« first day (1433 days earlier)      last day (3251 days later) » 

15:00
but it is seeming quite illogical to me that equivalent law is a nature's law
@DeNiSkA Why?
user116211
Exactly what is bothering you?
It's because you're looking at this the wrong way.
user116211
@IͶΔ: You are pretty fast...
It's about probabilities, and molecules aren't self-conscious.
@MAFIA36790 ?
Calculating stuff with moles sometimes gave me that impression as well.
Note that stuff never know what they're doing.
They're random.
user116211
15:03
@IͶΔ Today multiple times, we posted the same thing within a fraction of second; you were ahead of me always ;P
user116211
@DeNiSkA: You read about Law of reciprocal proportion?
Well, there's a reason I'm one of the most active chatters of all time.
user116211
@IͶΔ Because you are Flash.
@MAFIA36790 no!
@MAFIA36790 Nah man, there are much faster people than me.
Snailboat, Regdwight, Cerberus etc.
15:05
@IͶΔ usain bolt
user116211
hmmm... well that's a corollary of the law of equivalence.... can be found in old books of 60s or 50s....
user116211
My point is that....
@DeNiSkA I'd think about it
user116211
Most of these laws were proved empirically....
user116211
Law of definite proportion; Law of multiple proportion....
15:07
Chat says I'm the 51'th most active user of all-time in chat.
Kind alike 50'th, since user #2 is a bot.
user116211
all were proposed after rigorous experiments.
user116211
@IͶΔ Who is 1?
user116211
@IͶΔ Thanks.
Although I'm also an active chatter on chat.meta.SE.
Thanks for self-removing that @Decent_Indian
user116211
15:09
@IͶΔ It was the lyric of the rap.....
One could argue that it makes it more offensive.
Doesn't make it any less offensive in any way.
Hmm, let's see. I used to be able to type with my eyes closed.
This messahe is written with eyes closed.
Oh, one letter off.
@IͶΔ are you programmer?
@DeNiSkA No
Mar 23 at 8:54, by IͶΔ
Unless LaTeX counts as code
i see!!
@MAFIA36790 ?
!!table
Ah damn
user116211
@IͶΔ The last line of the rap.... see
user116211
I've not done it ;(
user116211
That's damn BSNL
user116211
@DeNiSkA: you know what I'm speaking :(
15:17
@MAFIA36790 no!!
user116211
My message gets posted multiple times when my BSNL becomes damn slow....
user116211
@DeNiSkA Hey, you noticed it at hbar, don't remember?
user116211
@IͶΔ: sorry
For what?
user116211
My luck....
15:18
ya,ya i remember it :D
For your luck?
user116211
@IͶΔ For posting it multiple times :(
Posting what multiple times?
user116211
My BSNL 3G Faster than Thoughts
@MAFIA36790 lol
user116211
15:19
just gave a shot of 88kbps !
user116211
@IͶΔ the video url!
Oh huh, I didn't even notice that
Bad internet?
user116211
o.O
Badder internet?
user116211
@IͶΔ No.
user116211
15:21
Worst.
!!gun
user116211
@DeNiSkA Mr.Bot is dead :(
@Hipp the bot has only been absent for a few hours and I already miss it.
user116211
@Hippalectryon: Mr. Bot!
lol, but @Ramanewbie is also a bot in chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/1/sandbox
user116211
15:22
There is also a bot in Agents of Nothing....
@DeNiSkA Try again here, it should work
!!gun
( メ▼Д▼)┏☆====(((_◇_)======⊃ see
!!beer
user116211
Hey! How did it happen?
!!wiki/hello
15:23
Hello is a salutation or greeting in the English language. It is first attested in writing from 1833. == First use == Hello, with that spelling, was used in publications as early as 1833. These include an 1833 American book called The Sketches and Eccentricities of Col. David Crockett, of West Tennessee, which was reprinted that same year in The London Literary Gazette. The word was extensively used in literature by the 1860s. == Etymology == According to the Oxford English Dictionary, hello is an alteration of hallo, hollo, which came from Old High German "halâ, holâ, emphatic imperati...
user116211
@Ramanewbie: Do you know Chembot?
@MAFIA36790 Yes, I just put it on because it was dead.
user116211
@Ramanewbie: Are you AI?
@Ramanewbie O_o
Welcome to the Table anyway.
!!img/cyclopropane
@IͶΔ Am I bothering again ? -_-
I just put the bot on
No of course not.
@MAFIA36790 Artificial Intelligence ?
@DeNiSkA How what ?
@Ramanewbie how?
user116211
15:27
@Ramanewbie Yes!
user116211
@IͶΔ: Is he not different from Mr. Bot?
@DeNiSkA I just sent him to the Sandbox the other day because he went testing the bot in the room and clogging it with messages.
@MAFIA36790 Kind of, but not really.
@MAFIA36790 Yeah, he's a cyborg
@IͶΔ Yeah sorry, I didn't know about the Sandbox...
user116211
15:28
@IͶΔ I was getting the sense.... he can respond to anything unlike Mr.Bot.
!!greet/@Raman
Welcome to The Periodic Table @Raman! Here are our chat guidelines and it's recommended that you read them. If you want to turn Mathjax on, make a bookmark of the link in this answer. Happy chatting!
user116211
@Ramanewbie: Who created you?
Oh thanks @IͶΔ ! You made me greet myself... :D
@MAFIA36790 Hippalectryon made the bot.
@Ramanewbie I'm that ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ
15:30
@IͶΔ What is that even supposed to be...
hippa made the block but how can you access it @Ramanewbie
user116211
@Ramanewbie That Mart rules here.
I'm co-ruler.
Nice to meetcha
user116211
We are just pawns of him except the rogue @IͶΔ
user116211
He is the co-ruler, yeh ;P
15:31
@Ramanewbie A bunch of random Unicode chars from a Canadian pronunciation symbol language and math symbols.
@IͶΔ What does it represents then ? A sleeping face ??
@Ramanewbie No, a cool guy.
@IͶΔ Alright...
user116211
@Ramanewbie: Accustom yourself with the world of emoticons.
@MAFIA36790 Yes, im not used to it.
user116211
15:37
@Ramanewbie is much developed than @Chemobot
@Ramanewbie We're a pretty weird bunch of people. We use proper capitalization and punctuation, but we also use a lot of table flipping and messing around.
user116211
!!table
(੭ ◕㉨◕)੭ =͟͟͞͞=͟͟͞͞三❆)’дº);,’:=͟͟͞͞
Ok
@IͶΔ proper capitalization and punctuation? rly?
@pH13 When we're not basic of course.
user116211
15:38
@IͶΔ: Ramanewbie first does things and then thinks what he did ;P
got it
!!table
(╯°□°)╯︵ ɹǝʇʇıʍ⊥
!!untable
user116211
????
Maybe he's running an older version of the bot.
!!coffee
user116211
That's it.
user116211
image not found
@pH13 Does your phone like my images in this answer?
user116211
@Loong: o/
@MAFIA36790 jambo!
user116211
15:42
I've seen you've special affection for IUPAC rules?
@Loong bamboo!
@MAFIA36790 He is IUPAC.
@Loong nothing special, but then those images are smaller than my width
@pH13 yes, sure. And the resolution?
beautiful ... better than on pc ... xD
:-)
15:43
want screenshot?
That's the most official smiley you get @pH13, enjoy while it lasts.
@pH13 I can imagine.
Imagine all the ... images ... ♫
@Loong what makes the new images so special to get a quality-review?
@pH13 the size of the image files is much larger now, in order to allow for 2 or 3 subpixels, and I do not indicate the height in html, in order to avoid distortion of the images on small displays
user116211
Do we have mineralogists in Chem SE?
15:55
@MAFIA36790 Michael, mayhaps.
user116211
@IͶΔ Of Australia?
Dunno where he's from.
Yeah him
He's at least a geologist.
user116211
Super fast, @IͶΔ
@Loong width 123 ... :D
@MAFIA36790 I'm glad that I meet up to your expectations master
user116211
16:17
@IͶΔ We are comrades; I wouldn't repeat it ;(
Repeat it?
Repeat what?
Dude, stop thinking you did something wrong.
user116211
That we are comrades.
Oh, does this mean calling you "master" annoys you?
Don't expose your weaknesses. :P
I'm now listening to Man of Steel's soundtrack.
user116211
@IͶΔ Hmmm.... and me?
@MAFIA36790 ?
user116211
16:23
Reading point group and Schoenflies system ;(
My condolences
user116211
@IͶΔ Yes, that's my weakness; I'm bit socialist but damn not communist!
16:47
Man, this Hans Zimmer dude is really awesome.
user116211
@IͶΔ The music director!
Yah
user116211
Saw the movie?
Long ago
user116211
@IͶΔ oh.
user116211
16:50
And what am I watching?
A bunch of boring diagrams?
user116211
Your comments.
O_O
My comments on the main site?
user116211
(-‸ლ)
A beautiful graphic of media-inflamed fears. Im sad to say that risk parity is not on it. https://t.co/KkIdrPtshF
17:28
@Loong I'm not sure it's related to us.
@Brian's trying to make up for all the days he didn't show up. :P
@IͶΔ yeah, that was my second idea.
@IͶΔ I don't inch into the swimming pool -- I just jump right in. :-P
user116211
Hey, @Mart, Brian is regular now here.
user116211
@IͶΔ Responsible ;P
@MAFIA36790 It would be awesome if @Mart actually pinged him.
17:36
@Brian It does.
Three letters are enough to ping someone in chat.
user116211
@Bri
Assuming you don't change your mind in the middle.
Meaning @Mar pings him, so does @Mart, but @Mars doesn't.
Although he is a god of war of some kind.
user116211
Mart is probably the first German who is interested in cricket :)
@IͶΔ "Whoa."
Our definitions of "interested" vary.
@Brian Are you one of those people that woah instead of whoa? ಠ_ಠ
17:39
So, what's the difference between what I assume is a "regular" ping that we mere mortals are able to do, and this feared "superping" brought to bear by @Mart and others?
@IͶΔ Uh, no. It's "whoa." No alternative spellings will be countenanced.
Oh, we're on the same side of the river.
@IͶΔ Convenient battle line, that river. Do we have artillery?
user116211
!!gun
(キ▼▼)o┏┳……
Oooh, the @Rama bot, even better!
17:41
@Brian In chat, you can only ping people that were in this room for the past seven days. Ron was here some ten days ago, so he's not pingable. Mod superpings, however, are pinging someone even if they weren't present in chat.
That's the most pronounced difference.
The rest need not concern us.
@Brian We can also flip a !!table.
(ノ#▼o▼)ノ ┫:・’.::・
@IͶΔ Got it. I figured it had to have some sort of feature like that.
@Brian Isn't it :D
Is there some way to hail a mod in chat?
Yes. Ping-attack @Mart.
17:43
Are pings of him (and other mods) exempt from the seven-day threshold?
@Brian He's been here a few hours ago.
user116211
@Brian He is always available.
That's what I like about him. More accessible than my pen.
So you can ab use you him and get stuff done.
user116211
@Mart is the ruler here.
I'm the eraser.
user116211
17:44
So, is @IͶΔ :P
Other chatters are stationary stationery.
user116211
@IͶΔ: You are indeed Flash.
I haven't seen @Mith around lately.
user116211
I remember he last came when I was discussing of Gibbs Free energy here....
user116211
Well, he came later also....
17:50
@MAFIA36790 I am not.
user116211
@Martin-マーチン You didn't sleep?
@Martin-マーチン 5 a.m. in the morning there, ain't it?
@Brian additionally I can summon any user to chat, even if s/he has never been in chat - hence a chatid must be created.
it's 3 am, but yeah, about to sleep...
About to sleep? I like your attitude.
@Martin-マーチン See, now that's a superping. Since I've already been in chat, it's just a chat message that pokes my inbox. Not that intrusive/creepy.
user116211
17:53
@Martin-マーチン About to good night!
I saw so many messages, I needed to check that first
Everyone was showing me the magic of truncated pings.
well, @brian, it shows up the same way even if it is a summon.
i have to admit I had a hard time pinging you, there are too many Brians in the network ;)
@Martin-マーチン Ah. Still would be weirder. "Huh? Where'd this chat thingy come from? I've never even BEEN in the chat."
@Martin-マーチン Not many brains though.
Ha! Maybe I should disambiguate myself a bit, now that I'm <puffs chest> a Respectahble Membah of the Communitah.
@Loong I still have never seen that movie. <ducks for cover>
Abou your suggestion with health.se, it is worth considering extending that close reason... we just need to find the wording for that
@Martin-マーチン It's slippery, because sometimes there are questions (usually ones that are categorically unsafe), that it might be worth answering.
> Consider taking a look at [health.SE's on-topic page] to see if your question is suitable there.
yeah something like that...
17:58
(Depending on what you meant, Martin -- with that above I'm thinking of safety questions &c., too).
just included in a new meta post that could offer a little more guidance...
It would really be helpful to whiteboard the scope of the various close reasons
yeah the safety issue is also on my mind
That's both the GR close reason and has the wording you like. The best of both worlds.
17:59
haha... lol

« first day (1433 days earlier)      last day (3251 days later) »