@AvnishKabaj yep, I changed my mind :P See, the trend is so brilliant, I was hoping for some explanation behind it. I admit I might be hopeless in hoping some explanation, but still. I'll hope. Within a month I'll put a bounty on that question and hope that someone comes along and writes an explanation based on intermolecular forces or any other theory
@GaurangTandon I asked Secret, he said that Soumik Das' answer is correct except one minor error. So should I award him the bounty and also type his answer in a more neater way as a new answer?
Also, @GaurangTandon Pleasee help me enable chem jax.
After performing a very scientinfic exapariment I have come to the conclusion that changing your Avatar from hand drawn smiley to the emote and name from 'Avatar Shiny' to an equally fake but real sounding name leads to an increment in the upvotes to answer ratio by a phenomenal amount. Including previously deleted answers the ratio was .4 upvotes per answer pre profile update, post profile update the ratio is 7.33 upvotes per answer.
Last night dream, there's a lot of people (including me) in a wooden house. In one of the room, there is fluorine leaking from a fume cupboard pipping, and causing the whole group to be coughing as it give off a pungent smell. They must obtain the antidote from the host else die when the bones get calcified by the F- ions (one boy already has his arm gone, exposing a piece of bone that gradually became sharper and more worn as the CaF2 conversion makes it brittle and shatter to dust
I think the dream somehow mixed up HF with F2
also I don't recall whether CaF2 is brittle compared to Ca3(PO4)2
@Abcd Nah, I had a more detailed look again, and I don't think martin's answer actually address the two angles you are interested in. Bents rule will explain the two bridge bond angles, but not that 118 angle
James answer address the question for the solid state case, but I am not sure if he had addressed the gaseous case
@GaurangTandon I asked Secret, he said that Soumik Das' answer is correct except one minor error. So should I award him the bounty and also type his answer in a more neater way as a new answer?
" also type his answer in a more neater way as a new answer?" @GaurangTandon
@Abcd I edited his post's grammar myself, so I am not sure if the source of your confusion lies in its grammar; that said, i'm not sure how you can post a new answer without inadvertently saying everything he said and thereby falling into plagiarism
Introduction
The bonding situation in $\ce{(AlCl3)2}$ and $\ce{(BCl3)2}$ is nothing trivial and the reason why aluminium chloride forms dimers, while boron trichloride does not, cannot only be attributed to size.
In order to understand this phenomenon we need to look at both, the monomers and t...
@StianYttervik I think Martin's calculation does not really address why the other Cl-Al-Cl angle is 118. Sure, bent's rule will explain why the inner Cl-Al-Cl is 79 < tetrahedral, it does not explain why the other angle is larger than tetrahedral (and using bent's rule there will mean those Cl will have more negative formal charges than the bridging Cl) — Secret21 hours ago
well its a bit vague, cause comparable only means the difference between I effect and M effect is small (abcd can confirm that), but it does not say which one is stronger
abcd did point out that F is the weakest deactivating group
There are many interesting posts about ketone deprotonation, but browsing them I am unable to answer the following question(s)
Ref: "Which enolate of butanone is more stable?", "Regioselective enolate formation"
From what I can tell, deprotonation of the central hydrogen leads to the more th...