« first day (1691 days earlier)      last day (3624 days later) » 

16:00
Gute Morgan Ted.
16:13
@DanielFischer Guten Tag. I would like to prove that if $f$ is a continuous function on a open set $U$ (non empty) witch admits locally antiderivatives then $f$ is holomorphic on $U$. I cannot get that, I just have that $f$ is holomorphic on a disk.
@Gato Being holomorphic is a local property. For every $z_0\in U$, you know there is a disk $D_r(z_0)$ around $z_0$ such that $f$ is holomorphic on $D_r(z_0)$, hence ...
And we can just choose a smaller disk, if $D_r(z_0) \cap U' \neq \emptyset$, so we may as well assume $D_r(z_0) \subseteq U$.
@robjohn Hi , how are you ?
@robjohn Do you have any idea on interpolation between $L^2(\Omega)$ and $W^{1,2}(\Omega)$ ?
@DanielFischer hence f is holomorphic on $U$ because f is holomorphic on $D_r(z_0)$ for every $z_0\in U$ (this is the main point).
@DavidWheeler u saw what I pinged you
16:28
@DanielFischer Does I need to spend more time on proving theorems in my course or doing exercise ?
(analysis complex)
Yes, but there are some technical issues. @SayanChattopadhyay
Is the idea right
You can't deduce global behavior for $M(k)$ just from a small number of test points. At best, you have a heuristic (hand-waving) argument.
But I did prove $$d/dx e^{x}=e^{x}$$
Specifically, you are already ASSUMING that $M(k) \stackrel{\text{def}}{=} \lim_{n \to \infty} \dfrac{k^{1/n} = 1}{1/n}$ exists for EVERY $k > 0$, and is a CONTINUOUS function in $k$, and even more, that it is monotonic.
What you HAVE proved, is that $e^x = e^x \cdot \text{some limit}$, but you have not shown that limit is $1$.
16:33
So what are the changes do I have to make @DavidWheeler
What I would do, is back up, and take $k = e$.
@Gato Some exercises should be proving theorems. But apart from that, the point is to understand the theorems, and doing exercises using the theorems helps much with that.
The trouble you are going to run into is proving: $\lim_{n \to \infty} (1 + 1/n)^n = \sum_{k = 0}^\infty \dfrac{1}{k!}$
I think that's what I have done
@DanielFischer ok. thanks.
16:36
You proved the limit on the right DOES EXIST, and is between $2.5$ and $3$.
You have not shown the limit on the left exists, and that the two are EQUAL.
please say you all aren't still discussing the number e. it's been like ten hours
Like I said, what I would do is define the sequence:
And do what I did with the sequence
But @DavidWheeler then after I found $e$ I can describe $e^{x}$
$a_n = 2 + \sum_{k = 2}^n \dfrac{1}{k!} \left(1 - \dfrac{1}{n}\right) \left(1 - \dfrac{2}{n}\right)\cdots \left(1 - \dfrac{k-1}{n}\right)$
Then show for any $n$, that $a_n < a_{n-1}$.
And from the binomial theorem $a_n = \left( 1 + \dfrac{1}{n} \right)^n$.
@DavidWheeler I thought of a sequence and showed that it is e right
16:44
Then show that $a_n < \sum_{k=1}^\infty \dfrac{1}{k!}$, so that $e$ is an upper bound for the sequence $\{a_n\}$.
Then you want to show that for any $n \leq t \leq n+1$, that:
$a_n \leq \left(1 + \dfrac{1}{t}\right)^t \leq a_{n+1}$.
Finally, show $\{a_n\}$ is CAUCHY, so that $\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n$ = its least upper bound.
That will show that $\lim_{n \to \infty} \left(1 + \dfrac{1}{n}\right)^n$ exists.
I suggest you delay the proof that our two definitions of $e$ are equal until you study Taylor series.
Could anyone please help me with the following derivation: gyazo.com/3276d0d2f65a17321685baa085a4b1dd
Firstly, am I right in presuming that the integral of dT/T=ln(T) because of the rule: integral 1/x = ln(x)?
If $T$ is a function of a single variable, sure.
I have no idea what $\mu$ is, though.
mu is the coefficient of friction, just a constant value
I don't understand how the ln(T) at limits T1 and T2 is equal to ln(T1/T2), I would have thought it would be ln(T1-T2)
16:59
$\int_{T_1}^{T_2} \dfrac{T}{dT} = \ln(T_2) - \ln(T_1) = \ln\left(\dfrac{T_2}{T_1}\right)$
using $\ln(ab) = \ln(a) + \ln(b)$ and $\ln(c^{-1}) = (-1)\ln(c)$
@DavidWheeler my book mentions e and $ln(e)$ first after derivatives
@DavidWheeler David, hi. If set A contains all words that begin with a and set B contains all words that begin with aa, so intersection of A and B is just all words that contains all of the words that begin with a?
@BenBeri its like a set contains numbers and the other set contains the multiples of it
@BenBeri Convince yourself of this general principle: if $X \subseteq Y$, then $X \cap Y = X$.
Am I right @DavidWheeler
17:10
@BenBeri Is $ab \in B$? If not, how can it be in $A \cap B$?
@BenBeri its like let a set be something like this:
$$A:{2,3,4,5}$$
@SayanChattopadhyay Being right, and proving one is right, are two different things.
But isn't he just asking about the idea
Not the proof
@SayanChattopadhyay he is asking about the meet of two regular languages, not sets in general. Even so, most sets do not have a notion of "multiplication".
What if my set is $\{elephant,red\}$? What is a multiple of "red"?
It can be that the other set contains the description of the first set
17:16
Sets can contain each other, yes, but "multiple" is the wrong word.
I was taking about the case of numbers
@DavidWheeler so what's should i do my book gives me e and natural logarithm first and then Taylor sereies
@SayanChattopadhyay how does your book define $e$?
It just starts like logarithmic differentiation and natural logarithm after implicit differentiation@DavidWheeler
The reputation bar isn't giving notifications for me
@Sayan somewhere in your book it mentions $e$ for the very first time. How do it do that?
17:24
Oh wait in the appendix the Taylor series has been given for e but not how you get it
I would start where it talks about logarithms, and look backwards.
Is there a problem with the latex on the site?
it doesn't load and I've tried two different browsers
In most proofs on differentiating exponentials, one uses the limit: $e = \lim_{h \to 0}(1 + h)^{\frac{1}{h}}$, to conclude $\lim_{h \to 0}e^h = \lim_{h \to 0}(1 + h)$
Then, in calculating: $\lim_{h \to 0} \dfrac{e^{x+h} - e^x}{h} = e^x\lim_{h \to 0} \dfrac{e^h - 1}{h} = e^x\lim_{h \to 0}\dfrac{1 + h - 1}{h} = e^x(1) = e^x$.
That is the "usual" proof that $\exp'(x) = \exp(x)$
@BenBeri Every string that begins with $aa$ also begins with $a$, but not vice-versa, so the intersection is all strings that begin with $aa$ (the more restrictive condition).
17:48
@DanielFischer I don't know.. Could we use a heap to merge k sorted lists into one sorted list in O(n lg K) time?
0
Q: Are the propositions right?

evindaI want to choose if the following propositions are true or false and justify the reason for the choice. Polynomial: good, exponential: bad. Radix Sort works correctly if we use any right sorting algorithm to sort each digit. Given an array $A[1 \dots n]$ from integers, the time that CountingSo...

Does anyone have an idea for the above?
@DavidWheeler Uhh man im having a very hard time understanding this whole intersection part, i don't know why ...
18:09
It's like this: Suppose $L_1 = \{Tom, Ted, Thad, Bob, Tessa,Alvin\}$ and $L_2 = \{all\ people\ whose\ name\ starts\ with\ T\}$. What is $L_1 \cap L_2$?
it would be {Tom, Ted, Thad, Tessa}
Right. $L_2$ is the "bigger set" so it's easier to look at $L_1$ and weed out the ones that don't belong.
yes i get that part, but it confuses me at some points like the question i stated, i dont know why
If $L_1 = \{w| w = ax\}$ and $L_2 = \{w| w = aay\}$, given a word $w$ we check like this:
Is the first letter $a$? If not, it's not in $L_1$, so we reject it.
yeah i get that part
user143442
18:14
hi
Then we look at the second letter. If it is $a$ as well, it's in both $L_1$ AND $L_2$, so it is in the intersection.
user143442
I have a question on topology
This shows that ANY word in $L_2$ is in $L_1 \cap L_2$.
oh its based on the second set?
The trick is showing that NO OTHER WORDS are in $L_1 \cap L_2$
user143442
18:15
Why can't I upload an image?
We shown $L_2 \subseteq L_1 \cap L_2$, now we need to show it the other way around.
@user I have no idea-it could be the platform you're using, or your reputation level.
user143442
hmmm
But showing $L_1 \cap L_2 \subseteq L_2$ is "obvious"-do you see why?
user143442
Can you watch it here please? postimg.org/image/8ub3zy0bj
user143442
18:18
I have a question about the 4th question
user143442
I don't know which is the quasicomponent of $x$
user143442
and is the component of $x$ just the line containing it?
Is that true: $\begin{Bmatrix}a^n | n >= 0 \end{Bmatrix} \cap \begin{Bmatrix}a^n | n >= 1 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix}a^n | n >= 1 \end{Bmatrix}$
@BenBeri Yes, being greater than 1 always means that it's greater than 0, but not vice versa.
So for example: $\Bbb N \cap (\Bbb N - \{0\}) = \Bbb N - \{0\}$
i see
18:23
The set of subsets of a given set forms a lattice under join = union, and intersection = meet. The (partial) order is called inclusion.
user143442
:(
i see
{All words that begin with A} $\cap$ {All words that end with b} = {all words that begin with A and ends with b}
logically, this corresponds to "or(non-exlusive)" for union, "and" for intersection, and "contained in" for inclsuion,
exactly.
@user it's not clear to mean the topology you're using in that figure.
user143442
I don't know
user143442
they don't say it
user143442
18:27
I think it could be the topology induced by $\Bbb R^2$
user143442
the relative topology
user143442
but then every square and line is clopen
{All words that begin with a and ends with b} $\cap$ {all words that begin with a and ends with c} = {All words that begin with a}
ya, but since it's "All white" I don't know what's in $X$, and what isn't.
user143442
and then the quasicomponent is the line coinaining $x$
user143442
18:29
the black lines are in $X$
is that right
user143442
yes @BenBeri
but if we have {All words that begin with c} $\cap$ {All words taht begin with a} = $\emptyset $
user143442
\emptyset
yea
yeah i think i got it prettyt much now, try guys
18:35
@evinda Yes. (Assuming $k > 1$ and that the lists are non-empty. If the lists can be empty, you need $\Omega(k)$ to go through the lists to check that they are empty. Then you can do it in $O(k + n\log k)$, but not in $O(n\log k)$.)
user143442
@DanielFischer how much reputation do I need to upload images here?
@user It's not listed explicitly on the privileges page. I'd expect that "remove new user restrictions" at 10 would do it. Have you a problem uploading an image? If so, what happens when you try?
user143442
I don't see the button of "upload image"
Hi everyone
user143442
I just see the button "send"
user143442
18:43
I see it when I refresh the page but then it disappears
try a different browser perhaps?
user143442
nope
user143442
the button doesn't disappear when I log in with my other account with more reputation
ah fair enough
@user You need 100 rep to upload images in chat
18:45
Is anyone able to review a question of mine about geometry? I'm not sure if it's difficult or unclear
user143442
thanks @ᴇʏᴇs
@DanielFischer So do we have to make k different heaps that will contain the elements of the sorted lists and then compare the values of the elements of each heap?
@evinda No, you make one heap. What do you put into the heap? (Hint: where does the $\log k$ come from?)
@DavidWheeler I find it easier to show that $\left(1+\frac1n\right)^n$ is increasing and $\left(1+\frac1n\right)^{n+1}$ is decreasing to show that $\left(1+\frac1n\right)^n$ converges.
@robjohn OK
18:52
@DanielFischer Do we have to compare the first elements of the k heaps and put at the root of the heap the smallest, then compare the second smallest of the list from which the root of the heap is, with the smallest of the other heaps and put the smallest of them at the left side of the root and so on..?
@robjohn There's...a lot of different ways we might go about defining $e$. Showing they're all equal is not always quite so easy.
@evinda No. One heap of size $k$ (initially).
@DavidWheeler Yeah. I showed a lot of them were equal when I first came to MSE.
There seemed to be a bit of interest at the time.
@DanielFischer So do we make a heap with all the first elements of the k heaps?
@evinda You keep writing of $k$ heaps. You only make one heap.
18:57
@DanielFischer Sorry, I meant from the k sorted lists.
Personally, I like $e = a: \int_1^a \dfrac{dt}{t} = 1$
@evinda Okay. Then you're getting closer. But you don't put the elements of the lists into the heap. You put something else into the heap.
It's pretty easy to define the properties of logarithms from that, and one can define $\exp = \ln^{-1}$ and use the inverse function theorem. Probably not the best approach for a first look, though.
@DanielFischer Do we maybe compare the elements of the sorted lists and put at the first position of the heap how many elements from the first list we use so that the array is sorted, at the second position how many elements from the second list we use and so on?
@evinda No. Why do you want to put numbers in the heap?
19:05
@DanielFischer What else could we put in the heap? :/
@evinda What property must things you put in a heap have?
@DanielFischer The left child of a node should have a less value that this of the node and the value of the right child should be greater than this of the node, right?
@evinda So what is the property you use?
@evinda That, by the way would be a binary search tree, not a heap.
Hey all. The "math mode" of this site suddenly turned off for me, so it no longer shows the formula nicely, but shows them in their raw TeX format with dollar signs and all. Any idea what I did to obtain this (and how to reverse it)?
@HowDoIMath Sometimes reloading the page helps (when the mathjax code hasn't been properly loaded), have you tried that?
19:10
Yeah. Also tried another browser, same thing. But on my phone, it looks ok for some reason
@HowDoIMath JavaScript disabled in the browser maybe?
@DanielFischer Oh yes, right...
The trees should satisfy the heap property. In a max heap, the keys of parent nodes are always greater than or equal to those of the children and the highest key is in the root node. In a min heap, the keys of parent nodes are less than or equal to those of the children and the lowest key is in the root node.
Let me check
Yeah, it is
@HowDoIMath That's probably it then.
Oh, sorry. I mean, it is _en_abled. :)
19:13
Hello!! Is someone of you familiar with characteristic curves??
Maybe it will reappear after reboot or so
@HowDoIMath Ah. Pity, would have been a nice simple thing. Which browser and OS?
Firefox on Windows 7
@HowDoIMath You already tried restarting the browser, I suppose?
@HowDoIMath Are you using NoScript?
Yeah, didn't seem to work
NoScript? I don't think so. Let me check
I have no process running resembling that (also don't recall installing it)
Thanks, Daniel. I will try a full reboot later tonight and see if it fixes it
Thought I had toggled some unseen option on the site
19:17
@HowDoIMath It's a FireFox plugin. Not sure where the Windows version of FF tells you which plugins you have installed. Anyway, my non-expert ideas are coming to an end, so maybe you should indeed try to reboot, and if that doesn't help, post on meta.
Ah, let me check that as well
Nah, no such plugin
How would you go about $\int{e^{\sqrt(x)}} dx$?
Thank you for the effort and time anyway. :) I'll post on meta, if it doesn't help
Hello @Hayden @quid !! Are you familiar with characteristic curves of PDE's??
@MaryStar a long time ago I knew a little about it but I am not sure if any knwoledge remains.
19:21
@Owatch $\int{e^{\sqrt(x)}} dx$

We set $\sqrt{x}=u$. Then $\frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x}}dx=du \Rightarrow dx=2 \sqrt{x}du=2udu$

So $\int{e^{\sqrt(x)}} dx= \int e^u 2udu=2 \int e^uudu$

Can you continue?
Where did you get $\frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}}$ from?
We have the equation $$2u_{xx}-u_{tt}+u_{xt}=f(x, t)$$

This is equal to $$\left (\frac{2\partial^2}{\partial{x^2}}-\frac{\partial ^2}{\partial{t^2}}+\frac{\partial ^2}{\partial{x}\partial{t}}\right )u=f$$

To find the characteristics do we solve the homogeneous equation $$\frac{2\partial^2}{\partial{x^2}}-\frac{\partial ^2}{\partial{t^2}}+\frac{\partial ^2}{\partial{x}\partial{t}}=0$$ ?? @quid
derivative of sqrt(x) I guess
@Owatch $(\sqrt{x})'=\frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x}}$
ok thanks
19:24
$\dfrac{d}{dx}(\sqrt{x}) = \dfrac{d}{dx}x^{1/2} = \dfrac{1}{2}x^{-1/2} = \dfrac{1}{2\sqrt{x}}$
@Owatch :)
Latex is not rendering
I have clicked start ChatJax several times, and also hit rendering on. But it never renders new stuff.
I have to keep pressing the bookmark
Thank you David
@Owatch Where do you try to start ChatJax?
Bookmark
@MaryStar sorry I do not know.
19:26
Where is this bookmark? @Owatch
Where the bookmarks go, in the tab above the page?
Hello @Theorem
Ok... No problem... :-)
@evinda Yes Sir
@Owatch I don't see it... Where is it exactly?
@Theorem How are you?
19:28
@evinda I am doing ok . What about you ?
I am ok too :) @Theorem
There
@evinda Nice . I wish i was in Australia . it has got such wonderful weather :)
@Theorem How is the weather in Germany?
@evinda still gloomy and wet
19:33
I don't see the bookmark bar... Where did you find it? @Owatch
@Theorem Aha..
We have the equation $$2u_{xx}-u_{tt}+u_{xt}=f(x, t)$$

This is equal to $$\left (\frac{2\partial^2}{\partial{x^2}}-\frac{\partial ^2}{\partial{t^2}}+\frac{\partial ^2}{\partial{x}\partial{t}}\right )u=f$$

To find the characteristics do we solve the homogeneous equation $$\frac{2\partial^2}{\partial{x^2}}-\frac{\partial ^2}{\partial{t^2}}+\frac{\partial ^2}{\partial{x}\partial{t}}=0$$ ?? @MikeMiller
Do you have an idea??
Hello @IlmariKaronen Could you take a look at this?
0
Q: Are the propositions right?

evindaI want to choose if the following propositions are true or false and justify the reason for the choice. Polynomial: good, exponential: bad. Radix Sort works correctly if we use any right sorting algorithm to sort each digit. Given an array $A[1 \dots n]$ from integers, the time that CountingSo...

@evinda It's right there in the picture.
Look above the chat.
@Owatch Above the chat, there are these bottoms: load older messages load to my last message full transcript highlights
Nope, it says rendering on, rendering off, render MathJax.
19:40
Not at mine... :( @Owatch
Well of course not yours, I'm not using your computer.
I'm saying I'm clicking the bookmarks supposed to run the JS that continuously renders Latex, and it isn't working.
@DavidWheeler please have you an idea on how to prove that $A=(\mathbb{Q}\times\mathbb{R})\cup (\mathbb{R}\times \{0\})\subset \mathbb{R}^2 $ is path-connected
It's okay, doesn't natter.
@Owatch Did you press a button to activate the bookmark bar? Because I don't have this bookmark at my computer..
Hello
I need help finding the exact value with the half-angle identity for tan 195
19:42
Hello @Karl !! Are you familiar with characteristic curves of PDE's??
I know the answer is $2-\sqrt{3}$
Oh look, it's Max.
Have you activated ChatJax? @Theorem
I have $\frac{\sqrt{1-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}}}{\sqrt{1+\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}}}$
I then multiplied by 2 to get $\frac{\sqrt{2-\sqrt{3}}}{\sqrt{2+\sqrt{3}}}$
Do I have to write this?
javascript:(function(){if(window.MathJax===undefined){var%20script%20=%20documen‌​t.createElement("script");script.type%20=%20"text/javascript";script.src%20=%20"h‌​ttp://cdn.mathjax.org/mathjax/latest/MathJax.js?config=TeX-
19:49
@Mary Sorry I'm not. I'm a pretty useless mathematician truth be told.
Ok...
Hello @Huy !! Are you familiar with characteristic curves of PDE's??
So If I multiply the top and bottom by $\frac{\sqrt{2+\sqrt{3}}}{\sqrt{2+\sqrt{3}}}$
then I probably did this wrong but I got $\frac{1}{2+\sqrt{3}}$
Hmm, are you sure you're multiplying by the conjugate correctly?
I don't think so
Why are both +?
Could you paste the latex without the $ signs so I can edit it?
19:54
I don't know, I was just trying to get rid of the bottom
Would I multiply by the negative?
The conjugate should be the opposite sign.
But then again, it depends on which you pick.
Hey @robjohn !!! Do you know where I can find the bookmark to activate ChatJax?
Ok let me try that
And the problem is you need to multiply by the opposite sign on both sides. So you technically did it right.
Well.. I guess I did it
19:56
If using the top. Maybe someone else has better in sight.
If I do the negative, the bottom is 1 and then I just cancel the square root on top and get $2-\sqrt{3}$
Which is what the book says
So by picking the other side, you were able to achieve the answer from the book?
Okay.
Let $f$ be a continuous function on $[a,b]$. Is there anyway i can simplify this limit?
$\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}\int_a^b \dfrac{\epsilon f(t) dt}{(t-x)^2 +\epsilon^2 }$
20:02
Guys, there is an INCREDIBLY CRAZY GAME BETWEEN SIMONA HALEP AND JELENA JANKOVIC!
I barely can get these moments! It's simply craziness! :-)
I do no math now!
:-)
BBL (they began again)
@Chris'ssis Thanks for the tip-off. I'll have to watch it in a few hours.
@MikeMiller It's live now.
@Vrouvrou Go from $(x_0,y_0)$ down to the $x$-axis (unless we're already there), move to $(x_1,0)$, and then travel to $(x_1,y_1)$.
I have deadlines some things I need to get done soon, and shouldn't be distracted. (I guess that means I should also leave the room.)
Thanks again.
Hello @SimonBaars !! Are you familiar with the energy method at PDE's ??
20:05
@MikeMiller I never saw such a game so far. Welcome.
I did another problem wrong:P
Need to find $tan\frac{\theta}{2}$
given that $sin\theta = \frac{3}{5}$
in quadrant 1
Easy?
I used a pythagorean identity to find $cos\theta$ which was $\frac{4}{5}$
Draw a right triangle.
Then write $\theta$ on one side (Not the right angle).
I then plugged in $sin\theta$ and $cos\theta$ in $\frac{1-cos A}{sin A}$
20:09
@DavidWheeler but where is used Q ?
So its $\frac{1-\frac{4}{5}}{\frac{3}{5}}$
$sin\theta$ = 3/5, since sin = opposite/hypotenuse, that means you write 3 on the far end, and 5 for the hypotenuse. Then use pythagoras to find the remanining side
Ah... theres the issue, I kept it as 1 instead of 5 when multiplying by 5, or at least its 1 thing I didn't do, could be another issue
Let me try tht
Since sin = 3/5, then cos must = adj/hyp. And then combine those to give you tan.
I got $\frac{1}{3}$, answer is just 3 :O
20:11
Hallo @Huy
Hello @quid
Owatch, when I multiply by 5 it should be $\frac{5-4}{3}$ right?
hello @evinda How was your weekend?
I dunno, I tried giving an answer but I don't think you read it.
You are talking about a triangle, I have to use half-angle identities to solve this
Yesterday I went out for a coffee and today I studied a bit.. How was your weekend? @quid
20:12
Fine.
solving $tan\frac{\theta}{2}$
Multiplying by 5 will give you 5-4
So that aspect is right
? divided by 3
yes.
yes... which is $\frac{1}{3}$ in the end but should be 3
20:14
It was somewhat similar to yours @evinda
5-4 is 1
/3
Nice :) @quid
So how do I get 3?
Oh, you want 3.
My bad.
Yes, the answer is just 3 but I have $\frac{1}{3}$
20:15
You would have done something wrong earlier I assume. Your question about simplifying the fractions was what I looked at.
@quid Could I ask you something? Have you enabled ChatJax?
if sin=$\frac{3}{5}$ then cos=$\frac{4}{5}$ ya?
@evinda no I do not have enabled ChatJax. But I manage to read the math (sometimes by copying it somewhee else.)
So if you want to write math it is fine
@quid I do it also like that :D
@Maximilian Yes.
20:18
In an example in the book with tan$\frac{\theta}{2}$ they use the half angles of sin and cos though, but the formula does not, so am I supposed to find the half angles of sin and cos first and use those?
@Maximilian What is your profile picture
A lego
@Maximilian It looks scary
It's Vitruvius from The Lego Movie
@DavidWheeler i must take two points $M_1=(x_1,y_1)$ from $\mathbb{Q}\times \mathbb{R}$ and $M_2=(x_2,y_2)$ from $\mathbb{R}\times\{0\}$
20:21
@Maximilian I never saw it
Well its amazing
@Maximilian Oh you are a wizard
how do you add text between { } in latex with spaces?
I go to Hogwarts
20:22
and i must find a continuous function $\varphi:[0,1]\rightarrow A$ such that $\varphi(0)=M_1$ and $\varphi(1)=M_2$ right @DavidWheeler
@owatch the issue was because I forgot to make cos a negative... oops
At least it's done.
Solved
Lol
So many formulas
@DavidWheeler if i say $\varphi(t)= ((1-t) x_1+ t x_2, (1-t) y_1 +t y_2)$ it is true ? but where is the importance of Q ?
20:28
how can I describe string length in math symbols? e.g #_w(c) length of c's in w but theres no # in latex for me
@DavidWheeler ?
$L_1 = \begin{Bmatrix} \text{All words that begin with bb} \end{Bmatrix}

L_2 = \begin{Bmatrix} \text{All words that end with aa} \end{Bmatrix}

L_3 = \begin{Bmatrix} \text{All words that do not begin with bb} \end{Bmatrix}

L_4 = \begin{Bmatrix} W | W \in \begin{Bmatrix} a, b, c \end{Bmatrix}, \text{length of c mod 3 = 1}\end{Bmatrix}$

Is it true that $\begin{pmatrix}L_1 \cap L_2\end{pmatrix} \cap \begin{pmatrix}L_3 \cap L_4\end{pmatrix} = \begin(Bmatrix) \text{All words that don't begin with bb, but they begin with aa and the length of c's mod 3 equals 1}$
I mean: $(L_1 \cap L_2) \cap (L_3 \cap L_4) = \begin{Bmatrix} \text{All words that don't begin with bb, but they begin with aa and the length of c's mod 3 equals 1}) \end{Bmatrix}$
20:51
I'm f***ing proud I'm Romanian! Simona won!!!!!!! The game was completely madness!
The last hour or so was an hour by hell. She finally did it!
I've got a random terminology question: Why is it that mathematicians seem to prefer the prefix "skew-" over "anti-" (e.g. antisymmetric vs. skew-symmetric, anti-Hermitian vs. skew-Hermitian) while it seems to be the other way around in physics (being a physicist, I see more logic in the latter, but maybe that's just bias :P)
We are all sos440
@TheEmperorofIceCream Nice Kandinsky you got there, btw
@Danu thanks, good eye.
I live in Munich---the Lenbachhaus there has quite a lot of his work

« first day (1691 days earlier)      last day (3624 days later) »