« first day (1223 days earlier)      last day (4094 days later) » 

07:00
how is it not injective?
It has to do with finding a map from an ideal of the form $(p,x)\subset\mathbb Z[x]$ to $\mathbb Q(x)/\mathbb Z[x]$ which does not extend to a map from $\mathbb Z[x]$.
I need to prove that sinc(t) is bandlimited while sinc(t^3) is not using the Paley Wiener Theorem and quite frankly don't know how to go about this
@Potato It is being handled.
07:28
@robjohn Thanks.
I saw it too...wow I agree with Potato on this one. LIke if you're going to help others, don't be selfish and delete
@anon Questions got bulk-deleted?
some sort of contest/exam and a single user IIRC
supposed to be temporary. might have been just closed not deleted, don't remember.
Huh. I guess there's all sorts of MSE inside baseball I'm missing.
@anon Do you know which old user Post No Bills is?
no
07:36
This is clearly not his/her first rodeo.
07:53
@Potato Thank Martin Sleziak and Arthur Fischer; they've done most of the work.
08:10
I saw on the news that many people in the Minnesota died because of the snow.
@John You should ask on the main site. Paley Wiener is nontrivial.
Now that I have 300 points, I may retire, lol.
Greetings
I just saw a ghost and I need to be sure this is real!
Is Marvis gone?
I saw this on his account "This account is temporarily suspended for rule violations. The suspension period ends in 7 days ".
As far as I know, Marvis had a great contribution on MSE, his answers were always very good.
08:28
If I remove the coordinate axes from R^3, do I get six circles which wrap a cube?
homotopically?
yeah but he threw a tantrum, went nuts, and decided to act selfish @Chris'ssis
it's sad that someone that smart would stoop low by deleting answers and editing a lot of things.
@Chris I see the same thing :-(
@badass Well, I think he should make a decision when he's not angry.
I agree
He was a great helper in this room also
I wonder what caused him to snap?
08:39
Why doesn't he just invite each mod to a separate room and talk it out?
Divide and conquer
Bill D tried to take them all on at one time and it cost him one year
@Chris'ssis from the comments on this answer and his meta post, it would seem he had some problems with downvotes.
"Useless moderators and thankless users" are his last words
08:55
@robjohn thanks, I understand now.
I'm going to bed night guys
Later
@badass Sometimes the words are simple words, not necessarily meaningful. (depending on the circumstances)
@badass I say many things when I'm angry ... :-)
Yes context/circumstances mean everything
@Chris'ssis He was sort of on the edge before, but then Shog9's answer pulled the plug.
09:00
And down the tube he went....
...sad to see
@robjohn Yeah, that guy was a bit tough. ... Nothing new under the sun, this usually happens in the real world.
@Chris'ssis I never noticed any signs of a problem until recently
@robjohn Everybody makes mistakes.
@Chris'ssis He was making 200+ points regularly and a few downvotes shouldn't have even affected him. I mean not at all, any downvotes would be completely erased by the opvotes.
@robjohn Maybe he was reguraly downvoted and this can affect you. I remember when I was regurarly downvoted by an user ... it was pretty annoying.
09:08
He must have been a perfectionist
Trying to please all of the people all of the time
@badass Also on this site, it depends on your aim here. For instance, if you wanna have more rep than some users it's one thing, but if you want to learn and enjoy math is a different thing.
@badass no matter how good you are, there is always something to learn from the others.
Pride in mathematics can simply "kill" you.
When you think there is nothing to learn from the others, then you're really done.
Indeed!
@badass I like to know things but I'm aware that I need to learn as long as I live - - this is not true only for math but for any other area of life.
If I have 100 solutions for a question (supposing that) and someone wants to teach me another solution, I'm very willing and humble to learn it.
user97303
This is probably not the best place to ask, but I was wondering if anyone knows of a intuitive and simple tutorial of MFC? Particularly if you just want to drag a command line program in there where do you put it?
The many proofs of the Pythagorean theorem is a great model of this @chris
09:23
@badass Indeed :-)
user97303
@Chris'ssis I read your last comment and immediately thought of the 100 prisoner's problem
@ReilaLee Interesting. :-)
user97303
Actually, don't read the paper
user97303
see if you can come up with some ways of solving it
user97303
09:27
The riddle:
One hundred prisoners have been newly ushered into prison. The warden tells
them that starting tomorrow, each of them will be placed in an isolated cell,
unable to communicate amongst each other. Each day, the warden will choose
one of the prisoners uniformly at random with replacement, and place him in
a central interrogation room containing only a light bulb with a toggle switch.
The prisoner will be able to observe the current state of the light bulb. If he
wishes, he can toggle the light bulb. He also has the option of announcing that
Thanks for sharing @ReilaLee
user97303
anytime, @badass
09:44
@ReilaLee I suppose the simplest solution is to have one prisoner keep track of how many prisoners entered the interrogation room.
Something like having the other prisoners toggle the light if it is off and it has never been off before when they were in the room; otherwise do nothing. The prisoner keeping count will do nothing if the light is off or add one and untoggle the light if it is on. (We can have him/her count to 100 excluding him/herself to account for the possibility of the light initially being on)
To solve the riddle:
Wouldn't a possible solution be that given that there are 100 prisoners and they are randomly selected uniformly, then at $t< \infty$, they will all at least be interrogated once. The strategy would consist of knowing the maximum potential of the current in the lightbulb, or to avoid electric circuits technicalities, "the voltage" or brightness. Suppose the value is 100V. They are only allowed to lower it 1V the first time they are interrogated. This means that it will undoubltey arrive to 0V, and the lightblub will be off when that happens, and the prisoner will turn t
user97303
@KarlKronenfeld, yep, that's about the simplest solution. The caveat is that we're waiting so many days between successive counts that this solution takes much longer than the statistical 99% confidence of a normal distribution
Neither meta nor the main site works for me. Am I the only one, or do other people have problems too?
@robjohn Isn't this limit $\log(11)$? This is what I got. math.stackexchange.com/questions/599203/… 99231
It seems that other sites in SE network do not work for me either.
user97303
09:50
@Arturo the lightbulb is an ideal lightbulb only capable of depicting 1 bit of information (otherwise we could have prisoners sign the bulb when they go into the room or something :) )
@ReilaLee oops! ok thanks
Can anyone here explain what the "rank" of an elliptic curve means?
I can't wrap my head around the concept
do you know that an elliptic curve has the structure of an abelian group?
if you have an abelian group isomorphic to Z^n x torsion-part, then the rank is n
it's kind of like the dimension of a vector space, but Z-linear instead of K-linear
user97303
10:08
Does anyone know how to stick a c++ function in MFC so you can use it from there?
i understand that it's an abelian group. but i don't see how it is isomorphic to Z^n x torsion-part
i'm pretty new to this, so it's quite confusing to me. what corresponds to Z^n in the elliptic curve group?
10:25
there is no unique "torsion-free part"
it doesn't work like that
Given an abelian group G with torsion subgroup T, one may write G=TxA and G=TxB, with A and B distinct subgroups of G both isomorphic to Z^n
Mordell's theorem states that the group of an elliptic curve is finitely generated
since the group is also abelian this forces it to be isomorphic to a direct product of a torsion group and a free abelian group - this is classical structure theory for abelian groups
hm, I think I may lack some background here on torsion groups.
a f.g. torsion abelian group is just a finite abelian group btw
so a torsion group is a finite group that generates the rational points on the elliptic curve?
huh?
the adjective "torsion" used to modify the word "group" just means every element in the group has finite order
by itself it needn't refer to elliptic curves or anything like it
and saying "the group generates the group" is fairly redundant btw
but no, the torsion elements of the elliptic curve need not generate all rational points
the fact that one speaks of rank at all means generally elliptic curves have elements of infinite order
and they cannot be generated by any torsion elements in an abelian group
so far it seems your questions are about group theory, not elliptic curves
yeah, that's probably where i'm weak
11:19
Hello?
 
2 hours later…
13:21
If anybody happens to be here at this hour: When performing the euclidean algorithm on a pair of Gaussian integers, is it done when the remainder is a unit or 0? In the case of normal integers, a remainder of 1 tells that the two integers are relatively prime... but in the Gaussian integers, there's also $i$ to contend with.
Also, if asked to find all GCDs $\gamma$ of two Gaussian integers, does it suffice to calculate $-\gamma$, $i\gamma$ and $-i\gamma$?
Huy
Huy
@agent154: It depends on when you consider it to be "done". If the remainder is a unit, that remainder is the GCD since the norm of the remainder strictly decreases with each step, so you are basically done already. Of course you can still do one more step and will get remainder 0 and are done then at the latest.
Is it convention to consider only the "positive" GCDs? So in the case of normal integers, we never seem to say that $-1$ is a GCD, though it is an associate of $1$...
Huy
Huy
And yes, the GCD of two Gaussian integers is unique up to multiplication by a unit (i.e. $\pm 1$ or $\pm i$).
I don't know about convention but I imagine saying $1$ is the GCD looks a lot nicer than saying $-1$ is.
OK, thanks
13:36
Hi there, I am having a little trouble understanding power series. I know that e^x = sum(0 to inf) (x^n)/(n!) for (presumably, cause that's where I struggle) x_0 = 0. What would it be for x_0 = 1 ?
@robjohn I was wondering the following question: for instance, is it fair someone that knows nothing about calculus downvotes someone that knows calculus? I mean there should be some kind of filters such that one that didn't ask or answer calculus questions cannot downvote someone that posts answer/questions related to calculus.
@Huy Do you know where I can read up on how to do prime factorization on Gaussian integers?
Huy
Huy
@agent154: I don't know if I can recommend anything to you, my Algebra course was in German and so was the textbook I used for it.
ah
One of the only things I have here is saying that if the norm of a gaussian integer is a rational prime, then that gaussian integer is a gaussian prime
Huy
Huy
@Romiox: The Taylor series of a smooth function $f$ around a point $x_0$ is defined as $f(x) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{f^{(n)}(x_0)}{n!}(x-x_0)^n$. Just plug in $f$ and $x_0$ and you will find your power series for $e^x$ around your desired point.
@agent154: Try your textbook or just googling. For example, this came up as one of the first results when googling: math.ou.edu/~kmartin/nti/chap6.pdf
@Romiox: Did you figure it out?
13:49
@Huy I believe so, sec
@Chris'ssis looking at his reputation in his profile, it seems that the downvotes started around Nov 23. It was a fairly recent occurrence.
@Huy sum(0 to inf) (e^x)/(n!) (x-1)
Huy
Huy
You forgot a few things.
It is $f^{(n)}(x_0)$, not $f^{(n)}(x)$ and also it is $(x-x_0)^n$, not just $(x-x_0)$.
@Chris'ssis yes. I upvoted your comment. I doubt the OP will correct it, however.
@Huy "it is $(x-x_0)^n$, not just $(x-x_0)$." I see, thanks. "$f^{(n)}(x_0)$" not sure what that translates to
Huy
Huy
13:54
Well, $f^{(n)}(x)$ for $f(x) = e^x$ is just $e^x$. Now you plug in $x_0$ for $x$.
@robjohn I hope he changes his mind. I'd like to go through his answers.
@Huy So... e? oô
@Chris'ssis I have said this countless times before. Voting is capricious. It is impossible keep voting fair while encouraging knowledgeable people to vote, yet discouraging others.
Huy
Huy
@Romiox: Exactly.
hmm, that's nice
Huy
Huy
13:58
That's because $1$ is a nice number. :P
And e^x does play its part, too :D
@robjohn Indeed.
Huy
Huy
Yes, indeed.
@Chris'ssis GREAT CHRISSY! :)
@Charlie GREAT CAT! :-)
14:00
@Chris'ssis hehe how are you?
I was preparing to leave for some shopping. How about you? :D
@Chris'ssis I'm fine :D
@Huy Thanks a lot, I'll go and put that knowledge to work :)
Huy
Huy
@Romiox: You're welcome, I'm glad I could help.
@Charlie hehe, glad to hear that! :D
14:03
@Chris'ssis buy me a gift ;)
@Charlie Well, I'd prefer to create a question to you! (a kind of mathematical gift) :D
Morning @TedShifrin
14:51
@Chris'ssis fair enough :)
@Charlie This one is really great!
Let $(a_n)_{n\ge1}$ be an increasing sequence such that $\lim_{n\to\infty}(a_{2n}-a_{n})=1$. Compute
$$\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{a_n}{\log(n)}$$
How can I see that $4*p_1*p_2..p_m-1$ contains a factor of the form $4*q+3$?
@Charlie it's not created by me, but I can use it as a gift. :D
Huy
Huy
@Adam: 4-1=3.
@Huy: are you refering to the fact that we can write the former in the form 4(p_1*p_2*..p_m-1)+3 ?
Huy
Huy
15:01
Something like that. Did I misunderstand your question?
Well, I already know this fact. Maybe I am thick-headed or something, but does that imply a factor of the form $4q+3$?
Huy
Huy
Well, if you can write it as such then clearly one if its factors is $4q+3$?
@Adam, you're in the middle of a proof by contradiction, aren't you?
Hi @Mike.
Well, yes :-)
So, say explicitly what you're assuming and use the Fundamental Thm of Arithmetic.
15:06
I assumed that there are finitely many primes of the form $4n+3$
And used them all in your product above. Go on.
@Chris'ssis Cute question.
Now I want to show that this product has to contain a factor that is of the form $4q+3$, distinct from all $p_i$ and prime.
So what does FTA tell you?
Well, your $N$ is the product minus $1$. :)
For one thing, I know that any factor of the N is distinct from all $p_i$.
Ok, @Adam, so that leaves what for prime factors?
They have to be of the form $4q+1$?
So when you multiply such numbers, what is the mod 4 remainder?
1, I guess.
Yes ... Prove that. So there's your contradiction.
15:22
So the whole number has to have a mod 4 remainder 1, and a mod 4 remainder 3 at the same time - contradiction, right?
How do you write ~ in LaTeX?
@Mike thanks :-)
15:39
@Chris'ssis thank you, chris :D
@badass Hello
@Charlie Welcome :D
@Chris'ssis :D
:-)
@Chris'ssis I think I'll change my avatar
@badass hi mr.Patrol
15:41
@Charlie Won't you be a cat anymore? :D
@Mike: \sim is one possibility.
@Chris'ssis for a day, maybe
@Charlie ok :D
Hi @charlie how are you?
Thanks, @Adam!
15:46
@badass fine, and you?
Fine thanks @charlie this Mobile experience is so miniature
@badass yup, sometimes quite annoying
Indeed
And sometimes quite interesting @charlie
@badass yes, internet everywhere mwahahaha
16:05
Mwahahaha
16:16
@badass will you wear christmas hat this year?
Ah, another christmas with mse guys, how cute :)
@charlie the hats at stack exchange have to be earned starting Dec 15
@badass eh?
Something about Christmas Bash @charlie
@badass hmmm
16:32
@Charlie I am not sure if math SE is going to take part in it
@badass Not all sites are involved?
Correct @JasperLoy
@badass Mind telling me how old you are?
Last year MSE did not take part
ELU definitely took part.
16:41
@badass :/
@charlie :-)
back from algebra final
brb studies 2 days straight ideals and polynomial congruences and i get questions about irreducible polynomials for 5 questions out of 8. brb killing self, brb hope professor gets fired.
omg one of the questions was find a prime factor of $2^{35} - 1$
wtf?
didnt do it
@DonLarynx What is brb?
Be right back
@jasper.........be right back............
16:53
But it does not make sense in your sentence
@Jasper: stop taking it literally and it will make sense...
hey jasps
@anon Hey anon, I am feeling very bad. I am afraid I may never recover...
@DonLarynx by geo sum formula it's divisible by 2^5-1, which is easily computable by hand as 31
@JasperLoy aww
oh geometric sum formula, something we never learned in class. oh how cool
i better get at the very least a B
in that class
16:56
@JasperLoy Dude.
The worst I got for math classes was a B+, so not too bad.
@PedroTamaroff Hi Pedro.
@Jasper: Did you ever have a bad professor?
@DonLarynx Yes, about half of them were bad.
@Jasper then I am assuming you read 99% of the time
@DonLarynx Well, to be honest, I think I did OK despite my mental problems because the course content was not too hard.
16:58
@Jasper: Have you been thrown in a course where you don't know what to study?
That is precisely this course.
With this teacher.
And this book.
@DonLarynx Ah, yes, and I think I got B+
@Jasper: Did you ever have a sucky book + professor
??
@Jasper: If you have...I praise you.
@Jasper: I have a book published by pearson
thats so lame
@DonLarynx Yes, definitely. I just went into the exam hall and bluffed my way.
i want to kill all that is evil in the world
@DonLarynx Tell me what book it is.
16:59
like this book
i want it gone

« first day (1223 days earlier)      last day (4094 days later) »