« first day (1938 days earlier)      last day (3379 days later) » 

04:00
@TedShifrin Reminder that my program's online... I might consider getting access to UW-Madison's library, but I don't recall it being cheap
Interesting. I wonder what the definition of degree is.
Oh right @Clarinet.
Ok, I think one example would be the map from M_{1,1} to the j-line. I'm told that has half a degree.
I'm too classical. I just can't make sense of this.
Presumably it can only happen in some finite characteristic setting.
No it happens over $\Bbb{C}$.
04:03
So let's put it this way. We have a map f from the lambda line $X$ to the j-line $Y$ that factors through M_{1,1}.
The map from $X \to Y$ has degree 6.
Ah, so it's a formal definition with multiplicativity of degree?
I dunno probably yea. But it's got something to do with groupoid cardinality and automorphisms that I don't fully understand.
Anyway, I was going to say the map from $X \to M_{1,1}$ has degree 12, so in any reasonable sense the map from M_{1,1} to Y must have degree 1/2
Right, that's what I meant about formal multiplicativity.
yea.
So apparently there's a connection between experimental design and Galois fields mind blown
04:05
@anon You should apply here.
Doesn't make sense to me, though.
@TedShifrin Anybody at your school applying to here for grad school?
Yes, @Clarinet. Look at Lidl/Pilz Applied Abstract Algebra. All sorts of such stuff.
I'm gone, @BenLim. I've retired. I am not sure. Our super-star student asked me to write only a few letters (for schools that wanted 4 letters), so I don't know if Stanford is on her list.
oh ok.
So these aren't functions in the usual sense, @BenLim. Preimages won't work if they are.
04:09
huh what is not a function?
the mapping between stacks
ah yea. For a map from a scheme to a stack you can make sense of that by Yoneda's Lemma.
But atm I don't know how to say what a map from a stack to a scheme is.
What do you guys think of my profile picture?
right, but set theory for functions fails for this degree 1/2 stuff to happen.
yea.
i think the point is that M_{1,1}(T) for a scheme T is not a set but a groupoid.
04:11
Groupoids aren't sets?
in a set there's only one possible arrow from one element to another right?
(if there is even one)
but in a groupoid there is possilby more than one arrow.
ah, so that explains fractional degree, then.
yea.
If there are two arrows going out, then you see degree 1/2.
04:13
Yea I think the 1/2 thingy is related to the fact that a "generic" elliptic curve has automorphism group of size 2.
Right, the hyperelliptic involution.
yea
the presence of automorphisms presents the functor from being representable.
I'm glad I'm too old to learn this stuff :D
Because the naive functor M_{1,1} : Sch \to Set is not an fpqc sheaf.
@TedShifrin Don't worry, as I get older I'm starting to think less and less about the formalism.
04:15
?
the gulp was at the first sentence ... a functor not being a fpqc sheaf :P
Ok here's a translation: There are non-isomorphic elliptic curves over Q that become isomorphic over Q(\sqrt{2}). Is that better? The fpqc part is just that the map Spec Q(\sqrt{2}) \to Spec Q is fpqc.
OK, that's nominally better. Thanks :)
@TedShifrin See all these complicated words just mean something concrete
@Ted: Maps of degree 1/2 should exist for the same reason you might have non-integer Euler characteristic for an orbifold, I think. I don't know if people think about degrees of maps between orbifolds.
When someone says stack to me I always think orbifold and what they say sometimes makes sense.
04:17
Oh, but this is a very different situation, I think, @MikeM. You actually are in a setting where you don't have functions in the traditional sense.
@MikeMiller There's a post by qiaochu on this I think, fractional euler characteristic and related ideas.
I remember thinking about the orbifold example with intersection homology many moons ago.
I guess a vague analogy is trying to give a "morphism" from $\Bbb Z/2$ to $\Bbb Z/4$. :P
Anyhow, I'll leave the math to you young'uns.
I'm tantalized by the wiki page that says a group action on a set corresponds to a groupoid. Since I love group actions so much. I'll have to mull that over sometime.
Wow, Alan Weinstein even wrote an article on it.
@Ted: I have come to like orbifolds quite a bit after first hating them quite a bit. I dunno why.
Well, most of them are coming from the hot-shot undergraduate programs. For the most part, undergraduate education in this country is very undemanding.
@TedShifrin True the people in my year are from like MIT, UChicago and Princeton.
04:23
I never hated them, @MikeM. Also thinking about symmetric products of things of higher dimension than curves leads to such quotients.
Right, @BenLim, so they already took grad courses at such places.
Hey. Does anyone know how to number a diagram in LaTeX like
<diagram> (1)
@JulianRachman Put your diagram in the begin equation environment.
Well, most of the US is way different, too, @BenLim. Most of UGA's best students got crucified by me their freshman year and that got them sweating, but most of the rest of their courses weren't so tough. Now that I'm gone, we'll see ...
@TedShifrin hahahahahahahah
@Ben Ok and?
04:25
The figure environment normally numbers for you, @Julian.
that auomatically numbers it.
not tikz-cd
begin equation followed by tikzcd
MichaelAlbanese hadn't commented to me about feeling underprepared at StonyBrook, but he actually did a masters in Australia, I think.
I'm sure there are some American students who are overwhelmed, @BenLim. Maybe not the ones taking second- and third-year grad courses like you :P
04:27
@TedShifrin I'm taking the first year graduate algebra, analysis classes and math216 which is ravi's algebraic geometry. nothing crazy.
When I was at Berkeley, approximately 60-75% of the grad students dropped out the first few years.
wow.
This stacks stuff is not first year stuff.
@TedShifrin Well I spent a lot of time in undergrad understanding basic stuff in moduli theory.
Yeah, that's not standard undergrad.
Or even first-year grad.
04:29
@TedShifrin ok true.
@Ted: That's special to Berkeley, whose admissions process may very well be called unethical.
Just calm down, @BenLim. You'll do fine. Most grad students most places go through various stages of freaking out periodically.
@MikeMiller Why is it unethical?
It's changed some, @MikeM, but I tend to agree with you.
When I was there the grad program was 400 ... now it's something like 200-250?
They admitted many students who had no prayer of being successful, @BenLim.
Some of us (successful) students ranted about it, indeed.
REUs are overblown, seriously.
There's also the whole question of financial support.
@MikeMiller wow ok. You can delete your comment.
04:32
In all my years at UGA, I very rarely encouraged students to apply to Berkeley. Some went to MIT, Penn, Chicago, ...
I hate all this deletion. I refuse to delete.
Do you actually understand Grassmannians geometrically, @BenLim? :D As homogeneous spaces, as manifolds, etc.?
@Ted: Some of us are hoping to have careers and don't like gossip attached to our name. You know I delete very little I say.
@TedShifrin I have maybe thought about this perspective like once in my life?
@MikeMiller Word.
Fair enough, @MikeM. Am I expected to follow suit? I have no career :P
Well, @BenLim, I would encourage you to learn that perspective. Seriously.
Nope... just don't want something I said showing up on google.
Yes, I get it.
04:34
@TedShifrin Fair enough.
And I haven't said anything here that I haven't said to various students and in public.
@TedShifrin I'm so sick of having to give any credit to wrong answers.
@PVAL, I don't know why you kvetch to me. I gave (generous) partial credit for correct methodology, even if the answer was flawed.
@TedShifrin This is something I like about Ravi's style. He doesn't want to mention unnecessary machine if you don't need it. Rather, he'd rather his students work things out with as little machinery as possible and see how far they go. When the time comes to introduce the big weapons, then he'll happily ask you to read about it.
Yes, @BenLim, and working out lots of concrete examples is excellent, too.
You're teaching ODEs, @PVAL? I guess I would want some context for your kvetch :)
04:37
@TedShifrin yea. If you read about this isom scheme in general it's like super complicated. I was extremely happy to be able to write down equations for it:D
Yes, yes, that's excellent that you did that, @BenLim.
Even if you can do everything super-abstractly another way.
@TedShifrin I remember reading oh Isom sits inside of the hilbert scheme therefore its representable blabla. And this hilbert scheme thingy is very complicated.
Students can't find the eigenvectors of a 3by3 matrix in order to solve a system of ODES, I don't understand what "correct methodology"means in this context. You can either do it or you can't.
Ah, well, I admit that was a topic I had trouble giving partial credit for, especially when they messed up the characteristic polynomial. But I usually had a rubric breaking the problem down and awarding partial credit.
I just wonder if theres a field where its useful to sort of, kind of, not really be able to find the eigenvectors of the matrix.
04:40
In real life they use a computer to find those.
Well I am grading 120 quizzes a week plus trying to actually teach, so it certainly is a rush job.
I made my students do that stuff by hand on exams, but let's not kid ourselves about what they have to do in a job or in the real world.
Yeah, I hate what you're having to do.
I think you should make up clever quizzes with fewer places for arithmetic errors.
I don't write them.
The quizzes are all arithmetic
04:42
Yeah, but I know from years of teaching that stuff that students always mess up that arithmetic.
And even though I told them 1000 times that if $A-\lambda I$ failed to have a nontrivial nullspace, their $\lambda$ couldn't be an eigenvalue, under time pressure on tests, I still saw such things.
I really do wonder why we're teaching 19th century style during the 21st century.
We should test concepts by making the arithmetic as trivial as possible on exams.
@Stan: I answered above.
I think one time the students had to prove something (the sum of a soln to a homogeneous equation and a sol. to a non-homog is a soln to a non-homog equation) . I proved a similar thing to help them (that the sum of two homog soln's was again a homog solution). Many students complained about the 0 they got after writing down exactly what I said!!
You'd like to think that UT students have progressed past memorization/regurgitation.
There
But reading is difficult. Understanding is more so.
There's some fantastic undergrads here. Many land in the top 3 schools for PhD programs. There's about 40k others though.
04:46
Yes. Remember that even at MIT, Princeton, UT, etc., only a very small number of math majors go on to Ph.D. work.
@PVAL and where is this?
at UT
austin
Texas, @BenLim.
ah ok.
UT also = U Tennessee :)
04:48
I think I told you the book was something it wasnt.
I don't berember.
It's actually Braun. I'm still waiting on my copy!
Oh, I don't know that book, but I've heard of it.
Great. End of semester and you're expected to TA? Ugh.
I cant imagine having heard good things.
Well .djvu is a hell of a format.
@Ted $y \rightarrow 0$ and $x \rightarrow \infty$
04:50
Right, @Stan. So you are not in general guaranteed a max. When there is one, LM will find it (plus extraneous points, possibly).
I think it has been available since like week 5 or 6, but after 6 weeks of teaching without a hard copy whatever.
I got 1 day notice on my assignment as well!
@Stan: This is why I make such a fuss about compactness and the max value theorem in the book.
Sounds like they don't do a great job of making their grad students feel loved, @PVAL.
@TedShifrin yeah I think I am starting to realize why
When I was associate head, the grad director and I tried to make TA assignments way earlier.
Ohhhhhhhh
04:52
Oh, @Stan, it looks like I'll be in Chicago mid-June.
facepalm
@TedShifrin what do you think of my profile picture?
Whom are you facepalming this time?
Nice! I can't wait :D
Who is it, @Sajindia?
04:52
Me! Lol the max value theorem. Now I get what it's for.
Duh @Stan :D
@TedShifrin me
Elegant outfit, @Sajindia.
thanks :D
Not to mention hair dye.
04:54
@Ted Too much time around economists. they have the worst respect for mathematical rigor.
For instance
Well, don't blame me, @Stan. I was trying to train you properly before they polluted you :D
yes :D I like to dye my hair
I make youtube tutorials
I learned about this thing called the Coase Theorem. It isn't even a mathematical claim! There's no proof. Nothing! Yet they call it a theorem! What nonsense
of make up
Cool, @Sajindia.
I was pronouncing that Co-ass, @Stan :D
04:56
LOL
How is life in Cali?
I miss my GA chiropractor. My back/neck/shoulders are in pain most of the time, despite visits to the chiropractor and masseuse. Frustrated not to be tutoring the way I wanted, but I am leaving so I won't rant about that.
Talk to you soon, @Stan.
K ttyl! @Ted
@BenLim: This reminds me of a talk Okounkov gave. The only person who could understand his talk would have had a good knowledge of both Hilbert schemes and the Seiberg-Witten equations. There are at most three people in my department that's true of, and I don't know if it is for all of them.
@TedShifrin here's my youtube channel if you want to check it out[youtube.com/watch?v=7NRm7lW24uk]
What is this makeup
Too bad no subtitles
05:06
sorry :( @morphic
To be fair I took Spanish class for like 5 years so I should know a little but I don't even know the alphabet lol
the alphabet is the same but with ñ
@MikeMiller Shende gave a talk on "Constructable Sheaves and Contact Structures". I can't imagine anyone here understood much of it.
Sivek gave what is presumably the same talk here but engaged with the audience and spent most of the time explaining what a constructiible sheaf was. I forgot most of it but I remember thinking I understood it then.
Of course it was a topology group seminar as opposed to a colloquium...
What is the difference between a seminar and a colloquium
05:13
A colloquium is intended for a general audience of math faculty and grad students. It should (but in practice needn't be) accessible to any attending grad student.
A seminar is a talk or a series of talks given to/by experts in the field. They are usually much more technical.
It was a geometry seminar. There wasn't a topologist in the audience. He drew something like and x with a circle in it and said something that was very strange, and at the end said this was a "Legendrian isotopy". It's strange when someone does things are incomprehensible to me and at the end says its something that I feel I understand quite not terribly.
I don't think it was a bad talk.
I'm not trying to insult him as a a speaker.
Fair enough.
If Bob was there, he might have understood it.
I'd have liked to ask him if he understood it as well.
06:09
Hi!
@TedShifrin @MikeMiller @BalarkaSen You three really make the room go, huh
06:24
@anon, how to show that a linear combination $cv+dw$, with $c,d \ne 0$, of two eigenvectors corresponding to different eigenvalues is never an eigenvector?
06:41
Hi,
-1
Q: Need to understand this calculus

Kened YassineCould you please explain me this Calculus: \begin{align*} Q(X>x) &= \int_{x}^{\infty } f(y)dy \\ &= \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \varphi_X(u)\int_{y>x}^{+\infty}e^{-iuy}dy du \\&= \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \varphi_X(u)\frac{e^{-iux}}{iu}du \\ &= \frac{1}{2}+ \frac{1}{\...

 
2 hours later…
08:12
Can a non-finitely generated semigroup be a subsemigroup of a finitely-generated one?
 
2 hours later…
09:51
is there any difference between the implicit/parametric equation of an upright cone vs one where the base is @ z=0?
user174558
10:13
@刘哲诚 Liu Zhe Cheng, what is an upright cone?
where the apex is at the origin
like an upside down cone
user174558
A cone is a cone, and its equations change if you want to put it in a different position in space. That is all.
can you tell me what the parametric equation for that would be
user174558
You should work it out yourself.
user174558
10:26
@Chris'ssistheartist It's amazing how some people keep saying bad things about you that are not justified and fail to see their own faults and then react when others point it out. I hope you will return to this chat!
10:36
0
Q: Searching for prezi like software that supports LaTeX natively

KasperI've been making some mathematical presentation in prezi, for example: https://prezi.com/aexypzd25tmd/spectral-theorem-from-proofs-of-the-book/ This is a prezi that I presented today, but it took me a hell lot of work, to get LaTeX working in prezi. I was wondering if there are any prezi alterna...

user174558
@Kasper It is taking forever to load here. Are you aware of the beamer package in TeX? It is one of the standard packages used for creating projector presentations and handouts.
@JasperLoy oh that is bad... stupid slow prezi :P

yeah, I'm aware, but I kind of like some features of prezi. the zooming out, and in features make it nice to kind of give a big picture overview of the whole proof
user174558
@Kasper Hard to have the best of all worlds in one package. If I were you, I would just use TeX and nothing else.
I would advise the same to people I think (after finding out how much time getting TeX working in prezi takes)
user174558
@Kasper Yes, better to eat a pretzel instead.
10:48
but I gave this prezi today, and the public said that they really like the structured way you can lay out a proof in prezi

so, I'm now thinking about maybe making some prezi like software myself for this, that support mathjax, (I am a programmer)
but I was wondering, maybe someone else already tried the same thing (which would save me a lot of time :P )
user174558
@Kasper Good luck! I like to give presentations using chalk and board only.
thanks :)
my goal is to get a job where I can work full time on software for mathematics (not for kids, but university level mathematicians)
user174558
11:03
@Kasper I hope you achieve your goal. But I would think I only need TeX, though I am not a mathematician.
there is a company in Amsterdam that is doing this, so I hope they hire me
user174558
I am looking for free software for geometrical figures.
@Kasper I'm thinking about things like a TeX editor that integrates with mathematica. So that you can select your formula in your editor, and it may calculates it
user174558
TeX is too complicated for geometry.
yeah, geometry is also something interesting
user174558
11:07
It takes a lot of code to do a simple figure, especially 3D.
user174558
The most powerful 3D package in TeX is pst-solides3d.
user174558
With it you can create all kinds of 3D graphics.
user174558
Take a look at pstricks.blogspot.com!
so basically you would want a WYSIWYG geometry kind of editor built in a TeX editor?
user174558
Well, it's OK if it is not part of TeX. You can import the graphics as external graphics in jpg.
user174558
11:10
But as a software developer, you need to cater to your market, so you need to find out who your market is first!
that is true, but this company I want to work for, has already market, many dutch university pays them so that they can make interactive university calculus courses

I hope they are also intersted in things like these :)
I have been experimenting with some kind of mathjax editor like this:
http://kasperpeulen.github.io/PressAndHold/
user174558
Calculus books in America are way too expensive! Stewart costs over 200 USD on Amazon.
user174558
He is dead. Long live Stewart.
yeah, that is insane
Mathematicians should unite and make an open source free calculus course of the same quality.
user174558
Apostol Calculus I costs over 200 USD and Apostol Calculus II costs over 200 USD.
user174558
11:14
That's over 400 USD for calculus. Total nuts.
user174558
@Kasper There are a number of good texts available already, but they might not be dumbed down enough for Americans.
hahaha ;)
user174558
So you need a cheap calculus text that is seriously dumbed down.
user174558
And then it will sell like hotcakes, or pancakes if you like.
user174558
Each new edition of these calculus books has more colourful pictures than the previous one.
11:19
I've been thinking about, if you would make a interactive ebook. And let the user dumb it down themself how they want.

I picture this like, you began with a short but sufficient explanation, that would satisfy most people that use it more as reference

and then you can click on the explanation, to let it expand with more intuition, more visuals, and click again, until it as dumb as you can think of :P
user174558
So you are paying for the coloured ink.
@JasperLoy JASPER!!!
user174558
@Chris'ssistheartist Hi Chris.
@JasperLoy Hi. Well, this is life sometimes. :-)
user174558
@Chris'ssistheartist I think lots of things get misread in a chat room, considering there is no body language or tone.
11:21
@JasperLoy Possibly.
user174558
But smart people should be able to interpret a line in over 9000 ways before anything.
user174558
@Kasper As an example, Canuto and Tabacco's Mathematical Analysis I and II is way more affordable and already sufficiently dumbed down. I think Americans should switch to something like that.
11:35
@JasperLoy All stuff told by Ted is a piece of cake compared with the unstar message yesterday that means taking (abusively) the freedom of expression (on chat).
@Chris'ssistheartist There is no freedom of expression on chat
Just for record: I ask that moderator to resign (in a hurry if possible).
@TobiasKildetoft Yes, it is within the rules.
Anyway, I have research to do.
BBL
@Chris'ssistheartist what rules?
@TobiasKildetoft See chat guidelines
@Chris'ssistheartist Nothing there about freedom of expression
11:40
@TobiasKildetoft Well, it's simple. As long as you don't break the rules you should have the same privilege like other users to express yourself on chat.
@Chris'ssistheartist That is not at all the same as having freedom of expression
@TobiasKildetoft Well, I repeat, as long as you don't break the rules you should benefit of the freedom of expression. Or wait a second. You failed contradicting me with math and try in another area?
@TobiasKildetoft Seriously, speaking do you teach students? If I were a student I wouldn't allow you to talk to me.
@Chris'ssistheartist I am not sure I ever tried contradicting you with math (how would you even do that?)
Yes, I teach students
@TobiasKildetoft Well, yes you tried to say that my math stuff is random stuff but you have no idea of what you say.
@Chris'ssistheartist Well, fortunately, my students don't think they are the next Ramanujan or make other strange claims. So I don't need to point out when they do.
11:45
@TobiasKildetoft You, and also Ted, thank to God you don't have in your classes students like me.
@Chris'ssistheartist Yep, very much so
Back, by freedom of expression in chat I meant that you can say all you want to say as long as you don't break the rules, expressing ideas, opinions, and so on, you express yourself freely.
As entertaining as this is to read, I don't see it going anywhere positive.
@ChantryCargill You're right, sorry
I don't see how using moderators powers to restrict my freedom of expression is anything good, other than making fun (of a user).
I thought that mod powers should be used wisely, but I might know nothing about it, and find now the things are totally different from what I thought.
OK, it's enough for me.
11:51
Can anyone explain how do I find the limit of the integral of a sequence of function?
Just the bare essentials through which i can fnd a solution?
@TobiasKildetoft So, if a student comes to you and tells about his/her dreams in mathematics, you might possibly tell him/her "you make strange claims" as you told me above?
@Chris'ssistheartist Not the first time, no. But if they keep on the way you do, at some point I probably will, because otherwise that person will be completely impossible to teach anything.
@TobiasKildetoft never play with people's dream. The fact that some dreams seem to you strange means nothing, and you shouldn't discourage anyone especially for the fact that you said you teach students.
@TobiasKildetoft A gifted student with a weak personality might believe what you say and live in math mediocrity.
Think well of what you tell them.
BBL (I have to finish some proposals)
@Chris'ssistheartist See the answer here (might be something you're looking for): meta.math.stackexchange.com/a/22049/109879
@ChantryCargill thanks
One more thing and I'm done (a quote I like very much)
"Don't let someone else's opinion of you become your reality." - Les Brown
BBL
12:04
So. My friends were working through some past year's exam papers for the upcoming exam, and came across a problem which seems unintelligible.
Not asking for a solution or anything, just that we can't even parse what the question is trying to ask
Huy
Huy
I assume you're asked to write down a "list" of all equivalence classes?
@PrivatePansy And there is nothing more? That does seem very strange
Maybe it means the set of all ordered pairs subtract each equivalence class defined by the relation?
Hmmm. I found the question. I think my friend might have missed some context. Let me read the first 6 parts
Okay. I think I got it. Well, the first part at least. Still not sure how the classes can be used to represent irrational numbers
The question redefined the congruence sign to be this relation
12:33
@PrivatePansy Ahh, then it makes much more sense
13:05
If we have limits of an integral of a sequence of functions, should we first expand sequence or directly find the integral?
 
1 hour later…
Huy
Huy
14:25
@Paradox101: What do you mean by "expand sequence"? If you mean "change the order of limit and integral", then NO, don't do that. In general, that is not allowed.
14:38
hello
Anyone is familiar with Schreier trees?
14:51
Hey @anon here?
Let $\alpha$ be a path in X from $x_0$ to $x_1$. we define $\hat{\alpha} : \pi_1(X,x_0) \rightarrow \pi_1(X,x_1)$ by the equation $\hat{\alpha}([f]) = [\bar{\alpha}] . [f] . [\alpha]$
what is here the alpha bar
they didn't define it
@Huy you know some algebraic top right ?
maybe can you tell me what is alpha bar ?
I guess it should be a path from x1 to x0
maybe
I see
Huy
Huy
ah, the bar
that's probably inverse
iirc you apply conjugation
does it make sense in the context?
I am just thinking of why it will have same start and end point at $x_1$ just a sec
yeah
I understand now
@Huy it is indeed the inverse, also the map defined above is a loop based at $x_1$
Huy
Huy
yeah, it has to be for the map to be well-defined
yeah
hm that is weird, but why is it like this what if there is no path from $x_0$ to $x_1$
what will happen then ?
Huy
Huy
15:13
@L33ter: you'll have to consider the fundamental group of each path-connected component
I see
Without touching pen and paper ...
$$\lim_{n\to\infty} \int_{\pi-\epsilon}^{\pi+\epsilon} \frac{\sin(nx)}{\sin(x)} \ dx$$
A bit of care to the generalization $$\lim_{n\to\infty} \int_{\pi-\epsilon}^{\pi+\epsilon} \frac{\sin(nx)}{\sin(m x)} \ dx$$
How to determine if series $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n(n+1)/2}}{\sqrt{n}}$$ converges or diverges. I mean, I see that $n(n+1)/2 = 1+2+\ldots+n$, but what then...
15:35
cortizol the numerator is a series of -1,1,1,-1,-1,1,1...
can you have path connected space which doesn't have fundmental group being trivial ?
@Cortizol Once you notice the pattern of the signs you group the terms pairwise, and then
$$a_1-a_2+a_3-a_4+a_5-a_6+a_7-a_8+\cdots$$
Now make the series higher
@Huy I meant if it's a sequence in terms of sin or exponential multiplied by something like $nx$ and the integral can't be solved simply
Replace $a_3$ by $a_2$, then $a_5$ by $a_4$ and so on
@Cortizol Q.E.D.
@L33ter: Yes, the circle. Or any number of spaces. The fundamental group is only defined if you specify a path-component in the first place so it would be a worthless invariant if it was zero for every component.
15:47
yeah I see
@Cortizol That is equal to $$\sum_{k=0}^\infty\left(-\frac1{\sqrt{4k+1}} -\frac1{\sqrt{4k+2}} +\frac1{\sqrt{4k+3}} +\frac1{\sqrt{4k+4}}\right)$$ So consider $$\sum_{k=0}^\infty\left(-\frac1{\sqrt{4k+1}} +\frac1{\sqrt{4k+3}}\right)$$ and $$\sum_{k=0}^\infty\left(-\frac1{\sqrt{4k+2}} +\frac1{\sqrt{4k+4}}\right)$$
@Cortizol To bound it from below you do the same.
@robjohn First I thought of it, but the general case works nicer.
@Chris'ssistheartist general case?
@robjohn when the conditions of the alternating test are fulfilled. Due to the signs you only group the terms pairwise, and the rest flows naturally.
@Chris'ssistheartist does it go to -inf ?
15:58
@Agawa001 It converges.
to a negative value
@Chris'ssistheartist I don't think that works any better, but differently. One uses the alternating series test, the other the convergence of $\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty\frac1{k^{3/2}}$
the only difference is how you group the terms.

« first day (1938 days earlier)      last day (3379 days later) »