« first day (82 days earlier)      last day (5253 days later) » 

00:23
omg
you know what would be awesome?
making a website which is a level for erkie.github.com
with like goals and stuff
Yeah, that would be pretty awesome.
Now I will star that so that people who don't check context will think you've undertaken this wonderful project.
Good luck! :D
damnit. I have to work though :D
I mean, I can't run the code on blackboard, so I suspect there is someway for the page itself to interact back with the spaceship
so you'd have places where you have to steer
UGH BLACKBOARD
BLACKKKBOOOOOOAAAAAARD
and if the page itself can detect when certain elements are gone (like containers containing javascript) then you can make a game over scenario
also last day of beta thumbs up
or second-last
whichever
00:26
lol
wait
we have to get to server fault numbers for a domain name
fml
:6023 Oh no. I must go moderate something before my powers are drained!
>:
I'm like 23 rep away from that stuff
hehe now you're 1 rep away from that stuff
Its not that exciting, being actually USEFUL and all. I can't actually think of anything useful to do with it just now.
00:31
DAMN YOU MECHKO
OMG! you know what is amazingly cool?
starting up erkie like 20 times on one page
it lags, but it's so fun
@Mana happy birthday
Is it your birthday or is he being ironic?
00:47
Mana just broke 2k rep
 
4 hours later…
04:52
you know you've had too much SE when you can no longer read uppercase 'so' normally
argh, 2 rep to go
 
2 hours later…
07:19
looks good
07:39
:6053 the bevel effect looks kinda wrong, actually, isn't it supposed to have a darker "highlight" too?
anyway I hope people won't take that logo and mistake it for a gamer dating site :P
08:08
this "just" in
Posted by Robert Cartaino on October 5th, 2010

Friday night we rolled back the domain name of our first out-of-beta website. After less than 24 hours of existing on the internet, nothingtoinstall.com was reverted to its original public beta name – webapps.stackexchange.com.

We’re sorry for springing this on you at the last minute but – at least at the time – it felt like circumstances didn’t give us much choice.

With deep concerns about domain name choices for the 20+ ongoing public betas and some negative feedback about breaking up the network into smaller domains, we made the snap decision to roll back the name change we had launched barely a day before. We felt that rolling back ASAP was preferable to letting problems grow exponentially through the next week while we discussed and voted and debated. That’s not an excuse; just an explanation. In hindsight, dealing with the community and the repercussions of our decisions should have taken precedence. …

Oak
08:32
Yo @badp, nice rep score :)
I should undo exactly one downvote...
Oak
Actually, would you like a rep recalc?
Oak
It's likely to get you past 3k
Oak
Though it can also decrease your rep, I guess, you can check on gaming.stackexchange.com/reputation
:6063 it'd get me to 2,982
Oak
08:38
Ooooo now I really want to recalc you >:-)
go ahead, make your day! :)
One day should be plenty of time to get 18 more rep right? <.<
Oak
Naa it's okay, I'll feel my evil quota later
no, please recalc it
Oak
And actually, you could take revenge on me pretty soon, I guess!
naaah, our mod team is an awesome one, no need to touch it
Oak
08:41
Can't tell if you're sarcastic or not :) but anyway, we weren't chosen through the community process, so I guess we do need to start the nomination process again
Oak
At least soon, once the site leaves beta
no, I'm not being sarcastic
what's awesome however is that we won't be on diamond life support like webapps is
Oak
Why, what's going on there?
Oak
Oh you mean the rep status... yes
08:43
Fourth top non-diamond user has 2,004 rep
that's a looong way to voting questions closed.
Oak
It's interesting that they actually have more users than us
Oak
Just a lot less >1k, >2k and >3k users
Oak
I guess they have had a lot less questions, which translates to a smaller rep pool
Oak
Well you asked, I complied :) go get those 18!
Thanks
Yeah, the first user page goes down to 500 rep
kinda depressing
 
7 hours later…
15:48
Posted by Robert Cartaino on October 5th, 2010

Friday night we rolled back the domain name of our first out-of-beta website. After less than 24 hours of existing on the internet, nothingtoinstall.com was reverted to its original public beta name – webapps.stackexchange.com.

We’re sorry for springing this on you at the last minute but – at least at the time – it felt like circumstances didn’t give us much choice.

With deep concerns about domain name choices for the 20+ ongoing public betas and some negative feedback about breaking up the network into smaller domains, we made the snap decision to roll back the name change we had launched barely a day before. We felt that rolling back ASAP was preferable to letting problems grow exponentially through the next week while we discussed and voted and debated. That’s not an excuse; just an explanation. In hindsight, dealing with the community and the repercussions of our decisions should have taken precedence. …

Why Pause for Help of all names?
@badp why a dark one?
it doesn't obey normal lighting conventions to begin with
:6100 er
and I can't think of any examples of a heart in games with both a light and a dark
Jin
Jin
@badp i had the gradient inverted by accident. check the heart in the header graphic i uploaded
i have since fixed it on my end
15:58
It looks correct on my end, but maybe I'm seeing something different?
Jin
Jin
yeah i inverted the gradient. the lighter part should be on top
ah, you weren't going for semetry?
yeah, that's what I was looking at
Jin
Jin
i fixed it there
I see
15:59
so no inner "shadow"?
asking if it's by design or not
but isn't the specular reflection wrong then?
if your light source is up and to the left shouldn't S=VR?
Jin
Jin
i can definitely tweak it some. right now solving some pressing css issues before the launch :)
oh sure
no problems :)
Jin
Jin
but normally, i don't try to make it 100% realistic. otherwise i'd have to change the shadow angle of the entire site :) some elements have top cast shadow, some from an angle..
the idea is just to get the feel out there.
16:02
sure
ok, but your diffuse lighting is from top left and your specular from top right, its kinda weird
I had assumed you were just ignoring lighting conventions and going for symmetry
Jin
Jin
you give me too much credit. i think i just simply wasn't paying attention...
btw @badp can i send you a html file and you test the text rendering on linux for me?
you can dm me your email address via twitter. i'm following you
thanks
you're welcome
anyway, if you do change it, here is was I'd normally see with lighting: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Phong_components_version_4.png
Jin
Jin
sure thanks. did you dm me?
16:10
:6134 er, no, I posted the email here
Jin
Jin
i wasn't able to copy your email here beofre you removed it
sorry, fixed.
Jin
Jin
sent. thx
2/4 done...
3/4 done...
@Jin replied
Jin
Jin
@badp thanks! much appreciated
16:25
I don't seem to have Lucida Sans installed apparently
anyway I attached screenies
you may want to make the ask question ship react on hover btw in some way
since the tabs do fade to white
Jin
Jin
ok thx
 
1 hour later…
17:26
:6148 I like that the asker basically openly admits that he's @tzenes-baiting.
17:38
:6151 I thought asking any SC2 question was @tzenes-baiting?
2
18:30
I'm gonna take a wild guess and say that's off topic.
19:27
woo, 3k rep of actual, honest-to-god reputation!
in other news I hate having the luxury of commuting
so bad for social interactions, so good for the pocket
20:13
ugh, not a 2v2 question
how do I say: 2v2 is horribly horribly broken
don't play it
21:02
@tzenes "PT: 8Rax Reaper + 7 pool"? Not TZ?
oops
fixed
Cool. I'd have just fixed it, but I had a feeling it might have meant you missed another in the list.
hey, congrats btw
you had more rep than me last week
I can't begin to tell you how relieved I was
Beaten by @oak as well!
Slacking Tzenes! SLACKING.
Oak
What did I do?
21:09
well, I had a slow week
I did see, thanks! :) I don't think I'll be able to keep it up, but I'm having fun trying.
but Will's week was better than my previous week as well
I think you can keep it up
Oak
Oh, the weekly ranking. Willful, bwarner, sjohnston and myself are there because of civilization v
I've had a slow couple of days already. I'll have to go play civ and ask a couple more questions.
Just remember, if you think you can write a better answer than already exists don't be afraid to answer a question which already has an answer or two
that was a hard lesson for me
because I didn't want to take away from answers that were there that were ok
21:11
Oh I have. I also use pictures, which are basically cheating.
I don't just rewrite what everyone else already has, but if I have something useful to add, I know that can stand on its own.
Oak
Pictures are great :)
Pictures are cheating. THe best kind of cheating.
even bad pictures.
16
A: How do I find diamonds?

LessPop_MoreFizzWhen in doubt, Find a Cave. If you don't see anything on the surface, Dig Deeper. Really, that's all there is to it. In general, you won't find Diamond much past 10 levels or so above Bedrock. The graph below (Found in this thread) shows the density of Diamond in one generated world. 0 on the ...

Oak
But @tzenes I admit that I am indeed bad at this "adding a better answer"
terrible picture
and it's nearly my highest voted answer
Oak
Graphs > regular pictures
Oak
21:14
My highest-voted also have a picture =D
Oak
chart actually
My highest definitely has a picture or 5. Its their own fault for asking for confirmation
:)
Oak
Man I wish civ5's rivers would look like civ4's
+1'd that for POIDH.
Oak
Ah finally, area51 lists us at 90 days
21:17
@Oak now I'm going to have to go compare when I get home.
also, "+1 for POIDH." is below the minchar for a comment.
:6196 Yeah it took me a while to differentiate between a "ok" answer and a "great" answer
Jin
Jin
@oak sooon very soon.
:6208 Lol well, thanks.
Oak
Yay @Jin!
21:18
:6210 YAY! Thank you. We <3 you Jin.
Jin
Jin
btw thank you for all your support with the design process.
All we did was cheer you on. The excellence is all you. :)
Jin
Jin
normally designers are scared by "design by committee" but you guys are nothing but supportive and constructive.
Oak
We can be cruel critics as well :)
Jin
Jin
when the design goes live (tomorrow) please let me know about bugs... i try my best to cover all the little obscure styles, but i don't always get it 100% on the first try.
2
Oak
21:20
We'll do our best
Oak
by the way, I'm sure gaming will be the most fun of all the se2.0 sites to design :)
Definitely.
Oak
only downhill from now, poor you!
Jin
Jin
ha. well some themes are more challenging than others.
Oak
(though I have to confess the cooking site drafts look incredible)
Jin
Jin
21:22
i happen to be a gamer(well, used to be before i switched to Mac), so gaming theme has been fairly easy and fun for me.
Oak
I really liked how in cooking, the red bar have these trails off to the sides
Oak
though it's all off-topic here
Jin
Jin
cooking site was pretty tough to implement in css. i made it hard for myself lol.
:6226 HAY! I'm a mac user and a gamer :(
Also, WE HAS LFD2 on OSX now!!!!
Oak
Oh, you poor guys
Jin
Jin
21:26
i still play games on consoles sometimes. what's that new FPS game coming out? it looks really good, it has Mechs etc.
Oak
Sounds like an [identify-this-game] question :)
Oak
Though actually I will be forced to buy a console soon :(
Oak
First time for everything, I guess.
Jin
Jin
I want to say it's Brink. but i'm not 100% sure. been out of the gaming loop for a while.
Oak
Hmm, I haven't heard about it
21:29
Brink doesn't have mechs....
though it looks pretty awesome. It's basically the next gen of Wolfenstein: ET in terms of mechanics
which makes sense, being the same devs
Oak
I'm off to gametrailers to check it out.
Jin
Jin
is "ID this game" type of questions allowed on gaming site?
i may just ask
Oak
We have an [identify-this-game] tag.
Oak
Mostly used for old games, but not reason it shouldn't be used for new ones
Oak
Just supply all characteristics you can
21:33
:6229 ITS GUS!
:6244 yeah I'm not sure why we decided its on topic, but its definitely on topic
@tzenes good stuff.
22:21
nite!
goodnight!

« first day (82 days earlier)      last day (5253 days later) »