\langle a,b \mid a^2=b^2=1\rangle$ of all words of even length
23:27
What is that, $\Bbb Z$? :P
yep
haha
This is why I'm not an algebraist :P
thought it'd make a nice question on an intro to group theory exam
Exams aren't the place for treachery, but it's a good homework exercise !!
haha true
23:28
@TedShifrin Btw, is $\mathbb{N}^\mathbb{N}$ in bijection with $\mathbb{N}$ or $\mathbb{R}$ ?
reals
(or something else ? idk)
I was going to say YES, but @DanR gave it away.
sorry :(
Is there an easy way to show that ?
23:29
Hint, @Ainz: What about $\{0,1\}^{\Bbb N}$? Do you recognize that?
Ooh binaries
Yuppers.
hint: continued fractions
that's cool :D
@ted's hint is probably more useful
23:31
@OldJohn!!!
@TedShifrin Hi Ted!
Lovely to see you!
Well then, i'm off
@TedShifrin Just dropping by (briefly) - spend more time these days in Music SE
How is your mountain climbing?
23:32
@TedShifrin Coming on nicely - 81 of my intended 214 climbed :)
So impressive!
I've now retired, but I won't be climbing mountains.
what else is retirement for if not golf and mountain climbing?
I am an abysmal failure, then, @DanR.
2
@TedShifrin Congratulations on the retirement - you willnot regret it!
@robjohn thanks, i jumped directly to numerical part lol, but i expected something like an irrational number expressed with roots and pi
23:36
Dammit - have to go. Bye for now Ted - should be back soon(ish)
bubye, @OldJohn
@TedShifrin waves!
@AlecTeal as a remark of latest incident, it was just a measly notice about ur website no need to go offensive against me 2/ im not the one who flagged/starred anything of maybe one whole page perimeter of that deleted message 3/ plz dont say another unnecessary thing after this
Now he's going to say something
Lol thanks @TedShifrin . @Nickolas I don't know of an extremely general theorem. It depends on a lot of things, such as how you're measuring MSE, what your functional form is, etc.
and how many variables you have
In the univariate case, it's simple
In the $p$-variable case, you need matrices
and some matrix calculus
23:51
@DanRust Is there torsion in $\pi_1$ of the Klein bottle? That's one of the more obvious candidates. Here $H_1$ is $\Bbb Z \oplus \Bbb Z_2$. I kind of think Gordon told me there are left-orderable groups with torsion in $H_1$ but I forget the examples.
yeah, the Klein bottle has $\pi_1$ and $H_1$ isomorphic
No it does not.
It's <a,b | aba=b^-1>.
hi guys, I've been experimenting with different ways to present a proof using prezi
I'm wondering if you guys think this makes a proof understandable (without someone narrating the presentation)
@DanRust On page 2 of these notes Rolfsen states that the Klein bottle group has $\pi_1$ LO which in particular implies Torsion-free.
@Kasper I'm not a fan IMO. I think the narration is necessary
23:56
I'm certain someone across the hall knows the proof of this better than anyone else.
@Kasper I would prefer that you just use Beamer instead. The moving around that Prezi is so well-known for is quite distracting IMO
@Clarinetist I was thinking about this, today I was doing in this style with a prezi for a presentation (so with narrating), and they found the prezi very helpful for keeping in touch with the big picture of the proof

but I guess without narrating it is a different story
No surface except $\Bbb{RP}^2$ has torsion in its fundamental group.
@PVAL sorry you're right. Klein bottle has a weird fundamental group $\langle a,b \mid ab = b'a\rangle$
@Clarinetist do you think also in this prezi, I'm moving around too much? I tried to limit it a bit
23:59
hah, don't know how I missed that
@Kasper Honestly, yes. I don't think it's necessary. I like how Beamer does pausing
@DanR: Equivalently, because they're all isometric quotients of the Euclidean or hyperbolic planes, any isometry of these of finite order has fixed points.

« first day (1938 days earlier)      last day (3379 days later) »