nope at all 9 pages noone uses sage sry

it's fine

If you need to cheat here oeis.org/A002025

thank you anyway :-)

and here oeis.org/A002046

Shall i say the result ?

I'm good from here. Thank you for all you have done.

It's weird. I get 31,626

thats right

@DominicMichaelis Ah

Thanks

but you didn't calculate that with your code or ?

$\Huge\text{(removed)}$ @Ethan Hi

hi

@pen because your code is very ineffective

And ugly.

There should be no place in the world for ugly code.

Unfortunately, ugliness will always have a place in the world.

@JonasTeuwen of course not! death!

YES.

@anon yes

had to go check google to make sure

@anon O.o

@anon you are not christian?

I was raised christian.

aah

I come from a catholic family

and studied in a catholic school

Easter is the most important date

same, except only half catholic (my mom is evangelical)

@Charlie therefore it follows that you are no longer catholic?

@Arkamis I am

Ah! A counterexample!

@Arkamis ?

there is a joke that Catholic school succeeds mainly in teaching the Catholic out of people

That makes it a failed conjecture.

My dad grew up going to Catholic school... he hasn't been in a church for anything except funerals in nearly 40 years.

Hi @CтарыйДжон how are you?

@Arkamis it was a pretty good school

@Cтарый Hii!!

@κρανίοπεριπολία Hi - I am well, thanks - and you?

"Give me a child for for his first seven years and I'll give you the man" - attributed to jesuits (I went to a jesuit hs)

Hi @Charlie

@CтарыйДжон Fine thanks.

@CтарыйДжон How are you, John?

The sisters at my father's school were very strict; also, my father was a troublemaker. This was not a good combination.

@Charlie Great, thanks! - How are things with you?

@CтарыйДжон Excellent!

@Charlie :)

@Arkamis it was a priest school

@JonasTeuwen how do you write latex on that chrome book?

Gotta run see ya' all later

@κρανίοπεριπολία Bye for now

@κρανίοπεριπολία BYE!

hola @peter

oh shit

@Arkamis what????

In future, I think I will only reply to κρανίοπεριπολία in Greek - serve him right for changing his name to Greek :)

A Russian hockey player died after a headshot in a Khazak league.

@Arkamis oh my!!!

@CтарыйДжон :D

@Cтарый Джон Hi into a question ?

@mick maybe

@Charlie you appreciated the irony: +1 :)

@mick you see, I'm here

@CтарыйДжон ;) always

@CтарыйДжон what irony ?

@mick sorry - that was meant for Charlie

@CтарыйДжон k

@Charlie i already saw

GOOD

Maybe this is trivial but Im stuck

@Cтарый Джон

@mick what exactly is the question?

Some guy "Tommy1729" seems to have posted some rambling rubbish - but I can't see a question

the question is about understanding and a proof of the behaviour measured.

@mick I repeat: what exactly is the question?

^[n] means n th iteration. for clarity. its about iteration x+ln(x) n times when we start with 2. Is that clear so far ?

@CтарыйДжон ?

@mick Yes - but I would advise reading stuff by real mathematicians - this guy Tommy is not making much sense, I'm afraid

@CтарыйДжон hes just a bit sloppy. if it was nonsense he would have gotten a negative reply there. ( it is moderated by hendrik trappman afterall )

Can you prove the bahaviour is like x + n (ln(n) + ln^[2](n) + ln^[3](n)) ln(x) for many values of n ?

@mick sorry - I am not convinced that is a useful line of research

hello can anyone answer any questions about lie algebras?

@CтарыйДжон But do you understand the question ?

or any idea who or what can help me ?

Does anyone have anything intresting to say about iterations of x + ln(x) ??

@mick The whole thing is far too vague - "can you prove the behaviour is "like" ... for "many values" of n" - too many undefined concepts

hello

@mick - If you can make the question much more precise, you could try posting on main

@Andrew123321 Hi Andrew

can anyone please explain how to compute lim ((-2)^n + 3^n) / ( (-2)^(n+1) + 3^(n+1) ) as n approaches infinity? (wolfram alpha: bit.ly/10rsKjt) It has to be some trivial transformation but I just can't figure it out. Thanks

@Andrew123321 Partial fractions, maybe?

multiply top and bottom by 3^-n

@CтарыйДжон He means interpolates x + n(ln(n) + ... ln^[k](x)) ln(x) with precision o(1).

Bloody hell, this time my 'maximum work load' has dropped due to chronic pain 8-).

:D

if you know what I mean

ergh. The author of this book drives me absolutely frigging crazy.

@mick As I said, probably best to formulate a decent question and ask on main

@CтарыйДжон I think it is already clear to an expert in the field , but for here you are probably correct.

@Mick no one knows what you mean. Write up the question in clear, logical steps. Maybe by writing the question clearly you will find an answer. Otherwise, stop begging. It's annoying.

Hi, does anyone here knows the identity of PavelM / 5pm ? thanks!

Like, does the author really need to present cauchy's integral formula three times?

Once for a disc centered at the origin, again for a disc centered arbitrarily, then for an arbitrary open set?

hi

hi

FFS, just prove it for the disc centered at the origin and throw basic topology at it.

@mick Only post on MO if you can make the question MUCH more precise, or it will get closed quickly

Yeah. Write it up professionally.

I posted a question about integration on chain, located there math.stackexchange.com/questions/346920/… , and I am completely lost by the explanation

Im not a professional but I will try

@anon Thank you!

so if someone has a way to explain the answer in simple terms ...

Happy Easter to all !!

happy easter

happy easter

"The proof is exactly the same as those of Theorems 4.14 and 5.1." Then why are you wasting a *(&@*^ chapter on it?!!??!

What book are you reading?

Complex Analysis by Bak and Newman

Im going to bed.

It is required reading for a course or something?

bye bye

it's the textbook for a course

I have an exam on Tuesday, and I am studying.

We went over all this material, but the professor deviates a bit.

Im not getting the opportunity to chat with an expert =(

I now understand why

@JorgeFernández Just with TeX Live.

To me, it doesn't make sense to split up CIF and it's associated consequences across several chapters.

Prof probably should have chosen a better book then, unless the uni requires it to be taught by that one.

The book is good and bad at the same time. I haven't figured out whether I love it or hate it.

right now I kind of hate it.

Newman and Bak is a very good book!

If you prefer more advanced, go and check out Greene & Krantz, Stein & Shakarchi or Conway.

I don't prefer more advanced. I just think it is sub-optimally organized.

It's just perfect.

I kind of get what they're going for.

Write your own then.

See why it is better.

Do you have an opinion on Ahlfors', @Jonas?

I just didn't like that they introduced new notation, but that's okay.

@Ben Yes, cool.

Succinctly stated.

But I recall it being more advanced.

Good night.

the issue is that Bak and Newman separate some basic properties of entire/analytic functions into two chapters. But in both cases, their analyses are restricted to analytic regions that are proper subsets of C anyways

So there's really no point.

Good night.

Or you just don't get the point, how about that?

Oh, I do get the point. I just think it adds very little.

does anyone here know PavelM / 5pm who was a recent math.SE contributor ?

Eventually you will learn that not everyone who has a different opinion than you is automatically wrong.

Is the "chat with an expert" thing just an implementation of the old "Eliza" program?

Night all

@CтарыйДжон Where?