« first day (13 days earlier)      last day (12 days later) » 

00:00
I suspect you won't be finding much in the way of "fat loots" here.
Just dropped in to see how the election was going. I still have an essay to complete.
@Ixrec In my experience, this is a new thing.
@Iksandar Many of the "rewards" here are mainly about enabling you to aid in moderating the site.
Most forums assign moderators, and users have fewer moderator abilities.
Being able to close and reopen questions, delete and undelete posts, protect questions, and so on.
And most of them unlock additional functionality - being able to post links, images, etc - rather than the housekeeping/moderation abilities we get on SE sites.
user61230
00:02
@Ixrec This is definitely nonstandard. Stack Exchange places a significant amount of trust in users with these tools, because they're the tools that allow you to shape the site into what you and other members want.
user61230
A lot of places don't hold that kind of trust in their user base, but Stack Exchange has made the a priori assumptions that a) people really care about the site they're participating in, b) can, for the most part, discuss things reasonably, and c) want to use the tools they've been given for good.
user61230
In a sense, the gamification of Stack Exchange is the privilege of shaping your community.
How do you deal with trolls, script kiddies, and the like?
"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." Very funny.
00:05
it varies depending on what they do, but the short answer is they get deleted
user61230
@ThaddeusHowze [grins]
Although when we get to 25k, we get to see cool stuff like this:
typically by one of us normal users "flagging" one of the offending posts, and then an elected moderator handles the flag with their superpowers
user61230
@Iksandar Skiddies are handled by code, but trolls are handled by moderators.
00:05
iirc literally anyone can flag regardless of rep
Thaddeus,, Im 50 years away from my one year of Latin
@ThaddeusHowze "Sorry, I don't speak Celtic."
(just re-watched The Fires of Pompeii last night)
Wrong family, my friend.
@Emrakul Trolls can be handled by ordinary users, given enough spam or offensive flags, though.
user61230
@jimsug Yeah, actually, you're right, that happens a lot.
user61230
00:07
(Just forgot about it because when users handle it, mods don't see it...)
@Ixrec I think you need 15 rep or so to be able to flag.
@randal'thor This is correct, and you need comment privileges to flag to close.
@jimsug You can flag answers as VLQ or NAA before you can flag questions to be closed?
Strange. I never knew that.
Alright, I have to get back to my essay. Alas they are never able to write themselves.
What topic, Thaddeus?
user61230
00:10
Questions are, oddly, protected from action just a touch more than answers.
Good luck with that, @Thaddeus! :-)
The Quantification of Mythology. Why do comic fans insist on trying to define feats and make comparisons or versus battles with superheroes?
@randal'thor This is because those close reasons generate comments; if you can't comment, you can't flag for those reasons.
There is no way for them to objectively compare because each story is an individual element written by a particular writer.
There is no OBJECTIVE criteria by which they can be judged or compared.
I also have to get back to posting stories for my Patreon account. My goal by midyear is to have $300 dollars a month in patronage.
@jimsug Ahh, makes sense.
00:13
Premise seems airtight
Well, not all of them do. Flagging as primarily opinion-based or too broad doesn't generate comments.
And recommending deletion of answers also generates comments (though flagging doesn't).
Wife informs have bought the exactly wrong red enchilada sauce. I must away...thank you all for your time and wisdom.
The funny part is: if you go to ComicVine or Reddit and suggest it is a fruitless task to collect feats and compare them, they will give you a rationale as to why they think it's relevant and in fact necessary.
Take care @Iksandar
necessary?
and people call us obsessed
Adios, amigos y amigas
00:15
Yes, necessary.
Because only with such feat based comparisons can we truly understand why some superheroes are being poorly written or undervalued.
According to some forums, the Flash is the most powerful metahuman in the DC Universe...
<le sigh>
Au revoir @Iksandar
> * these options will not appear in the flag menu until you have earned 50 reputation (the amount required for commenting).
@jimsug Wow, plenty of guidance for how to flag appropriately.
mhm, it's all there.
I've never read that stuff ... just picked it up by osmosis.
Which seems to have been good enough, judging from my ratio of helpful flags.
00:18
There's also a mod's version for handling flags...
Well, comment flags, anyway:
125
Q: A guide to moderating comments

Shog9Commenting is one of the unsung heroes of Stack Exchange. The help center suggestions that you should submit a comment if you want to: Request clarification from the author; Leave constructive criticism that guides the author in improving the post; Add relevant but minor or transient i...

Is there a whole mod-only page in the Help Centre?
Okay folks, stay frosty out there.
There are mod-only pages in the /help, but not everything you need is in there
Good page for budding moderators:meta.stackexchange.com/q/118972/260340
2
Well, for actual moderators.
You can't do much with most of that information until you have mod tools.
00:25
@ThaddeusHowze Frosty? With the Flame and the Void, we don't need to feel the cold.
 
1 hour later…
01:27
450 voters
 
2 hours later…
03:04
@Loong How'd you get that number? o.O
03:18
Oh I see.
:/
Badges are cool, I keep forgetting they are a thing.
 
6 hours later…
SQB
SQB
08:50
So ehr... Who's who?
 
4 hours later…
12:28
@SQB There are 5 seats available in that election. We won't be able to make an exact correspondence with ours.
SQB
SQB
@randal'thor It was just a light jab at the candiates - who's a turtle? Who's an ape?
13:17
@SQB I'm a snake.
It's still very interesting how many long standing 50k users miss the Electorate badge on a site that normally bursts at the seams with votes.
13:39
Now there are more voters (506) than last year (505).
stupid STV question: the candidate who gets more "1st choice" votes than anyone else will be one of the winners, full stop, right?
@Ixrec Hmm, I'm not sure. What if it doesn't suffice for election in the first run. Then they eliminate one candidate and all his second choices go to another guy.
@Ixrec not necessarily
oh right
@Loong Wow, what an evil threshold was that?
13:45
@NapoleonWilson only one open seat
@Ixrec But he certainly will when all his first choices are above the threshold, of course.
I suppose the better question is if a majority pick X as their first choice, then X wins; I assume 50% of all votes is enough to pass the threshhold?
@NapoleonWilson currently, you would need 170 first votes to directly win in the first round.
@Ixrec Depends on the threshold. More like about 33% in this case. There's two seats.
It should be #votes/(#seats+1) + 1. So ~1/3 is enough.
ok, so the threshhold can never be higher than 50% of votes
13:54
@Ixrec Depends. They use Meek STV, which alters the threshold dynamically during the election process. So maybe it can.
Or wait, maybe it can only get lower due to dropped votes.
14:36
when it says the election closes "tomorrow." Does it mean UTC tomorrow, or our actual tomorrow?
14:49
@JackBNimble 2016-02-02 20:00 UTC
What is that in human time?
15:23
@JackBNimble Middle of the afternoon Eastern US Time on 2/2.
So if I'm caught in an infinite time loop, I'll have to live through losing the election again and again and again.
until you learn to love not declare everyone as being dead to you
@JackBNimble 21:00 on the 2.2.16.
@phantom42 So... basically forever.
 
3 hours later…
18:34
@Ixrec I think that is true. the threshold for STV is "enough votes so that no other candidate could beat you"; I assume having a straight majority of the votes in the first round would always qualify.
mathematically I don't think the threshold can ever be higher than 50% + 1 vote.
@NapoleonWilson I think you're right, if I understand STV correctly; the only time the threshold changes is if votes are deemed "spoiled" (Meek calls them "exhausted"). The threshold is (# of unspoiled votes) / (# seats + 1) + 1
"undervotes" are one of the ways a vote becomes spoiled.
 
1 hour later…
20:04
I see we've got ever more candidates for the moderator election while I was gone. It's hard to choose.
@JackBNimble SE usually gives the actual timestamp as title text (tooltip) for timestamp text. I hate the abbreviated timestamps.
Choose life. Choose a job. Choose a career. Choose a family, choose your future.
I chose not to choose life. I chose something else.
I choose you, Charmander.
Poor predictable Bart, always chooses rock. - Good old rock. Nothing beats that!
 
3 hours later…
23:01
@b_jonas That's easy: choose me and @JackBNimble :-)
23:12
Greetings, all.....can anyone tell me where to go to vote for a mod?
the url is in the room description
ry, Mike
err....ty
It's also in the sidebar of the main site.
@b_jonas SE has helpfully devised a candidate score metric to help choose. And look at that -- only one candidate has a perfect score! That's an easy first choice. :)
Okay..I voted but I didn't get a stickie to wear...:(
23:17
@Iksandar Give it a few minutes; it'll come.
The Constituent badges only seem to be awarded at 5-minute intervals.
Oh...I actually get a badge, then.....cool.
(or should I say: patience, my young padawan)
From what Null said...there is a way to watch the election as it goes....?
...and the room grew deathly quiet....
23:20
@Iksandar There's no way to see who has how many votes at a given time (except maybe for mods and CMs).
Kinda figured..ty
@Iksandar Candidate score doesn't tell you how many votes people have in the election. It's a metric for helping judge how good a candidate is based on reputation and badges earned.
The site mods can see how many people have voted, visited the page, etc. at any time.
Well, it's pretty easy for the rest of us to figure out how many people have voted, too
To be fair
We can also work out how many people have voted in this election just from the badge count (currently 554).
Whoever votes next after @Iksandar will be the 555th voter.
23:23
Dang it I wanted that number....
If it isnt electioneering to say...two of my candidates are in this room.
[sidelong glances at @randal'thor and @Null]
:27264386 You pinged me and then removed it?
@JasonBaker Well, half the candidates are in this room atm.
Indeed
23:27
because you had already said what I pinged you to say.
premature pinging
Approximately how many eligible voters are there for sf and fantasy?
its a problem for us older candidates.
@Iksandar after the election is over it will give those kind of stats; right now I think only mods can see it.
ah, ty
Last Year's Stats: 3,039 voters were eligible, 1,442 visited the site during the election, 866 visited the election page, and 505 voted
We've grown a bit since then
There are 3185 users with 200+ rep
So it's slightly more than that
23:29
@JasonBaker you only need 150.
@Iksandar About 4000?
I know, but the leaderboard doesn't have that cohort
I wonder why so many people went to the election page and didn't even bother to vote?
4228 were eligible a couple of days ago, according to one of our mods.
Hated all the candidates?
2
23:30
@MikeEdenfield Well, you do get a badge for visiting the page.
@MikeEdenfield They probably saw a bunch of names they didn't recognize and decided to abstain.
Or they saw a bunch of names they recognized and decided the same
no...it is confusing...took me a while to understand the format (I was a grown man when the pc was invented)
According to SEDE, 4,215 that have > 150.
I finally noticed the three buttons by the names...
23:33
@Iksandar And then you get some pretty flairs appearing on the right when you've voted.
@randal'thor Oh? Didnt see any..wonder if my craptop just didnt show them
No worries, no one looks at the right sidebar.
@randal'thor Thaddeus is voter number 555.
2
That's where we put ads and advice for new users
That explains it...I am one of those people who don't rtfm, just dive right in.
23:39
I think Clippy should pop up on the election page. "It looks like you're trying to vote for a mod. Do you want any help?"
2
Clippy?
the one and only Clippy on wikipedia
They killed Clippy off, I thought?
One more day. Another day another destiny. This never ending road to moddery.
23:40
the dog was on my work computer until recently
the dog version of clippy
@JackBNimble should we note the fact the song is really about how everyone is about to become dead the next day?
Moddery.....sounds vaguely illegal.
@JackBNimble The Road goes ever ever on ...
So, is there an official installation for the new moderator...forelock-tugging, cannonade, that sort of thing?
These men who seem to know my crime won't surely vote a second time. One day more.
23:45
(just trying to lighten the mood)
@Iksandar Just an email letting you know about the agreement that you have to sign in blood and where the coffee machine is. Then you get to be a moderator-in-training.
You become a real moderator when someone calls you a nazi on meta.
Thankfully, you don't need to use your own blood to sign it.
Doesn't sound like a job for me...I much prefer to be outside the tent (think LBJ)....:)
Barber, get this mirror cleaned
@Keen ... so the blood of the conquered?
23:51
@phantom42 That works.
Thats what I like about this kind of chatroom...sends me to websearch...now I have to read up on Oysterhead...ty Shog9
@Gilles we used to get "anonymous" reviews from the students at the school i worked at. my friends and i used to hang the ones that called us nazis, or threatened physical violence against us on our fridges.
It must be weird to become a moderator, and suddenly have access to all those new tools.
we totally were nazis. i mean - expecting people to show up to class/lab, turn in their work, and not spend the entire time surfing the web. that's right up there with genocide.
Does the page refresh automatically or do you need to refresh manually to see a diamond next to your name?
23:55
diamond?
@Iksandar Haven't you seen mods have diamonds?
And blue names in chat.
@randal'thor you have to accept the moderator agreement first
No..havent seen a sitting mod yet, that I know of
@Loong Before getting access to any of the super tools? That makes sense.
@randal'thor yes
23:57
@Iksandar There's several in this chatroom.
Okay all I see is a blue that is almost invisible against the background...and no diamonds.
The diamonds don't show up in chat unless you actually click on their names.
I see it now....I learn something every three, four minutes...

« first day (13 days earlier)      last day (12 days later) »