« first day (3816 days earlier)      last day (1219 days later) » 

6:00 PM
choose the ones not containing the words "dynamic" or "system"
 
Dynamical Systems III would be a bit ambitious anyways since I did not do dynamical systems I or II
 
lol
reminds me of when I wanted to take Algebraic Geometry this semester, but then I realized it's Algebraic Geometry III and I haven't heard I or II
 
Although I have a tendency of taking lectures where I did not formally learn the prereqs
Needless to say, it's made lectures much harder
@Thorgott how did that work out
 
well, I didn't take it, that's how it worked out
 
ok yeah, if you literally write it down $1 -y = 0$ so $y = 1$, but if you were to do $(\Bbb Z / 2 \Bbb Z)[y] / (y)$, you'd write down $y = 0$ so $1 - y = 1 - 0 = 1$
 
6:03 PM
@Thorgott nice
 
@BigSocks yup
 
@Thorgott random dynamical systems might actually be interesting though
 
awesome, thanks again @Thorgott
 
and hopefully not exactly like usual dynamical systems
 
inb4 it's just a regular dynamical systems lecture, but they assemble the topics in an order dictated by dice rolls
 
6:05 PM
lmao
 
"And todays random dynamical system iiis....."
 
There's lottery where we'll talk about some random dynamical system
@Thorgott hahaha great idea
 
right, they should hire me
 
... you'd actually have to talk about the dynamical systems though
 
*rolls totally unbiased dice*
"...and todays topic is modelling dynamical systems in higher categories."
 
6:11 PM
is that... possible?
I think it's more of a meme... gotta be
 
uhhh the category people have some seminar on applied category theory that tries to do exactly that
and it is quite a meme
 
tfw "both" is the answer
 
@user2103480 JUST DO IT
 
@AlessandroCodenotti lmao
 
yeah, so let me briefly explain why smooth topoi are the right setting for studying differential equations.... furiously waves hands around and throws chalk through the hall
 
6:14 PM
lel
 
nlab at its best
first two articles are in russian
 
jfc it's real
 
I really hope they will get some useful results out of this in the next ten years, else I'll be mad that all this received funding
 
6:16 PM
lmao
ive been outdone by reality
 
@user2103480 Dynamical systems are nice
 
Session 10 (Jan 29th, 14:00 UTC): Parallelism: Parallel composition, symmetric monoidal categories.
Office Hours (Jan 30th)
Session 11 (Feb 1st, 18:00 UTC): Feedback: Feedback, trace, duals.
Session 12 (Feb 3rd, 14:00 UTC): Duals, compact closed categories.
.... yes engineers will definitely be able to appreciate symmetric monoidal categories....
poor blokes
 
If $\pi: E\rightarrow M$ is a vector bundle with connection $\nabla$, $p\in M$ and $X_p\in T_pM$ and $s,t\in \Gamma(E)$ and $s$ and $t$ agree on some smooth curve through $p$ with initial vector $X_p$, how do I show that $\nabla_{X_p}s=\nabla_{Y_p}t$?
 
lol
 
6:20 PM
Abstract
Effective interoperation between multiple scientific disciplines is crucial to systems engineering.
Can the study of interoperabilitythe working negotiations and hand-offs between theories and
modelsitself be made into a hard science? Hard sciences are based on mathematics, so this would
require a mathematics of interoperability, a mathematics whose subject consists of the bridges
and analogies that make data- and model-integration actually work. I propose that category
theory serves this purpose exceptionally well.
I think "outdone by reality" is an understatement
 
glorious
 
Cannot top this
"David Jaz Myers. Double Categories of Open Dynamical Systems"
 
"Richard Statman. Products in a category with
only one object
"
 
any have any idea?
 
oh dang that's twitter category people
 
6:24 PM
"Callum Reader. Measures and Enriched
Categories"
that one sounds good
 
@BigSocks one of my weirdest observation in the last few months was that there is a twitter transgender category theorist bubble
 
yep, I have definitely noticed that
 
I'm surprised that the intersection of these groups of people numbers in more than one digit
 
idk how the intersection of those things is so large but yes-
wow there you go
 
@Thorgott that's why it's so weird
I've found a random dynamical systems lecture in frankfurt and it looks nothing like a normal dynamical systems lecture
... perfect
 
6:32 PM
who's lecturing
 
Hans Crauel
 
ah, I don't know him
 
You took one probability course right
 
ye
 
probably chose the right point to stop
 
6:43 PM
i also TAd probability for compsci students once
that sure was an experience
 
oh boy they always wonder why they need to learn the stuff
I TA'd for "mathematics for computer scientists and mathematics educators" once
... even the computer scientists were better than the teachers
@AlessandroCodenotti yeah I plan to take that RDS course
 
@TedShifrin could I have a hint? without using connection matrix
 
So I get why $\Bbb Z[\sqrt 5] / (2) \cong \Bbb F_2[y]/(y - 1)^2$, but what am I supposed to think of what $\Bbb Z[ \sqrt 5] / (2) \Bbb Z[ \sqrt 5]$ is ?
 
but the other lectures are interesting as well. Tbh nonlinear functional analysis looks like it's "just fixed point theorems", which is of course an understatement, but probably more something that one learns when one needs to
 
@user2103480 you know, there's a competence hierarchy
 
6:49 PM
the lecture on functional analysis applied to modelling of molecular systems has a past website userpage.fu-berlin.de/dellesite/famolmod.html
@Thorgott yeh and math education students seem to be far far down
 
at the bottom, there are the Wirtschaftspädagogen
 
lmao
but the problems seem to be fun
check this out, from a master's lecture for elementary school teachers
 
lecture I was once in: "Ich glaube, wir haben auch Wirtschaftspädagogen unter uns. Wer hier studiert Wirtschaftspädagogik? Ok, sie müssen sich auch nicht outen."
 
lool
this one had me cracking up
there is exactly ONE obvious extension of the preceding figure, which has symmetry group Z_2
 
hahahaahahaha
 
6:54 PM
and as a lecturer at a german university this is just ridiculous
 
this is extremely funny, because I thought about this recently as well
 
a friend asked me if I could help a a friend of theirs with this sheet
The teaching student didnt react to the symbol at all, sad
But it's the "wrong" direction anyways (or, rather, it's the right direction if you don't want to be fired)
 
@user2103480 nice
 
@Thorgott what lecture was that?
 
some elementary algebra lecture, I forgot which
@user873110 did you see my recommendation?
 
7:01 PM
anybody here have a clue what invariant measures for PDE do, or stochastic homogenisation
 
yeah
 
both things seem to come from the deterministic theory of PDE, rather than from stochastic ODE/PDE
 
@user2103480 wait the picture I have in mind which would be inappropriate for a German university in particular can be rotated by 90 degrees too
 
you saw exercise b) right
Oh wait
 
7:09 PM
you mean... another Z right next to the Z?
fucking hell
ah wrong direction again
smart
 
huh, I don't follow?
 
smart symbol
 
I'm thinking about an ancient religious symbol
 
ok now I'm lost too, do you just mean the svastika or another appropriated ancient religious symbol
 
the swastika
 
7:11 PM
that was the joke all along tho
 
@user2103480 but the symmetry group is not Z_2
It can be rotated 90 degrees
 
it's supposed to be Z_4
 
That's my point
 
yeah yeah but exercise b) asks for symmetry group Z_4
 
siegrunen don't work, they have symmetry group Z_2xZ_2, no?
 
7:15 PM
true, I was just perplexed that his is also not far away
 
thought I reached my low point that time I started talking about the automorphism group of an among us map, but good to know one can always do worse
 
hahahaha
 
Do you guys have any mathematical expressions that you consider particularly "beautiful?" Someone close to me has been asking about that sort of stuff
 
@Rithaniel $K_p=\langle R_p(u,v,v),u\rangle$
gaussian curvature
 
7:25 PM
Oh, that's a good one
 
x(t) = ((-46/31 sin(170/113 - 11 t) - 230/29 sin(67/43 - 10 t) - 39/29 sin(47/30 - 8 t) - 364/23 sin(14/9 - 6 t) - 5503/128 sin(25/16 - 4 t) - 135/26 sin(29/19 - 3 t) - 4563/28 sin(47/30 - 2 t) + 7685/27 sin(t + 107/68) + 34/31 sin(5 t + 52/31) + 187/26 sin(7 t + 107/68) + 17/7 sin(9 t + 13/8) + 27/17 sin(12 t + 136/29) - 19995/26) θ(63 π - t) θ(t - 59 π) + (-2/9 sin(124/83 - 24 t) - 24/23 sin(61/40 - 20 t) - 16/31 sin(70/51 - 19 t) - 31/17 sin(20/13 - 18 t) - 7/6 sin(25/16 - 14 t) - 100/13 sin(67/43 - 6 t) - 9259/35 sin(58/37 - t) + 4638/37 sin(2 t + 41/26) + 1327/30 sin(3 t + 19/12) + 377
 
Maybe a little long
 
still very beautiful
here's an easier visualization
 
beautiful
 
thank you :-)
 
I AM THE GLOBGLO-GRAPH-GALAB
Well look who we have here... @TedShifrin
 
@BigSocks a particularly beautiful mathematical expression
 
indeed!
 
Free online grad intro course to elliptic curves taught by Álvaro Lozano-Robledo, following Silverman's book, and only assuming a year of grad abstract algebra.
 
ooo
thank you, looks nice
 
7:49 PM
@mathsresearcher You have a typo. You mean $Y_p=X_p$, of course. So it suffices to take a section that's zero along the curve and see that its covariant derivative is $0$ along the curve. Presumably you want to multiply by an arbitrary function. Have you tried working this out?
It's merely an illusion, @BigSocks.
@mathsresearcher That's "particularly beautiful"?
 
hmm it seems to be fooling me... wanna see another cool illusion? check out my new picture
 
No, it gives me nightmares.
 
hahahaha understandable
 
Are you in fact local?
 
@BigSocks There's preliminary talk posted today on YouTube. xD
 
7:52 PM
no, no- I'm closer to the other coast. But you can still think of me as a giant pair of socks you see floating over the sunset
currently in Puerto Rico if you'd believe a pair of socks
 
should've said you're global
 
agh, what a missed opportunity lmao
@NoName I will likely listen to it once I take a break from these funny ideals
thank you
 
@Thor: He's global, but he vanishes when you restrict him to local.
 
8:06 PM
ok wait then does that mean that I am a $C^\infty$ hypersurface?
1
Q: Local description of smooth functions that are zero on a hypersurface.

JZSWe say that $\Sigma \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ is a $C^\infty$ hypersurface if and only if, for all $p \in \Sigma$, there exists an open neighborhood $U_p \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ containing $p$ and a smooth function $f_p : U\to \mathbb{R}$ with $\nabla f_p \neq 0$ on $U_p$ such that $$ U_p \cap \Sigma...

 
hey @TedShifrin, I ran into a situation that you hinted at yesterday. same problem of finding the jordan basis but for a different matrix, and the system $(A - \lambda I)q_i = q_{i-1}$ didn't have a solution. but again I am having difficulty so I'd like to run this past you to see if there are any obvious problems with my reasoning

again there is only one eigenvalue $\lambda=3$, but with two blocks of sizes $3$ and $1$. the kernel of $A - 3 I$ is two-dimensional, so I have two eigenvectors immediately. one is for the 3-sized block, and the other is for the 1-sized block, so I called them $
 
tried some google-fu, given my algebraicGeometry-fu needs some work
 
8:47 PM
@jcora You did not take the time to understand what I was saying yesterday. You didn't do the exercise of understanding why $\text{im}(A-\lambda I) = N(A-\lambda I)$ in the case of yesterday. Today, you have to look at $\text{im}(A-3I)^2$. You cannot pick eigenvectors at random.
 
@TedShifrin if its not DG its not beautiful
 
9:00 PM
@TedShifrin hm I thought I understood what was happening yesterday, but I guess not since I don't remember that I was supposed to see those two were equal:/
I thought what you were saying was that I might run into a situation where I can't generate generalized eigenvectors easily with $(A-\lambda I)q_i = q_{i-1}$ because that system might not have a non-trivial solution
 
9:29 PM
ah I think I got something, I didn't ensure my generalized eigenvectors, the ones I picked from the difference of the kernels, actually correspond to the eigenvector in the sense that $A-\lambda I$ relates them. so I'm guessing I ought to start from $q_3$ and get to $q_1$, and it's not guaranteed that I'll get one of the basis vectors for $\ker(A-\lambda I)$ that I found originally
 
9:47 PM
there are times when i look at someone's question and I just want to be like "...what?"
 
10:03 PM
@Semiclassical me looking at the new problem sheet
 
10:28 PM
what are the categories that have bijective homomorphisms as isomorphisms?
I think Ab and RMod are examples of this, and Top and the category of varieties and (dominant) regular maps are nonexamples
 
@jcora Right. So you need to find an eigenvector that is in the image of $(A-\lambda I)^2$. This is the logic I suggested yesterday.
 
you're asking for concrete categories where the forgetful functor reflects isos
an interesting example is the category of Banach spaces and continuous linear maps
the inverse of a continuous linear bijection is automatically linear for trivial reasons, but it is also automatically continuous - that's the Bounded Inverse Theorem
 
eyyy concrete, that's the word. that means that isos are actually on the underlying sets right? reflecting forgetful functor I mean
 
sees functors doing evil things and flees
 
hahaha nooo
 
10:44 PM
a concrete category is just a category together with a faithful functor to Set, an iso in Set is just a bijection and for the functor to reflect isos means that if the image of a morphism is an iso, then that morphism is an iso, i.e. bijective (on the underlying set) morphisms are isos
 
ok this makes a lot of sense, I worded it like crap. bad to talk to people irl and phrase math. Thank you
 
any algebraic category (in a sense that can be made precise) has the property you're looking for
it usually fails in categories of topological flavor, as you say
 
I am interested to learn more of this stuff what does it mean that image of morphism is an isomorphism in precise terms
 
algebraic ones are my favorite. they have free objects and free $\dashv$ forgetful functor is a monad
 
\turnstile?
 
10:47 PM
mb
 
adjoint?
 
apparently it is dashv yeah
logic-poisoned-brain
 
no comments
 
oh so whenever you have some clearly defined adjoint that turns out to be isomorphism
 
hahaha T e D
 
10:48 PM
also, though this is just juggling terminology, any concrete balanced category has your property
 
then the morphism is isomorphism in what is called reflexive category ?
 
no, I love that, I want more of these words
 
@BigSocks shouldn't $\vdash$ be the logic-poisoned brain
 
yes, but calling the right one "turnstile" no matter what I think also counts lol
 
compact Hausdorff spaces are one of the rare categories coming from topological spaces where this holds too
also the category of fiber bundles over a fixed base has this property
 
10:50 PM
yeah but "compact Hausdorff" is like a god property and that gives you everything forever
 
also I am writing all these down for later rabbit holes for procrastinating
 
I guess you can also combine the two to get the category of fiber bundles over compact Hausdorff spaces, which also has this proeprty
 
Hi @TedShifrin
I will look at this stuff later for procrastinating as well.
 
hi Karim
 
10:52 PM
well, in the non-algebraic examples given, these properties are slightly less trivial and actually very important in practice, so they're worth thinking about
 
Yeah I know most of non-algebraic ones and examples mentioned though not in the language of category theory.
I am gonna get this book should have everything I guess
brb
 
11:07 PM
oh, there's a classic example that I forgot to mention
the category of first-countable Hausdorff spaces whose morphisms are continuous proper maps also has this property
 
yeah gunna have to brush up on topology for that one
 
don't do it, it's stupid
 
lol I believe that
 
the category of simply connected Hausdorff spaces and proper local homeomorphisms between them also has this property
I should stop with the silly examples
 
Isn't the entire conversation stupid?
 
11:19 PM
Ted wins
 
bows to Edward
 
lmao
 
@TedShifrin why do you hate categories, what did they do to you
 
I generally dislike formalism.
 
mmm I take it you're a platonist
 
11:23 PM
you should at least acknowledge that I actually gave the instructive examples first :P
 

« first day (3816 days earlier)      last day (1219 days later) »