« first day (1764 days earlier)      last day (3553 days later) » 

15:00
@Masacroso ur equation is perfectly right :/
Algebra question I'm hoping to avoid asking on main site: Given that $f : R \to S$ is a ring homomorphism between ID's, define $\varphi : \text{Frac}(R) \to \text{Frac}(S)$ by $\varphi(r/1) = f(r)/1$. I'm trying to figure out what $\varphi(r/u)$ is, and my guess is $\varphi(r/u) = f(r)/f(u)$, but I can't get that to follow from just what I'm given.
@anon didn't go to bed?
My goal is to show that $\varphi$ is in fact a ring homomorphism, but to do that, I need to know that it does to an arbitrary element of $\text{Frac}(R)$.
as long as this equation is solvable $y(2x+y)=w(2z-w)$
who is the guy of your avatar @RobertCardona??
15:03
It's robert cardona :P
it's me
lol, ok
its castro :/
That's what my parent's told me back when I had the long beard. :P
I've gotten rid of both the beard and the hair since
look even*even = even*even and odd*odd=odd*odd
sometimes I get long beard too @RobertCardona, but is so annoying xD
15:04
Yeah, I sleep on my stomach too, so my beard always gets squished to my face
haha... eating is a pain with a long beard, or just drinking anything... very very annoying
Is anyone here familiar with free abelian groups?
i fear when i lose my hair , some brilliant mathematical thoughts disappear with it
@Agawa001, don't dispair, Grothendieck was bald most of hist life (although by choice; he shaved it)
15:06
@RobertC, can you help me?
@SohamChowdhury, on what? I can try.
it's about free abelian groups.
he grows hair sometimes
he s kinda like me
I can try, but it's not my strong suit
what's the question?
let his hair grow few decameters then shave it all off
15:08
@RobertCardona it seems like a multiplicative function or so
I need help understanding the motivation for this definition:
$H^{\oplus A} = \{\alpha : A \to H | \alpha(a) \neq 1_H$ for only finitely many elements $a \in A\}$.
apparently this is the free abelian group on A.
the "finitely many elements" bit.
(paging @Balarka for when he comes online)
Is someone of you familiar with fluid mechanics and especially with streamlines and pathlines?
maybe try it out for a specific pair $H,A$ which seems simple?
all my simple pairs will be finite groups, in which case $H^{\oplus A} \cong H^A$ and the hairy bit of the definition isn't even needed
fair enough.
15:14
Hello @robjohn ! Are you familiar with streamlines and pathlines?
@Masacroso look ur equation is right, $a²+b²=c²+d²$ if $d$ is smaller than $b$ then $c$ must be bigger than $a$

$a²+b²=(a+x)²+(b-y)²$

$x(2a+x)=y(2b-y)$ this means $x(A)=y(B)$ with $B>y$ and $A>x$ and if $x$ is odd than $A$ is odd and same if even , same with $y$ and $B$
i tried with $x=2$ $A=16$ $y=4$ $B=8$ it gives me $7²+6²=9²+2²$
oh, ty @Agawa001, I did something similar but failed in some point
well u were on right path
it happens to me often :D
suspect the track in middle road
xD
Hey @Semiclassical

Could I ask you something?
sure, can't guarantee i can answer
15:18
If $\int_{0}^{x}e^{at}|b(t)|dt$ diverges as $x \to +\infty$, we cannot deduce that $\int_0^x e^{at} b(t) dt$ diverges, or can we? @Semiclassical
i'm probably not going to be able to answer that, unfortunately. i haven't done analysis in a whie
@Semiclassical A ok... :)
Does anyone have an idea?
though i think you're right, since if I take $b(t)=e^{i t}$ then I could imagine I get something convergent
@Masacroso im struggling hard with trigonometric pascal triangle lol its a pain
15:21
trigonometric Pascal triangle? there is something related to binomial coefficients?
yes
exactly
what relation with trigonometry?
$cos(nx)=f(cos(x))$
there pascal triangle for it
ok i ll link you
hmm. $b(t)=e^{i t}$ doesn't work, but something which presents decaying oscillations around zero as $x\to +\infty$ should work
@SohamChowdhury, have you taken topology?
well, i'm not in college yet, so, no
@Masacroso, yes it is, as it's a ring homomorphism, that's what I'm trying to show though.
proved by moivre theorem
In topology, we define the product and box topologies
look them up, that might help with the motivation to your question
@RobertCardona I am reading a topology book (Bredon) at the moment, and the product and box topologies are a few pages away.
15:28
Then keep a close eye for how the product topology is defined, as well as box, and then look at the examples of each.
The examples should help you realize why there was a need for both.
will do, thanks.
ping me if you get a more direct answer to your question, as I don't have one.
It just reminds me of the topo defn.
k, I'm out for now. see you all.
0
Q: Prove that Euler's equation can be written in a specific form

evindaAccording to my notes, the following theorem holds: If $y$ is a local extremum for the functional $J(y)= \int_a^b L(x,y,y') dx$ with $y \in C^2([a,b]), \ y(a)=y_0, \ y(b)=y_1$ then the extremum $y$ satisfies the ordinary differential equation of second order $L_y(x,y,y')- \frac{d}{dx}L_{y'}(x,y,...

Could you take a look at the edit part?
15:40
@SohamChowdhury what do you need?
I need help understanding the motivation for this definition:
$H^{\oplus A} = \{\alpha : A \to H | \alpha(a) \neq 1_H$ for only finitely many elements $a \in A\}$.
Okay, in what context?
maths.kisogo.com/index.php?title=Addition_of_vector_spaces Looks very much like "external direct sum" (see that page, scroll down, top of the indexed set section)
I dont know about your topic @SohamChowdhury but I think the words "finitely many" are the key of this definition
Yeah, finite support.
It is some sort of projection
what mean $1_H$? It is the neutral for the operation?
15:45
identity, yes
Yeah identity, $1_X:X\rightarrow X$ with $1_X:x\mapsto x$
oh, wait.
everything clicked.
Not to be confused with $i_X:X\rightarrow Y$ with $i_X:x\mapsto x$ WITH $X\subseteq Y$
indirectly the definition says that it doesnt hold for infinite quantities
not really.
15:46
or at least it seems
No not really
Well he's part right. Hilbert spaces sort of come into it. But not really enough to say more than "they're a bit similar"
it's just that if no element maps to the identity, then an element can't be part of that basis-like thing that $\Bbb Z^{\oplus A}$ has.
Anyway @SohamChowdhury what does it call it, and what does it try to do?
15:47
@AlecTeal wouldn't know anything about Hilbert spaces yet :)
Basis?
@AlecTeal so, with that construction, set $H = \Bbb Z$.
You're in Linear Algebra?
Nope.
But free abelian groups have a basis-ish thing.
Topology??!
15:48
when I encounter some definition that I cant understand deeply or in the deep that I want then I see it in many different books
This is an algebra book.
@robjohn @r9m did you ever try this one elementarily? $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{H_n}{(2n+1)^2}$$
@SohamChowdhury take a picture of the page, OR shush about it
Context is needed.
sometimes you only see something clear from ONE book and not the others
Anyway. Set $H = \Bbb Z$. Then $H^{\oplus A}$ is the free abelian group on $A$.
Pic coming up.
@AlecTeal, there you go.
Also, about "basis" in this context: "In abstract algebra, a free abelian group or free Z-module is an abelian group with a basis." (if you didn't know, that is. I think you do, forgive me)
15:52
@SohamChowdhury rather than talk you through it, I want you to talk me through it.
@SohamChowdhury yes, although I have never read it.
@anon has studied it, I guess, so you could ask him about it.
okay.
what did you do all day?
more big words? :P
16:08
elementary algerbra is torturing sort of death in long term :D
@evinda You called for me a few days ago, do you still need me ?
@Hippalectryon Yes, I have some questions.. :)
Assuming that my connection doesn't die I'll try to help :-)
A ok.. I am looking now at an exercise. I will ask you in a few. :) @Hippalectryon
16:13
@SohamChowdhury speakin about super sonic :D
and here it apears
xD
he was faster than u
Sanic is always fastur :3
16:16
Panic is always Hastur?
WTF is going on here?
i dunno, i'm just rolling with it
just roll nver look back
@Semiclassical Panic is always Hatcher ! We did it !
16:18
@SohamChowdhury lol super sonic researcher , who dyes his hair blue
i ll have signal procesing exam next saturday , its irrelevant of maths , but i really enjoy this place more :)
well not completely , but somehow
Hello @Hippalectryon !! Are you familiar with streamlines?
im readin about this amazing guy during my break , poor man he dies cuz of misery and indifference , and all his achievements were been stolen
@MaryStar Sorry for last time, my connection was so bad I couldn't reconnect btw
16:26
No problem... @Hippalectryon
@MaryStar I know a bit about those.
Could you take a look at my question: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/187494/… ?
@Hippalectryon
In differential geometry, the jet bundle is a certain construction that makes a new smooth fiber bundle out of a given smooth fiber bundle. It makes it possible to write differential equations on sections of a fiber bundle in an invariant form. Jets may also be seen as the coordinate free versions of Taylor expansions. Historically, jet bundles are attributed to Ehresmann, and were an advance on the method (prolongation) of Élie Cartan, of dealing geometrically with higher derivatives, by imposing differential form conditions on newly introduced formal variables. Jet bundles are sometimes called...
What is the dimension of the manifold described here? In particular, how does it depend on $r$?
@MaryStar It's div of a vector, so $div(\vec{u})$, not $div(u)$
@AndrewThompson: You're asking what the dimension of the jet bundle itself is?
16:32
No, that'll be clear once I know the dimension of $J^r(\pi)$ (as a manifold.)
I'm not used to the notation they are using; to me it seems as if its dimension should either be $\dim E$ or $\dim E + \dim M$, both of which are independent of $r$ and proves impractical as soon as we start looking at the bundles.
@Hippalectryon Yes, you are right!!
Yeah, it's going to be much bigger.
the arrow over a vector is something prehistoric, lol
@Masacroso not in physics
Agreed, although I don't see that given the definition given in the text.
16:36
Im joking... it is the standard cause we need to write in by hand
I haven't internalized this stuff yet, @AndrewThompson, but I know that you should be able to find a discussion of the dimension in Eliashberg's h-principle book.
Thank you, @Mike.
I think the dimension of $J^1(\pi)$ should probably be something like $(\dim E)(\dim M) + \dim E$.
Maybe $+ \dim E - \dim M$ at the end.
I read some books claiming about the old style that is write vectors with arrow instead of bold... but the point is that you cant make bold letters easily by hand
I would be hard pressed to justify that, though :)
16:38
I'll have a look :)
Let me know if you can't find the book, @AndrewThompson. My copy is at home and I can take a look tonight.
@MaryStar Seems correct to me, assuming that by $x^2t=C$ you meant $x^2y=C$
@Hippalectryon Great!! Thank you!! :-)
Already found it. My Russian professor gave me the website. "I am Russian. While that is not an adequate justification for stealing books, I find it to be an adequate explanation."
5
hahaha
16:40
lol @AndrewThompson xDD
@Hippalectryon Oh yes... It is a typo...
The cutoff points are the points of the $y$-axis, aren't they? @Hippalectryon
@MaryStar Yes
@hippa I thought you had die
@Ramanewbie I had
Could you also take a look at my other question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1310701/… ? @Hippalectryon
16:45
@hippa And then you came back to life ? Wouahou !
Hm, no immediate luck in that book, @Mike. I'll take a proper look later.
@AndrewThompson: I'm confident there's a discussion early on where the dimension ends up looking something like $\binom{n+r}{r}$.
@MaryStar $div \overrightarrow{u}=0 \Rightarrow (u, v, w)=(0, 0, 0)$ where does that come from ? did you forget a $div$ ?
This is for a special case (maybe it's for the fibration $M \times \Bbb R \to M$) but it should at the very least be a little helpful. Just a bit past the intrigue chapter.
Hm, reading it now.
16:51
@Hippalectryon $div \overrightarrow{u}=0$ means that the flow is incompressible, right? It should be $(\partial_xu, \partial_yv, \partial_zw)$, right?
@MaryStar $div \neq \vec{grad}$. $div$ yields a number, not a vector
Hm, ok, so the question is local, so assuming in the Wiki we have $M = R^m$ and $E = R^e$ I might be able to work something out in terms out dimensions.
Thanks!
@Hippalectryon So, it should be $\partial_xu + \partial_yv + \partial_zw=0$, right?
Indeed. Which immediately gives you $c$
That's why they asked you to do that first, it makes the following computations easier
@Hippalectryon Is it $div \overrightarrow{u}=0 \Rightarrow \partial_xu + \partial_yv + \partial_zw=0\\ \Rightarrow -cy=0 \Rightarrow c=0$ ?
16:55
@MaryStar That's what I get
Great!! Thanks a lot!! :-) @Hippalectryon
The streamlines are correct, aren't they?

How can we draw them? @Hippalectryon
@MaryStar I haven't checked the streamlines yet though
@MaryStar Back in ~20 mins
Ok... @Hippalectryon
Glad to help, @AndrewThompson. What are you reading this for?
r9m
r9m
17:15
@Chris'ssistheartist nope ... but seems quite difficult .. $\sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{H_n^{-}}{(2n+1)^2}$ seems tricky business!!
@r9m By series manipulation only?
r9m
r9m
@Chris'ssistheartist I don't know if it can be managed by series manipulation alone
@r9m Maybe it's not that hard as I can see now.
r9m
r9m
@Chris'ssistheartist okay .. I'll try and see if I get sth later
@r9m I think I'm done with it.
r9m
r9m
17:19
@Chris'ssistheartist fine
@r9m $$\frac{49 \pi ^2}{1296}+\frac{\log(2)}{6}+\frac{\psi ^{(1)}\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)}{108}-\frac{\psi ^{(1)}\left(\frac{1}{6}\right)}{108}$$
r9m
r9m
@Chris'ssistheartist and you got that with series manipulation?
@r9m No
@r9m BTW, I'm working on a proposed problem for RSME. It's not that (in general) I like to do that but I need some stuff published for my book.
r9m
r9m
@Chris'ssistheartist oho!!! I see!!! I'm done as well !! :-) Nice problem ;)
r9m
r9m
17:24
@Chris'ssistheartist I see!! that's good :)
@Chris'ssistheartist I'll complete the calculation and add it to my blog later (if you allow me to share the stuff that is) :-)
@MaryStar I'll be back later than planned (~40 more mins)
@r9m Which stuff? Not sure what your point is.
r9m
r9m
@Chris'ssistheartist the series you just showed me :)
@r9m Well, sure, no need to ask for that. I didn't create that series. :-)
@r9m You found an elementary way by series only? :-)
@Hippalectryon Ok...
r9m
r9m
17:30
@Chris'ssistheartist no way :P I'll have to think if there is an elementary way for that or not .. the integral is not too difficult to compute if I use a few reflection and summation formulae for digamma function .. I have computed a similar integral before too :)
r9m
r9m
@robjohn @Chris'ssis see this!! this hxthanx guy rocks!! :D
@r9m ooo, that's nice!
@r9m That was the sort of proof I was looking for. I knew there was something that simple.
@r9m I looked at something similar, but I was looking at something else at the same time and never came back to it.
r9m
r9m
@robjohn ya! I remembered the periodicity of $S_n$ (I read about it in one of Andrescuu's books when I was preparing for olympiad)!! it's a nice proof
17:40
@r9m I have that very $S_n$ in my notes, but never realized that it was periodic.
Anonymous
Where's Alex Clark?
r9m
r9m
@Ashwin ping him @AlexClark if you wanna reach him ..
Anonymous
@AlexClark How you doing?'
r9m
r9m
alrighty then!! back to watching one piece :)
17:56
@MaryStar I'm here
@MaryStar Well, Abel told you it was right so I guess it's ok :-) unless you have another question
Yes, it is ok... @Hippalectryon
@r9m You rarely saw such a beautiful series problem as the one I prepare now. :-)
@r9m referring to the proposed problem. :-)
18:12
hi
hi @Chris'ssistheartist
@robjohn I posted a question is quite similar to one you answer beautifully before. Do you think your method might work for it too? math.stackexchange.com/questions/1308085/…
@Chris'ssistheartist still doing really hard integrals?
@felipa Not really. Now I'm trying to finish a proposed problem to some magazine.
@Chris'ssistheartist aha... I saw a really nice and hard looking coin weighing puzzle recently. Do you like things like that?
@felipa Sure, when I have some time. :-)
@felipa i know these puzzles
@Chris'ssistheartist It would be nice if people added the optimal solutions for more small cases
i solved most of them
@Agawa001 the one I pasted just now?
@Agawa001 try that one
I think n = 10 is already interesting to do
and n = 20 is very interesting :)
@felipa btw, do you somehow know me from the real life? :-) Asking me such a question cannot be just a coincindence (or, well, it might be).
18:18
im big fan of logic puzzles , as far that i can leav my priorities for em :D so i will try
@Chris'ssistheartist no.. I just read your questions/puzzles online :)
@Agawa001 great! I look forward to see your contribution to that puzzle
@felipa My posts on MSE?
@Chris'ssistheartist and mathematica.se
@felipa I remember doing something like that a while ago. Have you looked at that? I will have to find it.
18:20
@robjohn yes.. it is math.stackexchange.com/questions/1021933/… . I stole my notation from there :)
@robjohn but I feel I don't think I understand your trick well enough to extend it to my problem
@Chris'ssistheartist the mathematica.se answers to your questions are great
@felipa Yeah, but not all though. ;)
my goood , its generalisation of the classic N coins and a scale puzzle
@felipa so the difference is that in your question, we have $(\frac14,\frac12,\frac14)$ instead of $(\frac12,0,\frac12)$ for the $w$
i claim for creating a group devoted for matlab
as there is for mathematica
A matlab sect ?
18:32
but i cant deny that mathematica is the best :D
yes a section
18:42
@robjohn yes.. I don't know what to do with the 0's basically
Is the radius of convergence also defined for a polynomial or only for infinite series?
@Hippalectryon http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1182796/legendre-differential-equation-y-1-y-2-linearly-independent-solutions
If $p \in \mathbb{R} \setminus{\mathbb{Z}}$, is the radius of convergence defined?
@evinda Finite series are a special case of infinite series. Any finite power series (eg a polynomial) has an infinite radius of convergence
So the radius of convergence will be $+\infty$ if $p \in \mathbb{Z}$, right? @Hippalectryon
r9m
r9m
@robjohn OP here is asking a derivation using differentiating under integral sign! I'm not all that much used to the method .. could you take a look? :-)
@evinda What's $p$ ?
18:59
@Hippalectryon Did you take a look at this link I sent you?
The differential equation is $(1-x^2)y''-2xy'+p(p+1)y=0, p \in \mathbb{R} \text{ constant } \\ -1 < x<1$ and:

$$a_{2k}= \frac{\prod_{j=0}^{2k-1} (j+(-1)^{j+1} p)}{(2k)!}a_0$$

and

$$a_{2k+1}= \frac{\prod_{j=1}^{2k} (j+(-1)^j p)}{(2k+1)!}a_1$$
@evinda Why would it be ? The series is $\sum a_k$, which is not finite, right ?
@Hippalectryon hello
@Gato $\huge\text{:(}$ $\frac{5}2$
@Hippalectryon résultats ??
@Hippalectryon If $p \in \mathbb{Z}$, then one of $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{2n} x^{2n}$ or $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{2n+1} x^{2n+1}$ will be a polynomial.
@Hippalectryon Then will the radius of convergence of one of them be $+\infty$ ?
19:02
@Hippalectryon ENS et X ? Mines ? Centrale ?
and from the other 1? @Hippalectryon
@evinda How do you know that it will be a polynomial ?
@Gato Pas admissible à X/ENS. Seules les ENS m'intéressent, donc .... :(
Could someone take a look at my question:
0
Q: Find the forces

Mary StarAir of pressure $p_0$ and velocity $|\overrightarrow{u}_{A}|=|\overrightarrow{u}_{B}|=c$ enters the space $D$ from the sections $A, B$ of surface $S$. If at the orifices the distribution of the pressure and the velocity is uniform and at the exit $\Gamma$ the pressure is equal to the atmospheric ...

?
@Hippalectryon If p=2*i, then $a_{2j}=0, \forall j>i$. Or not?
@Hippalectryon Dommage!! a peu de choses ou ?
19:05
@Gato A en croire le barème (barra vers 12.5/20), j'en suis loin... j'en suis assez étonné mais bon ....
@evinda But what about the $a_{2j+1}$ ?
@Hippalectryon Ah bah désolé pour toi, l'année prochaine tu l'auras. Tu vas quand même passer des oraux ?
$sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{2n+1} x^{2n+1}$ will be a series.
So won't it hold that the radius of convergence of $sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{2n+1} x^{2n+1}$ is $1$ and the radius of convergence of $sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{2n} x^{2n}$ is $\infty$ ? Or am I wrong?
@Gato j'ai passé les mines/centrales donc j'aurai probablement des oraux que je passerai comme entraînement (les résultats mines/centrale arrivent plus tard)
@evinda Your product only becomes $0$ for $2k=p$ (or something similar), so indeed the radius for the even terms is $\infty$ iff $p\in\mathbb{N}$
@Hippalectryon Ah d'accord, je connais pas trop le système. ET sinon à Llg des beaux résultats ? LegrandDoDom ?
@Gato Il est à llg ? :O Sinon oui aparemment au global cette année est très bonne
19:11
Oh yes, right... @Hippalectryon But the radius of convergence from the solution will be 1 , right?
Oui, tu discutais avec l'année passée non ? C'était un autre pseudo.
@Gato Il était à llg l'année dernière, je ne sais pas s'il a fait 5/2 où s'il a intégré (je n'étais pas à llg l'année dernière)
@Hippalectryon Bha vu ses questions sur le forum il était en 5/2, il a posté une question qui venait d'un sujet de ENS.
@Gato D'un autre côté, ça va être drôle d'exploser tous les exercices l'année prochaine :3
19:15
@Hippalectryon Oui, tu pourras aller encore plus loin et très bien maitriser. Tu pourras m'aider comme ça ;p
room is frenchified ..... INVADERS
@Agawa001 :D
@Gato Toi tu passe en L3, non ?
@Agawa001 Ssh you must now speak French or pay $10 :D
lmao
oh sorry , MDR
@Hippalectryon Non, je suis en L3, j'étais en L2 physique puis L3 maths, ils avaient acceptés... mais j'ai bien progressé, en plus le niveau des élèves n'est pas excellent à la fac.
19:17
@Gato Après c'est M1 ?
@Hippalectryon Oui, M1 maths pures.
@Hippalectryon ça va être dur, j'ai encore beaucoup, de lacunes.
i wont pay ten bucks it costs too much in my currency
lacunes.... éléctroniques ? :D
@Agawa001 You live in Zimbabwe ? :)
19:18
lol its worse
nvm
1.00 EUR = 407.295 ZWD
@Hippalectryon :DD
je suis algerien :)
@Agawa001 Salam
oh les compatriotes
salam
i didnt mean it when i said its worse than zimbabwe :D , its just sarcasm
Can someone help me evaluate the following limit: mathb.in/37120? I'm wondering if there is some sort of dominated convergence argument that could be made since the integrand has a pointwise limit of 0
@hippa For the second time, I have someone on irc asking straightly for my asl, any idea why they do that ?
in zimabwe u must pay bag full of money for bread
19:25
age sex location @hippa
@Agawa001 That used to be the case... litterally
@Ramanewbie no idea
@hippa nvrmd then
@Ramanewbie lol its a bot
@Agawa001 I don't think so ! The way it / he talks is too natural...
i have been there , and once you log in , you get loads of requests
19:28
@Agawa001 reminds me of that I just received
yes they r subtly programmed bots
in way u dont touch any difference
@Ramanewbie on the 42 room or your private channel ? Are you a registered user ?
@hippa on another room. Yes I am
What room ? (continue on irc to avois flooding the chatroom)
i like freenode , no much trolls there
19:31
ok
I'm usually on freenode, sometimes #maths or #physics, or reddit /r/maths and /r/science. /r/science is a very good way to keep up to date with new findings
@PhilipHoskins I can help you in about 30 mins if you still need it by then. Send me an email to remind me.
and moderators are more numerous than chatters :D
maybe 45 mins
u would be banned for saying , shit , or crap , wtf etc
19:33
@Agawa001 freenode is a network, not a channel though
i know
@PhilipHoskins the basic idea is to expand f in maclaurin series and integrate term by term
Thanks @AntonioVargas.
That was an approach I tried and nothing immediately jumped out to me. Maybe I should go back and try it again
@Hippalectryon Corps quotient tu fais ?
@Gato Non. Avec les nouveaux programmes, ça a disparu en PC. J'ai juste un peu travaillé sur $\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$ par moi même.
19:45
@Hippalectryon Ah ok too bad.
i have new heuristic for this question codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/50467/… , but its sophisticated for bein implemeted :/

« first day (1764 days earlier)      last day (3553 days later) »