What ways would you propose for getting the inequality below?
$$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{k^s}{k^{2s}-1}> \frac{3\sqrt{3}}{2}(\zeta(2s)-1),\space s>1$$
The left side may be written as
$$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{k^s}{k^{2s}-1}>\zeta(s)-1$$
but how do we prove then that
$$\zeta(s)-1> \frac{...
Question, I have the homogeneous linear second order differential equation as follows: $y''+8y'-9y=0$ With.. $y(1)=1,y'(1)=B$ I found the solution, but am having trouble with the following: 'Find B if y approaches 0 as t approaches infinity.' How would I go about solving this?
@Link The solution is a linear combination of an exploding exponential and a decaying exponential. Make $B$ so that only the decaying exponential is present.
What ways would you propose for getting the inequality below?
$$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{k^s}{k^{2s}-1}> \frac{3\sqrt{3}}{2}(\zeta(2s)-1),\space s>1$$
The left side may be written as
$$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{k^s}{k^{2s}-1}>\zeta(s)-1$$
but how do we prove then that
$$\zeta(s)-1> \frac{...
What ways would you propose for getting the inequality below?
$$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{k^s}{k^{2s}-1}> \frac{3\sqrt{3}}{2}(\zeta(2s)-1),\space s>1$$
The left side may be written as
$$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{k^s}{k^{2s}-1}>\zeta(s)-1$$
but how do we prove then that
$$\zeta(s)-1> \frac{...
Suppose we have a function $f:B(c,R)\to\Bbb C$ that can be expanded in a powerseries around every point of the ball, with a positive radius of convergence. Then the series around $c$ converges at every point of $B(c,R)$. This is a theorem of Hurwitz.
I haven't thought about it, it might not be too hard...?
This was mentioned in Remmert after we used the identity theorem to show that singularities exist in the boundary of convergence.
"Auf der Peripherie des Konvergenzkreises von $\mathfrak P(z/a)$ liegt immer mindestens ein singularer Punkt."
That I can guess.
@DanielFischer Let me see if I can sketch the proof.
It suffices we show that above, because if the radius of convergence was $\rho < R$, there would be a singular point in $B(c,R)$ which is absurd, since by hypothesis we can expand $f$ in powerseries around every point.
I mean, provide an elementary proof of this fact, which Remmert proves using the identity theorem (this I think is elementary, at least the id. principle for powerseries) and using Cauchy-Taylor.
That if we have $f\in\mathcal O(D)$, around each point we can expand it around a convergent powerseries with radius at least the distance from our point to $\partial D$.
In the case of a ball, we get the best fit, so the convergence is throughout the ball.
@PedroTamaroff On page 50, near the bottom, "Folglich gilt $$\left\lvert\frac{1}{n!} \mathfrak{P}^{(n)}(a)\right\rvert \sigma^n \leq g",$$ How do they prove that? Is there something pertinent in §3?
@nablablah It depends on how you define cure and how you define OCD. For me, there is a cure for OCD, and that cure is to sort out my thoughts on my own...
what does the last part of: Let $E$ be nonempty subset of $\mathbb{R}$ and $f:E\to \mathbb{R}$, I don't know that notation. Does that mean the domain of $f$ goes to the reals?
In mathematics, the codomain or target set of a function is the set Y into which all of the output of the function is constrained to fall. It is the set Y in the notation f: X → Y. The codomain is also sometimes referred to as the range but that term is ambiguous as it may also refer to the image.
The codomain is part of a function f if it is defined as described in 1954 by Nicolas Bourbaki, namely a triple (X, Y, F), with F a functional subset of the Cartesian product X × Y and X is the set of first components of the pairs in F (the domain). The set F is called the graph of the function. The set...
@WillHunting not exactly, but any https link has low frequency of working, and just in general wikipeida for where I am doesn't load often, but if I goto the fancy Hotel in town, it loads just fine.
@Sawarnik I get a little leaway because I am not chinese, but if I say things that are not in line with the party on political issues, then yep. But saying the web sucks and general complaining they don't mind.
I like the book, just wish I got more feedback from the class, just turn in homework and get a grade. I download other books on analysis and they are seem different because they talk about metric space.
it says that $\delta$ is the tolerance allowed in the measurement $x$ of $a$ which will produce an approximation $f(x)$ which is acceptably close to the value $L$.
@WillHunting I understand the previous two chapters, chapter one was basic stuff like inf and sup. Chapter 2 was series which was harder but not difficult, but chapter 3 the notation and the examples have been too simple, just need to check to make sure that I am correct.
@Sawarnik, that is what I was thinking, would have been great to include that in the book.