The two are related, in that most nucleophiles are (Lewis) bases and vice versa. Some good nucleophiles are also strong bases, e.g. $\ce{HO-}$. However, a species can be a good nucleophile and a weak base, e.g. $\ce{I-}$; or a species can be a weak nucleophile and a strong base, e.g. $\ce{t-BuO-}...
There's this bit on nucleophiles:
I understand that iodide is a good nucleophile (in water). Would that mean the generic "Nu" used in the reaction (in the image) refers to any nucleophile stronger than iodide?
( Just want to know if I interpreted that right, or if I've overlooked something )
(Ah, since it's a primary alkyl halide, I guess it's SN2)
@orthocresol And then we could also fix the names in the Wikipedia article.
I actually do that a lot: Reading a question concerning a compound on Chemistry.SE and then checking the corresponding Wikipedia article, first of all correcting the names
Depends. In most running PWR units it was just air plus concrete slabs. In the BWR's next door it was mostly water. My current unit is not in operation yet, so it's just open in the air.
@Loong, if you are up to it, the Wikipedia names for the salts also need to be changed (LiHMDS, NaHMDS, KHMDS). I guess the corresponding PINs would be "lithium 1,1,1-trimethyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)silanaminide"?
According to the current version of Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry – IUPAC Recommendations and Preferred Names 2013 (Blue Book), a structure with two or more identical units that are linked by di- or polyvalent groups can be named in two ways:
by ordinary substitutive nomenclature, in which ...
@GeoffHutchison Thanks! I'll ask you if anything pops up. Most of it is actually done, I'm just finalising some of the stuff I've written, mainly the statement of purpose. (Only applying to UK.) P/S I used Avogadro to generate some pretty images for a presentation at my group meeting, which went down fairly well, so thanks for that too!
@Loong I'm sure you already know it, but work on Wikipedia benefits so many people. To a lesser degree, work on SE does that too, which is one factor which motivates me to try and write thorough stuff that is properly referenced etc. I never really got into WP editing though.
In an online forum, OP means "original poster," but can it also mean "original post?"
For example, instead of saying
To answer the OP's original question...
could one instead say
To answer the question in the OP...
or would this be an improper use of the term?