hahahaha :) true. it is reminding me why i love math in the first place, but his grading is killer. i screwed up and switched to k one step later than he wanted and he took off 75% of my score even though everything else was correct
well, for example, when counting some collection of things, it's useful to distinguish cases. these correspond directly to subroutine branching (usually some kind of if then else command).
@PaulPlummer Maybe you're right. I did many times lately understand mathematical concepts on a much deeper level and then when I went back to my horrible school text books it suddenly wasn't nonsense.
@gideon it is definitely worth a try and it sounds like it maybe working out better. Plus the kinds of things that might be in apostol rather than some algebra 1 text is more interesting so you will have more motivation to keep on going and learning. I think it is important to do math your interested in since it is motivating.
Use the binomial theorem to show that $$a_n = 2 + \sum_{k = 2}^n \dfrac{1}{k!}\left(1 - \dfrac{1}{n}\right)\left(1 - \dfrac{2}{n}\right)\cdots\left(1 - \dfrac{k-1}{n}\right)$$
How do you show your $M$ is a WELL-DEFINED FUNCTION, that EVERY such limit exists (is finite) for ANY $k > 0$, and that $M$ is one-to-one? I don't think that's easy to do.
@PaulPlummer oh yes I do feel stupid learning Algebra 1. I might not get 5 Algebra 1 answers right in a row but I certainly know it. Calculus I WANT TO learn desperately, have wanted to for exactly 4 years now, because I have come across it's applications in physics, machine learning so far and maybe a few more instances in my job and life.
@PaulPlummer I want to learn more about Combinatorics, Formal Logic etc because again as I run deeper into my career field of programming I get stumped at the bottom when I hit the related underlying math. So yes I have lots and lots of motivation to study these things.
And I WILL apply them, one or or another I will find a way to apply them.
I had a mathematical dream last night. There was the value 99/100*Pi^2 calculated from some operation on a matrix, and then there was the same value 99/100*Pi^2 as the convergent of a series. It does not make sense and I never saw any more details than this.
@SayanChattopadhyay Hmm. Not sure then, search/post on meta.SE. I looked at privileges and you seem to have enough to post links and what not. What browser/OS are you using ?
@robjohn I face a very strange situation with Mathematica. It shows me that Hurwitz zeta function becomes negative for large input. How is this possible?
The flaws are simply dramatic. Mathematica can't even imagine how to compute one of my creations and becomes suddenly crazy.
I am not sure what book but normally this sort of problem follows something that happened in the chapter you found it in, what happened in that chapter?
If $f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}^2$ is a homeomorphism, would you now how to show that there is a homeomorphism $\mathbb{R}\setminus \{x\} \to \mathbb{R}^2 \setminus \{f(x)\}$
Hi, off topic. I'm studying stereographic projection (Riemann sphere). Let $z=x+iy$. The line in 3-D from $z$ to $N$ is given by the set of points $tN+(1-t)z$. How is this set equivalent to $\lbrace ( (1-t)x, (1-t)y, t) : -\inft < t < \infty \rbrace $? Why isn't $N$ present in the latter set?
Not sure, I think if you post the plain url, a lot of sites get formated and previewed in chat, but I don't know if that works for all sites. Maybe give that a try
Alright you should be good to go, I upvoted 3 of your questions, maybe leave, exit the browser and come back and see if that works (it might take a bit, not sure if there is some lag)
$\Bbb R^2 - \{(x,y)\}$ is connected for any point $(x,y)$. It's even path-connected (just drive around the hole).
But if $f: \Bbb R \to \Bbb R^2$ was a homeomorphism, then the partition $\{(-\infty,0),(0,\infty)\}$ would map to a partition $\{U,V\}$ of $\Bbb R^2 - \{(x,y)\}$ for $(x,y) = f(0)$.
@DavidWheeler, @PaulPlummer the contradiction is that $\mathbb{R}\setminus\{0\}$ is not connected where $\marhbb{R}^2\setminus{f(0)}$ is connected right ?
I am not 100% sure what you want but I am pretty sure all you have to do is calculate $P^{-1}JP$ for generic values in $P$ $$P=\begin{bmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{bmatrix}$$ @Committing
Although its almost 6am here and I havn't gone to bed (this is not normal behavior for me) so I would take any advice I give with a mountain of salt
I was reading some math in a book, it was looking at the symmetry group of the octahedron proving that it was generated by these two subgroup the author defined. Anyways part of the reason I am up so late/early Is that I was trying to figure how this group the author defined was isomorphic to $S_3$, I thought it was a typo and maybe meant $S_4$ because it seemed to be much larger than $S_3$.
So I have been sitting around doing a bunch of calculations to see if the author actually meant $S_4$, only to come to the conclusion that the author did mean $S_3$ but the author actually meant to say it was generated by rotations rather than reflections!
I am mildly irritated in part because of the mistake the author made and in how long it took me to figure out the mistake. I should have caught it sooner.
@infinitesimal Not necessarily, If the book was filled with errors like that maybe. I have read more of this book but I guess the last time I looked at this chapter I didn't spend much time thinking about that example.
Maybe I will email the author though, it doesn't look like there is an errata. (and that part was worded in a strange way)
Yah. Not a typo but all this talk about spelling a such reminds me of an MO post, I think it was just asking for funny or clever things in papers and books and I guess one of them the author was looking at the categories of Banach analytic manifolds, and following category theory traditions of using the first three letters of the words the category was called BanAnaMan
We have that $w_t(x, t)=0$ and $w(x, 0)=0$. To find $w(x, t)$ we have to integrate the relation $w_t(x, t)=0$, right?? Is it $$\int_0^t w_t(x, t)dt=0$$ or do have to use an other variable, for example, $$\int_0^t w_{\tau}(x, \tau) d\tau =0$$ ??@robjohn
Hi. I need to prove using the definition that the limit of (sqrt(x)-2)/(x-4) when x approaches 4 is 1/4. I have done it, but I am not sure it is correct. Is it acceptable to publish my prove as a question so that more knowledgeable people can verify it for me?
Hey @DanielFischer!!! I want to write a Ο (n lg Κ) -Time algorithm that merges k sorted lists into one sorted list, where n is the the total number of elements in all the input lists. Hint: Use a thin heap for a k -way merging. How could I use the hint?
I've been trying to fix a computation for a while and I'm really confused: Is $$\sum_{x,y} (f(x) + g(y)) = \sum_{x,y} f(x) + \sum_{x,y} g(y) = \sum_x f(x) + \sum_y g(y)$$?
@ᴇʏᴇs I think it really depends on where you go. For example, I'm not about to sign up for where there are drug cartels everywhere or where there are currently wars