« first day (1435 days earlier)      last day (3249 days later) » 

02:41
@pentavalentcarbon What thoughts on Gentoo? (Most of my experience is on Debian, but I was forced into Gentoo when one of the computers I tried to install Linux on crashed out on boot with Debian.) Seemed more trouble than it was worth for all but high-end power users, wanting to optimize performance of everything.
@pentavalentcarbon And then there's the fun when you have things with conflicting dependencies. I now see the magic of virtualenvs, but haven't yet needed to figure them out.
user116211
03:05
0
Q: Basic Intro to Quantum Chemistry. Two Slit Experiment and Bohr Model

Jess L.We just learned about the 2 slit experiment in Quantum Chemistry today, where electrons behave as waves when nobody is looking and behave as particles when they are being observed. So, what would happen If I were to observe an atom (such that all it's electrons now behave as particles instead o...

user116211
@Martin-マーチン: What do you think of the above question?
user116211
Shouldn't it be migrated to Physics? It has nothing related to Chemistry
03:48
@Brian Based on my limited understanding of Gentoo, Arch is similar except the official repositories contain pre-compiled binaries. So, it's just like Ubuntu from that standpoint.
So, 99% of my packages are "official" ones that I haven't modified in any way, and things update normally.
Dependency management is never an issue; it's excellent. The package manager (pacman) is so nice to work with.
The nice thing is that compared to Debian/Ubuntu, packages are build using what amounts to a glorified shell script. There's a few other variables specific to their package building system, but you get used to it.
So, if I want to modify an official package (say, compile with more options or leave static libraries in), I update my clone of the official repositories, edit, make, install, and I'm off to the races.
A lot of the software we use doesn't exist in the official repositories, of course. I think the existence of the Debichem people is great. They might have packages for all the truly free quantum packages that don't require signing a license agreement.
So I've either written Arch packages to compile from source or re-package the Debian ones, since some things I still can't compile properly.
For software where I want multiple versions, I still use environment modules, but other things I just want the latest version and for it to work. So the system install is fine.
 
3 hours later…
06:48
@MAFIA36790 Agreed, not much about Chemistry. I don't have the time to do the research, but I think on physics.se there should already be a question along the lines "Why don't electrons fall into the nucleus?" I don't want to close it just yet, but you can push it into the queue.
12 hours ago, by IͶΔ
We VTC homework questions because we assume the OP is someone unfocused trying to get us do his job, rather than a baffled student eager to learn.
I am not sure this is true.
> That's the biggest mistake with this.
We're judging content from its OP.
It has never been that way in closure.
But now that we've dived in, we can't look back.
@Martin-マーチン Be elaborate, get philosophical
I'm not sure this is true either
It was true when I started reviewing.
It's how I understood CV reviewing too.
I'm not sure any more...
Well, my opinion is scarce nowadays.
06:53
I already moaned a lot about being nicer to the newcomers... I can't do it any more
Why?
-1
Q: Schiff bases formation and conditions

NadineI would like to know what kind of catalysis I must use to carry out the condensation reaction of 4,4'-diacetylbiphenyl with urea in order to obtain a Shiff base or the genearl conditions to achieve this condensation.

Speaking of new users. :P
Well, if the comm is not offering guidance, then... it's not happening
@Martin-マーチン What do you want guidance to be?
Sometimes I check the queue and find a question with four cv, yet none of them offered a comment
I do see a bunch of close votes before I comment.
But I myself don't comment when I'm the 4th or 5th close voter, because the banner is there.
I don't wanna be redundant.
06:56
Closing a question should be about improving it, at least if it's a new one...
Also, @Mart I know the feeling.
The attitude I saw on meta.SE when I first got there about OT questions shocked me at first.
no-one can improve the question if they don't know why we won't answer it
But then I realized one should waste time for posts that are worth it.
I'm getting relatively less feedback on my CV comments.
I'm sure you also feel that way.
06:58
Well, I mostly don;'t get any feedback either...
It's because someone who didn't even care to write a good title is highly unlikely to be trying to cooperate.
in very rare occasion, someones says thanks and edits the question
more often i get "THIS IS NOT $%^& HOMWERKZZZZ!!!!"
Yeah, and don't let that wear you off.
AFK I gotta do some cleaning
Back in an hour or less
No probs, I have lots to do
07:10
@Brian I just saw you comment on the HW chatroom. Since most of the HW is from new users (rep 1) that would not help. They need to be summoned to chat or gain rep 20. And with a sloppy HW this is simply not happening. So this idea is a dead end.
I kind of think that the only real approach is a faq like library for common hw questions. That of course should come with all the necessary explanations and a deeper insight, possibly more sources. And a couple of worked examples. This way we can close such "Is it correct?" question as duplicates. We still can tell them in the comments it's okay and if they want to know more they should check this post.
I believe that such questions open the possibility of encouraging new users to get active on the site. And active users is something we always need...
@Martin-マーチン HW chatroom?
that was some quick cleaning...
I'm a fast worker.
are you now...
(/¯◡ ‿ ◡)/¯ ~ ┻━┻
07:25
I think we need to say goodbye to the idea that we can help everyone.
Whenever did we say hi?
┬─┬ ノ( ^_^ノ)
what? hi?
ahh... ok
too slow today
you can't help all of the people all of the time
I think everyone is meant in that way that we don't exclude anyone from getting help @Mart.
And that is what's happening.
you can't help most of the people most of the time :/
07:26
This content is visible to everyone.
Help shouldn't literally be helping people get answers to their question.
obviously ... help is providing the necessary resources to help yourself
some people are beyond help
Help is how someone with the same question as me finds the answer to their question even though they were neither the answerer nor the asker.
That's what I said, isn't it?
07:30
It is.
But you're getting weary, and that's worse than not answering a HW vampire.
I have little time recently to answer anything... not even asking that question that is bugging me...
I am currently lost in code and can't think straight...
@Martin-マーチン What question is bugging you?
@Martin-マーチン Think curly then. !!table
Bah, where is Chemobot?
well, if i could tell you in a few words, i would have posted it already... :/
it needs research i can't do just now because codez
(ノ^◡^)ノ︵ ┻━┻
07:53
┬─┬ ノ( ^_^ノ)
 
2 hours later…
10:07
Two tips: 1) 8675309 is not just prime, it's a twin prime, and 2) if you ever find yourself raising log(anything)^e or taking the pi-th root of anything, set down the marker and back away from the whiteboard; something has gone horribly wrong.
3
$69^{\pi^\sqrt{5}}$
I <3 that
10:52
I think there's a typo there.
The second reaction should have the reactant 2MnO4 marked with (2-), not just (-)
Maybe I should ask a question about this on this site.
@IͶΔ I love xkcd
Me too.
$\displaystyle\lim_{8\to9}\sqrt{8}=3$
@Martin-マーチン Had forgotten that self-entry to chat required 20 rep. Good point.
@Martin-マーチン Yeah. The VTC reasons need to be changed, to avoid this kind of OP frustration, for sure.
yeah someone had this discussion earlier, but it simply is impossible due to anti trolling protection
Well, we need to change them to keep our frustrations at bay, too.
10:58
if people want to troll they will find a way...
yeah... but it's harder this way...
@Martin-マーチン This would almost require a new adjunct site, which would function ~completely differently from the SE model. It would be really awkward to try to cram into the Q&A structure.
register, interact positively, troll...
@CowperKettle Hmm, I think he wrote the overall reaction.
I'm kinda distracted right now tho'.
@Martin-マーチン Oh, absolutely. It's like WordPress just simply not allowing posting of images into blog comments. No one wants the kinds of images that 99.9999%+ of the comments would contain.
11:01
@Martin-マーチン Which is hard even for the most proficient trolls
Trolls manifest language sites though. @Cowper knows it
It's not worth their time -- too many easier targets
@CowperKettle The only thing you need to understand is starting looking for reaction mechanisms
Your curious mind needs a nicer thing to read than an online tutorial.
@Mart The whole time through this discussion I keep coming back to my positions stated here
4
A: Policy on questions in basic mediums

BrianThese sorts of questions touch on the fundamental identity of the community. What do we want to be on- and off-topic here? Do we want to be a resource that extends to educating raw beginners? Do we choose to take on the responsibility to guide every misinformed, misguided, or confused individual...

No matter how good that might be.
@Brian true dat, the internet is full of easy targets ;-)
11:03
Go grab a textbook on bases vs. acids @Cowper, and then learn for yourself what happens in reactions.
Not merely products vs. reactants scheme
Things come up that make me go, "Ahhghggh, it would be so nice if we could help people like that!"
"..... but it just. Isn't. Practical. with the SE model."
4 hours ago, by skill patrol
you can't help all of the people all of the time
@Brian We all agree with each other but can't come up with something to do, or maybe feel too lazy/anxious/bored/worried to do so. It's like a bunch of kids around a cake not touching it because they worry they might finish it.
@skillpatrol Great minds, right? :-)
@IͶΔ But there should be the charge (2-) at the MnO4, not just (-)
11:05
@Brian :-)
4 hours ago, by Martin - マーチン
you can't help most of the people most of the time :/
@CowperKettle I think he wrote the first and the last steps of the reaction
@Martin-マーチン rinse and repeat...
The reaction above that is one of the steps.
@IͶΔ I don't think it's quite this. What we need is for the handful of us to be able to spend an hour and a half around a whiteboard hashing things out, instead of trying to cram the discussion through the drinking straw of a chatroom.
11:06
@Brian I'll look through that again... I'm a bit exhausted tonight... i've been coding all day
BRING IN THE WHITEBOARDZ
@IͶΔ but in order to get "dark brown" we first should get "dark green", and this dark green chemical has the charge (2-)
@Martin-マーチン That's exactly why we should discuss this. :P
@CowperKettle Yes.
@Martin-マーチン Hope it went well. Was up late myself revising some slides. Sleep well. (No time to copy the Japanese over from Google Translate, my youngest is clamoring for his breakfast. :-)
Nah. One day a week I will make it to the supermarket in time...
11:07
@IͶΔ anyway, I sent him a letter telling there might be a typo.
BBL!
@IͶΔ Could we use TeamViewer or something?
@Brian Sure, whatever you guys'd like
\o
I don't know what's out there that might be helpful
Skype, maybe
@Brian if you want to have a look: codereview.stackexchange.com/q/124354/92423 I think I did okay. It is a big improvement over the clutter I had before and I am ashamed to share.
okay... nighty night @all!
The challenge will be getting me & @penta on at the same time as @Mart and you, @IͶΔ and @MAFIA36790. Truly worldwide community!!
(Apologies to anybody I left out...)
11:09
Sleep tight @Mart, don't let code bugs bite
cya later
@Brian Japan vs. Iran vs. the US.
Is there anyone from Mars here?
WATNEY?!?!
Mayhaps
<grin>
11:10
@Loong's been to Jupiter before
2
Ok, gotta go dish some applesauce.
@IͶΔ ?
Nothing
Hahahaha
<tips hat> later, all.
\o
11:12
cya
Back to watching an empty chatroom and dirt piling up
11:40
@Mart (or anyone), what's the rep level where regular users gain the ability to summon people to chat, if any? Could we ask SO overlords to implement a privilege, say at 500 or 1000 rep, enabling summoning-to-chat? That might be one way to draw low-rep "HW" askers into chat, to draw the interaction off the main site?
(Ok, actually leaving now.)
@Brian There is no rep level for the ability to summon people to chat.
Sounds like a good question for Meta.
@skillpatrol No
Because it would be a dupe of
11
Q: Suggested Privilege: Inviting new users to chat

LilienthalSuperpings allow moderators to ping any user on the site from the chatroom, even if they haven't been in the chat in the recent past. If the superpinged user doesn't have a chat account because he lacks the required 20 reputation it will be created. This allows moderators to invite new user to th...

@Brian The standard way to draw low-rep "HW" askers into chat is when the system creates a chatroom for discussions that go on for too long in the comment section of a question.
12:07
!!gun
hmm, no bot is alive :(
 
2 hours later…
14:18
@skillpatrol Mm. That's pretty messy and unreliable, though.
@Brian messy yes, but how is it unreliable?
I don't want to have to wait until the SE system decides the comment thread has gone on too long in order to be able to kick things over to chat.
See Monica Cellio's answer to the question @IͶΔ linked
15
A: Suggested Privilege: Inviting new users to chat

Monica CellioWhen a promising new user is having trouble making his first post and the community wants to help, we should make it easier for them to do so. I've seen chat work really well for this, and discussion in comments is not a pattern we want to set with a newcomer's very first participation on the si...

fair enough
There is also a "start a new room with this user" option on everybody's user profile link :-)
I see your point now.
The topic definitely warrants more discussion.
15:29
@IͶΔ Turns out he did, the second line is the overall equation. But he wrote that he will rewrite that part a bit to remove the source of possible confusion.
> I can see that as I have written it, that is a logical assumption to make. In fact, the second equation is a properly balanced equation starting from manganate(VII) ions, and considering the overall reaction.

I will rewrite the text to remove the possible confusion. I will do that now ..
 
2 hours later…
user116211
17:26
@IͶΔ: o/
\o
user116211
Good night.
Night?
17:41
This is not the kind of answer I expected for a bounty ._. chemistry.stackexchange.com/a/48783/5591
._.
!!table
(ノ`´)ノミ┻┻
17:57
@IͶΔ monster self answer post accomplished
Yeah noice
Have 15 sweet repz
!!greet/@ramsay
Welcome to The Periodic Table @ramsay! Here are our chat guidelines and it's recommended that you read them. If you want to turn Mathjax on, make a bookmark of the link in this answer. Happy chatting!
@IͶΔ I don't think I get points if I accept my own answer.
hii
@pH13 But still get points from upvotes.
@ramsay \o
17:59
@pH13 $\mathrm pK_\mathrm a$
@Loong the a also? ... meh
I never did this ... why you start telling me now? !!table
(۶ૈ ᵒ̌ Дᵒ̌)۶ૈ=͟͟͞͞ ⌨
!!untable
┻o(T_T )ミ( ;_;)o┯
@Chemobot is that a table?
18:00
why everyone types !!table ?
(ノ`Д´)ノ~┻━┻
@ramsay Table flips are a tradition here.
oh, i see O-O
lol
@Loong also k_\mathrm{W} ?
@pH13 yes
18:03
grml
!!wiki/Besserwisser
A know-it-all or know-all is a person who obnoxiously purports an expansive comprehension of a topic and/or situation when in reality, his/her comprehension is inaccurate or limited. This display may or may not be directly expressed. The German word Besserwisser is also used in some languages, literally meaning "better knower." == See also == Pedant Polymath Smart Alec Whiz Kid == References... ==
@Loong ;)
please keep doing that
;-)
Does it matter for your answer that pH is actually defined in terms of activity rather than concentration?
I guess for pkc<2...3, yes ... but as no teacher cares, I also didn't
I might want to note that as one assumption.
is chemobot a bot?
18:12
@ramsay indeed
Why does quickly cooling a saturated solution cause precipitation?
does it?
It usually does.
stuff is better dissolved in hot solvents, why when cooling it, it's again not so good dissolved which follows in precipitation
!!wiki/Recrystallization_(chemistry)
In chemistry, recrystallization is a technique used to purify chemicals. By dissolving both impurities and a compound in an appropriate solvent, either the desired compound or impurities can be coaxed out of solution, leaving the other behind. It is named for the crystals often formed when the compound precipitates out. Alternatively, recrystallization can refer to the natural growth of larger ice crystals at the expense of smaller ones. == ChemistryEdit == In chemistry, recrystallization is a procedure for purifying compounds. The most typical situation is that a desired "compound A" is ...
18:18
Yes, but why does slowly cooling it sometimes make a supersaturated solution?
I mean, why the different results in the method of cooling?
What happens in quickly cooling that doesn't in slowly cooling?
Reorganisations. Isnt it just like how if you hit supercooled water it freezes, but if you lightly move it it stays liquid ?
@Hippalectryon This does not provide an answer to the question. To request clarification from the author, leave a comment below their post.
I didn't mean supercooling.
Oh wait.
Hmm . . .
for me, your second question also sounded like supercooling
@hippa The bot on my RPi apparently can't display images. !!img/[] return error. Why ?
<An error occured : cannot identify image file. Check your molecule's name.>
18:22
That error ^
I gtg :( sya
@IͶΔ Physical agitation/disruption. In order for crystals to form (or for gas bubbles to form, too, for that matter), there's sort of an "activation cluster size" that it has to get across.
Oh
Lone dissolved ions/molecules are more stable than clusters of, say, four crystal units (no idea if that's the right number).
18:24
To Googlez
But, once you get beyond some critical number of particles, it'll happen rapidly.
Alternatively, surfaces & edges & such can act as a 'catalyst' for nucleation
@Brian when reading this, I have to think about a fancy paper about very very very clean water that freezes way below 0 °C
Either way, you have to 'leapfrog' up to a large enough cluster size such that continuing to form a larger crystal/bubble is energetically favorable.
(I guess "Free-energetically favorable," to be precise)
:o It all makes sense now
In theory, actually, both fast cooling and slow cooling should have the same potential for overcooling
But there's essentially always some physical disturbance associated with fast cooling that provides the 'bump' needed to get over the nucleation activation barrier
It's why in chem lab when you're boiling water for a hot water bath you're always supposed to scratch the beaker you're boiling in, or to add boiling chips.
Both provide nucleation sites that catalyze water vapor bubble formation.
</science rant>
18:28
You changed my life
Thanks @Brian
<bows> My pleasure!
There was a use to this chat after all . . . !!table
(ノ´□`)ノ ┫:・’∵:.┻┻:・’.:┣∵・:. ┳┳
OK I gotta move. See you all \o
I was tempted to !!table, but... is there such a thing as a "happy !!table"?
18:30
(ノ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ノ︵┻┻
That.... actually looks like one, yes.
@Brian I was tempted to tell @Hipp to let us categorize table flips.
@Brian but that was just coincidence
Here's an xkcd as a last message today:
Giving @Brian 4.5 stars
:-)
!!confetti
18:32
It would be a real mess if @Chemobot's cache ever got wiped -- would he re-scan the chat history, and then re-post every post he ever posted? That would be... massive output.
but funny
I can hear the groanings of the SE chat server now
@IͶΔ only 25 rep so far !!table ... moar! moar!! moar!!! ... moar(!)_n
(ノ`□´)ノ⌒┻━┻
18:39
user image
2
Uh. Wut?
is it already april 1st?
Oh. Maybe where @Mart is?
Just shy of 9pm UTC
2:40pm EDT here in Ohio
@pH13 Interesting -- is its freezing point actually depressed, or does it just have a huge capability for supercooling?
(I assume the latter)
note the date in the corner
@Brian link didn't work ... I'll try again tomorrow. It was in nature ... moore and someone else ... :D
18:53
Mmk. Yeah, ultraclean water in an ultrasmooth container should supercool a looooooong way.
19:05
was about -48 °C or so
@Loong there the activity comments come in ;)
@pH13 I have warned you
He must be wise to know what I think ;)
but then he has a phd
I am unsure if it's the error range or the pkc-scale that is bad ... or both?
19:31
@pH13 This report focusses on the measurement of pH. But maybe you can use it for another answer.
 
1 hour later…
20:42
@Loong Somewhere in the world
20:59
The game is unsurprisingly entertaining.
21:26
@Brian There's no cache
@Ramanewbie What was the issue again ?
The bot is running on my RPi. All works fine, except that the !!img/[] command returns an error.
<An error occured : cannot identify image file. Check your molecule's name.>
This error ^
I don't understand why, since everything else works fine.
what molec name did you try ?
@hippa any, such as water or cyclohexane.
At test-room (10121), your bot returns the image properly and not mine.

« first day (1435 days earlier)      last day (3249 days later) »