does it ever make sense to have $\mathbb{C}^n$? What I think I am asking here is: can I have more than one complex plane? (My intuition says, hell why not, but part of me says there can only be one $i$).
let me rephrase that last bit
what I mean by "there can only be one $i$" is something along the lines of, If $$
Of course $\Bbb C^n$ makes sense. Those of us who work(ed) on complex manifolds consider things locally isomorphic to that but globally far more interesting. You can do $n$-dimensional vector spaces over any field, finite or infinite.
Here's what you're thinking. Start with $\Bbb R^n$ and take a basis $v_1,\dots,v_n$. Then the vectors $v_1,iv_1,v_2,iv_2,\dots,v_n,iv_n$ give a basis for the complexification $\Bbb C^n$.
I hope the feedback went back to the teacher at least. Will see
in any case, I'll be a bit bummed if I don't get rebooked, but I do have a lot on my plate otherwise, so it won't be the end of the world
I do volunteering as well, and with my new commute times being a significant chunck of time, I'm wondering if I will ever get back to figuring out QM :P
When I was a grad student, the friend of an old family friend wanted to hire me to tutor her high school son in math. I explained that I was very overqualified and that she didn't need someone of my qualifications. She insisted. I made some good money. The kid was bored in school and we actually covered about a month of his curriculum in a few hours each time we met.
@TedShifrin I don't think the kid I was tutoring was bored in school. It seamed to me his mother just wanted to put some pressure on him to do his homework.
If you say area between two curves (so area between the graph and the $x$-axis), that's always the geometric area, i.e., the integral of the absolute value of the difference.
So, the Harvard chem student may be right, in fact.
Hey, I have another mathsy question. The other day when I was playing around with decay rates, and Ted, you mentioned that ODEs werent a great way to model what I was modelling. Did you have something in mind that would be better?
(I'm thinking of taking a minute to convert the rules of my loan into an ODE and try and solve for the least money I need to pay back)
(and by minute I really mean the better part of the day at my speed)
that would better be done with a fairly complex spreadsheet. ODE is overkill.
actually, if you're solving for least money under different payment terms, maybe just a programming language of your choice. lots of moving parts, but not too many, depending on the complexity of the loan agreement.
depending on the size of the loan it may be helpful to consider tax implications too, although tax cosniderations don't matter too much if the amount of your loan isn't 'too high.'
@leslietownes yeah probably right there. I made a quick and dirty numerical simulation already, looks like a decaying exponential, but now i'm curious if it is
i don't know what the law is in your area, but they likely would even if it was illegal
there was a big suit against one of the main student loan servicers in the US, for automatically steering some big class of students, i think military veterans?, into more profitable payment plans.
hmmm, I presume you mean my time steps where massive relative to the size of the parameters. Otherwise I'm not sure how I could have improved the discretization
but you probably dont mean that cause I dont think I gave you values of the paramaters...
i have made most financial mistakes that are to be made. while one should be aware of tax implications, it is not usually a good idea for tax considerations to be the main driver when it comes to such things.
thankfully i am willing to take a big hit as necessary, but my impatience & risk profile tends to carry a lot of heart stopping, ucler inducing exposure. for example, i was all cash for 18 mos before the 2008 financial crisis (because i figured it was coming), but after so long decided i was wrong and got back in, just in time to take a whopping hit.