« first day (1234 days earlier)      last day (3450 days later) » 
00:00 - 18:0018:00 - 22:00

user161117
18:06
Lol is there a relationship between the de Broglie wavelength and the period of of the Periodic table? :P
@StevenGrigsby We can't be explained by science.
user161117
18:22
I have a brain puzzler
Oh hey @Dissenter! Long time no see!
Does the electronegativity of a central atom increase with increasing oxidation state?
Professor basically argued the opposite - that electropositivity increases as oxidation state increases.
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M hey, what's up! :)
Does that even make sense?
No, of course my professor's argument doesn't make sense
Is this the hexamethylcyclohexane professor?
18:24
Because I'm right :P but I want confirmation/additional view points
user161117
oh
@Dissenter He is? LOL
It is the same person yes
@Martin don't miss this conversation.
user161117
18:24
are you sure?
@StevenGrigsby sure about what?
@StevenGrigsby No, he's Dissenter.
user161117
electronegativity
So yes/no, does electropositivity (EP) increase with increasing oxidation state?
I say "hell no"
user161117
where
user161117
18:26
I think you might be wrong
@Dissenter What's his argument?
user161117
like you have the right idea
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M I made a post on SE
user161117
it's just the words you're using are wrong I think
@StevenGrigsby can you please elaborate?
user161117
18:26
Well explain what electronegativity is
@Dissenter Link. #TOOLAZY
Ability to attract electrons within a covalent framework
They are clearly not using the term correctly, or at least in the same way I understand it. Don't get up on it. — jerepierre 15 hours ago
All I see in the newest question is . . . Oh I had to scroll down. Sheesh.
user161117
Like the way in which electronegativity is defined is sorta not independent
@StevenGrigsby This is the definition my professor and I agree on
user161117
18:28
so it's almost by definition that if an atom is more oxidized it is more electropositive
user161117
because electronegativity is defined on a bond not on an atom
user161117
it's how it's measured
Right
user161117
Maybe I'm backwards haha I feel like I might have confused who was saying what
18:29
We were talking about the various forms of chlorine from chloride ion to perchloric ion
Whoa whoa waiwaiwait. @Dis did your professor just see some video on how "cold doesn't eixst"?
He said that in the perchloric ion, the central Cl atom is way more EP than Cl-
user161117
yes
user161117
this is right
user161117
because it's oxidized
user161117
18:30
:O
Okay so if the central CL is way more EP than it must be way less EN than Cl-?
So can we agree that he's saying that the central Cl atom in perchloric acid is much less electronegative than chloride ion?
user161117
Huh
EP and EN are opposite properties
@StevenGrigsby Wait. You're saying the EN of Cl- is less than Cl+?
More of one, less of the other
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M exactly! That's what I was trying to get him to see
user161117
18:31
No what you're saying isn't making sense
user161117
you can't compare electronegativities like that
user161117
CL is way more EP than it must be way less EN than Cl-
user161117
that is weird
That doesn't make sense.
18:32
I'm saying if Cl is way more EP in perchloric acid then it must be way less EN than Cl-
Let's fight.
user161117
no that's not how electronegativity works
You can definitely define EN for atoms that are bonded
Not responding
user161117
18:34
I'm trying to think how to best explain thsi
scroll up to section 7.6
bon
bon
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M Lol
1
Q: banned from chat?

santiagoOkay, this is weird and somewhat disconcerting - for the past few hours, I have not been able to access the Periodic Table (as in enter it, I can see it though). The last message to me from a room owner was to not ping him as he was "sleeping", which I could not have known, and I only pinged him...

@bon IKR ;)
So what do yall think lol
16 hours ago, by inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M
@santiago I'm asleep. Don't ping me.
And he now thinks I banned him . . .
18:38
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M you presented a good way of looking at the problem, I thank you
Cl- vs. Cl+
Which problem?
user161117
Sec, Dissenter I think you and your professor are talking about two different things
18:39
@StevenGrigsby huh?
@StevenGrigsby Great.
@StevenGrigsby he outright says that Cl+ is more EP than Cl-
He may not realize it but that's what he's arguing if he says that Cl in perchloric acid is more EP than Cl in chloride ion
user161117
Hmm so if you look at a bond of two atoms
user161117
and one atom has more electron density near it than the other
user161117
is it more electronegative?
18:42
The one with more electron density existing around it is less EN
user161117
So in HBr, Hydrogen is more electronegative
user161117
according to you
user161117
since there is more electron density existing around Bromine, it is less EN
Seems legit. So?
user161117
18:44
Hahaha no that's not legit at all
Well that may be true because the EN of elements are different from the EN of elements in molecules and ions, and that's not the correct takeaway from my statement
user161117
Few things are more electronegative than Hydrogen
I should have clarified
user161117
Bromine is one of them
The one with more electron density existing around it is less EN than its usual, stated EN value
user161117
18:45
I am trying to clarify the subtle difference
user161117
between you and your professor
user161117
because you don't really understand what electronegativity is I think
No, he doesn't understand
This is the man I had to correct last semester wrt to negative ions and EN
user161117
I don't understand how my clear example
He said that a more negative ion would be more EN
user161117
18:46
is being refuted
Is S(2-) really going to be more EN than S?
user161117
you have clearly shown that H is more electronegative than Br in HBr
And your example was thought provoking but I clarified my statement
user161117
which isn't right
@Steve how do you define EN?
user161117
18:47
I don't understand
The one with more electron density existing around it is less EN than its usual, stated EN value
@StevenGrigsby that's my updated view of EN, which doesn't imply anything that you are saying
user161117
Yeah because your definition of electronegativity is wrong
@StevenGrigsby How do you define EN?
user161117
It's not defined for atoms
user161117
it's defined on a bond
18:48
I'm saying that Br in HBr is less EN than in `say Br in a molecule containing an F-Br bond
@StevenGrigsby are you sure?
EN can be defined for atoms; that's in the first sentence of WIki
Gold book definition says it's defined for atoms as well
@Steve then the values in Wikipedia would've been for bonds not atoms.
user161117
I agree with these sources
Plus you can't have a bond without atoms
EN is relative, I get it. But that doesn't mean we're not defining it for an atom.
user161117
Yeah so when you compare two molecules
user161117
18:51
like your professor was doing
user161117
that's different than comparing two elements
Are you saying that the book I linked to was wrong?
user161117
See, Chlorine remained the same
The book used the example same example as my professor - from chloride ion to perchloric acid - and said the exact opposite - that EN increases for Cl from chloride ion to perchloric acid
Prof says EP increases for Cl from chloride ion to perchloric acid
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M these are contradictory statements ;)
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M Someone has to lose here, hopefully that's not me
@Dissenter We're relatively defining it. Gosh I hate terminology.
18:53
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M the definition to me is clear - it's just the power of an atom to attract electrons within a covalent framework.
The more partially positive Cl is, the better able it is to attract electrons
someone woke me
Done
@Martin-マーチン will you please lend us a peice of your brain
@Martin-マーチン Go back to sleep.
now i am awake...
what's up
I mean it's my own fault i forgot to silence the tab...
@Martin-マーチン this is a very interesting question
This is wrt to our favorite professor
:D
18:54
@Martin-マーチン >:D
The electronnegativity thing...
Yes please I want your opinion Martin lol
hmmm, i just glanced over it
@Martin-マーチン I'm right correct :D?
Cl+ is waaaaaaaaay more electronegative than Cl
user161117
18:55
Yeah maybe you're right, at least at the end of the day I think we agree where the electrons are
and Cl is waaaaay more electronegative than Cl-
@Martin-マーチン then why would my professor argue that Cl in HClO4 is more electropositive than Cl in Cl-?
@StevenGrigsby You never know where electrons are.
that does not make any sense
user161117
18:56
lolol
it is more positive, but it's affinity to electrons is higher
user161117
I think the professor is seeing it from the stance that
user161117
"If it was more electronegative we would see that by the bond actually having more electron density near it"
I told my professor that "I do not associate being positive with electropositivity and being negative with electronegativity" and he said
"Why not?!"
OMG
because it is the oposite?
18:59
Sorry @Martin-マーチン please don't have nightmares
@Dissenter Bah, just wait for two days so his RAM is cleared up and realizes he's dun goofed.
perhaps
definitely
no no, that's okay...
Wait so @Martin-マーチン is that an acceptable excuse (Steven's justification)?
I sorta anticipated that point before I eeven brought it up
I know we are responsible for your education ;) @Dissenter
19:00
:p
So @StevenGrigsby this is sort of a chicken and an egg problem?
Not really. If anything, electronegativity is a measurement of a potential
OH there we go
There, that takes care of that argument - if the Cl were indeed more EN then why wouldn't it just attract more electrons toward itself
user161117
Yeah in my mind I am more or less thinking you can only measure electronegativity differences of a bond
you can compare the electronegativities of chlorine in HCl and HClO3, then which one will be more likely to take more electrons
So we ran in circles and now back to square one. Congrats guys.
19:03
@Steven that is something you cannot measure
@Martin-マーチン my professor argued that with increasing oxidation state, Cl becomes less EN
facepalm
no it's the opposite
Well I guess it's up to me to get him to rescind that statement from his textbook
Oops
@Dis tell him this way:
1. Sir, define EN.
2. So you're saying the Cl in HCl is more likely to attract electrons.
3. Epic fail
the more positive an element is the more electrons does it want
19:04
Yep
user161117
You can in terms of this
user161117
See I hate to diss him like this but I really genuinely believe that his view of EN is screwed up
This was the man I had to correct last semester wrt to EN of negative ions
define the terms please
user161117
what I'm saying is the difference is what you measure based on the ionization energies
19:05
Sir cough sir, I believe you're an idiot no sorry I mean imbecile.
user161117
dissociation energies I think
user161117
lol
Well I'll see him Monday and let you guys know how it goes
For now, more drinking for me
haha... cheeers
And him
:P
Cheers Martin, thanks for letting us borrow your brain
19:06
ya... no problem
Now zzz @Martin.
user161117
Wait are you telling me you don't know what this equation is Martin?
user161117
how can you say you know what electronegativity is if you don't know this equation
We're qualitative chemists here :P
19:07
Pssssht.
user161117
Erm no wonder you guys are wrong haha
I am satisfied
With being correct, as usual :P
user161117
gj
I think you are wrong
About what
19:09
I thought that equation was only good for Pauling.
2 mins ago, by Steven Grigsby
Erm no wonder you guys are wrong haha
Grabs popcorn
That equation assigns an arbitrary number to an element and ranks other elements according to it
I still taste my chemical samples and perform flame tests
That's how quality I am
*Qualitative
19:11
@Steve yeah I'm with @Martin. Unless we're writing a periodic table that equation is useless.
You should find all necessary arguments to crush your prof there
@Martin-マーチン I'll let this marinate in my mind for the weekend and on Monday it's going to be a smackdown
No mercy!
Comeback match
Mayweather vs. Pacquaio
Back to bed for me now....
and this time i'll silence that phone
And if you ping me while I'll sleep, I'll ban you @inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M
2
19:17
@Martin
@MARTIN
Not sleeping yet :P
Sleep tight.
@Martin
Sweet dreams :P
@Martin asleep yet?
19:18
Please don't have nightmares about hexamethylcyclotriene
*hexamethylcyclohexatriene
@Martin ​
I'm testing the pings @Mart.
@Martin
It seems he's asleep.
I mean @Martin's asleep.
@Martin
(He'll strike when I'm sleep. O.o)
@Martin-マーチン You look handsome.
@Martin
 
2 hours later…
20:58
New profile pic.
@MartiN
bon
bon
Oh you sexy cyclohexane ;)
ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ
Actually I'm only hot for boats. Are you a boat @Bon?
bon
bon
No I'm but a humble square
21:32
@Martin
00:00 - 18:0018:00 - 22:00

« first day (1234 days earlier)      last day (3450 days later) »