« first day (1945 days earlier)      last day (2739 days later) » 

00:25
@M.A.R. Oh, sorry. I looked for a post by someone saying this, but didn't find anything. Overlooked ya. :'(
 
4 hours later…
04:10
D(-)-mannitol
I wonder what this minus means
 
2 hours later…
06:35
Dextrorotation and levorotation (also spelled as laevorotation) are terms to describe rotational direction of plane-polarized light as it approaches an observer. Dextrorotation is, like clockwise, right direction from top to bottom or also left direction from bottom to top; levorotation is opposite like counterclockwise is of observation from opposite direction. A compound with dextrorotation is called dextrorotatory or dextrorotary, while a compound with levorotation is called levorotatory or levorotary. Compounds with these properties are said to have optical activity and consist of chira...
 
2 hours later…
08:35
@orthocresol Thank you! I guessed about D/L but why -/+?
I'll read up on this
09:12
@CowperKettle The (+)/(−) nomenclature is explained in that page, after the table of contents.
Confusingly, the D in D-(−)-mannitol does not refer to it being dextrorotatory. It means that the stereochemistry of D-mannitol is related to that of D-glyceraldehyde. Again, the Wikipedia page (tries to) explain it.
Oh, this Wikipedia page is actually better:
An absolute configuration refers to the spatial arrangement of the atoms of a chiral molecular entity (or group) and its stereochemical description e.g. R or S, referring to Rectus, or Sinister, respectively. Absolute configurations for a chiral molecule (in pure form) are most often obtained by X-ray crystallography. All enantiomerically pure chiral molecules crystallise in one of the 65 Sohncke groups (chiral space groups). Alternative techniques are Optical rotatory dispersion, vibrational circular dichroism and the use of chiral shift reagents in proton NMR and Coulomb Explosion Imaging. When...
09:27
ah! And Bob's your uncle!
Thank you!
 
2 hours later…
11:44
If we "reduce" a disulfide, does it break it?
My text says that the antibody was analyzed as a reduced antibody.
12:28
@CowperKettle reduce it with what?
 
1 hour later…
13:49
@M.A.R. I have no idea!
The text does not say that.
I just came across "reduction of disulfides" while googling
I thought that maybe my "reduced antibody" has its disulfide bonds broken
I have no time to read.. ))
 
2 hours later…
15:59
@CowperKettle Usually, the "reduction of a disulfide" (disulfide = R-S-S-R') implies that the products are the sulfides (R-S-H + H-S-R'). Therefore, usually, the reduction of a disulfide involves S-S bond cleavage.
16:15
@CowperKettle Yes, usually. I consider each disulfide sulfur to carry a -1 formal charge, same as the oxygens in peroxides (i.e., corresponding to units of $\ce{S2^{2-}}$ and $\ce{O2^{2-}}$, respectively). @ortho
Thus, when $\ce{R1SSR2}$ becomes $\ce{R1SH + HSR2}$ and each sulfur goes to the typical -2 formal charge, it's an overall two-electron reduction.
 
3 hours later…
19:20
Do functional group tags really connect people to content they are interested in? Weigh in on meta.
5
19:41
0
Q: Tag Review 2017. I. Tagging by functional group - revisited

orthocresolBack in 2015 it was decided that we should create and apply tags for a bunch of functional groups. See: Should we create tags for common functional groups? I'll be upfront about what I think: after ~2 years of having this system, I've decided I don't actually like it. Reasons: Reactions involv...


« first day (1945 days earlier)      last day (2739 days later) »