@tb that's maybe a surprise for you that my question is adressed to you but anyway. Could you suggest any ideas how to find where the journal is indexed/abstracted if this is not stated on its webpage?
the journal I keep in my mind is quite well-known, but since my supervisor is not in that field he would like to be sure by which engines our paper would be found if the journal accepts it
It's also on jstor and project euclid, so I'd bet it is a sufficiently renowned journal to appear on all number-crunching-lists that are relevant to your professor.
@Gortaur Two more things: can you slip a keyword relevant to the systems and control-people into the title? Also, putting the thing on ArXiV with links to the relevant sections would help raise awareness.
@tb 1. I think I will agree with my supervisor to do this. I am fighting quite successfully for the titles, but I'll have to write a thesis in this department, so it would be wise to fix titles a bit 2. thanks, that's maybe also a nice way to tackle it
@Jonas: Ask your advisor whether he finds it suitable. I've seen quite a few masters theses on ArXiV, often with mixed feelings. To put it bluntly: 1. Is there something original in it or is it mostly a recap of known stuff? 2. Are you sure you won't regret it in a few years? 3. Do you think it will be of interest to a few people or is it for satisfying a fancy of yours?
It should be transformed into a paper, but it contains much more detail. But the paper alone would be fine as well, I guess. If I'm not able to remove it (as you ask me if I would regret it or not) I will certainly not do it ;-).
@RamanaVenkata show it for open sets first. If A is open in Y and Y is open in X then A is open in X
if A is open in Y, then A = V\cap Y for some open V. Since Y and V are both open in X, then... for the closed sets you just apply almost the same technique
Oh yeah, I don't mind the topic. It's just very tiring at the beginning. You have to keep writing full proofs and you cannot skip things like "easy" or "trivial" or "without loss of generality"...
@robjohn No. What he means is: if you start your answer with $\newcommand{\blah}{\mathrm{blah}}$ We will prove, this leaves an unnecessary space in the beginning.
@Srivatsan: I abused a displayed math environment for sectioning my answer, using $\newcommand{mypart}[1]{\unicode{x2014;}\text{ #1 }\unicode{x2014;}}$
@robjohn No, I think it's MathJaX. It lets you insert unicode characters in displayed formulas because html and markdown formatting are turned off as soon as you are in the MathJaX environment.
@robjohn my intention was to put an answer too, since there were no answers that moment. But I though that about 2-3 answers will appear while I'll be typing. So I breathed deeply and prepared to have fun )
@HenningMakholm It probably depends on the high school and the class. I wouldn't have been surprised to see some of the better math students at my high school dealing with something like that.
Cool. When I was in high school, the highest-level math course got us to integrals and some simple ODEs, but no series. I did a project of the complex exponential, but was not even introduced to its power series, as far as I remember...
@Jonas: After a year of algebra and a year of topology in my master's program I felt like what I was studying was abstraction for its own sake. I wanted something more applied. I didn't find numerical solution of partial differential equations interesting (which was big at Texas A&M at the time I was there for my masters), but I had always enjoyed probability, combinatorics, and algorithms. OR seemed like the logical choice.
It seems like you need to be really good if you want to find a position in abstract things like algebra or (abstract) analysis. I have the next four years to also figure out how the stuff I know can be applied. :).
Once of the nice things about OR is that if I ever get tired of academia I can (hopefully) easily find a job in industry.
In fact, for the second half of my sabbatical this year I'm going to be working for a financial services firm in Seattle. I don't know a lot about the financial applications of OR (I lean toward OR theory, and my adviser worked on transportation problems), so it should be interesting.