« first day (576 days earlier)      last day (4445 days later) » 

12:00 PM
Hi @Kannappan. How are the metric spaces doing?
 
Right. I'm finally out of bed.
 
@tb I am doing pretty well but yet to type things up. I'll mostly be doing them these few days.
 
What do you mean your density doesn't integrate to $1$? You don't have a density written that I can see, only a cumulative dis function.
 
@AsafKaragila Have you been in bed for two full days?
 
No.
I wasn't home yesterday...
 
12:03 PM
@anon Ah, you may differentiate that to see the density. I'll add it now.
 
I went to bed at 3am and just felt tired until now.
 
Hi @Matt
 
Hello Kannappan.
 
Hi, Matt, Asaf
and anon, of course!
 
Mr. T.
 
12:03 PM
Hi Theo.
 
@Kanna: and how do you intend to differentiate at y=1/2 w/o Dirac deltas?
yeah, yeah, hi everybody. normal human being greetings and all that yadda
 
@MattN Yes, don't come knocking is what I had in mind. And yes, most of the WW films aren't particularly...thrilling... :)
 
: )
 
World Wide? Wide Web? World Web?
 
Wind Waker, obviously.
 
12:05 PM
@anon We'll not define the density at that point. I mean we don't care about that point and at $1$. Changing the density at few places does not affect the distribution function, right?
 
Wise Willow?
 
Wim Wenders.
 
Changing the density at few places does not affect the distribution function, right? and yet you wonder why your integration isn't coming out to the full 1 ... :P
 
Annnnd I'm tired again.
 
@AsafKaragila You must be as you typed in those n's several time!
 
12:08 PM
@AsafKaragila chase some diagrams... That'll annoy you so much as to wake you up...
 
the density has half a dirac delta impulse at y=1/2 such that it contributes 1/2 to the full integral entirely at the point y=1/2, so you can't ignore that point
 
Look at all the sun. I can't wait for the hay fever and the mosquitoes. Summer is the best time of the year!
 
Let me first think. Distribution function is discontinuous at $x=\dfrac{1}{2}$. How?
It cannot be the case!
 
I thought it was winter.
 
12:10 PM
I wish.
 
My sarcasm alarm just went off. Who tripped it?!
 
@Kanna: Because $P(Y\ge y)$ is 0 for $y<1/2$, but $P(Y=1/2)=1/2$
 
@AsafKaragila : )
@tb http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/3606206#3606206
So you are a... mathemagician?
 
Yo peeps, what do you all think of the idea of arrows pointing to/from arrows in diagrams? Scroll up to see my example.
 
@MattN I am aspiring to be one, yes. I still have to work on my mathematical knowledge, my book reviews and my orthography in order to get there.
 
12:12 PM
Oh, now that I think of it, it's probably a bad idea. The diagram is supposed to be categorical, but it references things inside objects (the dual vector spaces). Nevermind all.
 
Now someone's tripped my sarcasm alarm. : D
 
@anon Yes, that's my main complaint about it. Also, it doesn't really depict $f^t$ but only its action on one specific element of $W^\ast$.
 
Well, we describe functions like $x\mapsto x^2$ a lot and it doesn't count as depicting $f$ at only "one specific element" $x$...
 
@Ilya -> shout at
 
I suppose we could adopt a policy where labelled arrows are specific morphisms, while unlabelled arrows represent Hom(A,B)'s in generality..
that could get confusing though
 
12:21 PM
I don't want to name all my arrows!
 
heh heh
maybe we could draw a circle through the arrow to represent Hom .... strokes peach fuzz on chin
 
@anon Yes, noted this point. Because of this pmf is an animal I don't know how to tame!
 
pdf?
 
probability mass function, I meant.
(or density, as I called it!)
 
mass function is for discrete variables. we're looking at continuous, so we call it density
 
12:28 PM
Yes! Even I call it density. But some how I got that lingo! Sorry about that confusion!
For the first case, I think we will say there is no expectation, no?
(Expectation does not exist as density does not exist!)
 
given X<0.5, we have Y=0.5 identically, so of course the expectation is just 1/2
 
Should I undelete the answer?
 
As I see the answer now (a) the density is incorrect and (b) you don't say how to use the density to get the answer. There's also a new comment so that this question is pretty much finished, IMO.
 
New comment?
 
by Dilip, with two upvotes
 
12:42 PM
Yes!!!!!!!!!! I knew this thing!!! I did not get this idea!
 
@tb I always thought men give names to their arrow.
 
@Matt: hi, thanks
 
Np : )
 
If I have a triangle with three equal sides what is it called?
in R3
 
equilateral?
 
12:47 PM
in R3?
 
In R3??
 
In a condom? Use Durex instead.
 
it is defined by (0,0,3) (3,0,0) and (0,3,0)
 
doesn't matter what dimension it's in.
 
: )
 
12:49 PM
I would define it as a cube with sidelengths 3 that is sliced along its diagonal
 
a cube? are you sure you're talking about the figure formed by the line segments joining those three points?
 
@anon ***** I am kind of tired
(0,0,3) (3,0,0) and (0,3,0) and (3,3,0)
 
So it's a pyramid.
 
chuckles
 
You're talking about a tetrahedron, I think.
 
12:51 PM
that's not a cube, but it is a very slanted pyramid
 
@AsafKaragila If I built a Pyramid like that, the Pharaoh would behead me and feed me to the cats!
 
the base of the pyramid is the triangle defined by the first three points you gave and the top is (3,3,0)
 
@anon Yeah, but you could look at it as the area you obtain after slicing a cube with sides 3 along its diagonal.
 
@N3buchadnezzar You're a Babylonian king. Pharaoh would have had you beheaded anyway. You could try and build a ziggurat instead.
 
a cube with three sides, you really don't know what you're talking about do you? :P
 
12:54 PM
@anon Interpret what I think not what I say!
 
let me phrase it this way. we start with four points, as you've given. are you creating a solid region out of these four points?
 
@anon yes =)
 
@N3buchadnezzar Say what you mean and vice versa.
 
If so, it's a figure with four vertices that is a tetrahedron (go check a Wikipedia picture), which is most certainly not a cube.
Well, if you say what you mean, then by the symmetric property...
 
12:58 PM
@anon I am not saying it is a cube, I am saying you can look at it like a cube sliced along its diagonal
And we are looking at the bottom part
 
even that is not true.
 
your figure is a subset of the away-from-the-origin half of the cube after slicing through the diagonal, though
also, I have no idea how that picture is representative
 
I think tetrahedra is a shorter name for it though =)
 
It was sunny, but now it's raining. Now it stopped.
 
1:05 PM
@MattN I grabbed a AM, literally grabbed it from the library for Comm. Alg.
 
@KannappanSampath Aces : )
 
It was like fight for the copy, I won the fight thanks to the that kind lady who rescued AM from a research Scholar for me!
 
"rescued from a research scholar" lol
 
Yes!
@anon Rescued AM from...
 
Once on of them research scholars gets their hands on it we'll never get to see it, yee haww!
 
1:11 PM
Hey guys, I gotta go soon. The weather is simply too nice to hang around in front of my computer... Catch you all next week.
 
@tb See you next week.
 
@tb Later alligator.
 
@tb Next week?
 
that's why I have a laptop
 
@KannappanSampath He'll be away til next week : (
 
1:13 PM
@tb Go put on your gold chains, Mr. T.
 
@anon me too, but I don't like working in the sun with my laptop :)
 
@AsafKaragila Wha..? lol
 
@MattN well, next week it's gonna be winter again, so...
 
@MattN Precisely that makes me sad too.
 
Hey guys :-)
 
1:13 PM
Hi, robjohn
 
@tb for another few weeks at least.
@AsafKaragila you pitying someone?
 
@robjohn Hi Robjohn!
 
@robjohn Hi, Rob
 
@robjohn No, but Mr. T. might be.
 
1:15 PM
@tb But weather forecasts are not always right.
 
@robjohn run awaaaaay
 
Did you guys check for groundhogs?
:3658141 Groundhog Day.
 
@tb Why don't you open the window and sit in the sun there instead? : )
 
@MattN that's about as worthwhile as watching people eat good food...
 
@AsafKaragila There are several groundhog ceremonies around, but the main one in Punxsutawney, PA differed from the one in New York, NY. There seems to be a regional difference, so I don't know what to apply here :-)
 
1:18 PM
Okay, I'm off. Have a nice weekend y'all!
 
@tb Bye!
 
@tb typical :-)
 
Bloody kopfschmerz. I need more ristretto 8-).
 
@tb have a good day :-)
 
@robjohn Well, if you ever find yourself becoming Bill Murray... who you gonna call?
 
1:18 PM
Anyone using Geogebra here?
 
@tb Have a nice weekend.
 
(Or any form of help for some graphs will be appreciated!)
 
@KannappanSampath The one that just left does, afaik.
 
Huf!
: -(
 
@robjohn Did you see the star on N3buchadnezzar's comment "Interpret what I think not what I say!" 30 minutes ago?
 
1:23 PM
I think I'm going to sleep : (
 
@KannappanSampath I have GeoGebra, but I don't use it because I am familiar with another program for drawing.
@Skullpatrol I wasn't here 30 minutes ago.
 
@robjohn Which one? Can you please tell me?
O Matt went off! Have a nice nap, man!
 
@KannappanSampath It's a Mac program: Intaglio
:3658313 Oh, yeah; I see it.
 
For windows, they don't seem to have a version and the Mac version is pay-and-use!
 
@KannappanSampath yes, I usually find that you get what you pay for :-)
 
1:27 PM
Have you graphed using GeoGebra?
@robjohn :-)
(I'd like to graph Maximum functions)!
 
@KannappanSampath I am not used to it so I'd have to learn its capabilities before using it.
@KannappanSampath for example?
 
@robjohn max(x,1/2) in (0,1) is one among the three.
 
@KannappanSampath For something like that, I would use Mathematica.
 
I don't have it. Is it open source?
 
Certainly not.
 
1:31 PM
@JonasTeuwen Yes, I asked prof. Google now. But, TPB, the public backup system seems to have some genuine backups! :p
 
@robjohn Have you heard of the absent minded math professor who writes "x" on the blackboard, and says "y" when he means "z", but it should have been "t"?
 
So, it has come to this
 
@KannappanSampath Personal version is about $250
@Skullpatrol Um, no.
 
@robjohn As a student it is cheaper :-).
But we have a campus license.
 
@N3buchadnezzar come to what?
 
1:32 PM
@Skullpatrol Yes, I have. From a book of exercises in Probability :-)
 
Studying!
 
@JonasTeuwen I can get those prices, but when I purchased, they were about the same.
@N3buchadnezzar my deepest sympathies.
 
@KannappanSampath I think I read it in George Polya's book "How to solve it."
 
@Skullpatrol: Sorry I missed your message the other day. No, I'm not a native English speaker, obviously.
 
@JonasTeuwen do you periodically have to prove that you are a student to keep the license?
 
1:34 PM
@Gigili No nothing is obvious.
 
@Gigili No problem.
 
@robjohn I don't know. I just have a campus license :-).
 
@JonasTeuwen That's even cheaper :-)
@JonasTeuwen I got my first copy from a site license that Apple had
 
@Gigili Neither am I.
 
@KannappanSampath : But the fact that I am female is obvious.
 
1:37 PM
@JonasTeuwen I used that very old version until they came out with the personal license.
 
@Gigili Why would anyone care?
 
@Gigili No it is not and yes, I don't care!
 
Not so much. People can have anything as their avatars and it doesn't mean they're one or the other gender (or trans or w/e).
 
@JonasTeuwen I think I avoided the academic license, fearing I would lose it if I no longer worked at UCLA.
 
The character in my pic is, in fact, a woman.
 
1:38 PM
The character in my avatar is not even a human being.
 
I'm not talking about avatar and such silly things, I'd get offended when someone refers to me as "he".
And I was talking to @KannappanSampath, obviously again.
 
@robjohn Oh, but you could just buy it yourself then?
 
@anon Same goes for @JonasTeuwen.
 
Thanks.
 
@AsafKaragila Really, I thought it was a pretty good likeness :-D
 
1:39 PM
@AsafKaragila That leads me to a nice conclusion.
 
I am not willing to talk anymore about these!
 
@robjohn Likeness of what?
@Gigili That you're an imaginary thing?
 
@JonasTeuwen Yes, since I am at UCLA.
 
@robjohn Have you read George Polya's book "How to solve it."?
 
There must be conversation I'm missing.
Oh well.
 
1:40 PM
@Skullpatrol Nope.
@anon what are you missing? :-D
 
@robjohn It's a classic.
 
Does anyone want to know that quote, so I can grab that book for you?
 
@AsafKaragila That you're not a human being.
 
@Gigili Now that's a huge flaw in your logic right there. How would you expect to succeed in mathematics like that?
 
@Gigili Errr...?
 
1:42 PM
@robjohn: I'm assuming that someone (Kanna?) called Gigili "he" and then Kanna responded to that, so Gigi's "it's obvious" statement is predicated on what she originally said back in that discussion
 
@anon okay, so I am completely out on that one, too.
 
@anon Yes I did say 'he' once but I am unaware, right? I am not expected to know everyone's whereabouts! But, I'll flag remark on grounds of racism.
 
@KannappanSampath Don't do it!
 
That was pretty cool. I saw the flag validations go higher and higher.
 
@Gigili: To clear things up, were you being rhetorical to parallel your own situation here?
 
1:46 PM
She can't answer, she's suspended for 30 minutes.
 
@Skullpatrol I flagged it. I am pretty serious about these things. I don't expect people to make such remarks.
 
Because @Kanna is taking it literally - and if it was intended literally then it naturally deserves a flag.
 
@AsafKaragila it drew attention pretty fast.
 
Thanks for saying, @badp.
 
@KannappanSampath Come on man, racism is apart of life.
 
1:49 PM
Sure, so is everything that deserves to be changed for the better.
 
@Skullpatrol It doesn't mean people find it acceptable
 
Yes, as you say "apart" from life. It cannot be a part of life. That I am Indian should not bother people. For one, I have never made any remarks like this.
 
@KannappanSampath But we have to learn to deal with it.
 
My concern is that she might have been trying to point out to Kanna how he was coming across to her by paralleling sexism with racism, and that she did not communicate it well and Kanna obviously took it literally. I can't say what her intent was.
 
Interpret what I think not what I say!
 
1:51 PM
@KannappanSampath since anyone can claim to be from anywhere and take whatever pseudonym they want here, I assume, for the sake of argument, that what they say is true, but don't assume that that is really true. Nor does it matter.
 
The reason I dislike the flags here is that people just get the single line, without the context of the message.
5
 
Hah, trolled.
 
That should be the job of the moderator: to find the context.
 
@AsafKaragila I read the context. Obviously I cannot get too far back in so little time before someone else flags it, but I think it was a correct flag
 
@JonasTeuwen howso?
 
1:54 PM
@JuanManuel Oh, I'm not talking about this specific case. I'm talking about the general case.
 
Well, he dislikes the flags and it gets flagged, oh well.
 
@Skullpatrol Chat is an instant communication medium, if something is offensive it should be removed instantly as well. If the message is removed ten minutes after it's been posted does it really matter?
 
Oh, not stars 8-).
 
@AsafKaragila oh, ok then
 
How much moderator action does the math chatroom get compared to the other chatrooms. I'm really curious :P
 
1:55 PM
I agree the flag system should be looked at
 
@badp Good point.
 
@anon If you have 10k reputation across the network you'll find out the answer is "very little"
 
He has 15k or so on a single site, isn't that enough?
 
So, we are good Chat room, then!
 
One other question. Does the suspension prevent her from reading the content of the chat in the duration, or did she leave voluntarily?
 
1:58 PM
A non-troublesome one, perhaps :P
@anon She left voluntarily.
Angrily, perhaps, but voluntarily.
 
So, the answer to the previous question about the moderator activity is not to be revealed or something?
 
No, the answer was "very little"
 
Oh, thank you @anon.
 
I conjecture normal 10k users only get flags from the rooms they're actually in. I never see any from any other rooms.
 
@anon perhaps we should hang out in more rooms :-)
 
2:02 PM
Nope. I see flags from other rooms all the time.
 
@AsafKaragila even rooms your not in?
 
Hmmm....
 
Probably because you own this room!
 
@robjohn Indeed.
 
@anon That's probabaly wrong, but you know that better than I can do.
 
2:03 PM
Maybe I'm just on other tabs in my browser and the flags go away..
 
As a moderator I get flags from all rooms.
 
@badp I am not surprised by that, but why does Asaf see them from other rooms?
 
Because I am so awesome!
2
 
This is curious.
 
@AsafKaragila and the König! :-)
 
2:05 PM
@anon Flags do tend to get acted on fast. Perhaps too fast
 
@robjohn You should try to check out "How to solve it" by George Polya if you get a chance, it's a good little math book. I think Polya once taught Von Neumann and said he was the only student he feared.
 
Often times the flag popup cannot load in time for me to actually see the flag.
 
@Skullpatrol I will see if I can snag a copy.
 
@robjohn what does snagging a copy mean? Google has no reasonable meaning I can attach with this context!
 
snag = grab
 
2:08 PM
Thank you!
 
@KannappanSampath get a copy.
 
@Skullpatrol Is it this small 1-2 page document?
 
How to Solve It (1945) is a small volume by mathematician George Pólya describing methods of problem solving. Four principles How to Solve It suggests the following steps when solving a mathematical problem: # First, you have to understand the problem. # After understanding, then make a plan. # Carry out the plan. # Look back on your work. How could it be better? If this technique fails, Pólya advises: "If you can't solve a problem, then there is an easier problem you can solve: find it." Or: "If you cannot solve the proposed problem, try to solve first some related problem. Could yo...
 
Polya is an amazing Mathematician!
 
2:12 PM
In general, any historical mathematician whose name we remember / is attached to things was an amazing mathematician.
 
@anon Have you read this book anon?
 
May be it's time for my dinner. I will come back in an hour or so. Thank you people!
 
I've looked at it, don't really remember anything
 
@KannappanSampath Bye.
@anon I remember the story about the absent minded math professor who writes "x" on the blackboard, and says "y" when he means "z", but it should have been "t."
 
2:18 PM
indeed
 
George Pólya (December 13, 1887 – September 7, 1985, in Hungarian Pólya György) was a Hungarian mathematician. He was a professor of mathematics from 1914 to 1940 at ETH Zürich and from 1940 to 1953 at Stanford University. He made fundamental contributions to combinatorics, number theory, numerical analysis and probability theory. He is also noted for his work in heuristics and mathematics education. Life and works He was born as Pólya György in Budapest, Austria-Hungary to originally Ashkenazi Jewish parents Anna Deutsch and Jakab Pólya who converted to Roman Catholicism in 188...
 
@Skullpatrol: is this the book you mean?
 
@robjohn Bingo!
 
I have to go take Lilly for a walk. bbl
 
@robjohn Later alligator.
 
2:29 PM
Back.
 
@KannappanSampath So soon, that was a quick meal.
 
Yes, indeed! I did not like the food today, though I like the meal this day of the week mostly!
@RajeshD Hi!
Does anyone know how to reduce the screen size of the image I upload to the site?
 
2:57 PM
hi
 
I figured that out finally!
 
@kannappan : just a small Question if you don't mind
 
@RajeshD Sure you may ask!
 
where did you do +2 and how did you happen to choose math
 
@RajeshD I did my +2 at Trichy in Tamil Nadu.
(Sorry for late reply. I was writing this answer)
 
3:08 PM
@KannappanSampath Here is the source of the quotation that I was talking about earlier, if you're interested Kannappan: gap-system.org/~history/Quotations/Polya.html
 
(I will remove this messages now! So, if read please let me know, @RajeshD)
 
and you were not bothered about the iit bandwagon ?
yeah you can
 
"In order to solve this differential equation you look at it till a solution occurs to you."
"This principle is so perfectly general that no particular application of it is possible."
"Geometry is the science of correct reasoning on incorrect figures."
"My method to overcome a difficulty is to go round it."
"What is the difference between method and device? A method is a device which you used twice."
 
@Skullpatrol Thank You. I did go to the link. I am also replying to Rajesh. So, couldn't confirm the receipt of link. Thank you once again.
 
that happened to me aswell but a long time ago............i was totally ignorant of chemistry...which proved fatal
cool
 
3:14 PM
Yes. Chemistry and Physics decide! I am poor in Physics, I admit!
 
ok
 
I missed group theory sitters on the main site! :-(
Hi @Ilya!
 
Hey @Ilya
 
@Ilya here?
 
3:42 PM
Hi guys, was just dropping by
 
@Ilya Oh! How have you been? BTW, I finished that answer.
 

« first day (576 days earlier)      last day (4445 days later) »