The Periodic Table

« first day (1399 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (3287 days later) »

Mithoron

00:02

@WDUK Anion with negative charge on oxygens is much more stable

WDUK

ah i see

Mithoron

Well, goodnight!

WDUK

Night :)

6 hours later…

Feeds

05:50

Q: Reviewing the questions by a reputed user before posting

Is it right if I talk about a system where experienced users like somebody with 1000 points and above to review each question asked and make necessary suggestions as soon as possible and then post it.Also this should be done in a small time like 5 to 10 min.Which means questions should be posted ...

feature-request

6 hours later…

IͶΔ

11:51

pbs.twimg.com/media/Cb5u8_vVAAE3f3C.jpg -- This is awesome.

CC @Mart

Martin - マーチン

\(^o^)/

IͶΔ

Martin - マーチン

@IͶΔ Even google translate does a better job ಠ_ಠ

IͶΔ

12:15

@Martin-マーチン What? I didn't translate it!

Martin - マーチン

I know... i was just pointing out the painfully obvious...

user116211

@Martin-マーチン: Hi!

user116211

@IͶΔ: Hi!!

IͶΔ

Hullo!

user116211

@Martin-マーチン: Your look alike Brandon McCullum retired today.

IͶΔ

12:27

@Mart isn't retired. I still see his blue name.

Martin - マーチン

;) He survived cricket

user116211

@Martin-マーチン lol

IͶΔ

user116211

@Martin-マーチン He lost his last match to those damn Aussies ;/

Martin - マーチン

they seem to be a powerful force in cr.

user116211

12:34

@Martin-マーチン Not against Ind.

user116211

Ind whitewashed Aussies in their own den

user116211

in T20

user116211

Check his awesome moments in Test :

user116211

cricbuzz.com/cricket-gallery/2840/…

Mithoron

18:34

Q: Reaction Engineering

Determine the number of CSTRs of equal size and peclet number for a plug flow reactor with axial dispersion such that both reactors achieve 85% of the conversion of PFR for an isothermal first order reaction with damkohler number of 1???

reaction

Looks like most hardcore HW dump!

user116211

@Mithoron I hate hw

user116211

The problem is that the newbies think SE is just an another forum; where you dump anything and get pages of pages comments.

user116211

We are not Yahoo!

IͶΔ

19:15

"We are not Yahoo!" is going to be my motif for the next election.

@Mithoron Gotta love the question marks

user116211

@IͶΔ thumbs up

Mithoron

@IͶΔ I doubt if not only OP understands this, but even anyone here.

IͶΔ

I don't understand "this".

It's such a complicated determiner.

user116211

@IͶΔ; Bye!! gotta go to bed . good night :)

IͶΔ

Night

user116211

19:26

@Mithoron: Bye.

Mithoron

@IͶΔ I'm mean this question

@user36790 bye

user116211

@Mithoron: BTW, do we tolerate link-only answers?

IͶΔ

user116211

A: Why apart from when building atoms in the first place, the 3d is the lower energy orbital?

In P element, the energy of 3d is lower than 4s. Look at the link provided below. Only in K and Ca, 4s has lower energy than 3d. http://www.cdeep.iitb.ac.in/nptel/Core%20Science/Engineering%20Chemistry%201/Slide/lect6/6_6.htm Another reason could be because the symmetry of hybridized orbital w...

user116211

Not totally link-only but the link is now zombie.

IͶΔ

19:35

@user36790 That is not link-only at all.

user116211

@IͶΔ never said so;

user116211

6 mins ago, by user36790

Not totally link-only but the link is now zombie.

IͶΔ

@user36790 The correct course of action would have been to comment; which I now did.

user116211

@IͶΔ thanks, final Bye!!

IͶΔ

user116211

19:39

-_-

IͶΔ

chemistry.stackexchange.com/users/2093/ian-fang -- "Orgainic" That's awwwwwwkkkwaarrrrrd

IͶΔ

19:55

Q: Why is imidazole considered an electron deficient heterocycle?

The paper I'm looking at mentions electron deficient heterocycles such as (di)azines, benzothiazole and imidazole. Can you tell me the criteria to determine whether a heterocycle is electron deficient or not? (why is imidazole considered electron deficient?)