22:17
I don't think IT Shopping is a deviation, though; not really... while, sure, there is great potential for many questions on such a site to brush up against many of the guidelines that we ourselves set on SuperUser to determine whether a question should be closed/deleted or not, there's also great opportunity for a site that could gain a lot of traction as a source of knowledge for people looking to acquire computer "stuff". I just don't see how recommendations that may invite certain >>
problems, that all existing sites already have to deal with, makes it a "lower quality" offering than anything we already have.
A community's quality is not determined by its rules or what is considered topical there, but rather by the quality of the people who post there. I stand by that.
For proof you just need to look at the difference in quality of post between SU/SF, on the one hand, and 99.9% of SO, on the other hand
frankly, there are millions of questions on SO which are not closed, and probably never will be, which are absolutely horrid, and/or have awful answers, and nobody has the time or inclination to do anything about it. because that community has a critical mass of lower quality people than we do.
and yet the site, on paper, has basically the same rules as SU does.
by "lower quality people" I mean, chiefly, people who are worse at expressing themselves and communicating in a social/technical context, not, like, inferior in the eugenics sense or anything mean like that
regardless, I'm okay with the status quo and will happily write my blog, but I think someday SE may find their way off the well-trodden path and into some other interesting things that don't constitute a carbon copy of sites like SU or careers.SE.
it may not be today or even this year, but somebody is going to have ambition to take it to the next level at some point
going home, sorry for the long form writing.