« first day (2441 days earlier)      last day (2243 days later) » 

05:33
0
Q: 2018: a year in moderation

Shog9It's New Year's Day in Stack Exchange land... A distinguishing characteristic of these sites is how they are moderated: We designed the Stack Exchange network engine to be mostly self-regulating, in that we amortize the overall moderation cost of the system across thousands of teeny-tiny sli...

 
2 hours later…
07:50
hat collected
08:04
nvm misread criteria
 
1 hour later…
09:26
19
Q: 2018: a year in closing

Shog9Continuing my sometimes-annual practice of posting these numbers, here is the information on how many questions were closed on various sites around the network in 2018: Site Asked AskedAndClosed PctAskedAndClosed AllClosed DuplicatesClosed DuplicatesReopened O...

 
3 hours later…
12:51
@A.K. I take it you thought it was star a message intead of get a message starred?
13:08
Happy new year folks
سال نومبارک
@Loong Wow, closure rate is too high on Chem. Just . . . too high
No way we get as much relative crap as TWP
Bio is half ours
Almost half of the closed questions are closed as homework, which brings us back to our main problem.
Make it compulsory to have an account before you can ask
Should cut down on at least some of the zero effort he dumps
13:35
62
Q: "Post as guest" is a bad user experience and encourages low quality contributions. Get rid of it

Michael HamptonSince its inception Stack Exchange has tried to make it as easy as possible to ask a question, most of the time. This was done by implementing the concept of an "unregistered" user, identified only by a cookie, who otherwise does not have to log in to a Stack Exchange site. The unregistered user...

13
Q: Why are guests not allowed to post question but allowed to post answers?

puretppcI know this isn't a big deal for me but why do guests get to post answers but not post questions?

13:49
@orthocresol hm, so Physics has that
14:02
Yeah, and Maths.
> Why substances show difference?
because chemistry
@Gaurang They come here from pages like yahoo answers and forums, etc. In general sites that do not really curate their content. What's there is there, and there might be a bit of closing and redirecting, but in principle everything is retained and the reader have to weed out the unimportant stuff themselves. We have a completely different philosophy, a different set of goals. We delete crap, and retain the good stuff. When we have a net increase of good stuff we are winning the long game. With an open philosophy like ours, you'll never discourage lazy people. — Martin - マーチン ♦ Feb 20 '18 at 13:50
I think he deleted one of his comments
The only deleted comment on that post is one of yours.
The one which said that we don't have enough traffic as compared to the larger SE sites and he doesn't mind sifting through a lot of garbage just to find one good question
@orthocresol Must have been somewhere else then
Yeah, you might be thinking of another post.
14:10
@orthocresol How does site traffic compare to, say, last year?
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Well, this year we haven't had much traffic yet.
:)
:-D
To be perfectly fair it's most probably us (i.e. you, not me) that's doing it right
@orthocresol OMFG THE SITEZ FAILING
Well, "last year" is a metaphor for "last year this time", which would be a metaphor for "last year around these months"
Which would be a metaphor for . . . dangit, too much procrastination
More seriously, 2018 activity is lower than 2017 activity.
14:13
Guess I'm not the boy who cried wolf
@orthocresol Well, bring out the statistician in you and analyze patterns and if there's something unusual, write a meta post
That's what mods are supposed to do. 11 suspensions in one WHOLE year? Come on, even I suspended 14 people
How does Military Awesome Racoon suspend other users
I always had a suspicion you were Shog9's sock.
@AvnishKabaj I am insulted, regular user 46306.
Apologies
14:17
Well get in line, I have a few more people to suspend first
Back to not procrastinating,\o
@orthocresol Users destroyed 183 0
14:40
@orthocresol Yupz I totally agree. I remember there were more exciting discussions etc. in 2017.
chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/91254/… By the way, anybody would like to comment on this? I don't mind criticism as long as it is constructive.
I mean that's essentially why I put a bounty on it.
14:54
My observation is that a lot of "regular" users have stopped visiting, or visit less. I am not sure how much we could have really done about that. I suspect the fundamental reason is that a lot of people got busy with real life.
So, even though there has been a decline in activity, I'm not inclined to kick up a big fuss about it on meta.
Actually, is it just the latter half of the year?
I thought the first half was pretty lively
There's always a seasonal trend, probably because of the academic year.
Yes, who would visit this forum when they can be celebrating Christmas/welcoming the New Year...
More like summer holidays.
Actually, my activity rises during school holidays and declines during school time...
There is so much work from school that I hardly have time to think about these exciting questions or write up well-referenced answers during school time. On the other hand, you just stay at home all day during vacation...
15:16
@TanYongBoon Let's discuss further here.
Ok
I will take a picture of the relevant page. Hang on
The linear algebraic diagonalization I use to get my Eq. (11) is the same thing as Jensen's " solving 3N 1-dimensional SEs and then obtains the eigenvalues"
Well, technically I've reduced it to 3N-6 1-dimensional SEs, by projecting out the translation and rotation.
Yes, I know about the very complicated thing with the rotating and translating frames, conversion of Hessian to internal coordinates.
15:19
Hmmm, interesting.
Looks like (Frank) Jensen takes a different approach to get to the governing SE.
Whereas Jan Jensen went the F = ma route.
My principal confusion is that I don't understand what has diagonalisation of Hessian matrix got to do with solving nuclear SE
I do know that diagonalisation of Hessian is used to solve the eigenvalue equation H q = k q
Right -- and that eigenvalue equation is a composite of all 3N (or 3N-6) of the 1-variable SEs.
H is Hessian, q is the eigenvector of vibrations, k is eigenvalues, which are also force constants
And, since the SEs are linear differential eigenequations, the magic of linear algebra lets you solve all of them at once, via the diagonalization.
So how do we get from nuclear SE which has a completely different Hamiltonian to this simple-looking eigenvalue equation H q = k q
15:23
?
Any thoughts on that?
"H" in Hq=kq is the energy operator from the nuclear S
Nuclear SE has both KE operator and PE operator
KE is neglected
15:25
Assumption for this harmonic oscillator approximation is usually made that the $\frac{1}{2}m_iv_i^2$ terms are small enough relative to the PE involved in the motion that they can just be entirely dropped from the SE.
It's usually pretty reasonable for ground-state vibrations
To the best of my knowledge, anyways
You get much more dramatic deviations from the harmonic-oscillator model due to the fact that the potential isn't symmetric.
Ok. Could u also help me to make sense of this: When one properly solves the SE on the actual (anharmonic) PES, the SE with the help of a basis expansion is turned into a matrix eq.
H c = E S c
where c are expansion coefficients which determine psi, and S the overlap matrix. This is solved as generalized eigenvalues problem which yields both E and c.
This was sent to me by an expert I consulted
But I have no clue what it means
The Morse potential, named after physicist Philip M. Morse, is a convenient interatomic interaction model for the potential energy of a diatomic molecule. It is a better approximation for the vibrational structure of the molecule than the QHO (quantum harmonic oscillator) because it explicitly includes the effects of bond breaking, such as the existence of unbound states. It also accounts for the anharmonicity of real bonds and the non-zero transition probability for overtone and combination bands. The Morse potential can also be used to model other interactions such as the interaction between...
Hoofh
<-- not an expert in detailed quantum solutions
Ahhmm... the harmonic approximation assumes implicitly that all of the normal modes are fully uncoupled.
I.e., a displacement along mode 1 doesn't affect the energetics of modes 2...n
Mathematically, this can be expressed by saying that the overlap matrix S between the normal modes is diagonal.
Yes the coupling is essentially like the cross terms in Hessian right?
Mmmmmmmm......rrrggh sorta?
I.e. off-diagonal terms
15:28
The Cartesian coordinates are not the natural coordinates for the vibrational motion
And yes, therefore you get lots of off-diagonal terms in the Cartesian H
The natural coordinates are the internal coordinates?
No, the natural coordinates are the normal modes.
For the harmonic-oscillator approximation
The internal coordinates map much more closely to the normal modes than do the Cartesian.
But they're still not perfect.
If you look at animations of normal modes, you'll often be able to pick out a handful of internal coordinates contributing to a given single normal mode
Does the Wiki page on Morse potential mention KE = o assumption?
15:30
Not sure, but doubt it -- the harmonic oscillator page probably does, though.
It arises there because the HO model assumes no friction in the system.
Although I'm probably mixing terminology here.
To properly compute the vibrational spectrum one has to solve the SE in appropriate (non-redundant) internal coordinates
(T+V(r)) psi(r)=E psi(r)
where V is the potential energy surface (PES) and T the kinetic energy operator (KEO). V you can imagine as DFT (or any ab initio) energy as a function of nuclear coordinates. For molecules it has typically the shape of a well near equilibrium geometry. It is exactly parabolic in the vicinity of the minimum and deviates from the parabola at large displacements. For example, if you pull one bond you typically get a shape like this
Because the HO dynamics definitely involve a continuous exchange of PE and KE.
^This was the exact response I got from the consultation
So, IIUC there are two ways to get to the governing equation.
1) The way Jan Jensen does it, through a forces analysis -- F = ma
By governing eq. you mean H q = K q?
15:33
<nod>
Here, the force is provided by the displacement from equilibrium, as $-kl$, and $a={d^2l \over dt^2}$.
(roughly, those probably aren't exactly right -- see Jan's derivation for the details)
Yes, I have learnt this approach in my physics class on SHM
2) Through a "proper" Schrodinger equation approach, as given by the consultation
"proper"?
Where you write it down like they did, with T and V(r) and everything
There, T is the second derivative
Well, hm. How does that work, actually.
Can I confirm that the page I showed and this expert I consulted are both using Approach 2?
15:37
Yes, that's definitely the case
But I'm afraid all I've done here is reveal my ignorance of how actually to do quantum.
Oh it's fine I thank you very much for the insights you have provided! Have a good year ahead!
16:31
Wood is mostly carbon and hydrogen. I don't need a web page to support this, it is elementary chemistry. — Waylander 1 hour ago
 
2 hours later…
18:52
@Loong Well I prefer elongated torture. User nuking is so unclassy
@orthocresol My observation is after the design changes, the site doesn't feel like home to me anymore
19:19
I think they just got fed up with the homework trash
The suggested name “(E)-bromo-2-butene” is ambiguous and not in accordance with IUPAC nomenclature. The systematic name is (2E)-2-bromobut-2-ene. — Loong ♦ 10 mins ago
I'm pretty sure Loong was on the IUPAC committee
heh
At least it should be clear that "bromo" needs a locant in "bromo-2-butene".
@AvnishKabaj It's very hard to say anything with any certainty.
Homework "trash" isn't a new thing.
On the other hand, I've seen multiple people say that they've been too busy to really contribute much.
And that's been the case for me too. There have been long periods where I barely do anything on the site. And the "change" in my life (basically having to do my Master's project) was relatively small. You can imagine how it might be for somebody who has moved countries, or graduated from their PhD, etc.
19:38
such things are also not motivating:
fine, have a downvote instead
:/
@hBy2Py spotting you in chat be like:
Happy New Year!
Thanks! Happy New Year!
Yeah ... I'm focused more on music and coding side projects these days.
That and work's been a much steadier drumbeat
Playing music, or writing music?
Hmpf, more and more snow. That will be fun tomorrow morning to find my car and dig it out.
Playing/singing
We bought a proper piano; I played a clarinet duet for our church's Christmas Eve service; and I started a casual men's quartet, currently singing barbershop and Palestrina.
(@ortho)
20:01
Sorry, I was cooking dinner!
<grin>, no worries -- sorry to pester.
Never knew you could do all that ;) Have you been playing the clarinet for long?
Played extensively for 13yrs, 5th grade through undergrad.
Hiatus through grad school, up to this year.
Ooh, that's a long time.
I've been thinking about picking up either the clarinet or the oboe...
Probably won't happen for a while though. (And I'm leaning towards the oboe, haha)
Lot more demand for oboes -- double-reeds are rather trickier to play, though.
My mom wanted me to play oboe when I first started in band. I was apparently quite firm in wanting to play clarinet, though.
Yeah -- in retrospect, I never should've stopped playing regularly through grad school -- all of the ensembles at MIT were crazy competitive, and I didn't want that level of commitment... but instead of just stopping, I should've tried to scrape together a more casual chamber group or something.
20:10
Mmhmm, I can imagine that it's tougher for woodwinds/brass players too. As a violinist, it's pretty easy to get into orchestras...
And even if you're not super serious about playing the instrument, it's ok because you can hide behind the other violinists :)
20:47
@Loong Oh but that's accidental override. The OP started editing before you finished yours

« first day (2441 days earlier)      last day (2243 days later) »