« first day (2854 days earlier)      last day (2170 days later) » 

12:00 AM
@LeakyNun oh, I guess you could say that it does kind of follow from that weird definition of modules
 
could I
 
Can someone use a progralm to find a max and min for this function ?
f[x_] := -0.248226 Cos[2 x] - 0.0184829 Cos[4 x] -
0.0594608 Cos[x]*Sin[x] + 0.123626 Sin[4 x]
 
I won't stop you if you do
 
the intervall is ]0,3/2[
 
how do math departments receive funding if they do pure math with no applications?
i hope soft questions/slightly off topic are allowed
 
12:04 AM
In a ring where $2 \ne 0$, the group of units has non-trivial center
 
@Jacksoja I got $-0.266709$ for $x=0$
And $0.189257$ for $x=3/2$
Oh, you do not include boundaries (so include the limits $x \to 0$ and $x \to 3/2$)
 
no one never pays attention to me ;(
 
@Lozansky thanks , yeah no end points!
 
@MatheinBoulomenos You did some actual mathematics in your dream? That's nuts!
 
@Symposium well, it was nonsense :(
 
12:14 AM
That's still incredible!
 
yeah I'm sometimes in a kind of state between sleeping and thinking, dunno
 
I used to have one of those where you are aware that you're dreaming!
Sounds freaky, but it's actually kinda nice.
It's called lucid dreaming I think.
 
12:36 AM
@LeakyNun it turns out it's more difficult than I remembered
 
ok
 
@MacroGuy from centers researching pure mathematics?
 
@LeakyNun done
 
@MatheinBoulomenos commented
 
12:52 AM
@LeakyNun do you know tensor product over noncommutative rings?
 
@MatheinBoulomenos I know that if $A$ is a right module and $B$ is a left module then $A \otimes B$ can be defined
 
The point is that $\varphi$ makes $S$ into a $(R,R)$-bimodule via $r \cdot s = \varphi(r)s$ and $s \cdot r = s \varphi(r)$
I'll double-check that pushouts in the category of not necessarily commutative rings are still tensor products
 
@MatheinBoulomenos ok
 
@LeakyNun non-commutative doesn't work like that, but for other reasons
I commented on your comment
 
1:08 AM
I upvoted-accepted your answer
 
@LeakyNun god, even the coproduct of two non-commutative rings is really crazy
@LeakyNun thanks!
 
@MatheinBoulomenos right, it's like the free product in group
except more complicated
 
@LeakyNun yeah, kind of
in hindsight, it has to be like free groups, since we need that the coproduct of $\Bbb Z[x]$ and $\Bbb Z[y]$ is $\Bbb Z\langle x,y \rangle$ (the free algebra on two generators), so obviously tensor products won't work
Hey @Ted
 
hi @Mathein
 
@Ted what do you think about my LA pedagogy suggestions?
https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/44841587#44841587
https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/44840572#44840572
 
1:17 AM
@Balarka @MikeM @Mathein: This was sorta interesting. Do you approve of my answer?
 
@MatheinBoulomenos what even is $\Bbb Z \langle x,y \rangle$...
 
I won't even respond, @Mathein.
 
I do think that definition of determinants is really cool
 
I don't.
 
@TedShifrin I never saw compact vertical support
 
1:21 AM
@MatheinBoulomenos it isn't actually a joke
 
Aha, @Mathein. It shows up for Poincaré duality things with bundles.
 
@TedShifrin you get multiplicativity of determinants for free (it is equivalent to the functoriality of the exterior power)
 
Aha, I know compact support (which I assume is horizontal) for Poincaré duality of orientable topological manifolds
 
Wow... this compactly generated subgroup of binomial action operators with partial additive ring structure is proving to be a tricky problem to solve
 
Right, this is compact in fibers ...
 
1:24 AM
@TedShifrin anyway, I can't really comment on that answer. I "know" manifolds, but actually it's a fleeting acquaintance
(is this the right translation of "flüchtige Bekanntschaft"?)
 
But you're learning more topology. You should encounter the Thom class. It's very cool.
Yes, you translated "good."
 
I believe you it's cool
 
hi @quallenjäger
 
currently, most topological spaces I deal with are totally disconnected
 
Pfeh.
 
1:26 AM
Why
Why are closed homotopic curves more interesting than open homotopic curves
 
but I manged to simplify a proof in our Galois representations course using Cartan's theorem that closed subgroups of Lie groups are submanifolds
 
right, they're Lie subgroups.
 
Hi all. Here they plug $t(1-t)$ and $dt$ into the yellow part, but the boundaries of the integrals do not match. Can somebody clear this up ?
 
Sure they do @Leyla.
$s=0$ when $t=1/2$ and $s=1$ when $t=0$.
 
1:28 AM
$t=(1-\sqrt{s})/2\implies s=(1-2t)^2$ which maps [0,1/2] to [0,1]
 
oh
okay, thanks @TedShifrin
 
And there's a negative in the derivative that switches the integral.
Blah, that's too hard, @Semiclassic :P
 
lol
i'm just unpacking it
 
I just deal with endpoints.
So @Semiclassic, how's the next step in life going?
 
Why are closed homotopies more interesting than open homotopies
 
1:30 AM
well, right now I'm out of town on vacation with family
but I'll need to start seriously investigating things once I get back.
 
@TedShifrin the argument is neat, I think. This is the statement: let $G$ be a profinite group and $\rho: G \to \operatorname{GL}_n(\Bbb C)$ be a continuous representation. Then the image of $\rho$ is finite. The proof of my lecturer was more elementary, but more involved, I did this:
the image is compact, so closed, thus a Lie subgroup, so in particular locally connected like all manifolds. But since the kernel is a closed subgroup of $G$, the quotient $G/\operatorname{ker}(\rho)=\operatorname{im}(f)$ is again profinite, so totally disconnected (note: continuous images of totally disconnec
 
if I have time this week, I should try to start looking around online for some stuff and figure out my contacts
 
Yup @Semiclassic. Time is of the essence.
 
some nice basically point-set topological argument
didn't really expect that in the Galois reps course
 
Math has its interactions ... that's why it's so good.
 
1:33 AM
true
 
I had hoped to talk with my adviser a bit about it after my thesis defense, but he was busy the rest of that week and isn't back until 6/4
 
Well, that's soon, @Semiclassic. He'll probably push for postdocs (for which you're way late in the cycle), as most academics do. Have you talked about non-academic jobs?
 
I think he'll push more on the non-ac end, actually.
That's based on prior conversations.
 
OK, good, if that's where you still are.
 
@TedShifrin the statement is quite remarkable.
It says that if we want to understand finite-dimensional complex representations of a complicated, but important group like $\operatorname{Gal}(\overline{\Bbb Q}/\Bbb Q)$, we get them all by doing the "obvious thing" to construct representations: choose a finite Galois extension $K/ \Bbb Q$, then we have complex representation theory of finite groups, which is well understood and compose everything with the restriction map $\operatorname{Gal}(\overline{\Bbb Q}/\Bbb Q) \to \operatorname{Gal}(K/\Bbb Q)$
 
1:37 AM
There is one post-doc possibility that we'd talked about a while ago, but I have a strong suspicion that the window on that is closed. (Plus I was ambivalent about it, which isn't a great sign.)
 
the reason is basically that the Krull topology and the analytical topology on $\Bbb C$ are "incompatible" in some way
 
I stopped by my undergrad institution to talk with some of my old profs (and to share the news), and one suggestion I got was to look into postdoctoral internship opportunities.
 
My only hesitation, @Semiclassic, is that the humongous number of hours you spend here tells me that you truly do love teaching.
 
Yeah, I wonder about that too
 
You might find some short-term gig.
 
1:39 AM
And there definitely is an argument for me pursuing teaching at a community college or liberal arts level
I think I'll land on one of those two sides (industry vs. non-research teaching)
 
Most liberal arts places these days you still have to do some research, but some of it can be pedagogy-related.
 
But you're late for the cycle. Unless it's a 1-year thing.
 
And I don't think I'd entirely mind that kind of research level
Agreed.
 
Well, I'm rooting for you.
 
1:40 AM
thanks
 
I can write a teaching letter for you based on stuff here for years, if you need one.
 
I'll consider it. It couldn't hurt.
 
Let me know :)
 
I suspect that, even if I'm not working in a strictly 'teaching' position, one thing I"ll want my job to involve is communicating concepts and ideas to others
Not in a salesmanship way, of course
 
Hi there.
 
1:42 AM
A lot of consulting work involves that in a major way.
 
Right.
 
Hi @Topologicalife.
 
Hi
 
It's hard to go straight into consulting, though.
You sorta need to build up contacts first
And a good position in industry could help for that.
 
Plenty of my UGA students went to work for Arthur Anderson and such.
 
1:43 AM
If I roll a 10-sided dice and I get 6 or more as a result, I get a "success". But if I roll the dice and I get 1, it cancels one success, so that If I roll two times the dice and I get (7,1), I have 0 success, if I roll it and I get (7,2), I have one success, if I roll it and I get (1,1) I have -2 success. I am trying to compute the probability of to get at least one success. And yeah, I can have negative successes.
 
my father did consulting for a while and he still does something that partially involves consulting
 
My mom keeps bringing up the possibility of actuarial work. But that really doesn't appeal to me
 
I am trying to model that experiment.
 
but he first got his actuary degree (which is on top of masters/PhD or actually diploma back then)
 
Right, @Semiclassic. From what I know, it's insanely boring, but well-paid.
 
1:44 AM
The route I've also heard about is finance, which...ugh
 
Hey everyone!
 
Hey @Daminark
 
Your computer skills are a big attribute in that world, Semiclassic.
Hi Demonark.
 
When I talk to my father about number theory, he always mentions how boring the actuary stuff he did is in comparision
 
Using my mathematical talents to figure out how to make more money for people who already have way too much money isn't my idea of a vocation
 
1:45 AM
I'm on your side, Semiclassic.
I truly think you're a born teacher.
 
I wonder about that.
The tricky thing, I suspect, is that there's always a difference between being a born teacher and a born educator
 
Lol my mom used to want me to be a doctor when I was really young, though she realized I wasn't too happy with the idea and was like yeah nvm. My dad gives the generic "don't be someone with 3 masters degrees and using a grocery store job to pay off student loans"
 
Agh. I think I'm a born teacher, Semiclassic. These details escape me.
 
And I'm not sure i"m responsible enough to succeed as an instructor/administrator. That's what worries me.
 
I once made up a consulting experience to get a job.
According to my CV I had worked for Keiser Associates Inc. Ah, good times!
 
1:47 AM
Ah, well, that's an issue.
 
And one time I mentioned interest in AI briefly and he was like "Ah that's where the future is, excellent!"
 
@TedShifrin I wonder how much they would value the fact that someone wrote a program in magma to compute the characteristic polynomial of the Frobenius element evaulated at the Galois represntation associated to the function field analog of a modular form acting on the Bruhat-Tits building for $\operatorname{SL}_2(\Bbb Z_p)$
 
That may partly just be the exhaustion of having a TA for so long, of course.
 
I wasn't talking to you, @Mathein :P
 
@TedShifrin sorry
 
1:48 AM
One of my former students who's in grad school now has totally burnt out on teaching, @Semiclassic, in 3 years. But grad school tends to treat grad students terribly.
 
Yeah
For that reason I think I don’t want to jump into that immediately
 
You don't strike me as irresponsible in the least, Semiclassic.
 
Are the many hours I spend here indicative of that? :P
 
No.
Our discussions of snafus with your TA experiences ...
 
1:51 AM
That looks like Lasujous curve (sp?)
 
Lissajous?
 
That looks like the curves you get when you do that weird coloring on the integers
 
Yeah. Spelling is not my thing.
 
It's not lissajous curves but it does look a lot like them
what weird coloring on the integers?
 
Can’t remember tbh
I know I’ve seen something but I can’t find it
 
1:53 AM
I made it on desmos
has anyone heard of that?
 
@LeakyNun ah sorry, I overlooked that question. It's basically like the polynomial ring, but $xy \neq yx$ and $xyx \neq x^2y \neq y x^2$ etc. Think of the difference between a free abelian group on two generators and a free group on two generators. You can also construct it as the monoid ring $\Bbb Z[\Bbb N * \Bbb N]$, where $\Bbb N * \Bbb N$ is the free monoid on two generators
 
Say what?
 
nothing
 
free products of monoids are even easier than free products of groups
 
1:57 AM
smacks Leaky
 
:'(
 
you don't have to consider reduced words, just words
computer scientists and linguists work with free monoids all the time
 
@MatheinBoulomenos Bruhat what?
 
@geocalc33 I think we've all heard of Desmos, but that seems pretty tangential as to what the picture represents
 
@LeakyNun Bruhat-Tits building
it's a simplical complex associated to a p-adic Lie group which is the analog of the homogenous space of a real Lie group
 
1:59 AM
@semiclassical
I don't know what it represents
probably something like lissajous curves
 
It doesn't remotely resemble Lissajous curves as far as I can tell.
@Semiclassic is too polite to say so.
 
changed your mind Ted?
 
Ted's not the one who suggested Lissajous.
 
2:02 AM
No, I merely corrected your spelling.
 
actually...
11 mins ago, by Symposium
That looks like Lasujous curve (sp?)
 
sorry, Symposium's spelling.
 
My problem is how to model the fact that getting a "1" as result cancels a success. How to think about it in mathematical terms.
 
my thing is that it may look cute, but looking cute doesn't really translate into meaning anything
 
People look cute all the time, and they frequently mean nothing.
 
2:03 AM
So unless there's a reason to care about that picture, I don't really see much reason to linger on it.
 
lol yeah it was the first thing that came to my mind!
 
pictures are evil
 
@TedShifrin "People...frequently mean nothing."
2
 
glares @Mathein
 
@everyone
 
2:04 AM
Now I feel like making a comparison to flipping coins, insofar as their frequencies tend towards zero mean
 
I guess you could study it as a graph from a graph theory perspective
 
ACA_0 + $\lnot Con(PA)$ is consistient, right?
 
How? That's not a graph in the graph theoretical sense.
You can map that to a graph in that sense, but you'd have to specify how.
 
If you add nodes to where the intersections are
 
@PyRulez I know basically nothing about logic, but that looks like a straightforward consequence of Gödel's second incompleteness theroem
 
2:06 AM
then it would be
 
@PyRulez you might find more competent people in the logic chatroot, though
 
Okay, if that floats your boat
 
Well, godels theorem apply to first order logic, right?
 
There have been many occasions where math didn't seem useful or practical and then hundreds of years later it did
 
@PyRulez but isn't ACA_0 a conservative extension of PA?
 
2:08 AM
Yes, and people worked on such math because they found it interesting.
If you find that picture interesting and want to research it, great. Go ahead and have fun.
 
@MatheinBoulomenos I think so. I was just double checking.
 
I'm quite sure it is
 
Just don't be shocked if other people find different problems more interesting or pertinent.
 
Aren't there two different notions of consistency for second-order theories though?
Like a "no contradictions" one, and a "has models" one.
 
@geocalc33 but in that cases, at least the math was theoretically interesting in the time before it become practically relevant
 
2:11 AM
I'm not interested in studying it
 
@PyRulez wait, these aren't equivalent for second-order theories? Sorry, this is probably more logic than I know
 
@MatheinBoulomenos I thought they weren't. Are they?
 
I haven't really thought about it before
 
I know next to nothing about second-order logic.
 
Here's a silly question out of elementary probability theory which has been bugging me
...hmm, did I already ask this
 
2:13 AM
@PyRulez I think in any case you get that ACA_0 + not Con(PA) doesn't prove a contradiction
 
Well, anyways. Suppose I've got three pairwise uncorrelated rv's X1, X2, X3 with zero mean and unit variance.
 
that's the stronger of those two (potentially distinct) consistency notions, right?
 
Anyone else watching NBA playoffs?
 
Yes
I'm on my phone now
 
Suppose I construct three new rv's Y1, Y2, Y3 as linear combinations of X1, X2, X3 i.e. $Y_j = a_{jk}X_k$. These new rvs automatically have zero mean, and I'll choose my coefficients such that they also have unit variance.
 
2:16 AM
Cavs are bad!
 
Lebron isn't able to carry them through tonight?
 
think it's still going on
 
I don't think he will be able to! Everyone else looks clueless!
 
These new variables no longer be uncorrelated, so the pairwise correlations $\langle Y_1 Y_2\rangle, \langle Y_1 Y_3\rangle, \langle Y_2 Y_3\rangle$ no longer need be zero.
 
Follow up: Can we do physics in ACA_0?
I.e. do our physical theories work in ACA_0?
 
2:19 AM
@PyRulez No, physicists don't use axiomatic foundations
 
I mean the mathematics that physical theories use.
 
that's really vague
 
They use postulatic foundations. xD
 
Yeah, let me try to rephrase it.
 
Now, all of this has been abstract, but what I'm looking for is rather concrete: Suppose I take the case of those pairwise correlations all being -1/2. I can arrange for that using an appropriate $\{a_{jk}\}$ set. But I don't have an obvious model for that, i.e. a system where there are three rv's with zero mean, unit variance, and the pairwise correlations are all -1/2.
So I'm trying to think of a simple system with those properties.
 
2:22 AM
Can all the theorems that physical theories assume to be true be stated in second order arithmetic and proven in ACA_0?
 
There's probably at least one physics paper in the whole intersection of mirror symmetry with algerbaic geometry which uses Grothendieck duality and thus refers the corresponding SGA volume, which works with the universe axiom which is equivalent to the existence of some inaccessible cardinal
so the answer is no even if we replace ACA_0 by ZFC
ACA_0 doesn't even prove that any commutative ring contains at least one prime ideal (unless we're talking about countable rings), so certainly any paper that does something with algebraic geometry doesn't work
wouldn't be surprised if some physics paper heavy on functional analysis assumes Hahn-Banach in the inseparable case, as well
@PyRulez your question kind of assumes that physics is fully formalized already
Hilbert's 6th problem "How can physics be axiomatized?" isn't considered solved
 
Yeah, I was just about to mention hilbert's sixth problem.
I guess its still open.
 
"physical theories" is a really, really vast field
 
I know two people working on duality between p-adic quantum field theories
 
2:56 AM
@MatheinBoulomenos, Is this true:
8 hours ago, by Silent
Let $M_3(\Bbb C)$ be set of $3\times 3$ matrices with complex entries, and $V$ be subspace of symmetric matrices with trace zero. So, dimension of quotient space $M_3(\Bbb C)/V$ is $3^2-(\frac{3^2+3}{2}-1)$ , right?
 
seems correct
 
Lebron James is the Grothendieck of basketball!
 
what's the equivalent in basketball to declaring 57 a prime number?
 
Haha, hard one!
You know Lebron has an incredible memory. He recently recalled in an interview several minute's worth of play sequence by sequence when someone asked me "what happened?" on a game they lost.
So I guess you could say he's more of an Euler.
 
Is it settled who they'll be facing in the finals yet?
 
3:05 AM
It will settled tomorrow
Houston Rockets or Warriors
 
Grothendieck was one of the greatest mathematicians of the 20th century if not the greatest. Amazing story too
He got a fairly late start to mathematics
 
I'm not willing to say any single mathematician of a certain century is the greatest of the century. Sorry.
I have lots of competitors.
And I probably know a bit more math than you.
 
i said "one of"
 
You said "if not the greatest."
Try to avoid such silliness.
 
but i also said one of
 
3:17 AM
Bye.
 
bye.
 
True. It's hard to quantify these things.
 
I know but I and many others consider him the best of the 20th cent.
Just like lebron is considered the best baskteball player
*current bball player
 
I'm not sure if Grothendieck got into mathematics late.
But I remember reading Dieudonne say (when he was speaking of Bourbaki) that he didn't know what a group was when he was 28, which I found incredible!
It was either a group or something equally surprising.
 
Yeah like the other mathematicians of his day that were trained in the elite paris schools were so far ahead of him
but then he quickly caught up
 
3:36 AM
Is it always true that, if $V$ is a vector space and $W$ subspace of $V$, then dimension of quotient space $V/W$ is $\dim V-\dim W$?
@Daminark
 
3:47 AM
True.
 
thanks!
 
@Symposium sounds a nifty idea but (sorry for my obtuseness) i'm not being able to link the euler product with my sum, the expanded expression yields to all kinds of exponents aside 2^k
 
@Abr001am What's that in reference to? (Sorry I can't remember seeing/talking about euler products).
 
44833160
 
:44833160
 
4:02 AM
24 hours ago, by Symposium
We have $\displaystyle \prod_{0 \le k \le n}\left(1-x^{2^{k}}\right) = \frac{\left(1-x\right)}{\left(1-x^{2^{n+1}}\right)}\prod_{1 \le k \le n+1}\left(1-x^{2^{k}}\right) = \frac{\left(1-x\right) }{\left(1-x^{2^{n+1}}\right)}\prod_{0 \le k \le n}\left(1-x^{2^{k+1}}\right). $

But $\displaystyle \left(1-x^{2^{k+1}}\right) = \left(1-x^{2^{k}}\right)\left(1+x^{2^{k}}\right)$, thus $\displaystyle \prod_{0 \le k \le n}\left(1-x^{2^{k+1}}\right) =\prod_{0 \le k \le n}\left(1-x^{2^{k}}\right)\prod_{0 \le k \le n}\left(1+x^{2^{k}}\right). $
 
Oh, see!
 
well i didn't want to onebox all this stuff, i just gave you the message id.
 
I didn't know how to search with the ID :(
I'm not sure if it helps at all with the sum you had. I'm gonna think about it.
 
it seems impossible to give an approximate sum without theta summation.
 
4:17 AM
@Symposium, let $A$ be $n\times n $ matrix, then either $A^r=0$ for some $r\le n$ or $A^m\ne0$ for all $m>n$. Is this right?
 
Allo
@Semiclassical hiii
 
Hello everyone.
 
hello
 
I was trying to wrap my head around the idea of exponents less than 1 and I've found a pattern of sorts... i was hoping maybe someone could shed some light
For example 10 ** 0.4 = 3.16 * (3.16 * 0.25)
 
4:33 AM
@stephenbarter what's your problem?
 
10 ** 0.3 = 3.16 * (3.16 * 0.2)
 
10 ** 0.3? What that means?
To the power of?
Or what?
 
I think he means $10^{0.3}$
 
I've noticed when u take around a quarter from each square root.. it gives u a very close estimate of the result
^^sorry I write in python
 
@stephenbarter this will help
 
4:35 AM
It means 10 to the power 3/10
 
Forgive me, i just joined.
 
Also install the addon to convert text into mathematical symbols and stuff
@stephenbarter
 
Hmm ok. Thanks
 
@stephenbarter it will always give close results but not for some values like 0 or 1 or -1
You want to know why it works?
Just prove it by taking y = 2x^x and put the value of y in LHS
For X doesn't equal to zero
 
Yeah. Then I noticed that once you begin using numbers less than 10. The reduction becomes less. For example 9^0.4 is roughly 3 x (3 x 0.266).. instead of the 0.25 which works for sqrt (10)
 
4:52 AM
Sorry if I killed the room, was just hoping someone had some insight into this pattern.
 
5:26 AM
The area bounded on the right by $x+y=2$, on the left by $y=x^2$ and below by $x$-axis is ...
Isn't this correct?
Also, where do we use bounded below by $x$-axis?
@Semiclassical
 
5:57 AM
Outer product= matrix with each component fatten up by a matrix
 
6:32 AM
@TobiasKildetoft, will you please look at above question of mine?
 
Zee
7:30 AM
Language is useless
 
anything is useless if you don't know how to use it
 
Hi all! I finally have a bit of geometric intuition for flux and circulation in vector fields (within the realm of multivariable integral calculus), but was wondering if anyone could shed some light on what the flux of a curl field is from a geometric or physical standpoint.
 
Zee
@skull sup brother
 
hey pal
 
Zee
Chilling ?
 
7:40 AM
yup
u?
 
Zee
What time is it at your end
Ya , am chilling , am tired of thinking though
 
Frankly same haha
 
Zee
That’s language for you
Without language we can do all the same stuff without having to think
It’s wonderful
Paul Dirac didn’t like to talk , I can see why
Ok , that was too crackpotty for this place
Does the Feynman path integral have a solid def
Or are we getting scammed by dick ?
 
Figured out the curl thing from earlier, by the way--never mind on that front.
 
8:25 AM
Does it hold that the integral $\frac{1}{2c}\int_{-\frac{x}{c}}^0\left (\int_{x+c\tau}^{-c\tau-x}f(y,\tau)dyd\tau\right )$ is equal to $0$ ?
 
8:40 AM
Damn these restrictions on the number of characters used. They ask way too many small questions to reasonably answer in 2500 characters (including spaces!), given that it must also be formulated for a layman rather than an expert.
 
"My research is the besterest, give me the money" here I saved you thousand of characters for grants
 
@AlessandroCodenotti I gotta try that for the next one.
Maybe I should just use it here. I don't have particularly high hopes for it anyway, as they seem to be looking for someone more experienced than I am
 
I see, good luck!
 

« first day (2854 days earlier)      last day (2170 days later) »