« first day (2520 days earlier)      last day (2507 days later) » 

2:03 AM
In any case, I recognized it as the derivative of the Lambert W, which has a radius of $-1/e$ as well
 
oh lawd, lambert
 
With a $x\mapsto-x$ substitution, actually, I think
 
The instructions don't make sense
I cant add the link as a bookmark
How do you add a link as a bookmark
 
what browser are you using?
 
Chrome
 
2:05 AM
should be able to click-drag the link up to bookmarks
 
I can't
 
Computer or phone?
 
Computer
 
dunno what to tell you, then.
 
Control-Shift-B (or Command-Shift-B) makes your bookmark bar appear if it's not there already
Well, on Macs it's Command-Shift-B, I'm only guessing for PCs
 
2:07 AM
Hello, Computer!
 
Thanks Akiva
Have you guys ever been to Mu Alpha Theta Nationals
 
bangs head repeatedly against the wall
 
2:23 AM
@ALannister That problem makes more sense, though that doesn't necessarily mean easier to prove.
It basically tells you that you can't factor over Z in a way that's incompatible with factoring over Z/p
@ALannister One (probably silly) observation is that you can assume without loss of generality that $f$ is monic over Z/p. (the first term isn't 0 mod p prime, so it has a multiplicative inverse over Z/p which you can multiply f by.)
 
2:40 AM
How are you semi
hey listen to this
here's a putnam question
"find a formula to find the sum of the first $n$ odd numbers"
 
Is the product of two convergent series always convergent?
 
isn't the formula literally just $n^2$
 
how can that be a putnam question?
that's too easy.
 
idk
is putnam a college math competition?
 
2:46 AM
yes
 
Can you answer my question?
 
oh idk :C I am just an amateur, sorry.
 
oh its ok
What grade are you in
 
I am going into University next year :)
 
what school
 
2:48 AM
Canadian school.
 
yeah.
 
Not U.S.
 
Nah, I felt like staying in Canada :P
 
I'm studying for a national math competition in 2 weeks
 
2:48 AM
oh nice
 
thats going to take place in two weeks
 
are you a high school student?
 
Well, I hope you do well!
 
Did you take the amcs in high school
 
2:49 AM
No, I was severely unmotivated and directionless in high school.
I didn't even like math :)
 
OH
oops i meant oh
and now you like math?
 
It's been a long journey, friend.
I went to "college" (different in Canada than the states)
and didn't like it
I dropped out
and then found an engineering book
started liking engineering
took distance education courses and started to love mathematics.
and now here I am.
 
oh i see
 
I know shockingly less than I should, but I am motivated and passionate and I think if I stick to it I can hopefully become a good mathematician :)
 
good luck :)
 
2:53 AM
Well it wasn't perfect, but I am on the right path now.
And now I am going to the University that was down the road from the college I dropped out of.
Pretty radical.
and if it turns out that I am not good at math, I can always become an engineer! ;)
 
I thought engineers were good at math
 
Eh, it's mostly a joke. But engineering is more computation.
 
Depends on the kind of math.
 
Semiclassical can you answer my question
 
Product of two convergent series?
 
2:55 AM
yes
 
My gut says yes, but that isn't a proof.
 
thats what i thought!
apparently its not
 
huh.
Not sure why you needed me, then :P
 
I just looked at the solution
I just wanted to know if that was an obvious question or not
 
This bit on the Wiki page for convergent series seems relevant: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
 
2:57 AM
Semiclassical are you in hs
 
looool no
 
in college?
 
I'm at the end of grad school. (Which is formally defined as "any point in time when you know you want to get the hell out of grad school")
 
Math major?
 
math+physics for my undergrad
 
2:58 AM
He double majored I believe.
 
Physics PhD program.
 
What school?
 
University of Minnesota for grad.
 
undergrad?
 
also in Minnesota.
I've stayed pretty local.
 
3:00 AM
Did you do putnam?
 
Nah.
There were some regional contests but it wasn't a big deal where I was.
 
I did like to attempt the problems in the math journals, though.
 
Did you do the amcs in hs
 
I should take another look at that.
I don't think so? But that was over a decade ago, so it's not within memory now.
 
3:02 AM
lol i feel you
I'm still in hs :(
 
gotcha.
kinda surprised to see you doing convergent series, though.
Is that for coursework, or for a math exam?
 
Really?
I'm a rising senior I just finished calculus but I'm studying for a math competition in july
 
Granted, my recollection of high school calculus is also dated.
 
I never even learned integrals.
 
I guess there may have been some series stuff for that, though. I can't cast my mind that far back.
 
3:03 AM
I probably won't even be ready for putnam after first year though.
 
Does every university have putnam
 
An example of two conditionally convergent series whose product isn't convergent, btw, is apparently $1-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}-\cdots$ with itself.
Depends what you mean by that.
If you mean whether every university has people who attempt Putnam, I doubt it.
Certainly at the college level it's not true.
 
You should be able to request it in your math department
though it's only for U.S and Canada students, I believe.
 
Whether someone at a given university could take it if they want, is another question and one I have no insight on.
 
the school I am going to meets once a week to discuss putnam
 
3:06 AM
Oh, neat.
 
After this competition I have to start college apps kms
 
hm
are you going into grade 12?
that seems early to begin applying..
or late.
 
I'm going to grade 12 yes
 
Looks like in principle anyone at a US/Canadian college can take the exam, but it requires a bit of setup on the part of your university/college
But I doubt that's much of a hurdle.
 
3:08 AM
yeah if you really want to do it you should be able to.
 
I don't like this competition I'm studying for. Nothing like the AMCs
 
I think I'll look up the latest list of problems in the AMM, see if there's any that seem both interesting and tractable.
 
Whats AMM
 
(It's behind a paywall, but hey university access)
American Mathematical Monthly
 
What if I qualify/ win a bunch of math awards after I already applied to college
 
Could not tell you.
 
qualify for AIME
Can I update colleges?
 
Again, could not tell you.
 
its ok
Is there like a math competition room here or something
 
3:14 AM
That's a good question. Not as far as I know, though.
But that's something which other people might know, so---starred!
hmm, this is a neat-looking question in the latest AMM:
For $x\in(0,1)$, show that $$\prod_{n=1}^\infty (1-x^n)\geq \exp\left(\frac12-\frac1{2(1-x^2)}\right)$$
 
Guys plz helphttp://www.mualphatheta.org/useruploads/files/mu_sequences_&_series_mu_alpha‌​_theta_national_2015.pdf
oops
question 14?
oh shoot wrong one
question 14 on this one
 
$\displaystyle \lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{i=1}^{n^2}\dfrac{e^{i/n}}{ne^n}=?$
 
Well, first think I notice is that the 1/ne^n factor can be brought outside of the sum.
for the remaining series, my thinking is to write out the terms and see if I recognize anything
so that's $1+e^{1/n}+e^{2/n}+\cdots+e^{n^2/n}$
Which looks to be a geometric series.
Once that's summed in closed form and simplified, all that's left is a limit which should be straightforward enough.
 
Ok thnx let me try
 
3:23 AM
mmkay
Hrm. This seems more tedious than it should be.
 
what do you mean?
 
Well, I'm doing the hand calculations for what the sum would be.
And the limit just seems painful.
Doesn't mean it's not the right approach, of course.
 
How would you do the limit
 
Not sure, tbh.
 
Can you explain the solution to me then? Its kinda vague
 
3:29 AM
oh hey, I wondered if that was the approach to use instead.
 
oh really
 
So basically they solve it by making it equivalent to a Riemann sum.
 
How can you recognize that so quickly
 
Well, it helps that they've got the solution :P
 
Can you explain the solution?
 
3:30 AM
And in general when you go from a sum directly to an integral it's because of recognizing it as a Riemann sum.
Well, do you know how a Riemann sum relates to an integral?
 
yes
How did they get from the 2nd to third line
 
Yeah, that's the important one.
So they want to interpret $\displaystyle \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n^2} e^{i/n-n}$ as an integral.
 
By comparison, the Riemann sum definition of an integral is
$$\int_a^b f(x)\,dx= \sum_{i=1}^m f(x_m)\frac{1}{m-1}$$ if I'm remembering right?
hrm.
no, I'm remembering it wrong.
$$\int_a^b f(x)\,dx = \sum_{i=1}^m f(x_m^*)(x_i-x_{i-1})$$ where $[a,b]$ can be partitioned using the $x_m^*$'s
 
3:37 AM
But I'll be honest, I'm not see it immediately. What they've written seems plausible, but I never really felt like this kind of thing was my strong suit.
hmmm
hrm. I guess I really don't see it right now.
They have to be doing a Riemann sum somehow, but how they're doing it is far from obvious to me.
 
I guess I'll default for the moment to the obvious step of writing out the first few terms and see if inspiration strikes:
$$\frac1n e^{1/n-n}+\frac1n e^{2/n-n}+\cdots +\frac1n e^{n^2/n-n}$$
 
Zee
Is 3 hours of math reading/solving a day too little?
 
Depends what you're doing.
 
Zee
3:43 AM
For example , first year gradute math
 
why is everyone here in college lol
 
Zee
Can't tell if am lazy...
 
that seems too low? but I've successfully repressed the memory of my first year of grad school.
 
Zee
Oh man am in trouble
 
3:46 AM
How are they multiplying by 1/n when the limits of integration are from 0 to negative infinity
 
Zee
Three hours and am exhausted
 
tbh during the summer especially before competitions I just do math all day
 
@ChrisNguyen yeah, I'm perplexed by that too.
I mean, it seems right insofar as n is going out to infinity
but I can't piece it together
@Zee Work with others, it helps a lot.
Seriously, that's the only way to not go insane during first year.
 
shouldn't the limits of integration be from 1 to 0 if they are multiplying by 1/n
 
Zee
@ChrisNguyen do you actually sit down and and think technically all day??
I find that unrelatable
 
3:48 AM
@ChrisNguyen Well, bear in mind that the $i$-independent part includes the factor of $e^{-n}$.
 
I guess I don't know how grad school works :P
 
So they're not just multiplying by 1/n.
 
Zee
But it's not about math per say, just the ability to focus for hours
Am not sure anybody can focus on anything HARD for more than a few hours tbh
 
I can actually when I'm doing hard problems
 
@Zee I'll point out that I'm also not quite the right person to ask, since, y'know , Physics not Math PhD.
So other math grad students may have better insight.
 
3:50 AM
@ Semiclassical Oh yea I forgot
 
Zee
Ya, I need more self discipline
 
@ Zee I'm only in hs
@Semiclassical So they are actually mutliplying by $$\frac{1}{ne^n}$$
 
Right. At least that's how I think it should be understood?
 
Zee
@ChrisNguyen maybe it makes a difference, I didn't gradute HS :p
 
I still don't see how they got to the integral
 
3:55 AM
At this point a lot of my self-discipline has just been exhausted.
 
Zee
@Semiclassical sounds to me like you need a vacation
 
why do you think I want to get out of grad school?
 
My vacation is a math competition in New York :P
 
Zee
Well you can travel during the summer semi
Go to Thailand or Argentina
 
Eh. Depends what you're doing.
 
Zee
3:57 AM
Aware me
 
This particular summer I'm trying to get my exit plan figured out.
So travelling wouldn't be a great idea.
 
Zee
Do it while traveling, or travel for a couple weeks, trust me, two weeks and you will know what the heck you need to do
 
there's some truth to that.
 
Zee
Has nothing to do with "finding yourself" it's all about just changing your perspective outwardly
And for a short period of time, till you can look at your life soberly
 
Anyone see how they got the integral?
 
Zee
4:00 AM
What integral
 
Basically, we're trying to figure out the following step which a solution makes:
$$\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n^2} e^{i/n-n} = \int_{-\infty}^0 e^{x}\,dx.$$
It seems plausible as a "oh hey Riemann sum" thing, but
plausible isn't a proof :P
 
Zee
Man, it's been a while since I seen a specific integral
 
Do you guys not do this stuff as math majors
 
not so much, really. and if I did, it's been literally years
life isn't just math competitions :)
 
True
 
Zee
4:06 AM
Depends on the course, I only seen specific integral in calculus but even then they were simple
 
one thing I can see is that, if you write $j=n^2-i$, then the sum becomes $\frac{1}{n}\sum_{j=0}^{n^2-1}e^{-j/n}$
 
Zee
Math isn't math competitions...
 
Not convinced that's helpful, though.
 
I just need to do well on math competitions to get into college ya know
 
Zee
Nothing wrong with competitions just does not capture the poetic aspects of math
 
4:09 AM
And really doesn't tell you much about research.
 
I know
But how can I do research when I'm in hs
 
Zee
@ChrisNguyen let me tell you about a little secret in math, a second rate department might still have a few leading top mathematicians in their specific domain
 
Therein lies the problem.
But, hey, that's why you go to college.
 
I'm probably gonna do a math minor not major
 
Zee
@ChrisNguyen why???
You don't wanna be loved and admired?
 
4:11 AM
Got something else in mind?
@Zee ...
you're kidding, right
 
Zee
Chicks love mathematcians bro
 
I want to go to med school
 
Can I live in your universe? Sounds like an interesting place.
 
Zee
Pffff docs are just glorified mechanics
 
4:12 AM
naaaaah
mechanics don't end up with nearly as much debt :P
 
Zee
Hahaha
if that's your calling it's your calling
But lots of people wanna be docs for reasons that will make them miserable
 
like
 
i'll say that med school seems like an absolute grinder
i say that with more ignorance than knowledge of the process, though
 
Zee
like going in to help people and then wishing that patient that never stops cursing you out would die so you would not have to deal with his crap
 
4:15 AM
chill
 
It is a pretty exhausting profession, yeah.
 
Zee
Am telling you what I heard from a friend of mine whose a nurse
You stop caring at all who lives and who dies until one day you break down couse the guy who died has a name close to yours
 
Burnout isn't uncommon, no.
 
Zee
Am just giving you the awful stuff I heard , but it has its good moments too
After 12 years of debt
Become a scientist, they are like doctors but cooler
 
That's one thing which grad school has over med school: You get paid as a TA.
i.e. you don't have to accumulate more debt on top of what you got from college.
 
Zee
4:19 AM
And you do research
 
Can we just get back to the math q plz?
 
Works for me.
 
Zee
Lol he got shook
 
Zee
The moral of what am saying is, know what you like, don't listen to what is "in" , just go for anything you love and pays the bills
 
4:21 AM
The main thing I'm noticing right now is that $\int_0^{n^2}\frac{1}{n}e^{-x/n}\,dx=1-e^{-n}\to 1$ as $n\to\infty$.
But I'm not seeing how to quite connect that with $\frac{1}{n}\sum_{j=0}^{n^2-1}e^{-j/n}$
 
Zee
So the left side converges to 1?
 
Sure, that's the final desired result.
I feel like it should almost be obvious :(
 
Zee
Idk why bring in the integral , isn't more pleasant to work with the series?
 
well, the resulting limit isn't great.
 
Zee
Can you post the original question?
 
4:26 AM
But it's probably worth giving the series solution in any case.
It's up there in the transcript somewhere...
The problem is found elsewhere, but tbh it's pretty much self-explanatory from the setup of the solution.
 
When I solved the integral I didn't get what you got
 
Zee
And you wanna prove the solution?
 
@ Zee yes
 
@ChrisNguyen Yeah, I'm doing a slightly modified route I think.
But really, $\int_{-\infty}^0 e^x\,dx$ and $\int_0^\infty e^{-x}\,dx$ aren't that different.
Anyways, going from the sum I just wrote out: $\frac1n \sum_{j=0}^{n^2-1} e^{-j/n}$ is a geometric sum and gives the closed form
$\dfrac{1}{n} \dfrac{e^{-n}-e^{-1/n}}{e^{-1/n}-1}$
...blah, I've done something wrong. That doesn't give the correct limit.
 
wait howd you get that
all the e stuff
 
4:32 AM
Well, if the form I wrote out was correct, that's a sum of the form $\sum_{j=0}^{m-1}x^j=1+x+\cdots+x^{m-1}$
But that's a geometric series which equals $\frac{x^m-1}{x-1}$
 
So you are not going the rieman sum to integral route?
 
Which actually means I was a bit wrong. Should be $e^{-n}-1$ on top.
Yeah, I want to see how well the direct approach works.
So (moving it around a bit to be more convenient) I want $\dfrac{1}{n} \dfrac{1-e^{-n}}{1-e^{-1/n}}$ as $n\to\infty$
This is not too hard to do, though. As $n\to\infty$, the top becomes 1.
On the bottom, the behavior of $e^{x}$ for small $x$ is $1+x+\cdots$.
 
Hi $\phantom{What's up}$
 
So $n(1-e^{-1/n})=n(1-(1-1/n+1/(2n^2)\cdots))=1-1/(2n)\to 1$ as $n\to\infty$
hence it goes to 1/1 = 1 as $n\to\infty$
I don't really like that approach, but it does get you to the right place.
 
4:36 AM
I got lost
 
...yeah, there's the other problem :P
 
let me catch myself up
 
So, here's the series solution starting from the problem statement.
okay, I'll hold on
 
How did the numerator in the geometric sum
I thought a geometric sum was a(1-r^n)/(1-r)
r is the common ratio and a is the first term
 
Let's be specific just so that I don't mix myself up:
$$a\dfrac{1-r^n}{1-r}=a+ar+ar^2+\cdots + ar^{n-1}$$
Right?
 
4:43 AM
yes
 
And, just to make sure we're on the same page, which summation are you trying to do? (I've got two versions written down, and while they're equivalent I'd rather avoid any confusion)
 
the e^(1/n)+e^(2/n)+...+e^(n^2/n) summation
 
okay.
So that's got $a=r=e^{1/n}$, and instead of $n$ it's $n^2$
So that'll sum to $e^{1/n}\dfrac{1-e^{n^2/n}}{1-e^{1/n}}$
Recalling that the original series was $\displaystyle \sum_{i=1}^n \dfrac{e^{i/n}}{ne^n}$
 
Wait plz
howd you get the e^(n^2/n) term
 
Remember, that's $r=e^{1/n}$ with the $n$ in the geometric series being $n^2$.
So the numerator should contain $1-r^{n^2}=1-(e^{1/n})^{n^2}=1-e^{n^2/n}=1-e^n$.
 
4:52 AM
I'm still thinking sorry
ok i got it
 
Mmkay.
 
but what happened to the e^(1/n)
 
If you're comparing to what I had earlier, note that what I was doing there wasn't the original series.
it was the one I got by taking $j=n^2-i$
So that one would look slightly different.
But we don't really need to do that here. We can just work with the original series.
So let me do that...
 
How do you guys pronounce $\ln$?
 
lawn.
usually.
(sometimes L-N)
 
Zee
4:58 AM
L n
Lawn lol
 
We just argued that $$\sum_{i=1}^{n^2}e^{i/n}=e^{1/n}\dfrac{1-e^n}{1-e^{1/n}}$$
 
0
Q: How to decide $36th$ smallest element in max-heap tree of $100$ elements?

Mithlesh Upadhyay Consider a max heap tree with $100$ elements and a node from the same level is chosen randomly. What is the probability that it is the $36th$ smallest element______ . My attempt: Somewhere, it explained as: $P = 1/7∗0+1/7∗1/2+1/7∗1/4+1/7∗1/8+1/7∗1/16+1/7∗1/32+1/7∗1/37=0.087$ According ...

Take a look please.
 
So therefore the original series becomes $$\sum_{i=1}^{n^2} \dfrac{e^{i/n}}{ne^n}=\dfrac{e^{1/n}}{ne^n}\dfrac{1-e^n}{1-e^{1/n}}$$
 
Zee
@Semiclassical nice result
 
4:59 AM
yes
 

« first day (2520 days earlier)      last day (2507 days later) »