« first day (1680 days earlier)      last day (3006 days later) » 
01:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

01:11
!!img/N,N-dipropylcyclohexanamine
Jan
Jan
It’s celebrating \o/
@Jan Now, I really would like to see that answer sheet.
Jan
Jan
How come?
We see so many textbooks and websites with obsolete or blatantly wrong nomenclature; hence, I would like to know whether this test has the correct answers.
Jan
Jan
01:44
Let’s see how many upvotes I’m going to get for my just-posted answer.
Also, let’s go to bed. Why didn’t I do that an hour ago?
@Jan Most people die in bed.
user228700
Is anybody here familiar with Le Chateliers's principle?
@Kaumudi hm?
user228700
I have a quick question. For a solid <--> liquid equilibrium, what will happen if I increase the pressure?
@Kaumudi Which solid? Which liquid?
user228700
01:55
@Loong Not water.
OK, so do you assume that the density of the solid is larger than the density of the liquid?
user228700
Yes.
user228700
This means that the volume of the solid is smaller than the volume of the liquid, correct?
For a given mass, yes.
user228700
The way that I've been taught to think about this problem is like so: Since the pressure has been increased, the equilibrium will attempt to shift in a direction that will counteract this change in pressure. In this case, this would be achieved by shifting in that direction in which the volume is greater.
user228700
01:59
Is this the correct way to think about it?
If you press on a balloon, does this make the balloon larger?
user228700
No .__. This is exactly the problem. I'm confused as to how this principle actually applies.
user228700
If the following equilibrium exists inside the balloon:
user228700
$$2 A <---> A_2$$
user228700
Upon increasing the pressure, the equilibrium will shift in the forward direction, correct?
02:03
yes
user228700
OK. Can you please help me to find the flaw in my reasoning whilst proposing the first statement that u sort of disagreed with? What is the correct way to think about this?
user228700
(I find that I'm able to arrive at the correct answer when dealing w/ chemical equilibria. It's the physical ones that give me all the trouble)
@Kaumudi I guess, you are thinking about something like the ideal gas law when talking about pressure.
p V = n R T
user228700
Yes, I am...
Such a system cannot use a chemical reaction or a phase change to escape from your pressure.
user228700
02:09
Ah, I see. And why is that..?
By definition, the ideal gas does not undergo reactions or phase changes.
user228700
Oh, of course. Right.
user228700
In which cases then, should I look to apply the principle?
So if you change the external pressure at constant temperature, the volume of an ideal gas will simply adjust until the external and internal pressure are equalized.
However, if your gas could condense into a liquid, you get a new way to escape from the increasing pressure.
The ideal gas low cannot describe such a phase change.
Typically, the liquid has a much higher density than the gas.
user228700
OK, I understand. Again, in which cases then, should I look to apply the principle?
02:16
@Kaumudi The Le Chatelier's principle? You can apply it if you can express you system as an equilibrium A <=> B.
e.g. gas <=> liquid
or liquid <=> solid
or chemically: 2 A <=> A2
user228700
Yes. Alright. What about the liquid <--> solid equilibrium that I brought up in the beginning? How can I apply this principle? i.e. What happens when we increase the pressure?
If you fill your balloon with the liquid or with the solid, which one presses stronger against the balloon?
(same mass of liquid and solid)
user228700
Uhh. It's difficult for me to imagine this. I really dunno. If I'd have to guess, I'd say liquid.
Which phase wants to have a larger volume?
user228700
The liquid..?
02:22
Yes, the liquid phase wants to have a larger volume.
user228700
If given some more energy, the liquid can evaporate and change completely into gas-and the gas phase has the largest volume. That's how I guessed it. Is my reasoning terrible?
That's ok for most substances. But it doesn't work for some solids such as ice.
user228700
Gosh, it probably is, isn't it?
user228700
OK, given that liquid exerts more pressure than the solid, the equilibrium shifts in the direction of the...solid? (Upon increasing pressure)
user228700
This doesn't make sense to me because the solid has the lower volume, right? And lower volume corresponds to higher pressure. Dang it, I'm probably confusing this with the ideal gas situation again, aren't I? :-/
02:28
Ello
user228700
Hi :-)
@Kaumudi Ok. So when you increase the external pressure, the system will reduce its volume until the external and internal pressure are equalized. A simple ideal gas will do this according the ideal gas law. Your solid–liquid system can do this by transforming some liquid to solid.
@MelanieShebel Hi. How was you exam?
user228700
The question is, why does some liquid transform into some solid?
It went really well. I didn't get 100%, but I think I did REALLY well.
@MelanieShebel sounds good :-)
user228700
02:34
Erm..?
@Kaumudi When you increase the external pressure on an ideal gas, why does the volume of the gas decrease?
user228700
Because it's being compressed...
Yes, and the same principle applies to your liquid.
user228700
But what about this:
user228700
> "This doesn't make sense to me because the solid has the lower volume, right? And lower volume corresponds to higher pressure. Dang it, I'm probably confusing this with the ideal gas situation again, aren't I? :-/"
02:39
Yes, again you are describing an ideal gas without phase change or chemical reaction.
You had no problem with a chemical equilibrium:
37 mins ago, by Kaumudi
$$2 A <---> A_2$$
Which side corresponds to a higher volume?
user228700
OK. Can u please direct me to a source to study this principle properly? I haven't found a good one in all the time I've been searching (and searching).
user228700
@Loong Left.
@Kaumudi OK. And which side corresponds to a higher system pressure?
user228700
Left..?
Yes!
user228700
02:42
That's strange .__.
user228700
Wow.
@Kaumudi That's not strange, that's a chemical equilibrium, and not just a simple ideal gas.
user228700
Alright, thank you :-) Can u suggest a good source?
No sorry, I don't know a good source right now.
But maybe, we can find something tomorrow with better examples.
@Kaumudi So, and if the principle works for a chemical equilibrium like "2 A <---> A_2", you could do the same for "solid <---> liquid".
Good morning!
I'm trying to select 05 in 31.05.2011 but this regexp fails for some reason
It works only if I remove the ^ and the $ at the left and right ends
02:59
That's gross. Let me try it on regexer.com
Why is it gross? This is the second time ever I'm using regexp, so it might be a bit unwieldy
Regex gets gross easily. For everyone, seasoned or not (so don't feel bad.)
Maybe it's the kind of work I do but in my 5 years of programming seriously I've never needed lookarounds.
Groups, sure. Lookahead and lookbehind, no.
I read a little about "capture group" but understood nearly nothing.
Ahhhhhhhh. I see.
Capture groups are very handy and I think you need them here, but the stuff with question marks I don't think so. I'll try it.
03:07
0
Q: Regexp search in SDL Trados (a translation tool)

CopperKettleIn the document I'm translating there's a large number of dates of the type 12.05.2011. I need to replace the month numbers (in the middle) with month names, like -May-, which would give 12-May-2011. This is necessary because some readers might assume that the month number is in the beginning and...

Do you know what the ^ and $ do?
Yes, they indicate "the start and the end"
meaning, there should be nothing but our string in the whole body of search
Ok. There might be some invisible characters in the string then that prevent the match.
No, there are no invisibles, it seems
This regexp managed to "find" the string
If I use a capture group like this - ^[\d]{2}(\.05\.)[\d]{2,4}$ - should it only capture .05. for replacement?
user228700
03:22
@Loong OK. Thank you :-)
The capture group just gives you a reference to work with for later on.
For example, sed 's|\(\d*\)\.05\.\(\d*\)|\1-May-\2|' < test.
I keep the first and third parts of the date for use in my replacement. That's the \1 and the \2.
Now, I don't think you can do that here.
a guy offered this: (?<=[\d]{2})\.\d{2}\.(?=[\d]{2,4}[\r\t\n\s])
I've no idea what [\r\t\n\s] is
Those match hidden characters: \r is carriage return, \t is tab, \n is newline, \s is space.
The problem is because they're in [] and not []*, it will only match one of them, not an arbitrary number or a combination of them.
@pentavalentcarbon but with the asterisk, it will match even zero of them
Yes.
I guess I have a stupid question.
Why does it matter that you can't get ^ and $ to work?
03:30
Thank you, but I want to search for strings that fill the whole translation segment, because there might by chance be some non-date string, say, some production code, 2135.05.2011.462, and my search-and-replace might wrongly put -May- in there. ^_^ That will wreck my translation. — CopperKettle 12 mins ago
Ok, that answers my question.
In that case, you will still need to make an assumption as to what your date string will look like.
For example, will it always be dd.mm.yyyy?
Oh, I see that's why the {} are there.
(0:
@pentavalentcarbon excuse me for stupidity, but what is sed 's?
Sorry. That's the Unix command line tool sed, followed by a command that replaces text based on the regex.
ah! thank you!
The one I wrote doesn't do what you want though, you can ignore it.
03:42
Man, a lot of turds on the front page tonight.
in the news, or on Chem.SE?
Chem.Se
Well... both.
Frank Zappa is telling everyone from his grave "I told you so" right about now.
user228700
Can anybody please tell me why the number of $\alpha$ hydrogen atoms decides the stability of the molecule more than the cis/trans effect?
user228700
03:46
That would be a really good question for the Chem.SE (if you feel up to drawing that out w software.)
user228700
(c) has a smaller number of $\alpha$ hydrogen atoms compared to (b) but (b) is more stable! However, (b) is neither cis nor trans...
@CowperKettle Is that your systemwide rep next to your name or your Chem.SE rep?
The 30.4k
@MelanieShebel the total - my Chem rep is only about 800
user228700
@MelanieShebel Which software?
03:48
Chem Draw or whatever you have to draw chem structures.
user228700
(I'm using a mobile phone :-|)
user228700
Why is it a good question? (b) appears to be neither cis, nor trans...
So, I'm looking at the StackExchange chat rooms and it looks like this one is...
The 7th most popular chat room in the entire network.
Nice!
user228700
I'll ask the question on the main site. Can u please tell me why it is a good question? @MelanieShebel
Oh, I mean, in terms of current activity.
@Kaumudi It may benefit other users vs just answering questions here in chat.
Plus, you'll get more help there vs here in the chat room.
asking*
user228700
03:55
I understand why asking on the main site will be beneficial to a lot more people. I'm asking why this particular question is a good question.
Because it'll help others.
Who might have a similar question down the road.
user228700
Okay. The question seems a bit homework-tsy tho.
user228700
I'm not particularly confident that it will not be closed.
You don't have to write the question if you don't want.
If you word it right and include the homework tag (AND INCLUDE YOUR THOUGHT PROCESS/WORK) it should not be closed.
user228700
Okay. I think I'll wait. Thanks :-)
04:03
If anyone wants to reword the body of this question, that would be amazing. I'm not good w the jax.
0
Q: Finding Diameter of a Atom

noreturnSo I am looking to find the atomic size of a molecule. So we are given the dimensions of a sheet which is: 1698.03mm^3 Then we are also given that the sheet has a mass of 3grams, and molar mas of 8g/mole So we can do density by dividing area/mass. So 1698.03/3= 566.001mm/g. Then after that ...

Also maybe better tags?
4 suggested edits in the queue?!?! Is everyone asleep? Here I go!
It's a quiet night!
But there are some real turds on the front page tonight.
user228700
I've a very quick question. Is the resonance effect more consequential for the stability of a molecule compared to hyperconjugation?
@MelanieShebel I can't even figure out what this is asking. I will accept your edit but this needs a flag. It's totally unclear. I think they want volume of a molecule, but impossible to tell.
Oh volume? Really?
I'm sorry, I didn't read that! I just did a cursory look at the body and the title to clean it up. Sorry.
user228700
04:13
Anybody?
Well, that's what it said and it was asking, but I think they're totally confused about what they even want.
I modified my regexp a little: (?<=[0-3][0-9])\.05\.(?=[\d]{2,4}) -- is there a way to limit the first number by the 01-31 range?
@pentavalentcarbon That's possible. I cleaned it up a bit more. Perhaps they'll come back and clarify. (Hopefully.)
They have low rep and their username is noreturn, so perhaps not.
Bahahaha!
I just noticed that.
$\tiny\text{some of these I wish I could pour gasoline on and toss a match onto...}$
I wonder if the number of repetitions in the curly brackets will refer to "20" or just to "0": 20{0,1}
What if I want the number 20 to be present either one or zero times?
20{0,1} seems to match even the number 2
04:26
(20)?
? is 0 or 1 times
thank you
How does one define a string that would match only a two-digit number from 01 to 31?
Gotta love those "bomb" questions.
About how to make bombs?
Yeah, one just popped up.
We should have a "I wanna blow sumpin up" tag.
We should have a "defuse" button for moderators
With a counter with seconds ticking away to zero
04:34
Or a "I'm not being vague on purpose... this is totally legal..." tag
I'm talking about you, alkaloid question!
0
Q: General Alkaloid Extraction Process

Thor CorreiaI'm getting into alkaloid extraction from various ethnobotanicals. It is a bit frustrating trying to extract alkaloids from ethnobotanicals without good guides out there, and I wanted to make my own techniques and experiments. However, I need to know what the basic outline is for extraction. Are ...

I hate that crap and I wish it would just go away
Yeah, well see the latest post on meta!
ahem
Klaus is a great guy. I remember he gave a great answer to me
It looks like in Trados, you should put the ^ and the $ inside the lookbefore and lookbehind brackets, like this: (?<=^[0-3][0-9])\.05\.(?=[\d]{2,4}$)
I'm not sure, but it seems to work
I'm not sure if this is the best way, but the first thing that came to mind was 0[1-9]|[1-2][0-9]|3[0-1].
@pentavalentcarbon thank you!
04:40
867-5309
ugggghhhhhhh
I don't know enough about regexes or lookarounds to understand why it works when you put those inside.
don't think twice, it's allright
Klaus didn't ask it, he edited. We had a fun discussion about the question here the other day. :D
Klaus answers like all my questions, he's fab.
05:34
@hBy2Py That is a really good question. Unfortunately I have to go through some hoops to get Pople's original paper, and I'm a bit too lazy to look up the input specifications for qchem. But that's not really the main focus of the question. If you find the exponents, you'll somehow find the way to give them to the program.
@hBy2Py Thanks a lot for the input. I have just downloaded it now. Unfortunately I realised that I don't have the time to look into it right now O.o (I forgot about a meeting I need to prepare for.) I hope I get around to it during hat season. Did I read correctly, that you are not using a queuing system, but only run it interactively?
I also just read they are coming out with version 4.0 soon. (I really hope they implemented the reparametrised DFT functionals by Grimme.)
user image
2
06:01
1
Q: Homework requests in Periodic Table chat?

Melanie ShebelI don't mind guiding users in The Periodic Table with their homework. If I get a question or two, I'll discuss with the person. However, there have been times where users will sit in chat all night and ask question after question, seemingly completing entire assignments in chat. There have been c...

06:37
@pentavalentcarbon Down... down... down... down... DOWN... vote!
06:49
@melanie Are you online?
07:05
what's up
07:18
haha... sorry... this time I wasn't reading along...
 
1 hour later…
08:23
@CowperKettle 0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01] should match everything 01..31
08:48
@Martin-マーチン thank you!
ありがとう
what program are you using for your substitutions?
09:21
0
Q: Microwaving a glass of water

paracresolMost of us around here would know the simplified idea behind microwaving food: Microwave radiation hits the water molecules present in food, which excites them and causes 'em to vibrate rapidly in situ resulting in the heating up of food. Very straightforward. But what if you decide to microwave...

Gentlemen, ideas? ._.
 
3 hours later…
12:06
@Martin-マーチン Correct, I'm not using any queueing tool, other than a hacked together wait-for-this-given-PID shell script
well... i need to get that running first... obviously and then hack a script to submit it to my queue
@Martin-マーチン Do you mean Grimme's reparam'zn of the dispersion parameters? Or totally redone functionals?
not the reparametrisation of the dispersion correction, but these of TPSS
!!doi/10.1021/ct900489g
DOI 10.1021/ct900489g :
"A General Database for Main Group Thermochemistry, Kinetics, and Noncovalent Interactions − Assessment of Common and Reparameterized (meta-)GGA Density Functionals"
First author : Lars Goerigk
@Martin-マーチン If you have specific questions about queueing, I'd PM Reuti on the ORCA forum, in addition to posting on the board itself. FWIS he has the most experience with it.
12:13
I know... he's my former admin ;)
but he's a grid engine guy and i'm a pbs guy
(now)
@Martin-マーチン Interesting -- I'm sure I've read that one, but I don't remember them reaching into the internals of any of the functionals themselves.
But, has been a while.
@Martin-マーチン Hahaha, nice. :-)
Small world
well, there's only oh so few cluster admins out there...
@Martin-マーチン Indeed.
@Martin-マーチン Yeah, that notification on the Input Library about 4.0 coming out soon is new, but I don't know how new. Hopefully we'll have it by the new year....
and not a lot of them are visible on the net as much as reuti
well i saw on the forum that they are in beta, but they wouldn't say hwen they re ready to release
@Martin-マーチン I guess this is sort of like Fourier transforms matching a function with a nonzero value at x=0, while restricting yourself to only using sines... you need an ~infinite number of basis functions in order to drive the fitted function close to the actual f(0) value.
The text in blue caps here implies to me that it should hopefully be within the month.
12:31
@hBy2Py the input for STO-nG is quite simple for gamess and gaussian, you just need to fit the STO you have with a LC of GTO... it's pretty straight forward
not sure if there is already an algo which can do that, but that shouldn't be too difficult to do
anyway... i have the pople paper now, so i'll look at how he did it :D
12:47
0
Q: How can I tell whether or not a molecule is planar?

anilineI am doing several questions involving judgment on the planarity of a compound. Which of the following is not a planar molecule? A) $\ce{H_2C=C=CH_2}$ B) $\ce{H_2C=C=C=CH_2}$ C) $\ce{H_2C=C=O}$ D) $\ce{NC-HC=CH-CN}$ I had the idea that the compound in with central atom has sp hybridisation ...

13:10
@Martin-マーチン It's a straightforward nonlinear optimization problem. The difficulty is that most software packages are poorly configured to run contraction coefficient optimizations out of the box.
If I were to try doing it, I would probably drive ORCA with Python, automatically generating the input file with an auto-manually constructed basis.
why would you need orca to do that?
But then, I'd have to parse the output, probably building off of a dump of the coefficients matrix, in order to fit the Slater wavefunction... not trivial.
@Martin-マーチン <scratches chin>
Good point.
Since there's no HF calculation involved, just fitting functions.
So, just numpy/scipy then.
Maybe a scikit-learn or something, but that might be overkill.
well... yeah, I guess, I'm not good at that
scipy (I think) has a BFGS solver built in, so the solving side of it should be pretty easy.
user116211
I just noticed the Silent @Bob is here too ;)
13:17
well the procedure is outlined in !!doi/10.1063/1.1672392
Could not find the requested DOI : 10.1063/1.1672392
user116211
Hey @hBy2Py; also hi @martin; hope you are okay with the Japan earthquake or tsunami or sort of that recently.
yeah thanks, I'm fine. It was a big one, but no major damage
okay... gotta go... see y'all
user116211
@Martin-マーチン o/
13:43
ok
so in my chem notes
its writtent that
CCl4 , CH2Cl2 are both organic compounds
as they are derived from CH4
which is also an organic compound
well...then lets say we involve CH4 in a reaction
and take the product and involve the product in another reaction
and then take the product of that reaction too and involve IT in another reaction
and keep on ding this 10 times
and then end up with SO2
does that mean that SO2 is an organic compound too?
i mean if this is the definition then ANY element/compound can be termed as an organic compound right?
please help
@Martin-マーチン
it says that because CCl4 and CH2Cl2 are "derivatives" of CH4
user228700
^ This is a good question. I think it will be great if u asked it at the main site :-)
user228700
You may expect at least one upvote!
Bob
Bob
@MAFIA36790 shhhhhh
2
dont really care bout upvotes :P
0
Q: Question about "what" an organic compound actually is

MartianCactusSo in my chem notes its written that CCl4 , CH2Cl2 are both organic compounds as they are derived from CH4 which is also an organic compound. It says that because CCl4 and CH2Cl2 are "derivatives" of CH4 Well...then lets say we involve CH4 in a reaction and take the product and involve the prod...

14:09
0
A: Why is o-toluic acid (2-methylbenzoic acid) more acidic than benzoic acid?

fizzao-toulic acid is stronger than carboxylic acid bcoz the conjugate base of o-toulic acid is stabilized by hydrogen bonding

@MartianCactus See the question that I linked; the distinction between organic and inorganic is very blurred. Compounds like CCl4, CO2, are borderline.
oh
the title was misleading
i was asking if what my teacher said was correct
I would say it is wrong.
oh
maybe she means that it only goes till 1 reaction
like if the product of the first reaction of CH4 is another organic compound and not the consecutive reactions?
Can anyone tell me what is the reducing group in glucose and why it is reducing group
Please help in above question
@MartianCactus that's unnecessarily restrictive
and not correct either
14:14
oh
idk whats up with that now :/
if you need to learn it for purposes of exams, then do so
just bear in mind that, many people past and present have tried to define the line between organic and inorganic
it's not clear cut and if you ever see a one-line "definition" of what is organic and what isn't, it's probably not correct
most compounds are clear-cut; so few people would argue against acetic acid being organic and sodium carbonate inorganic
however, the issue with most definitions flying around on the internet is that they try too hard to fit CO2, CCl4, etc. into one category
i.e. false dichotomy
A false dilemma (also called false dichotomy, false binary, black-and-white thinking, bifurcation, denying a conjunct, the either–or fallacy, fallacy of exhaustive hypotheses, fallacy of the excluded middle, the fallacy of false choice, or the fallacy of the false alternative) is a type of informal fallacy that involves a situation in which only limited alternatives are considered, when in fact there is at least one additional option. The opposite of this fallacy is argument to moderation. The options may be a position that is between two extremes (such as when there are shades of grey) or may...
@Martin-マーチン Indeed, right there it is.
@MAFIA36790 'ello!
14:33
@orthocresol I also like the Blue Book approach (for the purposes of nomenclature), in short: Anything that contains at least one carbon atom and that can be named using organic nomenclature is considered to be an organic compound. (The actual definition is longer.)
@MartianCactus We have several questions about the definition of "organic compounds"; so, this part of your question may be considered a duplicate. However, your other aspect "what is a derivative" might still be interesting.
The Wikipedia article about derivative is poor. I just had to add a [citation needed].
@Loong so, tetrachloromethane is organic and CO2 isn't?
@orthocresol for the nomenclature purposes of the Blue Book, yes
I see.
The Red Book might disagree. ;-)
If IUPAC can't agree on it, what hope do we have
 
1 hour later…
15:42
0
Q: Why Does an Area in Phase Diagram Considered as Having Degree Of Freedom=1?

user466672 Why did the area in the center are Considered as Having 1 Degree Of Freedom. Aren't we able to change the concentration and the temperature at the sametime without changing the Phase? Here is the link to the document https://www.google.co.id/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.colby.edu/c...

 
2 hours later…
17:43
These are the test for alkyl halide
In first test what does it mean 'capable of carbocation'
@Zhe
Why this room is MOSTLY dead ??
18:02
@koolman it's "capable of carbocation formation"
@Loong but every alkyl can form carbocation
@koolman not necessarily with cold aqueous AgNO3 solution
How
@Loong can you please give me an example
A tertiary alkylchloride doesn't dissolve in water, but it will quickly react with AgNO3 in cold ethanol.
Zhe
Zhe
@koolman hey some of us are at work doing other things
Also, methyl chloride
Carbon tetrachloride is an even better example
Does it form a carbocation?
18:12
@koolman For a primary or secondary alkylchoride, you would have to heat the solution.
Zhe
Zhe
I'm not sure that's even enough for methyl chloride
@Zhe sorry I have disturbed you
Zhe
Zhe
In a dry heat?
You haven't disturbed me, but that's why the room is "dead"
@Loong how tertiary alkyl chloride
Jan
Jan
Does anyone know where to find issues of Zhurnal Russkago fiziko-khimicheskago obschchestva
18:14
@Zhe no
@Loong why we have to heat
@koolman Do you know about the stability of carbocations and SN1 or SN2 reactions?
Zhe
Zhe
Forming a carbocation is disfavored, even if it is an intermediate
@Zhe but if product is forming very stable
Zhe
Zhe
You're assuming it's equilibrium driven?
What if it's just under kinetic control?
18:18
Oh I see
Thank you @Loong @Zhe
Jan
Jan
*sobs*
> This question has an open bounty and cannot be closed
@Jan ?
Jan
Jan
The one about planarity. I want to close it as homework. Top of the active questions list.
I see.
@Jan btw, the International System of Units and ISO call that thing "solidus"; that was not my idea. ;-)
Jan
Jan
18:36
I was just unsure if I had the name correct ;) To me, it’s a slash ;)
@Jan Btw, @Loong, you wouldn’t know about the old Russian journal, would you?
@Jan I have just checked; sorry, I have no idea.
Jan
Jan
Shame =C
@Jan And on the occassion of my usual comment about the solidus, I once had to notice to my horror that some students from English-speaking countries think that there would be some order of precedence for multiplication and division because they use misleading mnemonics in school. :-(
Jan
Jan
Ouch =O
Hm, it is a line, so Punkt vor Strich? ;)
Zhe
Zhe
@Jan I just added a comment to the only answer
:/
18:44
@Jan I asked a somehow related question on UX, and I have got this non-constructive comment:
What's wrong with good old-fashions order of operations? Then a/b*c is clearly (a/b)*c. — Scimonster Aug 11 at 13:51
And this comment has got three upvotes. :-(
Jan
Jan
I’m considering signing up there to comment against Scimonster xD
Because really, that’s a misconception that should be cleared up.
Zhe
Zhe
What's UX?
Jan
Jan
@Loong Can’t see that properly ô.o White on cream.
Zhe
Zhe
/me runs away with arms flailing
This is why I am a backend engineer
18:54
@Jan Yeah, that's really a bad colour scheme, especially for a user experience site.
2
19:53
@hBy2Py it's said that for months, don't hold your breath
01:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

« first day (1680 days earlier)      last day (3006 days later) »