@Mithoron \o

Anyone, what paper is Yomen referring to in this answer: "Angew. Chem. , 75 , 793 (1963)"? Also, I think "l,4–difluoro–1,3–butadiene" is probably a typo. Please have a look, the question is popular (21k views).

I searched scholar Google without success

@CowperKettle Oh? I must've remembered that wrong then ._.

@CowperKettle Your sister was an observer with the embassy in New Delhi? Whoa! :O

@CowperKettle You were an observer too? :D

Secretly upvotes @Copper's answer

Assuming revealing your vote isn't taboo: You voted for Yavlinsky, right?

Personally, I've taken a dislike to politicians who throw things (water included) at other people. So I'm not particularly pleased that Sobchak and Zhirinovsky got the vote share they did :/

@paracetamol I have always voted for Yavlinsky, he is level-headed and pro-democracy, and supports social state, which would increase the wages of the poorest and support them.

O:)

This year though I sided with Navalny.

:O

Because he wages the strongest campaign against Putin.

Wait...so you didn't vote?

The key thing is to get Putin behind bars, and then I can return to voting for Yavlinsky.

^ Because you said Navalny

Yes, I did not vote.

Ah..

On a later consideration, I should have voted for Yavlinsky or even maybe for the communists.

XD

Yes, I should have voted for Grudinin.

Just to spite Mr. Putin.

I was just poking fun of his mustache though :P

Grudinin was clearly a puppet allowed to participate only to make the elections appear "fair".

Nods half-knowingly

@CowperKettle That's what I heard about Sobchak :(

@Avnish Cabbage? ;-)

@paracetamol ITISNOTCABBAGE

I know :3

Ka-Bhaj?

Kuh badge

That sounds like how a Brit would say it X3

That's actually pretty accurate

:O

@Martin-マーチン would it be okay if we could flag such a comment for editing and a mod could edit the "Possible duplicate of " part into "Related "? (I can write a userscript for that if it becomes tedious for you) I agree with your idea of linking the related questions, but I hope you too agree that such "possible duplicate" comments aren't the best way to do so.

@GaurangTandon no probs, i've been doing this since i've noticed that they get deleted, that's really not much more work. I can't speak for the other mods though. A custom flag on the comment should do the trick though.

@Martin-マーチン sure

@Martin-マーチン 8 stars xD

interestingly, a search for "cabbage" brings up only Avnish everywhere

and talks related to him

@Martin-マーチン also, sorry for today's flagging spree, but I've been trying to clean up as many obsolete comments involving me as possible :P

@paracetamol All are wrong:

>One can clearly see how the orbital symmetry for NO breaks the degeneracy of the pi orbitals.

The sigma would be in between the pi orbitals like here: Molecular orbital diagram for nitrogen monoxide, the nitrosyl cation and the nitrosyl anion

@GaurangTandon don't worry... if it's getting too much we can still let them idle around. We're plenty of mods to take care of them...

@Martin-マーチン great :)

@GaurangTandon Uhhh-ohhhh... you have triggered a vandalism auto-flag...

@GaurangTandon I do not think chemists talk a lot about cabbages

@GaurangTandon Your image looks so neat, I don't get such neat images on chemsketch

@GaurangTandon Is that question from MSC?

@Martin-マーチン ... What is that? :O

@Abcd go to the draw mode instead of the structure mode

@Abcd i've forgotten