« first day (3234 days earlier)      last day (1785 days later) » 

12:00 AM
@ÉricoMeloSilva mostly good. the place they're having us stay is awful, I might have told you that already
Fernando's thing is really good
@BalarkaSen I don't think he understood the question. He just reiterated that it's $\Bbb Z/2$ coefficients so $+=-$
@ÉricoMeloSilva there's someone here going to Chicago to work with Andre
 
Devon
from GA tech
 
oh i htink i met him
where r they making y'all stay lol
 
one of the undergrad dorms
but I don't think the cleaning staff is cleaning the shower area daily
 
oh rip that's gross
 
12:05 AM
indeed
 
bummed i couldnt go, what's fernando's minicourse thing on
 
Min-max in general. He's going to explain in some detail Almgren's computation of the homotopy groups of the flat cycle groups
 
oh that's sick
 
His wife is giving a decent course on classical minimal surfaces techniques
I think she's going to do the Hoffman-Meeks halfspace theorem tomorrow
There was a 30 minute moving planes argument today
@ÉricoMeloSilva I haven't met anyone else from the incoming class
 
iirc there was only two other guys who were maybe coming and interested in maybe working w Fernando
 
12:11 AM
There's someone from Irvine who's going to be here but isn't really transferring...dunno what's happening
My heart isn't completely set on him although we did have a good talk and he told me more stuff to read
I sent an email to Igor Rodnianski
 
so ur still open to the princeton GR crowd
 
Yeah
But notice I emailed Rodnianski not Klainerman :P
 
@ÉricoMeloSilva MN are writing a book...the students in 5 years will have it good
 
oh damn
i heard from some other students when i visited that the GR group is actually nice to work w mentorship wise cuz it's so tight knit
i expressed that i was maybe interested but that was before I spoke to Fernando
 
12:23 AM
it's tight knit to a fault
 
that sounds like what other people have said
 
12:37 AM
@santimirandarp keep in mind that people knew about parabolas long before they knew about algebra, so the geometric definitions (in one form or another) are the more historical ones
For instance, a parabola is a particular kind of conic section
 
\o @Semiclassical not keepin' an eye on the game?
 
What game?
(So, uh, no)
 
@santimirandarp they were used to calculate the taxes on the amount of area land in ancient Egypt
 
I know you guys can't read Chinese; just click on the big rectangle with big white words
 
Game 7 for the Staney Cup: Boston vs St. Louis
 
12:45 AM
that's the live covering of the situation in HK now
 
Oh. Yeah no @skullpatrol
 
@LeakyNun what am I watching?
 
the HK people are outside the legislative building to stop the second reading of the extradition bill
 
students with sticks?
 
that would allow suspected criminals to be extradited to China
 
12:50 AM
@LeakyNun that's a fantastic way to get a virus
 
heh
 
@LeakyNun i heard about this, hope the folks from HK are able to fight it
 
yeah
it's 08:51 HKT now, 2 hours until the second reading
 
sounds like a good way to get executed, if you get extradited
 
at least you'll provide much needed organs
 
12:53 AM
that's why people are fighting with their last breath
I've never seen this before; they're very disciplined
 
yeah, better than the hockey game ;)
 
skull did you expect your team to win
by one point
 
@LeakyNun what's the point of this bill?
 
what about KD man
 
i don't get it. what's the gain in sending suspected criminals to mainland china for trial
 
12:56 AM
I was watching in a bar yesterday, the number of raps fans in america is amazing
 
he's getting an MRI today
 
they hate the warriors so much that they forget their DUTY
 
@BalarkaSen that’s why so many people are protesting
it’s the hk govt that wants to push the bill
 
right, i'm just trying to understand what the govt gain here is
 
a government not elected by its people doesn’t care about its people
 
12:57 AM
of course it's a blasphemous policy contrast to individual rights
 
the govt would gain... eh... recognition from china i guess
we still don’t have universal suffrage
 
Da raiders are gonna be featured on the HBO series Hard Knocks in August @RyanUnger
 
@LeakyNun oh i didn't know that
 
woo wooooooooooooooo
 
12:59 AM
@BalarkaSen this would let them extradite people on trumped up political charges to take down political opponents
 
We took our hard knocks man!
 
That makes sense
 
there's clearly a lot to gain if youre selling out your people for more power
 
seems like something that can be turned around
 
there’s a figure of 1/7 of the people that went to protest on sunday
 
1:00 AM
just send everyone to china
 
Where they still use the death penalty?
 
i wonder if there are particular individuals that are involved in the political scene that the government would want to take out
 
I don’t know of that then
maybe the people who are still commemorating June 4th
or maybe Christians
who knows
 
@LeakyNun That'd make a lot of sense
 
what if this turns into a second June 4th
 
1:04 AM
What happened June 4?
 
god forbid
Tiananmen square, @skullpatrol
 
peaceful protests near Tiananmen square were met with bullets from the Chinese govt
 
riiiight :(
 
on June 4, 1989
 
there may be some kind of political pressure from china being applied to HK higher officials to weaken HK independence, which this move nakedly accomplishes
 
1:06 AM
I know anticommunists who were involved in the Tiananmen square who are still on the run from the Chinese government eg
 
thats right
 
the govt is still chasing 30 years later?
 
yep
I think there are still people detained at home indefinitely
parents of the victims
 
>8(
sad world
 
What's the deal with the phrase "meteoric rise"
Now I'm no scientist (or so I've been told) but I'm pretty sure meteors do the exact opposite of that
 
1:14 AM
meteoric meaning "fast"
like a meteor
 
At some point I oughta figure out how to use "Now I'm no doctor (or so the courts determined)" in a sentence
 
I love how they’re passing materials around and shouting their names
they’re very disciplined
 
@ÉricoMeloSilva Xi has been advocating the "one-china policy" since the very inception of his government, of course. It's fun how the national unification game played by China and Russia (with Ukraine say) has been identical
 
b For any closed curve $\gamma$ in unit disc $\mathbb D=\{ z\in \mathbb c||z|<1\}$, $\int_{\gamma}\frac{f(z)}{(z-a)^2}dz=0,\forall z\in \mathbb C$ with $|a|\ge 1/2$. where $f:\mathbb D \to \mathbb C$ ian analitic function. Is the statement true? If we consider the closed, $a=1/2$, $\gamma=\{z\in \mathbb C: |z-1/2|<1/8\}$, we get $2\pi i f'(1/2).$ Right? But in the answer key it is given that statement is true. please help me.
 
@BalarkaSen i thought the one-china policy specifically refers to the relationship between the PRC and taiwan
hong kong is autonomous but still "part of the PRC"
 
1:17 AM
Ah
 
now of course there are lots of reasons for the PRC to want to coarsen the autonomy of hong kong and make it bend the knee
 
also they’re setting up barricades with metal fences like wtf
 
I saw that^
no sign of riot police...yet
 
@ÉricoMeloSilva A pun you might enjoy
 
lol i hate this prick
 
1:25 AM
Buckley?
 
yeah he's a dick
the very model of american conservative media :3
listen to my man Kerouac
he's drunk like nobody's business
"You might have to... in due time... because of the Atom. ite. BOMB! HAH"
 
lol it was good
 
hi all
@BalarkaSen would you be interested in doing a 5 minute calculation for me to tell me whether I am an idiot or not?
 
Ya ok tell me
I might turn out to be the idiot though
 
1:31 AM
Okay on the sphere $S^2\subset \mathbb R^3$, take the vector field $X = (xz-y)\partial_x + (yz + x)\partial_y - (x^2+y^2)\partial_z$ and the area form $\Omega = x\,dy\wedge dz + y\,dz\wedge dx + z\,dx\wedge dy$. Calculate $d(\iota_X\Omega)$.
 
Oh that looks too annoying
I pass
 
The answer allegedly is: $y\,dy\wedge dz - x\,dz\wedge dx + 2\,dx\wedge dy$.
However, I do not get to the answer ever.
Heh, that's okay.
My calculation isn't really that long. I just do $\iota_X\Omega$ and then take $d$ afterwards.
I am pretty sure there is a typo in my solution here.
Since I have not since gotten the same answer when I do it.
But none of my other answers are the same either.
I think it is maybe a problem with $d$
What does $d_{S^2}$ look like on $S^2$?
That is, can I just do the usual local coordinate definition, but with $(x,y,z)$ because I am in R^3?
 
1:51 AM
No, that is the problem. $d\Omega = 3 dx\wedge dy \wedge dz$ on $\Bbb R^3$ for example, but $d\Omega = 0$ on $S^2$ (or rather, the pullback of $\Omega$ to $S^2$ is closed)
 
Alright so I have to find out how to represent $d_{S_2}$ in $\mathbb R^3$ coordinates?
 
You have to do this in spherical coordinates or something. That's why I said it's too annoying.
 
I don't know why the author would not have done it in spherical coordinates to begin with if that was the only way to do it.
 
You have to parametrize to take the exterior derivative in the first place.
 
I think he has some other way in mind.
Because admittedly the entire problem would have been easier in spherical coordinates.
 
1:55 AM
OK but I am not going to think about it lmao
There might be some insightful way by seeing exactly what flow $X$ generates, and then noting that your thing is just $\mathcal{L}_X \omega$ by Cartan's magic
 
@BalarkaSen do you know of any good cricket World Cup feeds?
 
nope dont follow it myself
 
oh, i guess i'll go with the bbc then
thnx
 
lol
 
Hello, it has been my understanding that if at least one integrating factor depending only on $x$ exists for an ODE, $M(x,\ y)\ dx + N(x,\ y)\ dy = 0$, then the formula $u(x) = e^{-\int \frac{2D=curl\begin{bmatrix}M(x,\ y) \\ N(x,\ y)\end{bmatrix}}{Q}\ dx}$ will find some of them. However, I appear to have come across a counterexample. Is the above a correct principle?
 
2:47 AM
 
 
1 hour later…
4:01 AM
Hmm...
f(h,h')=0, f(h,h')<0?
What about soulmates, is f continuous, what is the induced topology of F[H]
 
user131753
Is it true that any group $G$ is isomorphic to a subdirect product of simple groups?
 
user131753
It can be shown that any ring can be represented as a subdirect product of subdirectly irreducible rings. (In fact this was the original motivation for asking the question.)
 
user131753
If $G$ is an additive abelian group then $G$ can easily be considered as a ring by defining multiplication "$\cdot$" on $G$ as the the map $\cdot:G\times G\to G$ defined by $a\cdot b=0_G$ for all $a,b\in G$.
 
user131753
Denote this ring on $G$ by $R(G)$.
 
user131753
4:18 AM
Observe that if $S$ is a subgroup of $G$ then $S$ is an ideal of $R(G)$ and conversely for any ideal $I$ or $(R(G),+,\cdot)$, $(I,+)$ is a subgroup of $(G,+)$. In other words the ideals of $R(G)$ are precisely the subgroups of $G$.
 
user131753
From this observation it follows that $G$ is isomorphic to a subdirect product of commutative simple groups.
 
user131753
But what about the case when $G$ is not abelian?
 
4:36 AM
I was suspended for half an hour, and it said that I am automatically suspended. Does stackexchange detects abusive words even in jpeg form?
 
5:10 AM
automatically means without intervention of any moderators I believe
 
how did the second reading go?
 
the meeting was delayed @skullpatrol
 
okay...
 
 
3 hours later…
8:16 AM
Morning all
 
8:42 AM
morning
 
9:19 AM
Guten Morgen!
bzw. good noon
 
Lol hoi
 
@AlessandroCodenotti ho due compagni di tandem! Trovare compagni per fare un tandem è semplice via gruppi su facebook, forse anche tu vuoi cercare un compagno per migliorare il tuo tedesco?
Certo ci sono gruppi come "Tandem Uni Bonn" o qualcosa similare
@ÍgjøgnumMeg next semester there's intro algebraic number theory, I'd recommend you do it, even if you probably know most things
 
I have German flatmates already (even though we speak English...)
 
Ah I see
 
@Mathein Yay! I definitely will be
 
9:28 AM
@ÍgjøgnumMeg intro ANT here also includes local fields
 
Yeah I've seen the Modulhandbuch, it would definitely be useful for me
Intro Alg Geo as well?
 
no, alg geo and alg NT alternate
one year ANT 1+2, next year AG 1+2
 
Ah nice, that's fine
do you know when the Vorlesungsverzeichnisse are released?
 
I dunno
 
@Mathei here is a question for you: Is it obvious that nilpotent groups aren't closed under ultraproducts?
 
9:30 AM
No worries, thanks for the heads up :)
 
I guess I need to find a first-order property that implies the central series has length at least $n$
 
@Alessandro I know very little about ultraproducts of groups
I only read a bit on ultraproducts of fields
 
Hi all!
 
@AlessandroCodenotti first-order seems tricky since the central series is defined in terms of subgroups
 
9:32 AM
What is the definition of "isometric group"
 
\o @all
 
I mean the term isometric in connection with group
 
It's an exercise in Tent-Ziegler to show via ultraproducts that finite, torsion and nilpotent groups are not an elementary class. Finite and torsion are very easy
 
yeah, I was just stating the obvious, I'm not particularly well-versed in this first-order stuff
what is an elementary class? Defined by first-order properties?
 
An elementary class is the class of models of a theory $T$
So finite groups for example are not an elementary class because any theory in the language of groups that has all finite groups as models also has infinite models
(by compactness or ultraproducts, they're not very different)
 
9:36 AM
take property (5) here: groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/Nilpotent_group , that looks like first order to me
I find compactness easier to grasp than ultraproducts personally
 
I agree that compactness arguments are easier to write, but they can be translated to ultraproducts arguments
@MatheinBoulomenos Hmmm interesting
 
@AlessandroCodenotti I think that's what I meant
 
9:54 AM
@Alessandro I actually managed to apply logic to algebra once
 
There are a few applications
That was the topic of my bachelor thesis
 
interesting! Do you want to see my application? (there are logic-free proofs (that sounds weird), as well)
 
what we want to show is this: if $k$ is an algebraically closed field of characteristic $p$ and $G$ is a $p$ group and $\rho:G \to GL(V)$ is a finite-dimensional representation where $V \neq 0$, then $V^G \neq 0$
 
I don't know what $V^G$ and "finite-dimensional representation" mean
 
10:00 AM
$\rho:G \to \mathrm{GL}(V)$ is just a group homomorphism where $V$ is $k$ vector space
and $V^G$ are fixed-points, i.e. $v \in V$ s.t. $\rho(g)v=v$ for all $g \in G$
 
elements fixed by the $G$-action?
 
finite-dimensional refers to $V$ then?
 
Aha makes sense
 
the idea of the proof I came up with is this: if $k$ is a finite-field, then this is true by an orbit-stabilizer counting argument (the number of fixed points is divisible by $p$ and includes $0$), if $k=\bigcup \Bbb F_{p^n} = \overline{\Bbb F_p}$, then by finiteness of $G$, after choosing a basis for $V$, all matrices have coefficients in some finite field, so the proposition is true by the previous case
 
10:05 AM
This reminds me of the logic proof of the Ax-Grothendieck theorem
 
now fix $G$ and a dimension $n>0$. Fix generators and relations for $G = \langle X \mid R \rangle$. Then one can write the statement "every $n$-dimensional representation $G \to \mathrm{GL}_n(k)$ has a fixed point", in terms of matrix equations and matrix-vector equations, since a group homomorphism is determined by having for each generator a matrix such that all relations are satisfied. Expanding those matrix equations coefficient-wise leads to a first-order sentence in the theory of fields
now use completness of $ACF_p$
 
one can then proceed to use some descent arguments to remove the "algebraically closed" part
(I haven't worked out that part of the proof due to my lacking knowledge of descent outside of special cases)
the idea is that by some descent magic if $k$ is any field of char $p$ and $\rho:G \to GL(V)$ is a representation that the base change $\overline{k} \otimes V$ having non-trivial invariants implies that $V$ itself has non-trivial invariants
@Alessandro which application of logic to algebra did you write your bachelor thesis on?
 
10:41 AM
@Alessandro here's a (possibly quite difficult) question: Is the class of finite or uncountable groups an elementary class? It seems unlikely, but ultraproduct arguments don't work, since ultraproducts tend to be uncountable
 
11:10 AM
Couldn't you have a group where the underlying set is more than uncountable?
 
@MatheinBoulomenos no, not in the language of groups, by Löwenheim-Skolem
You always get a countable model as well
 
11:29 AM
@AlessandroCodenotti of course! I was only thinking about compactness/ultraproducts and forgot the other big theorem
@Rithaniel uncountable means anything bigger than countable
 
Ah, fair enough
 
(and yes there are groups of all cardinalities, assuming AC)
@MatheinBoulomenos I showed that ACF and RCF have quantifier elimination and got the weak nullstellensatz, Ax-Grothendieck, Tarski-Seidenberg and Hilbert's 17th problem as a consequence
 
11:50 AM
@LeakyNun looks like the riot police showed up :-/
 
right
 
12:12 PM
Riot police?
 
Hmmm, concerning.
 
1:02 PM
Hello,
if sequence $\{c_n\}\in l^2$, then we can change signs of $c_n$ so that $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} c_n e^{i n x}\in L^p$, for any $p>2$
anyone have heard of this conclusion?
 
1:38 PM
hey
someone is here?
would love for some help here : math.stackexchange.com/questions/3259788/…
 
user131753
2:08 PM
Hi @anakhro.
 
Hi!
How are you?
 
user131753
(Saw you in my general room earlier but you escaped before I could say "hi.")
 
user131753
@anakhro Fine.
 
user131753
What about you?
 
Heh, yeah, I clicked on the first room I saw thinking it was this one, then realized it was not the general math one.
I am okay, just getting started on stuff this morning.
 
2:10 PM
Definition of a cycle in a graph: Let $n >2$. A cycle in $X$ of length $n$ is a path $v_0,...,v_{n-1}$ in $X$ with $\{v_{n-1},v_n\} \in E$....Question: is the condition that $\{v_{n-1},v_n\} \in E$ hold a mistake? Shouldn't it be $\{v_0,v_{n-1}\} \in E$?
 
user131753
Would you be interested in discussing a group theoretical problem @anakhro? Actually I asked this earlier in the room but no one has responded yet. So I would be glad if I could discuss it with someone so that I may get some idea regarding how to proceed.
 
@user170039 I can try. What's the problem?
 
user131753
@anakhro Read from this message.
 
user131753
I will be writing the question again nevertheless.
 
user131753
Is it true that any group $G$ is isomorphic to a subdirect product of simple groups?

It can be shown that any ring can be represented as a subdirect product of subdirectly irreducible rings. (In fact this was the original motivation for asking the question.)

If $G$ is an additive abelian group then $G$ can easily be considered as a ring by defining multiplication "$\cdot$" on $G$ as the the map $\cdot:G\times G\to G$ defined by $a\cdot b=0_G$ for all $a,b\in G$. Denote this ring on $G$ by $R(G)$. Observe that if $S$ is a subgroup of $G$ then $S$ is an ideal of $R(G)$ and conversely for an
 
2:16 PM
Subdirect product is a subgroup of the direct product for which the projections are surjective?
 
user131753
@anakhro Yes.
 
Hmmm
That seems like it would be very hard if it is not easy.
Have you tried coming up with subdirect products of simple groups?
I am not very familiar with the subdirect product.
I would lean towards an answer of "no" based on the problems that arise with products of simple groups.
 
user131753
I was actually trying to generalize the idea of a ring to an algebraic structure where the underlying additive group need not be abelian. Then I was trying to prove an analogous theorem for this class of structures.
 
@Secret I think it's the same game
That was a demo
I think that was a demo for the thing the trailer was of, and at some point in the development they changed the name
 
2:42 PM
hello everybody.......
 
@user170039 I believe the type of object you're looking for is called a near-ring, and a caveat in having the underlying set be non-abelian is that the multiplicative operation cannot be fully distributive.
 
i see a proof of ramanujan's infinite sum but i thing the proof was perfect as it uses an alternating series is there any rigorous proof ?
 
user131753
3:11 PM
@Rithaniel Thanks. Reading the wikipedia article on nearring I believe what I am looking for is a left as well as right nearring.
 
You mean you want one that is both left distributive and right distributive? If so, then what you have is just a ring. Let $a,b,c,d\in N$ where $N$ is a left-and-right distributive near-ring and consider:
$(a+b)(1+1)=a(1+1)+b(1+1)=a+a+b+b$
$(a+b)(1+1)=(a+b)+(a+b)=a+b+a+b$
So, $a+a+b+b=a+b+a+b$ or $a+b=b+a$ and you've forced the additive structure to commute.
 
user131753
@Rithaniel Wait. Why would multiplicative identity exist?
 
That's fair. In that case just replace $(1+1)$ with $(c+d)$ and you get that any product of two elements commutes with any other product of two elements.
 
user131753
@Rithaniel That should not be problematic in the algebraic structure I am looking for. Multiplication can be commutative but addition need not be.
 
So it would only be possible if there are certain elements in the near-ring which are not the product of two other elements in the near-ring, which I believe is impossible (though the proof of that is something I do not know off-handed).
 
3:41 PM
@AlessandroCodenotti you might know this...if $C$ is a convex set in a normed vector space (not assumed f.d. or complete), is the distance to the boundary from any point attained?
 
Surely not without $C$ being closed at least?
 
@AlessandroCodenotti oh I mean attained by some point in $\overline C$
should be in $\partial C$
 
Oh ok, it sounds plausible now
 
Here's something that's been annoying me and it's probably very simple
 
@AlessandroCodenotti I really just need this in $\R^n$, but ... I'm curious
 
3:46 PM
Hmm I think it should hold for complete spaces (even though the point attaining the distance won't be unique), but I know very little about normed spaces in general
 
It's true for Hilbert spaces but that proof doesn't use H-B
 
Consider a probability space. Then the following is a Hilbert space: the set of all equivalence classes of random variables on this probability space with finite variance (i.e. $E[X^2]<\infty$), under the relation of equality a.e., with respect to the inner product $\langle X,Y\rangle = E[XY]$
(you need to consider equivalence classes to ensure that $\langle X,X\rangle = E[X^2]=0\implies X=0$)
 
Semi is that just $L^2$ wrt the probability measure
 
@user170039 it's not true that every abelian group is a subdirect product of simple abelian groups. Simple abelian groups are of the form $\Bbb Z/p$ from this, one can see that the order of any element in a (sub)direct product of simple abelian group has square-free order. In particular $\Bbb Z/p^2$ is not the subdirect product of simple abelian groups
 
3:51 PM
It's probably obvious, but why does one impose $E[X^2]<\infty$? Is it a matter of axioms, or of ensuring good behavior within this set?
 
@user170039 the problem is that the radical of $R(G)$ may be non-trivial
 
(Actually, if you use null multiplication or $ab=0$ for all $a,b\in N$ then you can have the underlying additive group be non-abelian and it would satisfy the other axioms for a near-ring)
 
@Semiclassical you want the variance to be finite right
 
user131753
@MatheinBoulomenos Yea. That's what was pointed out to me by Derek Holt. I think that I was concerned with subdirectly irreducible groups.
 
user131753
(It's nice to hear from you by the way.)
 
3:55 PM
@RyanUnger should have said "finite second moment", woops
 
user131753
@MatheinBoulomenos What is radical of $R(G)$?
 
If $X$ and $Y$ does not have finite second moment, $\Bbb E[XY]$ need not exist
That's the point of $L^2$. The inner product is defined because of Cauchy-Schwarz.
 
point
I guess there's also the issue that the inner product is supposed to be a bilinear map from the vector space to the reals, and $\langle X,X\rangle= E[X^2]=\infty$ isn't a real number :P
 
@user170039 see the non-unital section here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
 
In general if $X$ has finite $p$-th moment and $Y$ has finite $q$-th moment, and $1/p+1/q = 1$, then $XY$ has finite expectation. That's Holder, of course: $L^p \times L^q \to L^1$.
 
3:58 PM
Balarka going full analyst
though I don't think I've seen an analyst write Holder like that
 
:3
I guess you'd write it as $L^p \cong (L^q)^*$
 
user131753
@MatheinBoulomenos Oh. You were talking about Jacobson Radical. I know about that.
 
yeah I was being imprecise, there are many radicals in ring theory, of course
 
@BalarkaSen yeah
or, hell, just write out the inequality
 
user131753
@MatheinBoulomenos I thought about prime radical.
 

« first day (3234 days earlier)      last day (1785 days later) »