« first day (159 days earlier)      last day (4924 days later) » 

00:25
0
Q: Reviewing the site scope

Ivo FlipseLately I've been getting more worried about the scope of our site. First there's the problem with medical and general health questions popping up regularly and second the balance between Fitness and Nutrition. The first problem was covered in several other Meta questions: What should Main (F&a...

 
6 hours later…
06:44
@Ivo really glad you asked that question, lets see where it leads us
 
6 hours later…
12:38
Hello everyone! When can I expect Ivo to drop in? I'd like to contribute to blog writing in here regarding self improvement with daily blogposts.
user11126
Did you leave an answer on the meta?
user11126
8
Q: Do you want to blog about becoming fit and working out?

Ivo FlipseWe're actively looking for users who want to write blog posts! I'm looking for help from users who want to help breath life into a Fitness.SE blog! On Super User we got officially blessed by Jeff and I honestly believe that Gaming should be able to deserve one as well. On Super User we mainly ...

quoting final accepted answer: "So anyone who's interested in writing an occasional blog post, just drop into our chatroom!"
I believe answers were pre-launch thing. Were they not?
user11126
Doh... I think you're correct. I've been out of touch with this. Ivo is usually around anyway.
user11126
You could just prefix your message to him using the @IvoFlipse. I'm sure he'll see it that way.
user11126
12:43
whoo... magic...
Hellow :-)
@Eimantas You've come to the right address
Speak of the devil .)
@IvoFlipse I'd like to do the blogging thing
@Eimantas You've got mail
um.. that was a statement?
I'm not 100% sure whether daily blog posts are a great idea, but I do like the idea of self-improvement posts
12:46
oh, win
@Eimantas I created you an account, which should mail you with the details :)
well, that's odd
I got the confirmation with password'n'stuff
but the page title says "Page not found"
I see your account is activated though :\
I just did
I'm already in
12:48
404 on that link you gave me
I would suggest first making a draft and discuss it with others (else Rebecca is going to kick my butt), though at least I'm in here most of my waking time, so there shouldn't be much of a delay
Which time zone are you at?
I'm at +0200
now probably it's +0300
I'm in +1, so we're close to each other
btw I'm sorry to inform you that I actually think your hot drinks question should be closed
no problems at all .)
btw is fitness blog affiliated with stackexchange network?
@Eimantas yes, but it won't get official until we can prove to provide a steady stream of blogs
given that I managed to get the SU and Gaming blog up to that status, I'm not so worried about my little pet here doing the same
hi @ThomasMcDonald
note that I 'managed' it, I had a lot of help from fellow users in actually pulling it off :)
That helped
user30
12:57
morning early afternoon
user30
how many shirts did you get sent out in the end?
lol, will that be same for fitness?
@ThomasMcDonald I think 15 or so
@Eimantas well, when we get a bit larger, yes
@ThomasMcDonald darn I should have included you :O
user30
haha, it doesn't matter, I don't think I'd wear it
it doesn't have that text though ;P
@Eimantas as soon as you have a draft, simply post a link in here and we'll all have a look at it
user11126
13:04
hey @IvoFlipse have there been any questions on the effects of "not eating" and why no one should ever do it?
user11126
i want to know what biologically happens to your body but in no way do i want to promote something so negative and unhealthy like that
@MattChan define not eating, how do you consume nutritions then?
user11126
an entire lack of food.... basically starvation
ask the doctors in Africa
though with that new meta question of mine, I wonder how you would need to formulate it to get it to be on-topic
user11126
i was hoping for something like this:
user11126
13:07
6
Q: What are the biological processes behind the sensation of "being hungry"?

Jon TirsenI'm trying to work out if there is a particular diet or habits around eating that would minimize the sensation of "being hungry". Is "being hungry" a psychological sensation determined simply by the habit of eating at specific times during the day? Are there any observable biological processes a...

user11126
but considering that my question takes it further... and to a place that is... probably not a good place... i'm hesitant
user11126
i think your new meta question is merited anyway
On SU we have a policy that prohibits questions about doing 'harmful' stuff to your computer, simply because that's not what we're for
I guess the same applies to Fitness
if we start explaining what happens when don't eat enough, some might take it as an excuse to cut out a few meals extra, because it doesn't apply to them 'yet'
anyway, I'm going to lead by example and do some healthy grocery shopping
user11126
makes sense, thanks for the input
'k, gotta run
ttyl, peeps!
 
3 hours later…
16:24
hi @Greg I was trying to @-message you, but there's too many Gregs
Hey, how goes?
Yeah, I've been noticing I'm not the only one... I guess I can't copyright my name
Hehe, you can try ;-)
So hard to draw a clear definition - we either leave out good material or we let in some spurious topics
Its a difficult situation, we could 'limit' the questions to questions about actually performing the exercise, so we don't have to start answering questions about shin-protectors in soccer or helmets in football
but that would mean the questions about running shoes and dumbbells are off too
Right
16:28
If the site would be locked down to just a few branches of sports, we would start to compete among SE sites (if others ever launch), which I think is rubbish until we hit the size of Super User
Well two "meta" questions we have to consider are what the level of "experts" is that we want and whether we are willing to accept limited traffic to a more restrictive site.
Yes, agree that we don't want a bunch of similarly-scoped struggling SE sites
Besides, you would get a question about running shoes on Soccer.SE, Running.SE and Tennis.SE
What would happen is that all those would start, go through beta, struggle, and eventually be killed or merged back together
@Greg I can live with our expertise on Nutrition being mostly 'experience' based, as long as its related to exercise
I'm sure we can crowd source the validity when enough users with similar experiences are around
but when it would be about food allergies, well I think its no longer safe to assume we have the experience and knowledge to answer those questions
I agree with that
16:31
or like those about lunulae
we all just start Googling our way to an answer, echoing the weird sites that advocate using product X or diet Y
So I think activities, both physical and nutritional, that address strength, endurance, and flexibility are core topics that should fit under any scope.
But that doesn't change the fact that answering questions, like the one about skating are more difficult
The question is where to allow flexibility in that, in order to drive up site volume
Now I have skated often enough, but I suck at braking myself. Any skate coach would probably cry when they read my answer
@Greg I always thought Fitness was meant as a generic term to describe anything exercise related
Sadly all the Area51 questions got deleted when they removed the old proposals
Right, but that's one of the issues with one of your concerns on the meta post - we don't have nutritionists, but we don't have skating coaches either.
@IvoF
bleh
16:35
@Greg No, but that's why I think its important to at least have some experience in that area
Yeah, but I don't think Area51 is that important any more - the site is to be defined by those who use it, not those who proposed it
The guy who proposed it isn't even a member of the site AFAIK
when the nutrition questions are limited to how they influence you getting/being fit, there's a good chance some of us have been in similar situations
Agreed
@Greg I just wanted to point to Roberts discussion about the term Fitness
I wanted to call it something like Sports & Exercise (Physiology) I believe
but they made it more generic and added Nutrition to boot
Got a link handy?
16:37
nope, it got deleted :(
can't even read it on my own profile :\
Well there are linked problems here. First we have to come to a final agreement what the scope should be, then we come up with a name and FAQ material that communicates that scope well.
I basically summed up that everything covered in this book would be a good scope
That's actually a very good summation of proper scope, I think, but leaves something to be desired from one-word.se.com marketability. :-)
@Greg well that was my point, the book can be applied to pretty much anything sports related
Yes, applied, but it's not going to cover specifics of braking on skates or dunking a basketball, etc.
Building up the leg and ankle strength to do a proper brake would be on-topic.
16:40
@Greg well I'd also think the book would be too scientific for most of our users
Sure, but we're not asking them to read the book. The desire on the site seems to be for people who are willing/able to read the science to put it in layman's terms and cite the science behind it.
@Greg Grace Note is mailing me the contents of my Area51 answer, just to see what I said back then
@IvoFlipse Anyway, if we can restrict the scope of questions to having generally applicability across sports (i.e. no nutrition skeptics questions and no sport-specific techniques) then I think we're at a good place and just need a name that fits.
k
@Greg I don't mind Fitness per se, but it should be clear that its not the softy term for ladies talking about how fit they are after Yoga
But there is always gray area. Is learning advanced nuances of deadlift technique appropriate, if they most apply to powerlifters (a sport)?
16:45
brb, I need to dine (how appropriate)
@IvoFlipse Completely agree with that!
All right, ttyl
@Greg I think questions regarding technique could be on-topic, but we'd need to figure out how to handle the 'lack of expert' aspect
I mean I can calculate what the best technique for a deadlift would be ;-)
@IvoFlipse It'd be like everything else here - secondhand experts. We cite a book by Pavel or Rippetoe.
@Greg you've got mail :)
@IvoFlipse Yeah, I see that. Better than working! :-)
@IvoFlipse That's really a good list! I'd be happy to have this as the basis for the FAQ.
IMO, nutrition plays a bigger role in these items than the wording might suggest to someone less familiar with the science behind it, but I think that if nutrition is part of the right answer it will trickle up. It will certainly cut down on the obviously off-topic nutrition questions.
Basically, we want to reduce nutrition questions but should be fine with nutrition answers, if they are correct.
So the terms Wellness, Nutrition, Sports, Health all have negative implications for the questions we might get.
Fitness still feels like the closest we're going to get in one word. Exercise could be ok, but seems a little too limiting.
17:06
@Greg Well Fitness is fine, but then it should be really clear 'how' this all fits in the grand scheme of things
I think we copy/paste your list right into the FAQ
and that Nutrition is allowed should be obvious from the questions on the site and the FAQ, it doesn't need to be in the title
@Greg feel free to propose that as an answer on that Meta question ;-)
@IvoFlipse All right. I'll be sure to cite my source. ;-)
Though I do see Training for Sport covers things like using the right technique, for when you are not familiar with it
nice loophole :)
Did that list come verbatim from the book, or did you paraphrase the bullet points?
17:10
That's the index of the book
It could be a little "weird" if we copied the book's index word-for-word, however appropriate it might be
Btw we should bookmark this conversation and put it in the comments of your answer
@Greg well we can paraphrase it off course
for example by adding 'example' questions
brb
Agreed, but it is really good just the way it is!
17:29

Site's scope discussion

1 hour ago, 47 minutes total – 81 messages, 2 users, 0 stars

Bookmarked 41 secs ago by Ivo Flipse


« first day (159 days earlier)      last day (4924 days later) »