« first day (3918 days earlier)      last day (1398 days later) » 

17:00
one of the best is an arbitration agreement printed on the back of a cruise ship ticket that you didn't get to see until after you bought the ticket.
enforceable.
ted shifrin is a functional analyst now.
God only knows what immoral havoc the current Supreme Court is going to wreak.
banach geometry
Maybe Leslie is going to study Alain Connes next.
marc rieffel was always trying to get me to read him. no thanks.
the gallic influence on mathematics is regrettable.
i did secretly sneak a read of one or two of his papers and he is clever, but maybe too clever. frenchmen.
someone once said that french politics is dumb people pretending to be smart and english politics is smart people pretending to be dumb. i don't know if that's true. in america it is dumb people not pretending to be dumb.
These days in Britain it's not too much pretense.
17:09
the level of aggressive stupidity in the UK right now is something else.
it's nice to live in a part of the US where people don't feel that they need to compete to be as dumb as possible.
what do you guys think of identity politics in universities these days?
whats it like in the US ? do you notice it?
i do not work in academia. my wife does, she doesn't see it but maybe that is because her school is not a school that the people who opine on such matters would have attended. it seems like a straw man to me.
We old guys are no longer in universities. But the right-wing politicians are doing their best to make education an illiberal commodity.
so much of the discourse in the USA is focused on harvard, yale, and other places that people who get hired immediately out of college to report on nationwide news events attended. that's not the american experience.
@leslietownes I remember in school, people would be proud of how little they studied. Stupid was the new orange.
17:16
and it's hard for me to be too distressed about someone hearing views they don't agree with. my bottom line, which is illiberal, is, if you don't want to hear bullshit, don't major in bullshit. everyone who complains about liberal bias in academia majors in bullshit.
That certainly was not the case where I went to school, @robjohn :P
i've never heard a chemistry major complain about the political tendencies of the faculty.
@TedShifrin Luckily, I hung out with the nerdier contingent, where it was cool to know things.
@leslie We're going to disagree here. I am a big believer in the humanities (was a French major, after all).
i like the humanities. but, it's always some poli sci or economics major spouting off.
that's BS to me.
17:18
Business majors don't belong in universities.
my wife is a sociology professor.
she can't indoctrinate anybody, you overestimate her powers.
Well, sociology is a social science along with the two you listed.
Yes, humanities are a linchpin of society
there's a lot of crap in her department, i just don't see how it harms anybody.
. o O ( lynchpin? )
17:19
it's just academics doing what they do.
i was almost an english major. there's another world in which i wrote the great american novel.
@TedShifrin they used to put the business majors in a building off-campus at UCLA. Now they have a building in the far northeast of campus.
Somehow the history is all forgotten. There were not undergraduate business majors, and MBAs were intended for people in science/engineering. Now look at it.
Trade school.
trade school with suits.
sort of like high school with ashtrays. That's what they called jr college when I was in college
i do remember a few professors saying offensive and gratuitous things in the classroom. it was not connected to the subject matter of the courses. it's always annoying when that happens, some people feel if they have a professorship they are the king or queen of some domain. regrettable but not headline national news. just people being dorks.
Well, no, plenty of racists, homophobes, misogynists in academia, even in math.
17:23
that is broadly true in life
By identity politics I meant from the left as well
that's mostly what i was thinking of. there were several virulent homophobes on faculty at berkeley.
At least in the UK
my wife has to tolerate a lot of what would probably be regarded as leftist nonsense outside of academia. i also think it's nonsense, but it's not oppressing anybody.
I know Edinburgh university are having to change the name of one of their buildings call Hume tower ( after David Hume)
17:25
maybe they can change to john instead :-) (i know, wrong place)
because he supposedly wrote a sentence which these days would be considered racist.
I'm fine with trying to do away with racist traditions, along with plenty of others. If that's leftist identity politics, so be it.
They are part of history, but do not deserve to be honored.
name changing is an interesting thing. i don't think any old dead rich person deserves their name to be perpetuated. i do question whether, if we're going to address issues, that's the first place to start. but it's easier to change names than minds.
But if you go back far enough nearly everyone was racist
to some degree
we were idiots
No reason to keep perpetuating and honoring it.
17:26
we cant just stop honouring their other work
i see it as an extension of 'clannism'
yeah but naming a tower after Hume is not honouring some side comment he once made
@TedShifrin I agree, but I do not agree that taking down the monuments to the good things that people who had racist views did is good.
john or david?
its about his contribution.
17:27
they changed the name of berkeley's law school because the guy had advocated for legislation that stigmatized and humiliated minority groups, including groups who make up a near majority of berkeley's student body today. i'm not losing any sleep over that.
race to blandness
I am more concerned about the idiots who continue to fly and revere the Confederate flag in the US.
i don't see it as imperative. i could think of other imperatives, mainly economical ones. now i will give a lecture that radicalizes the chat into communism.
insecurity of some sort
I dont agree with Bret about lots of things. But this sort of thing is awful jakubferencik.medium.com/…
17:29
there's something called the means of production. do you control it? what do you control? are you alienated? are you palliated by consumerism? this is a figment of your imagination.
i'm going to start a communism chat.
If we took down all monuments to people who had some unpopular belief, we'd have no monuments
they'd still have the monument to me in the town square.
I forgot about that one
expecting our heroes to be perfect is a recipe for failure...
i'm on a warhorse. i have a copy of "harmonic analysis on semigroups" in one hand and a warhammer in the other.
the inscription is in latin but basically says, as far as i understand it, that i was flawless and righteous in all things. which i am and was.
17:35
awe-inspiring
awe shucks?
awe few?
sorry, awe some
we've declared a portion of long beach for the supreme soviet. all are welcome to join in this glorious revolution.
Hi guys, in This question, it's quite simple just put x=4+2-x and I am getting the integral as 1/2 , is it correct? since no option matches ...
Sorry to disturb
You want to exploit symmetry about $x=3$. I don't ever want to read "put $x=6-x$"!!
17:41
yeah, what is this, a math chat? i'm uncertain as to that substitution.
i get 1, but i've been wrong before.
@TedShifrin ok right
i wonder if sloppy ever pays?
@leslietownes 2(Integral)=1 ?
So, yes, add $\log(6-x)^2$ to the numerator and observe that that integral is the same. But you get $1/2$ of $2$, not $1$, so your answer is wrong.
because it certainly has a lot of evolutionary pressure behind it
17:43
You should be very self-critical when you don't get any of the multiple choice options.
i like the contrast between "i don't want to ever read 'put x = 6 - x'' and 'i am uncertain as to that substitution.' there are tiny differences even when there are no substantive differences.
self doubt can be a good thing in maths
So, ans is 1/2 right!
Well, I often get annoyed when people post that their textbook or professor has made a mistake, and almost always it's the student's mistake, not the book's or professor's. But we know counterexamples.
@Rover: Did you read anything I wrote?
throws daggers
@TedShifrin yes
17:45
So what is the correct answer?
half of 2 isn't half of 1, but i was raised in a broken home by circus performers
Even @leslie will back me to the Supreme Court on this one.
yes and i will even discount my normal fee to half of $0.
Wow. I owe you half a tea.
@TedShifrin 1? But to be honest I didn't got how? see we got two integrals and I added then then I got 2(Integral)=1?
17:49
Where did you get the 1 on the right?
Watching a viola recital from Houston — one of my talented math majors from my last years at UGA who also majored in violin/viola and is now doing a masters at Rice. Talented guy!!
I=$logx^2/(logx^2+log(6-x)^2 )and I= log(6-x)^2/(logx^2+log(6-x)^2)$
@Rover: No, that's not how you get the right-hand side. Think.
The world is a better place with latex bookmark installed
LOL @Koro
@Rover You've written $I$ as a function of $x$. Isn't it a number?
with the latex plugin installed, God's in his heaven and all is right with the world.
17:57
Would that we could solve the world's problems with robjohn's plugin.
@Rover the question can be answered without doing an integral. (frankly i would struggle with the integral at the moment.)
@TedShifrin it is, I dropped limits to integral.
Well, those are the crucial things, @Rover.
@copper He knows that.
Without the limits of integration we would not have symmetry to exploit.
Okay, so now integral is correct ?
18:01
Of RHS
So what is the integral of the sum?
Ok right I should change limits of integration also
That's how you argue that the second integral equals the first integral. You're missing the whole point.
the downside of multiple choice is that you can avoid doing the work or thinking that the author presumably intended.
Ok
18:08
Well, when I wrote multiple choice competition exams (never for a real math course), I tried to include answers that corresponded to all the mistakes I could imagine being made.
the problem with being a good test taker is you struggle for the rest of your life (talking about my self, to avoid confusion)
These people didn't include Rover's mistake.
i would just note that the integrand is in $(0,1)$ and eliminate the rest.
but i am pure lazy
i struggle for the rest of my life.
@copper Then those are really crummy multiple choice answers, I agree.
18:13
even struggling is a struggle for me
A well-constructed test would have several answers between $0$ and $2$.
well, i would have skipped computation, but if i had to evaluate in an exam (as opposed to picking a choice) i would probably have wasted time trying to solve directly first.
The kids know to look for these symmetry tricks.
Symmetry tricks appear on every competition sort of exam up to and including Putnam.
makes sense for exam sort of stuff.
but i can easily stumble past the obvious.
18:16
i never heard about the putnam until the middle of my sophomore year of college. i think that's a failure of something somehow.
One of my mantras for my multivariable course (particularly the integration half) was EXPLOIT SYMMETRY.
We all know to look for even/odd ...
i think that is a generally good rule in life
of course, all of the symmetric statues will be torn down in years to come precisely because symmetry was exploited.
Well, yes, there is that.
i wonder if this site is the bane of modern educators?
Because of symmetry?
18:28
there are no modern educators. only primitive educators
I guess I'm going to assume Rover eventually figured out his gap.
often modern is primitive. my phone is just a black slate. my old phone had nice buttons to press.
@TedShifrin I have a plugin for that, but it creates more problems than it solved.
Gives you something to work on in retirement, @robjohn!
something to look forward to... -_-
18:40
It'd be a lot more worthwhile than the nothing we accomplish here :P
I just have to figure out how to keep the sun from starting to burn helium and consuming the Earth...
This is probably not appropriate for the website since I have no idea how to approach this problem, and thus can't show any appropriate work for it, but I'll try asking it here.
I have non-negative numbers $x_1, \dots, x_n$. These numbers are all percentages rounded to the nearest tenth of a percentage. Unfortunately, I don't have any of the numerators or denominators driving these percentages.

The true percentages, $t_1, \dots, t_n$, are unknown and should obviously sum up to $100$. But this is not the case for the numbers $x_1, \dots, x_n$, due to rounding error.

Since these are rounded to the nearest tenth, I propose that I should add uniform random variables $U_1, \dots, U_n$ drawn from a uniform distribution in the interval $(-0.5, 0.5)$.
This looks like it's an optimization problem in disguise, but any of you who know my views on optimization textbooks know that I don't know the subject very well.
Isn't this really a statistics question (to do things meaningfully) rather than mathematics question?
Optimization how? What do you want to optimize?
I think you might be right in both respects
My view, knowing virtually no statistics, is that statisticians allegedly provide insight into why they use certain distributions, etc.
18:46
what are you trying to accomplish?
they do. sometimes they parrot their advisors, some of whom are parroting other people. but sometimes they know more than they let on.
@copper.hat I'm just aiming to get a discrete probability distribution. That's all it is.
so you are trying to find some probability measure on $1,...,n$ that is 'closest' to your noisy observation?
But you don't want to just add arbitrary things to make things add up to $1$. You could leave them all the same except fix the last one?
@copper.hat Yes, that's basically it
18:48
Closest in what sense?
$L^2$?
@Clarinetist I don't see that adding a new random variable into the mix is any different than shifting and possibly scaling the data so that it sums to $1$
Sure, it could be $L^2$. It doesn't matter as long as I get some sort of probability distribution.
sounds like a projection of sorts
You would think that people have run into this problem before
Presumably my suggestion is bad. Fix just the last one. It seems very not least-squares.
18:49
the space of distributions is a compact convex set, so you could try minimising the Euclidean distant as a first shot
that is just projection
If I'm understanding what you're saying, this sounds like a Lagrange multiplier problem
not even, basically projecting onto a simplex.
He's just doing normal equations projection.
i mean, it is Lagrange in some way.
You want to project your given data set onto the affine linear subspace $\sum x_i = 1$.
Yes, of course, orthogonal projection is a Lagrange multipliers problem. I even work it out that way in my multivariable book as a second approach.
18:54
Gosh, I wish that my linear algebra course actually taught projections. I got a crash course in some of that theory in my early grad-school stats classes.
Time to get that book out
malpractice. check the statute of limitations and sue.
what is $n$ in your problem?
@copper.hat $n$ is about 800
just use a qp solver.
... I hope I don't have to think about computational complexity
18:57
if you are experimenting.
Great, thanks
@Clarinet: I do least squares (projections) both with normal equations and with Lagrange multipliers. If you're interested.
there are reasonably efficient solvers, especially for simplices, but if you are just trying use a qp.
@TedShifrin Your book is first on my list after this week is done, since I'll no longer be teaching or trying to pursue the PhD. My multivariate calculus foundation is much weaker than it should be.
there is an $O(n)$ solver for simplex projection
18:58
i used LAPACK. written in fortran 90, so you know it's good.
this is stuff from my past life.
When I took Calc. III, we learned from Stewart and used Maple for everything. I don't remember much from that class. I didn't truly understand double integration or partial differentiation until probability.
i long for it, but i needed to pay the rent.
actually it looks like the version i would have used was written in fortran 77.
To make matters worse, the analysis in $\mathbb{R}^n$ course I took was poorly taught... all I can remember from that class is spending a ton of time talking about Jordan content and rectangles
19:00
For this look specifically in chapter 5, section 5, @Clarinet.
there is a lot that can be said but probably does not need to be said about higher-dimensional integration without measure theory. jordan content indeed.
@Clarinetist few people have perfect knowledge :-)
i think it is better to focus on your interest and backfill as needed. learning without motivation is...
another waste of time, extreme generalization of the fundamental theorem of calculus. when being taught that, i remember suspecting that even analysts don't care about this and the instructor was just going there because it was a theorem that could be generalized.
not motivating to put it politely.
Yeah, I have very different motivation and a much more precise focus than I did nearly 10 years ago, that's for sure
19:03
there are only so many hours in the day.
and you cannot revisit yesterday.
excuse my patronising. i tell myself this everyday :-)
my cat is so upset that i finished my sandwich. i didn't leave her anything.
You are always selfish, leslie.
i told her that it's dogs, not cats, who beg for table scraps.
It is going to be different, to say the least, to adjust to learning without being enrolled in a class, but I'm looking forward to it
the cat is just pretending to be upset in some sort of Chomskyish experiment.
@Clarinetist it works for some, not for others. personally i need company.
19:05
I talk about volume 0 only to prove that continuous functions on regions with volume 0 frontier (boundary) will be integrable. This isn't a huge point, but is necessary for logical completeness.
Some cats are more canine in personality. Most of mine were.
The three subjects I'd like to at least have a basic foundation on before I do any further study toward my main interests are multivariate calc, optimization, and functional analysis.
Leslie will tutor you in functional analysis.
olivia greets us lavishly when we come home and begs for table scraps. and meows if she's shut out of a room where people are. i've tried telling her that cats are supposed to be aloof and not play these kinds of games.
i can recommend books at a minimum.
Yes, she probably likes snuggling, too.
yes, particularly with my wife. she's really a pest.
19:07
Questions like this distress me.
oh for heaven's sake.
She would snuggle your daughter if she didn't try to molest her so.
just the typography is enough for me.
this is why it's good that i don't run the world. i would jail people for asking questions like that.
to be fair, it can be a bit daunting unless you are used to the tricks. like cleaning a fish.
19:09
Bold facing the $n$ is in poor taste.
or dispatching a chicken.
No trick. Write down exactly what you need to show. I added a comment.
what psychopath writes the scalar to the right of the matrix.
@leslietownes I'm planning on using Sasane's A Friendly Approach to Functional Analysis and Kreysig's Intro text as my main texts, with Conway, and Stein and Shakarchi to supplement. Thoughts?
hey, at least she is trying to format.
19:09
Linear algebra is good for one-line proofs like this. But you have to read and write down definitions.
i'm an underdog person
clarinetist it is not orthodoxy to recommend it but i think peter lax's book on functional analysis, published approximately 20 years ago, is one of the best things ever written.
those books are good too.
my gripe with lax is that it is expensive.
I used to recommend Riesz-Nagy to beginners. I no longer own any of these books.
riesz-nagy is my second favorite. and it's cheap.
My linear algebra professor complained to me, while I was a student in her class, that students were generally not doing very well.

The only reason linear algebra made any sense to me whatsoever was because I typed up all of my notes and reworked all of the proofs on my own. That takes time.
19:12
a number of enterprising pirates appear to have scanned dr. lax's book. i guess it is expensive no longer.
Arrgh!
I keep forgetting to buy Riesz-Nagy. Going to put that on my Amazon list.
i remember when i bought it, i had some discount because of something else i'd bought. it appeared when i bought the book but had disappeared by the time it shipped. i emailed amazon asking what the hell with the two emails as attachments. the person gave me a nonanswer. i still shop on amazon. nobody learned anything from this.
Interestingly, my multivariable math students (who were smarter bears than the typical students) found the linear algebra easy and straightforward (by comparison with the hard analysis, of course), whereas when I taught plain linear algebra, most of the students struggled.
One I liked was Kolmogorov & Fomin, "Introductory Real Analysis", not too formal.
19:14
Russians are generally less formal, which is a strong point. Same with Shilov.
just a caveat, some older books assume Hilbert spaces are separable (so there is really just one).
but it appealed to the engineer in me.
there are no non separable hilbert spaces.
i mean OK there are but don't bring them up around polite company.
There must be one somewhere. Let me look under the rug.
Linear algebra was the difficult class among the actuarial science students.

For the math students, it was real analysis.
is aoc a politician or a religion?
i think many of these classes are difficult because one is learning stuff without a meaningful application or notion.
19:16
i got in a very unproductive email interchange once with someone who had 'proved' the existence of something. they were working on a decidedly non separable hilbert space with results that were known only to hold in separable hilbert spaces. he ended up publishing it but not in the journal i was reviewing for.
my thesis does contain a line, hilbert spaces are assumed to be separable unless otherwise noted, and it does not otherwise note any exceptions.
i'm happy to stay in my happy sandbox.
life is insufferably separable.
i knew him personally but was also anonymously reviewing his paper. it was confusing to wear two hats at once.
i wonder who he's bothering now.
I had to review submissions a few times of someone I knew very well (and who, sadly, wrote very badly). Ugh.
Thanks to you guys, I'm trying to post my $\epsilon$-revised version of the diff geo notes on the AMS Open Notes website. My password no longer gets me into the site. I hate having to bother website administrators, but ...
it's "StopTheStealMAGA2021"
BTW, @copper, thanks for your clear, incisive view of anakhro's question about repeatedly iterating flows.
Yeah, that would be a good password for me, leslie.
I had a website bookmarked at AMS that no longer works. So I think they messed it up in the 3 years since I posted there.
19:32
i've forgotten what it was about, or maybe you are pulling my leg
No, no, not at all. Remember he was "flowing" by $f$, then by $g$, then by $f$, etc. ad nauseam.
i remember that. vaguely.
Damn, I'm the oldest here and my memory is not so bad.
Wait til dementia sets in.
if i start popping up here and repeating myself about how bad geometry is, we'll all know it's happened.
You already do that plenty.
19:36
i need a memory. i had to chase back through the transcript...
my short term memory is genuinely terrible. i blame the daughter. i also blame geometry.
@leslietownes My wife and I could tell that having a small child lowered the IQ by at least 20 points.
Well, @copper, I meant my thanks sincerely, but in the future I will skip it :P
@TedShifrin oh, i appreciate it very much.
@copper.hat who needs a memory if we have a transcript?
19:39
:-)
Now if I can only find the transcript from the mid 80s... my wife and I have different clear recollections about things that happened.
Oy vey.
Nothing all that important, so we can pretty much ignore it
but still, there may come a time.
i do like my daughter. she's very much me. she tells incoherent stories about animals as though they are breaking news and constantly changes the subject. last night she was on about the juncos, which are songbirds that live in a bush outside our house.
i used to keep a diary and found that my memory of events was quite different to what was recorded in terms of order.
verba volant, scripta manent
19:46
she told me the juncos had been in the house, and i said 'are you making that up?' and she said 'yes' with no shame and then kept on going about the juncos in the house.
she will be an effective litigator.
@Thorgott Do you know if integration can be defined categorically I believe that Lebesgue ntegration have categorification associated to it.
She has your gift of garbage gab, @leslie. Your wife will kick the both of you out.
Hi Karim
karim i do not know if this is relevant to your interest but it is possible to develop almost all of integration, down to the measure theoretical nonsense, in terms of linear functionals on function spaces. which seems the kind of abstract stuff you might be going for.
i don't think riesz and nagy do it this way although they certainly could have and would have known about it.
19:49
oh that is cool
Do you have reference for this stuff
maybe it's hard to get the completion of a measure space out of it, now that i think of it. if you're tossing in sets of measure zero that don't affect integration you might actually need measure theory.
here are some notes on measure and integration in locally compact spaces. math.berkeley.edu/~arveson/Dvi/rieszMarkov.pdf
It is not related to any of my thesis but it is just out of curiosity as I am studying algebraic geometry from Ravi Vakil so redoing category theory.
it largely but not entirely adopts that view.
i think rudin develops it that way for some limited context in functional analysis?
19:51
i've got some good notes somewhere.
rudin may have done. conway i think does.
The Daniell integral was the approach of Segal & Kunze. Although Segal was the worst lecturer I ever had, I sort of liked that approach.
in my thesis i got considerable 'pushback' from writing a linear functional as $\int f(x) \, d\mu(x)$ when $\mu$ was not a measure and the functional was not integration. i explained, i need to be able to talk about the variable and change it, and the integration notation is familiar to the audience.
the member of my committee said, "OK," in the back of his mind thinking "nobody will ever read this anyway."
segal is my mathematical great-grandfather. i should check that out. i never familiarized myself with the daniell integral.
19:56
Thanks @Thorgott
It avoids all the horrid measure theory.
measure theory is the junkyard of mathematics. right next door to geometry.
Nowhere close. Good thing it's lunch time for this bonzo. Bubye.
enjoy your lunch.
i think i've met tom leinster.
Enjoy your lunch Ted
19:58
such a small world.
there's only about ten people, and you just go back and forth between them until someone files for divorce and then it's nine people.
Cool I would love to have chat with him
I watched this lecture before youtube.com/…
it is a cool one
Leinster has some cool stuff
one day I will find the time to read his paper on self-similarity
you've being saying that since inception
i'll read a paper about the paper about a paper on self-similarity
hopefully there is a contraction in there somewhere
20:21
i'm on an endless call. endless. could have been two emails.
still trying to figure out why it cost \$25 to wire $1.4k to the uk. really, in this day & age
well, at least 25 pigeons were involved, each of them needs $1 in birdseed.
it makes sense to me.
:-). maybe i can get a 10 pack or something. they used to waive these sorts of fees. what is the world coming to?
20:55
pigeons gotta eat, man. i dunno what to tell you.
the whole fbar/fatca thing really screwed up banking in ireland/uk.

« first day (3918 days earlier)      last day (1398 days later) »