« first day (1800 days earlier)      last day (3515 days later) » 

23:09
You can derive an atom, @Semiclassical?
the equations for the bohr model, yes
assume linear momentum is quantized as $\hbar$ i.e. $L=mvr=n\hbar$
then there's a cute mnemonic: $\alpha=\beta$, where $\alpha$ is the fine-structure constant and $\beta=v/c$
Ah, that's all gibberish to me right now. :-P
What do you mean by the term quantised?
can only occur in integer multiples
that's the main assumption of the bohr model. it's ad hoc, but it works for hydrogen
out for now
23:24
Today was a good day, I found two interesting questions to think about :-D
Which fields are they in, @DanielFischer?
@KhallilBenyattou Analysis
Ah, real or complex, @DanielFischer?
@KhallilBenyattou One real analysis, one functional analysis.
Is there a notation for "n is a k-th power" ?
23:26
@DanielFischer Oohh, what's functional analysis about?
@KhallilBenyattou Topological vector spaces and continuous [or discontinuous, but I'm not into that] linear [or non-linear, but I'm neither into that] operators between them.
:22679296 $\exists m\in\mathbb{N}, n=m^k$
That sounds pretty cool, @DanielFischer! There's a module at my uni to do with that and I might take it!
@iluso "$\sqrt[k]{n} \in \mathbb{N}$" is not something you'd like, I suppose?
@DanielFischer I was looking for something that can fit nicely as a $\sum$ condition
23:31
@iluso Just write $m^k$ instead of $n$?
@DanielFischer Is something like $\sum_{m^k \in\mathbb{N}}$ readable ?
$$ \sum_{m^k \in \mathbb{N}}$$
On a new line, it's not so bad I guess. ^_^"
@iluso Well, so-so, but with $m\in \mathbb{N}$, you always have $m^k \in \mathbb{N}$.
The kth root notation seems more explicit!
$$ H(k+1, n) = k! \sum_{j=0}^k \frac{(-1)^j}{(k-1-j)!} \sum_{\substack{d|n \\ d\geq 2 \\ d^{1/(j+1)} \in \mathbb{N}}} H(k-j, n/d) $$
Arg
I think I'll go for a sentence like "the inside sum is take over the d such that..." ;)
r9m
r9m
23:45
@DanielFischer This was awesome!! :D (+1)
@r9m Heh :-) That was a really fun problem. (One of the two I mentioned above.)
r9m
r9m
@DanielFischer link to the other one please then :D

« first day (1800 days earlier)      last day (3515 days later) »