« first day (2476 days earlier)      last day (2560 days later) » 

7:00 PM
A promposal is a new word considered for inclusion.
 
@Astyx I'm not fond of more centrist-right economic policy, which is what EM promises
 
It means asking someone to go to prom with you.
 
Academie francaise (or something) is just straight up the authority on the French language
 
I usually take the approach that if people are using the word on a social level, it's a word regardless of whether or not it's in any dictionary
 
@Mike I can understand and agree with that
 
7:00 PM
Even if there is a regulatory body we can choose to ignore it.
 
Or at least in France, not sure whether Quebec and Africa subscribe to it
 
I'm glad I can abbreviate and criticise both at the same time :)
 
Is there a word for the graph consisting of lattice points and the one-unit edges between them?
 
@Daminark portuguese has one but most people ignore it because it's an attempt to regulate something which is basically impossible to regulate.
 
@Daminark Which is why we don't have "lol" (or "mdr" more appropriately in french) in our dictionaries :p
 
7:02 PM
Well, I suppose "grid" is fine
 
@MikeMiller I think Americans spell it as criticize.
 
I mean sure people can use it but say, in an academic or governmental context they better follow the rules
I'm waiting for Merriam-Webster to adopt the word "Kek"
3
 
I don't really care as long as people know what I mean and Ted doesn't make a fuss.
 
@Astyx Well, partly because lol is an English word, not a French word.
 
We use it nearly as often as you do in english @JasonBourne
 
7:04 PM
@Daminark It's not used that much though,
 
@Astyx You mean mdr?
 
My mission is to change that
@Jason He said mdr...
 
@Jason No I mean "lol". Do you use "mdr" ? That would really surprise me
Of course in "you" I mean "common people"
 
@Astyx No, I don't even know what mdr means.
 
Revelation: the fact that the characteristic polynomial of a $2 \times 2$ matrix $A$ is $\lambda^2 - \mathrm{tr}(A)\lambda + \mathrm{det}(A)$ very nicely anticipates Vieta's formula.
 
7:06 PM
It's an abbreviation for "mort de rire", ie "dead out of laughter"
Or "dying of laughter" I guess
 
There was this stupid lecturer who went on and on about how he knew how to solve the cubic and he was the only one in the department who could do it. He did not even mention the quartic.
 
And apparently we were doing big words, so if I may be forgiven for a foray into German:
Rindfleischetikettierungsueberwachungsuebertragungsgesetz
 
At some point in an apocalyptic near-future the vocabulary would probably just boil down to a bunch of acronyms, with little to no vowels present. (T sm pt in a nr-ftr th vcblry wd pbly jst bl dwn t a bnch of acrnms)
 
@Fargle I hereby award you a star, though in German they join words every day.
 
@Balarka I doubt so
 
7:08 PM
@BalarkaSen Welcome to Hebrew
 
I think that might be possible in interpersonal speech, but within subjects and industries the nature of jargon would probably keep the language full.
 
There's a reason it hasn't yet, partially because redundance is essential to communication
however there are obviously exceptions such as, as Akiva pointed out, Hebrew
 
Where "Welcome to Hebrew" is spelled "brvk hb’ l‘bryt" @BalarkaSen
 
@Astyx It's Hal Draper's visions, not mine! He hypothesized that this would be part of a futuristic information-control mania (trillian.mit.edu/~jc/humor/Ms_fnd_in_a_Lbry.html)
 
Biángbiáng noodles (simplified Chinese: 面; traditional Chinese: 麵; pinyin: biángbiángmiàn), also known as 油泼扯面; 油潑扯麵; yóupō chěmiàn, are a type of noodle popular in China's Shaanxi province. The noodles, touted as one of the "ten strange wonders of Shaanxi" (陕西十大怪), are described as being like a belt, owing to their thickness and length. == Description == The noodle is broad and hand-made. It was originally part of a poor man's meal in the countryside, but has recently become popular in fashionable restaurants due to the unique character used in its name. == Use in dishes == Dishes with...
 
7:10 PM
(Well, the "v" and the "y" are actually functioning as vowels in the above)
 
I also wasn't doing much for than joking.
 
Chinese character with the most number of strokes. ^
 
I feel like I used to text like that, but only because I had a flip phone, once things changed and full keyboards became a thing, I didn't really do that anymore.
 
I've heard of that, it's pretty cool @JasonBourne
 
@AkivaWeinberger Huh! Weird
 
7:10 PM
It's not even in Unicode
 
@BalarkaSen I guessed that :p Just wanted to input my (unasked for) opinion
 
Haha, fair enough
 
@AkivaWeinberger Yeah it doesn't show up in the box, one must click on the link to see it.
 
I anticipate language going a memetic route and everyone will say "whomst'd've'ff"
 
@BalarkaSen Will you show us the most complicated word in some Indian language?
 
7:12 PM
Language was already memetic in the strictest sense. It's very easy to glom culture onto language by its nature.
 
Nah
 
@Daminark Mdr
 
That's part of why language lends itself so well to idiomatic expressions and figurativity.
 
@Daminark You'd.
 
I was shooting more for memetic bastardization but kek
@Mike Lolol
 
7:13 PM
What does kek mean?
 
@Daminark there's an episode of star trek where an alien speaks entirely in references to their cultural myths
 
It's an internet lol, apparently came from World of Warcraft
Nice @Eric
 
I have seen lel too.
 
@Daminark And Koreans
 
kek is like a russian lol
 
7:15 PM
Which is kind of like speaking through memes
 
Do you guys know about ASMR?
 
Brazilians also sometimes write kek
but not in reference to wow
 
@BalarkaSen it's just a deformation of lel
top kek
 
I don't get ASMR. I don't feel any tingles when I watch.
 
@BalarkaSen Thought the Russian lol was "xaxaxa"
 
7:15 PM
topkek and kek are unrelated @MikeMiller
 
Deformation theory of complex manifolds.
 
i don't believe you
 
topkek is some turkish brand of snack
 
There's also a Turkish dessert called "Topkek", which has somehow figured into the meme
 
@Eric Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra.
 
7:16 PM
yeah i have heard of the origins but it feels russian
 
(Two people swinging at the same ball… @Eric @Damin)
 
yeah but that's obviously not the origin
 
kek was the way alliance players saw Horde people say lol in chat in WoW
 
@AkivaWeinberger Oh, sounds familiar to my favorite word, "axaxaxax mlo"
ml\"o I should say
 
there was the meme with the top gun hat
 
7:16 PM
There was a girl who always said hahax instead of haha.
 
@Fargle that's like my favorite episode
 
and then people made it into top lel, and later top kek
 
@Akiva For real today is the day of sniping
 
and then they found out "topkek" is actually real etc etc
 
@Fargle Gilgamesh and Enkidu at Uruk :)
 
7:17 PM
@Eric It's a very clever one.
 
wow
sorry for doubting you Eric
 
Wait I thought they had kek, found out about topkek, said "kek, let's incorporate it", and then decided to pull it back to lel to get top lel
 
Did you know that once someone did not cast Tom Cruise because they said he was not handsome enough?
 
This is interesting
@Jason I'm presuming this Tom Cruise is handsome?
 
Anyway, many actors look like shit when they are not filming...
 
@Daminark He is the star in Top Gun.
 
Is there a name for Eulerian paths in grids that only intersect themselves transversally?
 
memes converging is weird
 
A grid being a finite rectangular lattice of points with the one-unit edges between them
Well, not even necessarily Eulerian, actually
 
@AkivaWeinberger You could say "No tangent vertices"
or something
 
7:19 PM
@AkivaWeinberger When people say 3 by 5 grid do they mean there are 15 dots?
 
@Eric Is the space of memes complete?
 
Actually, "Eulerian" is definitely not what I want
 
absolutely not
 
I want it to hit every vertex, not edge
 
hamiltonian
 
7:20 PM
It's discrete @Daminark
 
@Daminark How do you define meme addition anyway ?
 
@Astyx LOL + KEK = LOLKEK
 
Lel
 
So it's automatically always going to be complete
 
@MikeMiller But it can hit the same vertex twice, as long as it's transverse (like a cross rather than a ")(" shape)
 
7:21 PM
@Astyx I think concatenation/composition could serve as our operation. Though completeness doesn't quite need that
 
Then definitely not @JasonBourne That's like the free group
 
@JasonBourne Sure
@Daminark KEK+LOL=KOK?
 
Except it's not a group
 
asks naïvely
 
The free monoid
 
7:22 PM
@AkivaWeinberger KEK + LOL = WTW
 
Is our identity just the pure form of meme? If so maybe you could make a group out of it
 
♫ Lolkok, oriental setting and the city don't know what the city is getting ♫
 
@Daminark I am waiting for Merriam-Webster to print Webster's Fourth New International Dictionary, because the third was in 1961.
 
what's happening here
2
 
@AkivaWeinberger I know what you meant
 
7:22 PM
i can't keep track of stuff
 
Lots and lots of stars being given this evening
 
"For every meme there exists another such that their composition makes it devoid of content and reduces it to the pure form of meme"
 
$\Large\star$
 
@Astyx Did you know that a conductor once told a soprano who said she is a star that there are only stars in the sky?
 
Yeah I don't even know how the starboard works anymore
Though that sentence is rather relatable
 
7:24 PM
@Daminark It's the right side of the ship, yeah?
 
@Jason Who said what to whom ?
 
snaps eyy
 
Was the conductor female ?
 
@Astyx I don't know. My pianist friend told me years ago.
 
(I guess the soprano was)
 
7:25 PM
Yeah, though there are male sopranos.
They either sing in falsetto or their voices did not really crack.
 
Sure, that's why it's a guess :)
 
I wonder whether there are female basses?
 
Surely
 
@MikeMiller If manifolds with boundaries aren't manifolds, perhaps I can let transverse Hamiltonian paths not be Hamiltonian paths.
 
Anyway guys the thickest single volume book I have is my 2800 page Oxford Paravia Italian Dictionary.
 
7:27 PM
In any case: Conjecture: There is precisely one transverse Hamiltonian cycle through a $2^n\times2^n$ grid (counting dots, not edges) that always turns clockwise.
For $n=2$ it's that clover thing on Mac keyboards.
(I know that there's at least one, I don't know that there's at most one)
 
@Akiva that sounds interesting
 
@AkivaWeinberger Should I get a Mac if I never tried one?
 
I haven't tried both so I can't say
 
Maybe I'll do some foliations before sleeping today
 
@JasonBourne install gentoo
 
7:30 PM
Rip Riemannian geometry
 
@AkivaWeinberger Does your Mac freeze now and then?
 
Not very often
 
@SteamyRoot I have used Debian for a while. Gentoo is too difficult for me, lol.
 
Protip: Don't download "Clean Your Mac."
 
One thing about Mac is that though it has Office from Microsoft it is not supported for as long and not as updated.
 
7:32 PM
Office isn't that good anyway (imho)
 
What's the Mac equivalent of Office? Is it really good?
 
Just get LibreOffice. It can take a while to get used to if you're coming from Microsoft Office; but it pretty much has all you need, and it's FLOSS
 
^
 
@BalarkaSen Maybe you can take a look at Petersen's Riemannian Geometry and Sakai's Riemannian Geometry as well. I think those are very hard though.
 
I have enough trouble learning stuff from a single book
i don't collect books, i also try to learn stuff from them
 
7:35 PM
You think you have enough
 
@SteamyRoot Well, I got Office because I don't like LibreOffice, especially the equation editor. I don't always use TeX for equations.
 
recommends yet another Riemannian geo book to Balarka
 
noo
 
Of course, I just like Lee's Riemannian Manifolds, though it doesn't contain much material.
 
@JasonBourne If you attended my science communication course, you'd just have failed.
 
7:37 PM
@Balarka weren't you using that Gallot something something one
 
But I like his treatment of the Hopf's Umlaufsatz and the Gauss-Bonnet theorem.
 
Oooh, are we spamming Riemannian geometry? I can upload some course notes...
 
yeah, Hulin and Lafontaine being those something somethings :P
I also use doCarmo to side read
 
Ah yes yes
Neves had me read some of it and I find it really hard to read GHL
 
actually i thought that but i am getting the hang of it
 
7:38 PM
GHL seem to be students of Marcel Berger.
 
It's the only intro Riemannian book I like
 
Because do Carmo doesn't do any forms stuff and he wanted to do some stuff about the laplacian on forms
 
@MikeMiller Why do you like GHL?
 
Jost is my taste but doesn't really make you feel the geometry
 
@MikeM I was planning on picking up Jost at some point cause it gives me the impression that it's kind of analysis-y, which I like
 
7:40 PM
Jost also has a book on calculus of variations.
 
<- no love for symbolic calculations
 
Marcel Berger has a long book on A Panoramic View of Riemannian Geometry, which is like a survey and not a textbook.
Calculations are very important. Without them, there is no food.
 
In working through the book you get a good concrete picture of the geometry of Riemannian manifolds; discussion of lots of explicit examples (and geodesics before curvature IIRC which I prefer as it's more visual)
the calculus of variations book is a conference proceedings
 
@Balarka same tho
 
@MikeMiller Wait, I think we are talking about different books. Jost has a COV textbook, published by CUP, grey cover.
 
7:43 PM
ok
@Eric You would like Jost. How much PDE do you know?
 
I've done some PDE from a functional analysis course and have read and done exercises for like half of Evans book
 
I don't know any PDE but I am using Folland's book for that.
 
ah, thats good
I was going to suggest Taylor's series
 
SoumyoB's starred message some hours ago kinda lost it's use now with all those new stars
 
@Astyx One should always update his computer anyway
 
7:46 PM
@Eric/@MikeM: How do I prove smooth manifolds are triangulable? Do I prove that a geodesically convex atlas is a good cover, and throw nerve theorem at it?
 
Sure, just saying
 
@Astyx But sometimes, after an update, something breaks. =)
 
I've been recommended Taylor's books but I'm broke and don't like online copies of books :/
 
I don't update my mac, I don't want to sell my soul to Apple
 
chicago library?
 
7:47 PM
If you are broke, you can always use copyleft versions first.
 
Right I guess I could check there
I usually never check out library books
 
Also, you need to return library books in X days.
Maybe you need X+Y days to read them.
Another solution is try to look for international editions of expensive books on abebooks.com
 
I've checked out a few, they tend to give you a reasonable amount of time. I checked out a book at the beginning of the quarter and they gave me until June 30th
 
at least as a grad student at UCLA I have 180 days per check out and can just renew online at home
so I don't need to take them back unless somebody asks
 
180 days is very good.
I like UCLA.
 
7:51 PM
+1 to UCLA because nice
 
Someone returned a library book after a few decades, a news article said. Some months ago.
 
actually I just checked and I was supposed to return the two books I have out from the main library over six months ago and they now consider them lost
 
I might get my hands on them from the library when summer starts since i'll have a lot of free time in june before a summer school starts
 
@MikeM Oops
 
@MikeMiller LOL. I think you at most need to pay a small fine of a few cents.
 
7:53 PM
i worked through various chunks of those at some point but i can't promise i remember all of it
 
I need to review/learn more PDE anyway or ill be completely lost when I attend analysis things this summer
 
Actually, nerve theorem won't do. It just proves it's homotopy equivalent to a simplicial complex.
 
I think in the third volume of Taylor he proves the Nash embedding theorem for compact Riemannian manifolds.
 
oh that's cool
 
@MikeMiller I like how they consider them lost rather than sending an email to the last person who borrowed them
 
7:56 PM
Can I prove a smooth manifold is homemorphic to a simplicial complex using geodesic neighborhoods?
 
I don't remember getting emails
 
Not sure how.
 
@BalarkaSen Try like this. Enumerate the finite cover and start in the first $U_1$. Pick a small standard simplex centered at the origin of as large radius as possible to fit into the geodesic chart, and exponentiate it. There will be pieces of the chart not covered, but you can glue a simplex (of a different shape) to the boundary of your last one inside your geodesic neighborhood to cover more space. Continue doing this until every point of $U_1$ not covered by your simplices is...
...contained inside one of the other $U_i$. Then make sure your boundary faces are small enough that each of them fits inside some $U_i$.
 
Got class so peace out for now frenz
 
The crucial fact that lets you induct between the charts is that the transition maps here are well-behaved - the boundaries of your simplices are (well, should be designed to be, maybe I did a bad job) totally geodesic, which is a property preserved by isometries
 
8:00 PM
See ya @Dami
 
I am really unconvinced about filling in the gaps. I guess you could take a point in a gap and exponentiate a polygon from it to fill it in (if the gaps are small enough, which is by constuction)
And then triangulate polygon
 
How should I refer to the fact that a shear is area invariant? I remember there was some kind of name for it for polygons.
 
@MikeMiller Ah, true.
 
I'll get going too, bye
 
@BalarkaSen Well, I'm not worried about triangulating each of the charts. The problem that stops you from doing this inductively in general is that when you change between charts the transition map might totally mess up your previous simplices.
 
So you're not sure how to continue the triangulation.
 
@AkivaWeinberger Thanks! Was blanking on it.
 
@MikeMiller Yeah, I didn't notice you were doing it for a chart first and then inducting. That's good intuition.
 
@Fargle It's more than just linear shears.
 
@AkivaWeinberger Right, I just couldn't express exactly what I meant succinctly. >_>
 
8:04 PM
The "adjacentness" of the geodesic triangles are preserved here, that's all. Gotcha.
 
It's interesting how they related a sphere to the complement of a double cone in a cylinder.
 
Yeah, that's damn clever.
4/3 just falls right out
 
Yeah Cavelieri's principle is really strange
 
Lucky thing it's true, though.
(If an inevitability can be lucky...)
 
I think classical results like triangulation of surfaces follow from Schoenflies theorem, whose main content is that continuous curves in surfaces are locally flat.
 
8:07 PM
True that.
 
So when you change charts the local flatness shows you can rectify the old triangulation to one that looks nice in your new chart.
 
Ah, I see
I haven't carefully read the TOP proof of triangulability of surfaces
 
I mean, that's it
Do these authors somewhere claim you can triangulate manifolds w Riemannian geometry?
 
Nope, I just heard it somewhere, and I thought I saw an easy proof upto homotopy equivalence by nerve theorem. But I couldn't immediately come up with a proof upto homeomorphism.
(I think all manifolds are homotopy equivalent to simplicial complexes?)
 
sure, embed them in high-dim'l euclidean space and take a normal neighborhood
 
8:11 PM
It should also be easy to do it smoothly without nerve. Take an embedding in R^n, take a tubular neighborhood, triangulate it carefully
and use that spaces dominated by simplicial complexes is simplicial complex
 
OK, I'm not 100% convinced about what I said, since the only thing I can make sure are totally geodesic by exponentiating are the bits coming radially from the origin, but not the 'edges' of the simplices
 
Do any of you know some techniques to get over regret?
 
That's a hell of a question
 
or reduce regret. I dont know
 
Well, in Riemannian manifolds, you admit neighborhoods which are totally geodesically convex. Any two points can be joined by geodesics
 
8:13 PM
@Balarka: Better put in "complete"
 
@Ted Hm, why would I need that if I only care about local neighborhoods? Am I being dumb?
 
Yeah but what I want is to fill in a totally geodesic $\partial \Delta^k$ with a totally geodesic $\Delta^k$. Can I do that?
 
Just criticizing your glib "any two points can be joined by geodesics"
 
@MikeMiller Just join the vertices with geodesics, right?
 
"in the totally geodesically convex nbhds"
 
8:15 PM
@Ted I meant inside the neighborhood
 
OK ... I'll remember to be a mind-reader :)
 
lol :P
 
Hi @Ted!
 
@BalarkaSen I'm worried that those run into, say, some other part of the triangulation
 
Hi @Fargle
 
8:16 PM
You'll never guess what I'm doing.
 
But you know this stuff better than I do, you should figure out whether this works
 
Procrastinating?
 
What do you all regret?
 
The exact opposite!
 
I regret my existence
 
8:17 PM
takes Fargle's temperature
 
@JingWeng Procrastination. And what Balarka said.
 
stop that, you guys
 
@BalarkaSen did you tell your parents?
 
Cover most of $U_1$ with a totally geodesic triangulation, then most of $U_2$ extending the previous, etc.
Yeah this totally works. I was confusing myself by thinking about the exponential map.
You should just work entirely geometrically.
 
I don't think my existence has much to do with my parents. Certainly the source of my existence, but that's not what I regret.
@MikeMiller Right, I think it should work too.
 
8:20 PM
The hardest thing is making the first simplex, in which you have to pick a bunch of points not on a plane...
but then you just pick an already-existing face and a new vertex, prove nothing else could be contained in this, and add a new simplex
Very cool.
 
Right, exactly
 
Hello, please iff $f$ is continuous over [0,1], and $\int_0^1 x |f(x)| dx=0$ how to deduce that $f\equiv 0$ ?
someone here ?
 
Rehi chat
 
@Vrouvrou Start by proving that for $g$ continuous and $g(x) \geq 0$, $\int_0^1 g(x) dx = 0 \implies g \equiv 0$
 
Hi @Alessandro
 
8:30 PM
ohi
 
Can I bug you with a pde question? @Ted
lol he ran away as I was asking, was that a coincidence? maybe :P
 
what was the question?
 
@SteamyRoot i know this then i have that $x=0$ or $f(x)=0$
 
But $x = 0$ only when, well, $x = 0$. So for all other $x \in [0,1]$ ...?
 
We showed that if $f\in C^2_0(\Bbb R^n)$ then the identity $f(x)=\int_{\Bbb R^n}G_n(x,y)\Delta_yf(y)\text{d}x$ holds. Now we want to use this to construct solutions to the Poisson equation $\Delta f=\phi$ with $f(x)\to 0$ uniformly in all directions and $\phi\in C^2_0(\Bbb R^n)$
We asserted that there is a unique solution of the form $f(x)=\int_{\Bbb R^n}G_n(x,y)f(y)\text{d}x$ and we argue that it is a solution based on the fact above. I don't see why $f$ necessarily has compact support here though
($G_n(x,y)$ is a fundamental solution to the Laplace equation here)
ah, wait I wrote it wrong. The solution should be $f(x)=\int_{\Bbb R^n}G_n(x,y)\phi(y)\text{d}y$ and the identity we use is $f(x)=\Delta_x\int_{\Bbb R^n}G_n(x,y)f(y)\text{d}y$ (which is equivalent to the one above)
and I also got it now, I don't need $f$ with compact support, it's $\phi$ that needs to have compact support and that's given. That was dumb
 
8:49 PM
Hrmf. Random question: is there any general strategy/approach to determine if a $2$-parameter family (over $\mathbb{Z}$) can be written as a finite union of $1$-parameter families?
 
when $x\in]0,1]$ then $f(x)=0$ but in $x=0$ ? @SteamyRoot
 
@Vrouvrou $f$ is continuous
 
A continuous function that is positive somewhere is bounded below by a positive number over an interval. Meditate on this and you will find the way @Vrouvrou. And do remember what I told you the last time.
 
@Vrouvrou x\in{]0,1]} $x\in{]0,1]}$ has better spacing, in my opinion
 
@AkivaWeinberger IMAO spacing questions are for TeX SE, lol.
 
8:56 PM
(It stops the $\in$ from sticking to the $]$)
 
Are there $C^2$ solutions $\phi:\Bbb R^n\to\Bbb R$ to $\Delta\phi=\phi$ apart from those of the form $\sum\limits_{i=1}^n (a_ie^{x_i}+b_ie^{-x_i})$?
 
The other thing @Vrouvrou is that a lot of these questions have been asked in books and online in many places, and the solutions are everywhere.
But if one does many questions without thinking about what one is doing, then one gets nowhere, except a bunch of solutions to a bunch of problems.
 

« first day (2476 days earlier)      last day (2560 days later) »