« first day (3732 days earlier)      last day (1298 days later) » 
00:00 - 15:0015:00 - 00:00

3:00 PM
@BalarkaSen speaks the mutant
@Anush yes, that'd be the set of functions from the empty set to {0,1}
Which is the power set of the empty set so {ø}
 
im a mere mortal
i can only apply the gromomorphism functor
 
@user2103480 {ø} makes sense, thanks
 
For a representation $(\pi, V)$ of $G$, the span of $\lbrace \pi(g)v : g\in G\rbrace$ for some fixed non-zero $v \in V$ is a $G$-invariant subspace of $V$ and if $V$ is irreducible then this is all of $V$. What if I pick $v \in V^{K}\setminus{0}$ and take the span of $\lbrace \pi(g)v : g \in G/K \rbrace$?
Actually it's obvious
but I couldn't word it to myself
the action of $K$ fixes $v$ so the only elements that do anything non-trivial are those not in $K$ so one can span the whole of $V$ by $\pi(g)v$ with $g \in G/K$
aight cleared it up to myself thanks chat
 
@BalarkaSen your knowledge is waaaay more useful. Foundations knowledge is nice to flex on mathematicians and philosophers alike, but hardly useful for anything remotely close to the "real world"
 
yeah i will switch to data science whilst all of you category theorists struggle to get tenure
thats what matters at the end
 
3:08 PM
Joke's on you, you'll be dragged into corporate bullshit and train linear regressions on steroids
 
lmao
 
Just get tenure and then do your own math research
 
I'mma do a mathematical biology PhD and sit in some government bureau doing mediocre research for half your pay
That's my dream job
 
I'm an applied mathematician here going "wuuut" at all the previous comments
interesting how you don't hear the word "statistics" from the corporate types anymore
 
I had a graph theorist lecturer during my undergrad who randomly started doing loads of research in design theory and then left to get a job in industry
 
3:11 PM
it's all data science this, data analytics whatever
 
@EdwardEvans lmao
@Alexandru yeah data science is the new normal
 
he was like
 
the only things I'm gonna apply are functors and my tears to the corner
 
big data
 
quick publish some applied shit
 
3:12 PM
ah yes big data another one
lol Edward
 
machine learning neural networks BIG DATA
 
lol lol
add "in a real business setting" at the end
 
@EdwardEvans I respect that though. Graph theory requires a kind of creativity that I lack
 
@AlexandruIonut hahah
 
On Applied (\infty,1)-Topos Theory
 
3:13 PM
@user2103480 that but with any kind of mathematics
tbf
I could just
take a course on crypto and then be like "yeah number theory" and maybe get a job reading Hilary Clinton's emails or smth
 
lmfao yeah man easily
 
Crypto is my plan B
 
@EdwardEvans well yeah but I could have imagined doing set theory and a bit of logic till the end of days and I think I wouldn't have been too bad at it
 
if I do manage to get a PhD position then I would probably have been in Germany for long enough to shed my British citizenship and take German citizenship and then work for the BND
I mean, post PhD
 
Edward Hackerman Evans
 
3:16 PM
@user2103480 I don't understand the appeal of set theory
 
cranks up those discriminants
to hack into people's mailboxes
 
@BalarkaSen disruptive techonologies
 
rofl
Hackerman
grow a mullet and buy some aviators
 
The field combined being abstruse and weirdly intuitive for me such that, if it was still fashionable, I think that would have worked out better than other fields
@EdwardEvans yaaaayy....
 
I just like the fact that number theory sounds retarded to the layperson
 
3:18 PM
😂
 
like at least in other fields you have names that sound technical or smth
 
what doesn't
 
but number theory sounds dumb
 
Oh no I failed the corona test
Meaning that it's negative
Sike
 
Lol
 
3:18 PM
nice congrats
 
Congrats
 
that goes on your zeugnis
5,0 in Corona
 
fucc
 
@Edward
 
you only get a 1,0 if you die
 
3:18 PM
People who see "number theory" on your CV probably understand "I like counting"
 
@BalarkaSen ohno
 
@EdwardEvans worth
 
will I not sound retarded when I go to a layperson and tell them I'm currently trying to write down the pseudo-2-adjunction describing the process of freely adjoining coproducts to a category
 
Nah man you'll just sound like a nerd
 
even I think I sound retarded
 
3:19 PM
@BalarkaSen such a disheartening state of affairs
 
Yeah, you'd be the tech guy that solves super complicated problems in films while speaking gibberish
 
lolol
 
You sound retarded to a mathematician since you talk about categories
2
 
hahaha then hit your keyboard really fast and change your PC theme to black background with green text
 
3:21 PM
looool
amazing
 
lmao that's great
@user2103480 ooooof
 
@BalarkaSen us
 
@BalarkaSen lmfao
 
sorry to do it to ya
 
3:26 PM
@BalarkaSen if only TDA would actually be useful in business applications
 
yeah TDA is pretty darn cool
 
TDA ?
 
ok, I successfully convinced myself that if $U\in V$ are two Grothendieck universes, the 2-category of all $U$-categories, functors and natural trafos is a $V$-category
 
im sure some companies will pay you for it though
 
back to the interesting stuff
 
3:27 PM
@BalarkaSen this talk might be interesting to you
 
lol at "trafo"
 
@Thorgott this might be interesting to you
data on a torus
manifold learnin
 
tl;dr is that the topology of the pattern in which orientation cells in mouse brains fire might be a torus, consistently across different shapes of the environment
 
yeah i have seen this in Gunnar Carlsson's papers i think
its ok ill just do catastrophe theory and psychology
 
3:31 PM
It was known that this is the case for a simple square shaped environment
 
ahhhhhhhhhh, applications
 
@BalarkaSen people dont want to admit it but the reason we are so bad at mathematical biology is that it's too hellishly complicated
 
yeah man we humans understand neither math nor biology
how can we understand math biology
medical science found a new human organ like yesterday
science is a scam
 
@BalarkaSen Really ?
 
yeah
lol
 
3:34 PM
Got a link ?
 
the based department
 
a fucking 2 inch big salivary gland up your throat
its in new york times
 
yeah, but have we discovered a new finite simple group
 
look it up
 
I wonder if there is a more inference orientated application of TDA. Its seems to be quite static and boring
 
3:36 PM
Is it more than journalistic sensationalism ?
 
Noice its true
 
but nonetheless powerful
 
@Astyx yup seems like it
 
@Thorgott It turns out there's another group of order 6
 
lmao
imagine
 
3:37 PM
damn, show me
 
Using science, scientists have scientifically found a new organ thanks to science
8
 
I've converted to balarkas and alessandros religion
Finite groups dont exist
Except for a point
 
@Daniel i imagine you can do something like that; i mean you can always say a certain data set is from a certain shape and then hypothesis test based on the persistent betti numbers
oh i see what you mean
yeah maybe you need to pick points from a distribution concentrated around your shape
idk how to say "points are from a given shape but upto a normal fudge"
 
actually, infinite groups don't exist
except $S^1$, I like $S^1$
 
numbers dont exist
-thorgott, 2020
finally a geometer
 
3:41 PM
Reject numbers, return to coming up with consistent axioms
 
Woops sorry I had to leave for a moment
 
numbers? you mean isomorphism classes of compact objects in $\mathbf{Set}$?
 
Is the universes stuff sorted out?
 
yeah, I convinced myself it works out, I think
 
There's this french guy who claims to be the one to have solved the Collatz conjecture, and he posted like a 30 minutes long video explaining why he should be the one the honors go to
 
3:43 PM
@Thorgott good
 
collatz is the dumbest open problem in mathematics
 
now I'm trying to figure out the difference between biadjunction and pseudoadjunction
 
it looks like someone noticed it while making the next IMO exam
 
The fun thing is he didn't bring a proof, he just says that he should be the one remembered as the first to solve it, but without giving a proof
 
I have solved the weak Collatz conjecture, which states that if you start with a natural number, half it if it's even and multiply it by three and add one if it's odd, you obtain a sequence of numbers
The strong Collatz conjecture crucially relies on this result
 
3:48 PM
lol
 
oh fuck fuck fuck, I think I actually have to work with 3-categories
someone save m
 
ncatlab can be so silly sometimes. Is a 2-morphism simply morphism between morphisms?
 
I think that depends on how you define higher categories
 
4:07 PM
hey chat
 
hi
 
given that I have the invariant factors of an operator $T$ (i.e., if $V = \bigoplus_{j=1}^n C_T(v_j)$ as in the cylic decomposition and I know how the minimal polynomials $m_{v_j}$ look like), can I find a Jordan decomposition for $T$?
 
Actually i was thinking the other day, is there an equivalent notion for graphs. I.e. one can get a graph from another by letting the vertices be nodes in the new ones, etc.
 
@BalarkaSen easy. Just sample from the normal manifold distribution whose mean your manifold is
>implying this thing exists
But I've seen definitions of random manifolds, and would like to go through those some day
 
Maybe TDA could tell you what samples you can't have given that you know a set of them.
 
 
1 hour later…
5:15 PM
@BalarkaSen en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…. this seems to be a metric on riemannian manifolds
but I have no clue whether the corresponding space is separable. If yes that would be a first step for a manifold-valued random variable
For a hilbert space of manifolds, one could just apply the theory of gaussian measures on hilbert spaces
But how the hell do you define addition of manifolds
 
connected sum?
unless you want an actual group structure
 
@Thorgott this
 
Hmm I'm not sure about manifolds, but there are notions like "the (standard) Borel space of Polish spaces"
 
pass to the grothendieck group lol
 
5:37 PM
Can we apply binomial expansion on infinitesimal
 
Hello, I have a question about representing bounded linear functionals by signed measure with control statement.
What I've tried is to present the bounded linear functional Lambda by difference of two nonngative bounded linear functionals Lambda^+ and Lambda^-, but I failed to control the measure decomposition. Any ideas or thoughts? I may post this on the community if I have further progress. Thank you.
 
6:05 PM
whats the domain of lambda. just some normed vector space? banach?
Ah uh
f are continuous functions on [0,1]?
with sup norm
 
hi! any numerical analysts here?
 
6:25 PM
uh
wtf is that
like analysis ?
 
numerical analysis
 
i googled it might be bale to help you out, whats the question
 
1
Q: Asymptotics for 2 Humbert series special forms

Alexandru IonutI have 2 Humbert seriers special forms that arise in a quantum physics problem. $a$ and $x$ are real. $$\phi_1(1+ia,ia,ia+3/2;1/2,ix)$$ $$\phi_2(ia,-ia,1/2;ix,-ix)$$ I want to find asymptotic expansions when $x \to \infty$ in order to compute precise approximations when x is sufficiently large.

 
i dont understand the notation of the maps lol.
 
In mathematics, Humbert series are a set of seven hypergeometric series Φ1, Φ2, Φ3, Ψ1, Ψ2, Ξ1, Ξ2 of two variables that generalize Kummer's confluent hypergeometric series 1F1 of one variable and the confluent hypergeometric limit function 0F1 of one variable. The first of these double series was introduced by Pierre Humbert (1920). == Definitions == The Humbert series Φ1 is defined for |x| < 1 by the double series: Φ 1 ( a , b , c ; x ,...
 
6:31 PM
I'd try using the faber-schauder system (a schauder basis for C[0,1]) to define the signed measure on [0,1]
 
Are you sure the first series is even defined when $|x|>1 $?
 
the special form I am concerned with has x=1/2 so it converges
sorry some confusion there
 
So the $x \to \infty $ is for the second series then>
 
it also converges
 
Sorry im not going to be able to help you lol. its intresting though what kind fo physics problem does it show up in?
 
6:34 PM
Landau-Zener
 
Interesting ^^
 
7:11 PM
@Ted Shifrin hià
 
7:26 PM
Well this is a relief retractionwatch.com/2020/10/22/…
2
 
lol what
 
@rschwieb That is at least something. Though I still find it highly improper that it was published at all
Any peer reviewer with the background to be asked to review the paper should have spotted the problem immediately
 
8:11 PM
ok, so if we find a finite measure \lambda such that \Lambda is L^2([0,1], Borels,\lambda)-bounded on the space of continuous functions.

Then, since the continuous bounded functions are dense in that space, we can extend \Lambda onto that L^2 space. This means that its extension is a bounded linear functional on that hilbert space and hence by riesz, there is a function g such that \Lambda(f) = integral over [0,1] of f(x)g(x) \lambda(dx)
 
This guy must have a degree from Tromp University.
 
Then we take g(x) as the density of the signed measure that we actually want
 
@TedShifrin Or even more likely, a university sporting his own name and distinguished by the fact all the staff and its most famous graduate are the same person.
 
sounds like my university
 
And obtain that \Lambda(f) = integral over [0,1] of f(x)g(x) \lambda(dx) = integral over [0,1] of f(x) \mu(dx)
 
8:16 PM
Yeah, but his defensive pugilism based on delusion sounds like he learned from the master.
Hi, @Alexandru.
 
The problem is finding that finite measure \lambda for which |\Lambda(f)| \leq D*int_[0,1] |f|^2 d\lambda
 
Dollar signs would be helpful.
 
@TedShifrin Maybe he's got a dayjob in the administration. Hard to understand how he'd stay employed elsewhere.
 
@TedShifrin but latex formatting is not automatic here, is it?
 
8:20 PM
Well, he claims to be allied to Oxford.
 
dollar signs make it readable for everyone who's got the formatting tool, but even less readable for the others
 
@TedShifrin I posted a question on the mainsite finally. Do you know any numerical analysts or special function people?
 
@user2103480 have you ever come a across a pdf that when integrated on it's support is an integral transform?
 
Everyone here uses the tool. See the link on the upper right if you're on a computer.
Not here personally, @Alexandru.
 
I have am at an impass in quite a weird niche right now.
 
8:24 PM
@geocalc33 Uhhh i dont know much about integral transforms
 
$F(s)=\int_0^{\infty} x^{s-1}f(x)~dx$ is an example of an integral transform
I guess I'm wondering if there are any examples of known probability distributions, that are also well-known integral transforms...
 
8:39 PM
*I am at an impass... (weird typo up there)
 
*probability distributions when integrated over their support rather
 
8:52 PM
@geocalc33 Can't you just define one exactly like that?
 
@user2103480 yeah, that's a good point, I'm just trying to come up with a good example
I need to choose an $f(x)$ s.t. the kernel is a known pdf
I guess $f(x)=x$ would work
then the kernel would be $x^{s}.$ And I could tweak the bounds of integration to be $0,1$
 
9:12 PM
is it possible that two real matrices are similar over $\mathbb{C}$ but not over $\mathbb{R}$?
 
good question
 
@LucasHenrique real matrices?
 
matrices with real entries
 
The answer is no.
 
my professor's book has an exercise asking for us two non-similar real matrices like this...
 
9:22 PM
Here's a hint. If $E$ is a field ext of $F$ can the gcd if $f(x),g(x)$ in $E[x]$ be different from that in $F[x]$?
 
what i thought: similar over $\mathbb{C} \iff$ same Jordan form. if I could compare the real Jordan forms...
@TedShifrin nope
 
The prof messed up.
 
@TedShifrin I don't get it. :/
 
You are rightl the prof is wrong .
 
Hi guys - wondering if someone can help me.
The number of items bought by people entering a shop is random variable X that has a geometric starting at 0 with mean 0.6. Find the value of the parameter p of the geometric distribution and write down the p.g.f of X.

So E(X) = 𝑞/𝑝 which can equal 1-p/p =0.6. I think the answer to p is 0.375, how is this answer worked out?
 
9:30 PM
@TedShifrin, I mean: how does that imply that they are similar?
 
never mind guys got it, thanks.
 
@LucasHenrique the question you're asking is equivalent to the following: if $L/K$ is a field extension, let $V$ and $W$ be $K[x]$-modules, finite-dimensional over $K$. Then does $L \otimes_K V \cong L \otimes_K W$ as $L[x]$-modules imply $V \cong W$ as $K[x]$-modules? Noting that $L[x] =L \otimes_K K[x]$, we may replace $K[x]$ by any $K$-algebra $A$. and ask the same question.
This is answered positively by the Noether-Deuring theorem: if $L \otimes_K V \cong L \otimes_K W$ as $L \otimes_K A$-modules, then $V \cong W$ as $A$-modules
 
maybe I could use stuff easier than module theory
the rational form of a matrix
 
9:46 PM
@LukasHeger Galois descent?
 
@LeakyNun there are no restrictions on $L/K$
 
aha
wie gibt's?
ich hab' nicht dich gesehen hier fur eine lange Zeit
 
mir ging es zwischendrin nicht so gut, aber jetzt wieder besser
if $L/K$ is finite, say of degree $n$, then there's a nice proof of Noether-Deuring: use restriction of scalars on the isomorphism $L \otimes_K V \cong L \otimes_K W$ to get an isomorphism of $A$-modules $V^n \cong W^n$. This implies that $V$ and $W$ have the same indecomposable factors with the same multiplicity by Krull-Schmidt
 
are $V$ and $W$ finite over $A$?
 
you need them to be finite-dimensional over $K$, even
 
9:56 PM
this feels like rep theory
 
that's why they are of finite length and we can use Krull-Schmidt
you can call $V$ and $W$ representations of $A$ if you wish
of course $A=K[G]$ is a common application of this
 
yooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo @Lukas
 
hey @EdwardEvans
 
Nice to hear from you man
 
@LukasHeger werdest du her öfter kommen?
 
10:01 PM
hmm, mal schauen
 
Bist noch im Studium oder bist du kurz so "ausgestiegen"?
 
ich bin wieder im Studium
 
Okay freut mich :)
Was hast du dieses Semester vor?
 
meinen Bachelor endlich zuende bringen
ich muss noch so nervige Sachen wie Numerik oder Stochastik hören :D
 
Hahaha ja gut, macht auch Sinn
Hab auch vor kurzem herausgefunden, dass ich mindestens eine Vorlesung "angewandte Mathe" hören muss, was auch immer das ist
 
10:05 PM
was muss ich weissen, wenn ich in Deutschland PhD studieren will?
 
Wahrscheinlich weniger als du jetzt schon weißt
 
o, welcome back
 
@Lukas! We were worried about you!
 
hey @Ted
 
as in, what should I pay attention to
do's / don'ts
 
10:07 PM
yeah I went underground for a while
 
@Leaky probably best to ask @Alessandro as he recently applied, and was accepted, to a PhD program in Münster
 
danke
 
Gerne
Ich werde ihn auch fragen, da ich mich auch dort bewerben werde lol
 
hast du einmal ein CEFR test getan? @EdwardEvans
 
Glad to have you back! 😻
 
10:09 PM
@Leaky ja ich musste für die Zulassung zur Uni in Heidelberg eine Deutschprüfung machen
 
@TedShifrin hast du ein Katze?
@EdwardEvans was ist dein Niveau?
 
Angeblich C2
 
nice
 
Il y a longtemps j'avais plusieurs chats, mais pas maintenant.
 
warum nun nicht?
 
10:11 PM
@TedShifrin glad you just stuck to math chat then
 
it's possible to do a PhD in Germany without proving your German skills, though, there are some PhD students in Heidelberg with little German knowledge
 
@Lukas I'll be taking p-adic Hodge theory this semester T_T
 
oh wow
that's challenging for sure
 
yeah I'm a bit scared
I'm not sure what the content will be, but if it's some comparison between cohomology theories then I might be überfordert
The program isn't decided yet, so I guess I'll decide for sure when it's updated on Mampf
 
Just stuck, @Edward?
 
10:17 PM
@TedShifrin wait, what's the question?
 
@EdwardEvans That.
 
does not compute
 
@LeakyNun I think it's less of a terrible procedure than what I hear from the US and such
 
that's great
 
Do you already have a master's?
If not, you could also apply for berlin mathematical school which is more like a normal PhD program
you can apply in either case, which I'll probably do as well, but you get a financial stipend with BMS*

*not blue mountain state
 
10:22 PM
Shouldn't you get like TV E-13 as a PhD student anyway?
 
Yeh, but I mean during the master program as well
 
ah I see
I applied for BMS and got denied
so fuck berlin
(not bitter)
 
haha fair enough, corresponding to the PhD program that is more alike the US ones, the admission process is proportionally more annoying
I'm also just doing a normal master's
 
Also, berlin doesn't have much in algebraic number theory, do they?
 
10:32 PM
errr I think I remember there being a reasonable number of number theory courses
but I think they are more focussed on arithmetic geometry or smth
I don't remember
they're dead to me
 
hahahaha
 
Spectrum of Advanced Courses

The advanced courses regularly offered include Abelian Varieties, Algebraic Stacks, Arakelov Geometry, Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties, Class Field Theory, Complex and p-adic Hodge Theory, Elliptic Curves and Cryptography, Moduli Spaces, Shimura Varieties, Theory of Automorphic Forms.
 
https://agnes.hu-berlin.de/lupo/rds;jsessionid=997A1A6448222BBD22F31510A29653A5.angua_root?state=wtree&search=1&root120202=185123|180601|180709|175833&trex=step

HUs course catalogue is really solid this semester but not number theory, but they have serious geometry
 
were you supposed to be at HU?
 
nah, I'm at FU, but idc I do courses at all three as a nebenhörer
 
10:37 PM
ah nise
 
FU has algebra III this semester with

Course contents: a selection of the following topics

properties of morphisms (proper, projective, smooth)
divisors
(quasi-)coherent sheaves
cohomology
Hilbert functions
the Riemann-Roch Theorem
and algebraic K theory
 
algebra
 
as another lecture
but that's really it
https://www.math-berlin.de/academics/courses/advanced-courses

I love berlin
2 advanced algebra classes across three unis
 
I wonder why "Modular forms and applications" is in "Differential geometry, global analysis, and mathematical physics"
 
How can this be simplified? $\int_0^{\infty} e^{-x^s}dx+\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{n!} \zeta(-ns)$
 
10:40 PM
"Mathematical physics" just means math
 
@EdwardEvans I think it stems from the professors specialization
Interests: enumerative geometry, quantum
algebra/topology/geometry, topological recursion,
integrability, moduli spaces, algebraic structures in
QFT and strings, random matrix theory, combinatorics, science outreach.
 
"Science" "Outreach"
 
take that, algebra
 
lawl the single algebraic geometer at my previous uni insisted on his homepage that he was interested in mathematical physics and all of his research was pure category theory
I mean, the physics group at that uni was huge so maybe it was to get the job or smth idk
 
to be fair he does the course on integrable systems which does sound pretty interesting
Description: The course is an introduction to the theory of classical and quantum integrable systems. The classical part is concerned with constructing solutions of (systems of) non-linear PDEs ; the quantum part is concerned with the 'explicit' diagonalization of (family of) operators ; in both case, their 'integrability' means that there are miracles making these seemingly complicated problems solvable. These miracles are closely related to the existence of many (hidden) symmetries. This applies to a variety of models that are relevant in physics, including examples of non-linear wave pro
 
10:43 PM
the fuhhh
 
yeh
 
@user2103480 Did you use Hahn Banach to complete the extension? And how to do you complete you last step-"finite measure \lambda for which |\Lambda(f)| \leq D*int_[0,1] |f|^2 d\lambda"?
 
@Mike no no, I used the fact that if we have an operator that is bounded on a dense subspace of some larger normed space (bounded in the norm of that space!), that maps into a banach space, then you can uniquely extend it to a continuous operator on the larger space
since R is a banach space
and I dunno how to complete that step. Might also be the wrong way to tackle the problem
 
Okay. I might post this problem to the community. I applied Riesz theorem and Hahn decomposition to it, but I find it hard to use the control inequality. @user2103480
 
You mean the boundedness of the functional?
 
10:50 PM
I think your idea may be applicable, but I don't see how to complete the last step you mentioned.
 
|Lambda(f)| \leq ||\Lambda|| * ||f||_sup
 
I think the proof should be two sided: One side is just
|Lambda(f)| \leq ||\Lambda|| * ||f||_sup (as you mentioned), but the other side should be harder.
 
What do you mean by that? We are already given that inequality if I'm reading it correctly
and we need to use that to derive the rest of it
Ah I see that you already have a theorem that uses an idea, quite similar to what I was trying to do
From on of your questions
 
I'm having trouble understand how this derivation works by integrating with bounds:
$\V=L\frac{di}{dt}$
$\\int_{-\infty}^{t} vdt = \int_{-\infty}^{t} L \frac{di}{dt}dt$
 
You define \lambda([a,b]) = inf{\Lambda(f): f \geq indicator_[a,b]}
 
10:57 PM
Yes, you are right.@user2103480
 
i tried to take limits of ramp functions that converge to the indicator function from above, pointwise, but that is quite a bit uglier than the above definition
 
And I'll write a post regarding this question in the community. I'll send the link in this chat once I complete it.
Your method seems like proving Riesz representation for C[0,1] :)
 
@Mike oh btw the way I wrote it is wrong, this needs to be |\Lambda(f)|^2, since else I'd need to take the square root of the integral
But tbh I'm too lazy to bang my head against trying to make mu([a,b]) = limit of \Lambda(ramp function_n) work :D it should work somehow, but maybe that direct way is inelegant
@EdwardEvans helene esnault at FU does arithmetic geometry
and has the most touching professor's website I've seen yet
Her husband passed away and I'd suppose that explains the bittersweet poems
Oh my, that Anna Akhmatova poem
 
00:00 - 15:0015:00 - 00:00

« first day (3732 days earlier)      last day (1298 days later) »