« first day (1519 days earlier)      last day (3165 days later) » 

Jan
Jan
02:05
I … did it? The first bus of the day will leave in 25 minutes and I'm so taking it. (Too lazy to cycle)
02:57
You know what I saw last week?
Light.
In fact, no one has ever seen anything other than light.
user116211
@SirCumference whhhat?
True
Did I blow your mind or something?
user116211
Okay, elaborate.
You can never see your feet as they are. You can see them as they were a few microseconds ago, but light still took time to get to your eyes
So you see your feet in the past
Ok man, have you ever looked at distant objects in the night sky?
user116211
03:12
sorry, my shift button is not working
user116211
@SirCumference yeh, it's true but how is it related to the above comment?
Well, for example, we never truly see the Sun
We only see the light it produces
So it appears to be 8 minutes 19 seconds younger than it really is
user116211
@pentavalentcarbon: o/
@MAFIA36790 o/
user116211
Well, even the time-varying electric and magnetic fields that are the solutions of Maxwell's equations are time-retarded.
user116211
03:15
Take, for example, Jefimenko's equations.
user116211
This retarded time-dependence implies the validity of causality.
user116211
Causality however doesn't mean the cause must happen at past.
user116211
Force and acceleration are present at the same time, although the former is the cause of the later; then how can they follow causality?
Huh...
Never considered that
user116211
Well, then there is another rule which states that if the causal relations are used in the definition, then causality is still maintained.
user116211
03:21
Which is what happened in the second law; so it still follows causality.
user116211
How amazing are they, isn't it?
Anyone know GR and QM here?
 
5 hours later…
user116211
08:28
@TIPS: o/
user116211
WHERE HAZ MY GIF FEEDZ TODAY??
Shhh...stop yelling.
 
2 hours later…
10:31
!!greet/@Troll
Welcome to The Periodic Table @Troll! Here are our chat guidelines and it's recommended that you read them. If you want to turn Mathjax on, follow the instructions in this answer. Happy chatting!
user116211
10:55
hye @mith.
\o
!!flip
(ノ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ノ︵┻┻
@Mith did you get swag?
11:07
@TIPS Nah, didn't
Oh. :(
@TIPS Got the mail but didn't reply. Was it nice?
Yeah
The mug rocks
I'm even considering not using it.
@TIPS Hmm, thought it would be uncomfortable in practice
@Mithoron How uncomfy?
11:11
Because of shape
Well Nah.
I just think I wouldn't drink anything in it so I'd never have to wash it.
I might make it a pencil case thing holder thingy though.
Like Michael
:D
2
Q: receiving milk for working in harmful environment

mil'I just got a job in a chemical/biological lab (Post-Soviet Country). Chemists here receive milk for "harmfulness of the work",i .e. their work involves working with all kind of substances/reactives. (I'm not a chemist I do their analysis). The tradition of receiving 0.5 litre of milk a day comes ...

Haha :)
@Mithoron Chemists are toddlers in disguise.
user116211
@Mithoron Post Soviet
user116211
Are their labs different that made OP to mention that?
user116211
11:17
ah! got that! Soviet tradition!!
user116211
Damn commies ;((
@MAFIA36790 XD
@Mithoron the Soviets also used vodka against radiation sickness
@Loong That's why they got to the moon first
user116211
@Loong How could vodka help them O.O
11:20
@Loong Mass Lugol usage after Chernobyl probably didn't make much more good
@MAFIA36790 it might help against the symptoms ;-)
user116211
BTW, @Loong had I asked you which university in Germany provide course in English?
@Mithoron yeah, that was done unprofessionally
user116211
Well, the main criteria for being eligible to take admission entrance exam in Germany is to know German :(
@Mithoron btw, I wrote most of the German Wikipedia article on iodine prophylaxis including some useful numbers.
@MAFIA36790 yes, you talked about that.
@MAFIA36790 even for the purely English courses?
user116211
11:26
@Loong Well, it seems so.
user116211
!!wiki/Abitur
Abitur (Latin: "one who is going to go away", "a journey away is made", future active participle of abire) is a designation used in Germany, Finland, Lithuania, and Estonia for final exams that pupils take at the end of their secondary education, usually after twelve or thirteen years of schooling (see also for Germany Abitur after twelve years). Abitur is a matriculation examination and can be compared to A-level, Matura or the International Baccalaureate Diploma, which are all ranked as EQF level 4. == In Germany == === Overview === The Zeugnis der Allgemeinen Hochschulreife ("certifi...
user116211
@Loong: ^^^
maybe you could ask on academia.stackexchange.com about your possibilities
user116211
well, I'm checking at UK too.
user116211
11:29
The Oxbridge seems to be quite good in their administration and policy in taking foreign students.
user116211
And one good feature of English system is:
user116211
There is no major-minor culture
@MAFIA36790 That's good. I don't understand the American system.
user116211
You want to study Physics? Then choose Physics; have a BSc course in 3 years; no other additional subject is required to be taken; however, you can take classes and attend lectures of other courses too.
user116211
@Loong Unfortunately many countries including India also follow that.
user116211
11:33
This one is ridiculous:
user116211
We have a dual BS-MS degree; for first two years, we have to study:
user116211
Physics, Mathematics, Chemistry, Biology, Earth Science.
user116211
This is insane.
:-(
so you would try to study everything a bit, but nothing in a proper way
user116211
I like the English system but their expenses are far more than any Ivy college.
user116211
11:36
@Loong Total nonsense; what should I do with Biology? Rubbish ;(
13:42
Hey, can anyone tell me if this statement is correct?
"Protons and electrons will not always combine; electron capture only happens under high enough energies. That's why neutron stars form when the mass (and energy) of a white dwarf goes beyond a certain point."
 
2 hours later…
16:07
@SirCumference Pressure is most important in creation of neutronium. It just happens to correlate with mass and temperature in case of stars.
@SirCumference It is AFAIK
@TIPS Synchronization :D
@Mithoron ?
@TIPS We answered in almost the same moment after more then 2 hours :)
@Mithoron Aha. Well, great minds answer chemistry questions at the same time.
user116211
16:09
@Mithoron TIPS HAZ powers.
Even ones I have no idea about
Well, it's more like astrophysics... So why @Sir even asked it here?
Because you know everything and we hold you responsible for that.
user116211
@sir is at the bar; he asked it there also ;)
@TIPS Hahaha :D
16:16
I would suggest you ask this question in the physics.sx — Martin - マーチン ♦ Apr 1 '14 at 10:41
@Mart has betrayed us to TeX guys.
@Mithoron Neutronium is a sci-fi term
@SirCumference neutron-degenerate matter if you prefer
Yeah, pressure is important, but it's the energy that allows for electron capture, right?
@SirCumference a proton and an electron would only like to combine if your nucleus is on the left side of the valley of beta stability.
Okay, my point is, for a white dwarf to become a neutron star, it must be energetically favorable for the protons and electrons to combine, right?
16:32
Just going through my screenshots.
You want a screenshot?
Worst question I've ever seen
Now you're tingling, THE SCREENSHOT MASTER
OMG XD
Look at the question title and the answer given
Perfectly good question, but the answer...
@SirCumference Seems like a fun troll.
I want them to hit us. I wanna get some free flags and some giggles.
16:37
And here are people paying to go see clowns.
I just like it when bad questions don't get removed
Sometimes we need a laugh
But they should be closed
btw
I know I can trust Google
although i think that's out of my budget
user116211
@SirCumference you wanted to buy it?
I was looking for a good telescope
Well, then again, the Hubble Space Telescope is pretty good
user116211
What do you want to be?
user116211
Astronomer or Astrophysicist?
16:39
Theoretical astrophysicist
Those are the same thing
user116211
ah!
Astrophysicist is just a cooler name for astronomer
@MAFIA36790 Astrologer.
Erer
@TIPS Get out
NO U
16:40
I remember reading an article like "Astrologists confirm: Moon is made of cheese"
user116211
@TIPS Throws boiling chocolate at TIPS' face
user116211
@SirCumference The coolest is cosmologist ;)
@MAFIA36790 Meh, I'm more of a particle guy myself
I love nucleosynthesis and degenerate stars
Like white dwarves and neutron stars
Oh god I'm dying XD
user116211
16:42
@TIPS they are of same person, I'm sure ;P
Yes
Wait really?
That's even better
@Rama o/
@MAFIA36790 Case in point, didn't I tell you about gravatars and all that stuff?
Hey ! @Mithoron
16:44
-8
Q: Can there be life in black hole?

Gaurav SharmaCan there be life inside a black hole is it possible that we are living inside a massive black hole right now? This is because i see no reason why we cant be inside a super massive black hole the only thing is that we cannot escape it? I HAVE ALSO HEARD THAT THERE CAN BE WHITE HOLES OF WHICH MATT...

why the allcaps?
WHY NOT ALL CAPS
But seriously I have no idea
@LeakyNun 'tis the keyboard. SOMETIMES IT BREAKS SOMETIMES IT DOESN'T. ALSO IT'S FUN TO SPEAK THIS WAY
We had a question like "does sun speaks Om?"
@TIPS Wow like 7 people in the room! more than on some TRE
16:46
@SirCumference facepalm
@Mithoron We should make @Loong talk.
It was actually an edit to a completely different original question
@TIPS ?
@SirCumference Indecent troll is indecent.
@Loong I'd know you'd do that.
A bad original question. But the edit somehow made it even more bizarre.
16:47
YOU FELL RIGHT INTO MY TRAP
Now do you believe in the power of MAR the great SCREENSHOT MASTER
I wish we could do small caps in chat.
Unicode is too hard to be fast.
Best question, by far
-17
Q: If there is no gravity on the moon why is the american flag waving?

ZaneIf there is no gravity on the moon, how could this flag be flapping in the wind? (see link) http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/2wD6eg/hea-www.harvard.edu/~fine/images/desktops/Armstrong.jpg

-17 :)
Can you see the upvote:downvote ratio?
@SirCumference 'twas feasible with a script that did it before getting the privilege.
93
Q: "View Vote totals" without 1000 rep

Rob W Screenshot About The vote counts are a great tool to determine whether an answer is disputed or not. Unfortunately, not many of us have enough time to join all Stack Exchange websites and get 1000 reputation. This script unlocks the "View Vote counts" feature for those who are not logge...

@TIPS Yep XD
16:53
Great cakes and chemicals think alike
So, uh, question
Do y'all think physics explains the truth of the world, or just models it inaccurately?
The latter
Sigh
Okay, do you think theoretical physics has any importance?
Sigh
Sure, why not?
Okay good
I'm arguing with everyone on Physics SE about it
17:02
It it weren't for models, I wouldn't be chatting with some people from Germany, Poland, and India.
@SirCumference What are they saying?
Applied physics is the only meaningful physics. Theoretical physics is just a load of inaccuracies
To which I say, nay
@SirCumference Common, don't let me down.
Go argue over something that's worth it
That hyperbolic bullshit is sometimes even heard from more experienced people who should know better.
@SirCumference Like emacs vs. vim.
Pizza vs. ice cream
17:04
Ice cream with sprinkles or without
Isn't this a science site?
@TIPS Without
Yes.
DID YOU JUST SAY ICE CREAMS AREN'T SCIENTIFIC
Bubble gum or normal gum
Tabs or spaces
@TIPS Bubble
Dammit look what you're making me do
Hotdog with ketchup or with mustard
Oh, you're 17 too?
17:06
Well mayhaps
@SirCumference if you want to see the worst "scientific" explanations, you should go to SFF.stackexchange
-7
A: Why did the Empire design the Death Star to have a trench?

Michael MeliWell, by having a smooth surface, you have less resistance in space. By having a rough surface, it slows down the massive sphere more. For the trench, it seems more like a battleground written in to the story. Luke is racing down a trench, with no room for error, moving like lightning with a fi...

> Well, by having a smooth surface, you have less resistance in space. By having a rough surface, it slows down the massive sphere more.
So don't have a surface. Easy as that.
@TIPS Wʜʏ ᴅᴏ ʏᴏᴜ ɴᴇᴇᴅ sᴍᴀʟʟᴄᴀᴘs?
Here's something interesting: Google once cached a hilarious Wikipedia vandalism
17:09
@Loong To write in a fancy way, duh
@SirCumference I guess if Earth shades the moon, it'll rot and release poisonous gases.
Killing all of humanity
user116211
Speaking of applied Physics:
user116211
in The h Bar, 6 hours ago, by MAFIA36790
The colleges I've applied for are now saying those courses are for Applied Physics!!
Sun is why planets and moons don't rot. Wake up Sheeple
user116211
17:11
in The h Bar, 6 hours ago, by MAFIA36790
I would sue them T__T
user116211
Applied Physics is nothing but engineering ;(((
When I hear "applied" I think of creams and lotions.
Alas, I'm a pharmacy boy.
user116211
If you want to study physics, ought for Mathematical Physics
What kind of physics isn't mathematical?
21 secs ago, by Sir Cumference
What kind of physics isn't mathematical?
user116211
17:14
@SirCumference experimental and applied
You kidding me?
user116211
No.
Applied is very, very mathematical
You mean you don't wrestle with numbers in those?
user116211
Mathematical is also different from Theoretical.
17:15
I don't care for applied, but what you said isn't correct
@MAFIA36790 Are you kidding me?
user116211
@SirCumference No.
Theoretical is entirely based on mathematics
user116211
@SirCumference yes.
Then what are you talking about?
@TIPS Say, how do you quote something?
user116211
So, you are thinking by saying not mathematical, I'm meaning devoid of mathematics, is it so????
user116211
17:16
No, I'm not saying that.
Do you know what mathematical means?
mathematical |ˌmaTH(ə)ˈmadək(ə)l| (also mathematic)
adjective
of or relating to mathematics
user116211
Wait, see Chris' answer here:
user116211
27
A: Difference between theoretical physics and mathematical physics?

Chris WhiteTheoretical physics is the field that develops theories about how nature operates. It is fundamentally physics, in that the ultimate goal is to describe reality. It is informed by experiment, and at the same time it extends the results of experiments, making predictions about what has not been ph...

user116211
@sir did you get it now?
user116211
Mathematical Physics is more fundamental.
17:20
Ah
So anyone here an expert on degenerate matter?
user116211
@SirCumference ask at the bar. Chris is there.
user116211
@TIPS: goodnight o/
17:52
@SirCumference Just like the main site. ">"
18:26
@MAFIA36790 Night
18:36
@SirCumference Chemists usually also grab a couple of books on physics, but they don't know physics.
Otherwise, we would've become physicians and those syndromes would hit us.

« first day (1519 days earlier)      last day (3165 days later) »