« first day (442 days earlier)      last day (4874 days later) » 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

00:07
@JM: Congrats. You pass me on flag weight now.
I got a declined flag, which dropped me to 633. I'm really tired of this, and it pisses me off. I'm gonna stop flagging for a while.
I have? I haven't flagged in days...
You have 634... I have 633
(On the other hand, I apparently now have a 45 flag allowance per day.)
Yeah, that's crazy :D
Considering I only use three or four on a busy day...
(because it seems either Zev or Mariano are also online when spammers are poking about)
00:11
Yeah, I'm gonna stop altogether.
Maybe flat out spam, but not CW/comment-answers/account merging/whatnot.
Oh...
I'm completely pissed at the -10 for declined flags.
I mean, at this stage 10 points worth like 15 helpful flags.
For me it's like the system says "Hey, you're doing an awesome work. But this declined flag? It is worth as much as the last 15 helpful ones..."
I'd tell you to bitch at meta.SO, but I remember you're lazy... on the other hand, it does sound off from their stance on up/downvoting, no?
In that thread I wrote about flag comments Grace Note replied to me about this bitching, I wrote her a comment now stating that while it sounds pissy and immaturely whiny I am stopping all my flags until they fix this.
I mean, for voting on questions, the weight for "helpful" ones is higher in magnitude than the penalty for piss-poor ones.
00:14
Yeah, exactly.
and yet it's all backwards for flagging. I mean, who designs these things?
And while it's fine at the early stage where you win and lose the same amounts, and it's even fine at the lower part of the reputation where you seem to be more inclined towards bad flags and whatnot...
At the pinnacle of flag weight they just make it unreasonable.
The decline comment even began with "sorry for the weight-hit"
This software's weird.
Yeah...
Well. I'm going to bed now. Be seeing you.
@AsafKaragila sleep well
00:25
Have a good one, Asaf.
:-)
what flags are you talking about above?
Oh, flags for bugging moderators...
Are these things you only get when you have 10 or 20K?
for things like "this is spam", "please set CW", that sort of thing.
00:27
No, everybody with rep > 20 can flag.
those flags.
yes, now I understand.
i've never seen any spam on math.se
@Jack: Thank the promptness of the mods for that. :)
@JackSchmidt have you looked at any of my answers? ;)
I just get back from UCLA, and now I need to take the dog for a walk. BBL
Good grief, the world would be way lot better if spambots can write mathematical proofs...
00:42
Have you considered that perhaps I am just such a spambot?
As long as you post helpful and interesting stuff, you could be single-celled for all I care.
Thanks, I'll put in my agar order now.
Snug down in my petri dish and watch TV...
=))
Now I really need to walk my amoeba or it will absorb me.
Yeah, those buggers can get nasty when hungry. They'll engulf without warning...
First you think they're affectionately touching you with their pseudopods. Next thing you know, you're inside them.
01:17
Argh!
Whoops, never mind. It was a hiccup on m.SE.
01:29
@JM ah, you had that hiccup as well? strange. Didn't happen in a long while :) Meanwhile, they seem to have fixed the imgur-thing
Yes, I was dreading an hour without m.SE... :D
same here :)
01:53
Huh... I edited one of my answers before my walk, and upon arrival home, it has disappeared.
Perhaps the fix involved a restore from backup.
from just before my walk.
Probably the hiccup. Was a lot undone?
I have the change backed up locally, so I will redo it. I was confused until I saw about the hiccough.
A hiccup or hiccough ( or ) is a myoclonus of the diaphragm that repeats several times per minute. In humans, the abrupt rush of air into the lungs causes the vocal cords to close, creating a "hic" sound. In medicine it is known as synchronous diaphragmatic flutter (SDF), or singultus, from the Latin singult, "the act of catching one's breath while sobbing". The hiccup is an involuntary action involving a reflex arc. A bout of hiccups, in general, resolves itself without intervention, although many home remedies shorten the duration. Medical treatment is occasionally necessary in cas...
I guess I am old.
Nah, I just write "hiccup" because it's shorter. :)
(I'm lazy that way.)
Wikipedia spells it the same way
I used to regard that spelling the same way as twilite and hilite
midnite
but it is now more accepted than hiccough
Oh, those remain the visual equivalent of nails-on-chalkboard for me...
I'm lazy, but not that lazy.
02:38
Odd. The comment I made after I edited the answer was still there.
I have to step out. See you.
 
4 hours later…
06:16
I dreamed I met a Galilean, a most amazing man.
 
2 hours later…
08:16
J.M. is steppin' out and Gortaur has found religion.
@robjohn good early morning, 1am?
He had that look you very rarely find
It is just after 1 AM, indeed.
J.M. looked rare?
if he is Galilean - maybe
(though I was told that 'maybe' is from XV cent and I shouldn't use it)
Ah...
I remember some time ago my friend were willing to enter the university of arts
and there he had to sing a couple of songs at the enter exams
08:21
In Galilee?
I advised him Pilat's song and accompanied it with a piano - I liked to play this sogn that time
his voice was cool
@robjohn a bit to North from Galilee
what's happening?
@AsafKaragila it is indeed
For both of you it is 10:24 AM?
08:24
yeah
Since J.M. has stepped out, it is morning for all of us.
early morning for me.
after Einstein it seems like everybody thinks that everything is relative
we lost determinacy and objectivity
people even think that beauty is relative (
in a cyclic time system, I am tempted to normalize 24h = 2 pi...
It is 0.379609112308767 here
where is 0 then?
I thought in Greenwich
and time is not cyclic, it's spiral more likely
Ah.. then it is 2.21947703211945
08:29
I will grab a crappy coffee
but I want to grab a cool one, poor me
If I kept a log, then I could see making a Riemann surface of the time...
oh! we have a coffee plus! some cakes will be there, see ya
Great, now I am hungry at 1:30 AM.
:-p
wow, usually there is some residual rep trickling in, but nothing at all today. I'd better get to writing some answers :-)
Drats.
I asked a question on MO, and it seems that the basis for my question was a misguided idea and since I cannot find it written where I thought it was written, it means only one thing.
Once again my mind is playing tricks on me and I remember things from dreams.
my mind is playing tricks on me, I am not as stable as I used to be
08:44
@Gortaur you are at a saddle point?
or on top of a sphere?
relatively yes, if we assume that the Earth is the sphere - then I'm on its top
w.r.t. the saddle point I would say that bifuraction fits better here )
09:22
hi all
hi Alex
 
4 hours later…
13:44
that what the phase I found this chat in when first time appear here
nobody here and the last message was for 17 hrs ago
14:19
Can someone (maybe @JM if he is not too busy, since he has been keeping an eye on these things before) add the "tail of normal distribution" questions to our list of commonly asked questions on Meta? Some examples include math.stackexchange.com/questions/74151/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/28751/… (I'm a bit busy at the mo' or else I'd myself.)
Hi @Willie
By the apology on the declined flag, I'd take that it was you?
@AsafKaragila Not really here. Just here to leave a message / some work for volunteers. (See my previous post.) Need to head back to work soon.
@AsafKaragila yes.
Figured you'd have this kind of courtesy :-)
/me Bows. -- In any case, need to run. Sorry couldn't stay.
14:46
@Sasha: hi
15:02
@Willie: done. I added only one since the answer there looked more elaborate to me...
15:17
@JM: could you tell me please, what is the flag weight?
@JackSchmidt: hi
16:02
@Gortaur: see this.
@JM: thanks, reading
16:39
Can anyone explain me this statement "every metric space X is opensubset to itself and is closed subset to itself"
@RamanaVenkata: opennes and closedness are relative notions
The whole set and the empty set are both considered open sets in a topology
e.g. (0,1) is open as a subset of R but not closed there. On the other hand, it is closed as a subset of itself
so the whole set and the empty set are both closed and open sets.
@RamanaVenkata If you don't study topology, you can easily check this statement by the definition of open and closed set in metric space
the same for [0,1) - it's not open nor closed in R but it's an open as well as closed in [0,1)
16:43
I am actually a begginer so things are a bit confusing
@robjohn hi, how are you? )
@RamanaVenkata did you understand our comments?
@Gortaur: doing well, been busy the last couple of days with midterms at UCLA.
this topic, considered by itself, is closed, but still open for discussion ;-)
@Gortaur No My notions of closed set and open set on R are the ones due to which my confusion arises
what is your notion of an open set?
what is for closed?
Closed sets contain all of their limit points; open sets contain a neighborhood of each of its points?
16:47
Set is open if every point is a interior point of the set
Set is closed if every limit point is point of set
@RamanaVenkata how do you define interior point?
p is a interior point of E if there is a neighborhood of p N such that N is subset to E
Ah, so my assessment was correct.
So consider [0,1)
can you see that considered as a metric space, it is open and closed?
is there a limit point that it doesn't contain?
is there a point that is not contained in a neighborhood?
are these trick questions? :D
actually I am reading some theorems on metric spaces there they use the fact that if a set is not open then it is closed so I am wondering how they be simultaneously
be tru
if a set is not open then it is closed
completely wrong and dangerous statement
be aware
the set is open iff its complement is closed
i.e. A is open iff X \ A is closed
16:58
@RamanaVenkata either you are misinterpreting the book, or the book is wrong.
Okay I got my mistake My interpretation is wrong thank you
open and closed sets are complementary.
the open set said to the closed set, "my don't you look sharp!"
the closed set said to the open set, "you are surrounded by your loveliness"
:) in [0,1) i am not able to see which open set contains 0?
the whole set contains 0
@robjohn we don;t know that [0,1) is open yet
@RamanaVenkata listen
B(x,r,A) = {y\in A: d(x,y)<r} - this is an open ball in the set A
17:04
find a point in [0,1) that is not contained in the ball of size epsilon around 0
here d(x,y) is a metric/distance function
i know that
when you put A = R, then any B(0,r,R) contain negative values, right?
so it does not lie inside [0,1)
17:05
Yes
but now, if you consider B(0,r,[0,1) ) then it will not include negative values
because by our definition, B(0,r,[0,1) ) = {y\in[0,1): |y|<r}
did I confuse you?
@RamanaVenkata: find a point in [0,1) that is not contained in the ball of size r around 0
That point will not be in [0,1) so it is not on the table for consideration.
@robjohn okay then
@Gortaur can we call that ball open??
@RamanaVenkata: the trick is that some balls open in A are not open in R
you can immediately see it from the definition of on open ball B(x,r,A). E.g. let A = x. Then any ball open in A contain just one point: x itself
and certainly x is not open as a subset of R
@RamanaVenkata: it is open by the definition of open in a metric space, a point x is interior if there is a ball of radius r around x so that the ball is contained in the set
17:11
@robjohn I think that it's hard for Ramana to listen to both of us ) I need to go in 5 minutes, so the floor is yours, sir
The ball of radius r around x is a subset of the metric space, so the ball of radius 1/2 around 0 is [0,1/2)
@RamanaVenkata: sorry for the noise.
@Gortaur @robjohn Thank you guys for taking pains to clear my doubts
@Gortaur: sorry to be interference.
@RamanaVenkata: are you clear, or do you still have doubts?
@robjohn that's relative who is intereference here )
just wait a second i am thinking
Yes I am able to understand
17:15
@RamanaVenkata: if you can give me a pleasure and right what is B(1/3, 1/2, [0,1) ), i.e. x=1/3, r=1/2, A=[0,1) I will read it later and will be very happy
@Ramana: the open ball of radius r about the point x is defined as
B(x,r)={y in X:|x-y|<r}
I switched my x and r to match Gortaur's
@robjohn my pleasure )
@RamanaVenkata: and note please that the notation B(x,r,A) is not usual - I just use it here to underline in which space we are working because it matters. Usually one write B(x,r) keeping A in his/her mind
@Mike: Curse you! :-)
@robjohn: Did you notice the OP accepted your answer on the binomial inversion identity question? So maybe you should be thanking me! :P
I hadn't gone back yet. Thank you! :-)
17:18
@Gortaur think it will be [0,1/2)
@RamanaVenkata: really?
@robjohn: I'm always glad to mess up somebody's attempt at a post so that they can write a better second attempt. :)
@MikeSpivey All three answers are really the same thing in disguise anyway.
@RamanaVenkata: remember it is about the point 1/3
@robjohn okay
@robjohn: Sure.
17:21
silence almost all the day
and now I'm going home. that's all about time zones ))
@Gortaur: is there a connection? ;-)
@Mike: what time is it there? We can confirm Gortaur's conjecture.
@RamanaVenkata almost right, but not the 1/2 on the right end
@robjohn Gortaur's conjecture ) I like it - should ask G. Perelman to prove it
@Gortaur I excluded 1/2 from the ball
Gortaur's conjecture: One commutative Ring can rule them all. It was proved false by F. Baggins.
@Mike: in any case, it didn't stop me from upvoting yours. It was my first choice, after all.
@Ramana: let me know if you still have any questions. I will be about for a while.
17:40
It's 10:40 a.m. here. I'm in Tacoma, WA.
Ah, so the same zone, I am in L.A., CA
nice to finally see some people from this continent :-)
@robjohn: So where do the folks who hang out in chat tend to be from?
All over, J.M. is in the Philippines, Gortaur is in the Netherlands, and Asaf is in Israel
t.b. is in Switzerland
That is all over. Wow. You know, that's one of my favorite things about math.SE - getting to interact with math folks from all over the world, rather than just those down the hallway.
Other than us, those are all of the locations that people have divulged.
It is interesting especially listening into the discussions about food.
17:46
Food?? Math.SE chat is about food?
It moves around, sometimes there is talk about food, customs, language, but then there is math, too.
I have seen people talking about food recipies
those involve fractions...
@Ramana: 1/2 is in the ball. it is around the point 1/3.
Good early morning, @J.M.
or is it late night?
1:50 AM could be either.
@robjohn @Gortaur Ok I did a mistake the answer is [0,5/6)
@Ramana: that's it!
17:50
hooray
I m from the phone, can read not write
Hi @rob. just checking. I'm about to sleep; it's hard to do math with droopy eyes...
So, quoting your governor: Hasta la vista.
@J.M.: pleasant dreams.
good night, JM
@robjohn: He's not governor anymore, is he?
Not still.
Brown is governor again.
But Arnie is still the Governator!
17:55
When Arnold left did he say, "I'll be back"? And wasn't Brown governor a few decades ago, too?
I don't think Arnold gave that line, but yes, Brown was the governor from 75-83
@robjohn Can you give an example of a bounded set on R with exactly three limit ponts
take three distinct points
@RamanaVenkata: can you think of a bounded set with exactly one limit point?
If so, then you can translate it and make a couple of copies.
Okay I got Your point guys
18:00
@J.M.: If you're still here, good idea changing the "Moron" reference on that old binomial identity post from last year. I imagine it would have made no sense at all to new readers now that Moron has changed usernames.
@Mike: ouch. I remember seeing references to Moron, and since it was capitalized, I figured it was an avatar name.
@Ramana which book are u readibg
damn. re-a-ding
Principles of Mathematical Analysis - walter Rudin
Great book!
cool book they say
18:04
I used that in my first year analysis.
you see, again
What do you mean they say??
@RamanaVenkata: I assume he has not read it.
like, a lot of people say like this
yeah, I have not. studied analysis from Numenor manuscripts
@Gortaur: before the flood?
18:06
Hooray. I'm baking another loaf of bread!
@Asaf: what goes into backing bread?
they wete quite old, without category theory, topology and axiom of choice
I don't i saw that it contained a topic called Basic Topology So I started reading it
@rob: backing bread? :P
@Asaf: sorry, I couldn't resist.
18:07
@robjohn: Moron was one of the top users on the site from almost its inception until sometime around April when Moron changed username to Aryabhata. But there are still references in many old posts addressed to "Moron," which I imagine appears inexplicably insulting.
do you pur the bread in shower like chiken?
@robjohn: And there's the food you were talking about...
I only bathe my chick, not my chicken :-)
What food?
@Gortaur: touché
Hello Mike.
18:08
Hi Asaf. My first extended time in chat.
@Ramana you don't what?
I know, it is not without reason I generate about a quarter of the traffic in this chat... :-)
How do you like it so far?
@Mike: yes, it comes up at some point most every day. I don't know about yesterday since I was overseeing a midterm at UCLA.
@Mike if bathing chicken for you is about food, then yes
its just a mistake I just typed something while thinking something else I think
18:10
@Gortaur: I meant the bread. Although when I bathe my nine-month-old twins they do kind of look like chickens...
icic
The showering chicken quote has been moved off the starred list.
@Mike 0_o7
Anyway, I'm gonna make JM soooooo jealous.
Although this time we only have a good pesto, not awesome. Oh well. :P
18:13
He lives in a place where olive oil is expensive, so he cannot use it often. Unlike moi who lives in Israel where olive oil is good, common and used for almost everything.
@Asaf: Chat's a lot more active than it used to be - There was hardly anybody on it a year ago, but it seems pretty active now.
@Mike: Sure is, my part of the chat went down to a fifth! >:[
@Asaf: I didn't think olive oil was very expensive anywhere. There must be a decent substitute there.
@Gortaur: "Gortaur" is a Tolkien reference, isn't it?
@Mike: indeed
Gorthaur in the books
Sauron more commonly
18:18
He uses butter.
And where there are no olives, there is no cheap olive oil.
@Asaf: a substitute, but not quite as healthy.
Indeed.
So in this bread there are chopped black olives, tomato and garlic.
@Gortaur: Is the name Gorthaur mentioned in LotR or just in the later books (Silmarillion, etc)
@robjohn Can you answer my last question once since I think I did some mistake ??
@Mike: just after you joined this morning, I stated Gortaur's conjecture: One commutative Ring can rule them all. It was proved false by F. Baggins.
18:23
I don't think it was commutative.
Frodo was just in the center.
@Asaf: it sure moved around a lot
Does that imply commutativity? I don't think so!
It sure shows that it commutes.
Not between everyone, though.
Aha.
18:25
Just the few people in the center...
Well. I'm going to preheat and finish preparing the bread.
Thus, why the conjecture was proved false, it was annihilated by a member of its center
@robjohn Can you answer my last question once since I think I did some mistake?
@Ramana: you mean the limit point question?
@robjohn Yes
@robjohn: Very nice. And I think you're right about Gorthaur being in The Silmarillion. I rember that Sauron had another name originally, but I didn't remember what it was.
18:35
@Ramana: (2cos(2k\pi/3)+1)+(4cos(2(k+2)\pi/3)+2)+(6cos(2(k+1)\pi/3)+3)+1/k
now that is sneaky
(2cos(2k\pi/3)+1) is 1 for k=0 mod 3
and 0 for k = 1 or 2 mod 3
so the sequence for k=0 mod 3 converges to 1, for k=1 mod 3 it converges to 2, and for k=2 mod3 it converges to 3
so add 1, 2, and 3 to the set and you have a set with three limit points.
can we prove that only 1, 2, 3 are the limit points of the set??
what you can also do is just take the union of the sets 1/n and 1+1/n and 2+1/n
The bread is in the oven.
@Ramana: you can show that all the other points are isolated.
yeah I agree
18:42
That is they have a small ball around them that has no other points of the set
so those are the only limit points of the set
@robjohn Are you a graduate student??
@Ramana: no, I was about 25 years ago.
Okay so what is your profession?
18:50
A chatter... :-)
He sits here all day to chat with folks.
Nice chatting with you folks... I'm off to play some tennis. I'll have to drop by again sometime.
@Ramana: I currently write software to teach logic to students at UCLA, and it is also used in about a dozen other schools.
@Mike: have fun!
@Ramana: I did teach math at UCLA for a couple of years a long time ago, though.
@rob: You do? Interesting, what sort of software and how does it work?
@rob (ditto)
@Asaf: the students use the software to do their homework and exams. It gives instant feedback as to whether the answer is correct and, if not, in most cases why it is incorrect.
18:54
Interesting. CAS based?
That is they build proofs and it tells them what is wrong, or is it some multiple choice kind of thing?
It knows the rules used for justification and as they enter their proofs it can tell whether it is right, and if not, it can often tell them why.
It parses the WFEs into its internal format and knows the rules (modus ponens, double negation, etc) and how to apply them
it can also match a WFE and tell whether it is an instance of another WFE and return the substitution used
in most cases.
some cases it needs to get some information about the substitution from the user (in the form of a multiple choice question about which is the proper form they were thinking of)
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

« first day (442 days earlier)      last day (4874 days later) »