« first day (1180 days earlier)      last day (3504 days later) » 

05:16
@Loong There is a downside: it looks cool.
06:00
o/
whazzup? :)
that's not much
@Martin voice your concern of O.oness in this meta.SE question:
14
Q: C'mon, please give us a hint: how authoritative is that "obsolete comment" flag?

Monica CellioComment flags do not show who did the flagging, which is usually fine -- as a moderator reviewing such flags I can evaluate whether something is "not constructive" or "too chatty" or "offensive" without knowing the history. But "obsolete" flags require more work, enough that when I see them I us...

@PH13 What are you doing recently?
06:04
weekend and getting out of bed, you?
Fridays are weekends in Iran.
It's weekday again. :(
yeah, weekend is over
saturday and sunday is weekend here
now I'm searching what I can/want to answer and then I will start with tracking ... as last week
I haz a lot of rep lately; I wants badges.
^^ go on
 
12 hours later…
17:42
hmm another idea for a question
o/ @san!
What's the question about?
why is Teflon named Teflon?
Where do the everyday names come from?
Bah, that's not chemistry.
Most of those are trademark-related.
That's for IUPAC nomenclature.
17:50
dang it
Bwahhahahhahahha!
why is sucrose named sugar
and other things in this list csudh.edu/oliver/chemdata/com_name.htm
Most of it still off-topic, but you might find one with an interesting history and post it with a .
Nah what?
Did I succeed in changing your mind from writing a question?
17:55
not worth it
back to the drawing board
I've been writing some TeX recently.
The thing is magic, blows away your mind.
I am hesitant to do editing - in case I get a public dressing down
Then take a moment and feel sheer jealousy run down your bolts - I earned a "Good Question" badge on ELL.
that's another badge I'm unlikely to ever get
though I do have a Good Answer on Physics
@santiago Why wouldn't you get that badge
?
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M What are you now?
18:09
my questions aren't that good
A molecule.
I'm guessing diamon?
*diamond?
my rep is currently a palindrome 3663
Tetramantane. A diamondoid.
So basically a diamond molecular structure oligomer thingy.
@santiago Cool.
18:10
Yes, A thingy.
@santiago Whee! Now let me downvote you there. . .
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M How was your Eid?
18:22
i think i am close to a necromancer or two
Bah, you necromancers. I never even got a revival.
jealous?
I'm jealous of people who got their hands on Clayden's Organochem.
Bah, I've already upgoated that.
18:25
lol
18:40
thinking of changing my avatar
Whatever you do, be something consistent now.
why?
Changing stuff a lot makes my eyes bleed. I wanna get used to your avatar when I'm chatting with you.
awww
18:55
now, hopefully this will work
done
Your little avatar looks like a martian now.
it's pluto
I mean the head of a Martian.
nah
I even put one of my favourite quotes in my profile box
The Future and Truth of the Human Race exists in Science.
Put some quotes from me, pretty please? Puppy eyes
19:01
only if they are scientific
Science is my religion, sport and favourite drink
> Or above all of this, the most scientific instrument of all, toilet pumps. No one has figured out the physics ya know.
20:14
@Martin I have a question: I just found a dup whose original had only one incorrect answer but the dupe itself had one legit answer; should I flag them for merge?
o/ @Mith!
At least, SRB didn't win the gold. . .
@Manish could you also look at my question above regarding the dupe? Thanks or tanks.
And ours dinnoe win bronze :( Oh, just roll with it...
I don't believe in any medal other than gold.
Except when it's a science contest.
sport... bah
20:27
dingdingding
@Mithoron Yay!
@PH13 Boxing is meh.
\o BTW.
pffff
o/
\o
There's always bright side ;)
I like Pluto
\o @Nicolau, haven't seen you in a while.
20:35
Hullo
@san next drama:
0
Q: Why punish users who ask questions no one can answer?

LeonardoIf a user posts a series of really hard questions, the sort of question regular devs cannot really understand (so people don't up-vote), and he's not fortunate enough to have a expert crashing into his question, he will eventually be banned from asking. This seems highly unfair and counter-produc...

Judgement based on the title only
Been holding off spending too much time in Chem.SE lately, next month or two are gonna be real busy, I must rest and prepare
I wonder why I'm always the opposite.
21:08
drama
 
2 hours later…
23:05
I've been switching a few chemical-biology tags to biochemistry lately
\o @Curt. . .I was about to zzz.
I agree those two are being mistagged a lot
Not sure if we should try to make usage follow how they are used by academic departments or not
sorry to keep you awake, still new to chat here on chem.se
is this a general chem.se chat area? or is it for something specific?
It is for something specific, but I won't tell you.
Welcome to out humble Periodic Table anyways @Curt!
Thanks!
23:11
Mind tell us/me a bit about yourself?
I'm a chemical engineer by training
Woo!
In the US?
Got my Ph.D. ~2010, was a post-doc for 1.5 years, worked in biotech for 4 years after that, then relocated within the US and am back on the research end of R&D now
Neat
I've enjoyed reading your answers on the site
got excited by chem.se a few months ago
thanks
23:13
Nice.
I've enjoyed reading your guys' too
I haven't posted an answer in. . .some time.
I see you editing and improving lots of Qs and As though
Nitpicking LaTeX.
Its fun is incomparable to its labor.
Nitpicking LaTeX is very important! People have very strong feelings about it. See e.g. the recent meta mini-edit battle between me and pretty much everyone else.
23:15
Which question?
15
A: Should we correct math formatting?

tschoppiThis answer tries to be a guide to new members of the (chemical) scientific community for instructions on how to apply the right formatting when writing chemical and mathematical equations. The main problem most members struggle with is: Which symbols are written in roman (upright) font? The So...

Bah, the worst part of voting too much is daily vote limit reached - vote again in 43 minutes :\
@CurtF. OMG so much fun!

« first day (1180 days earlier)      last day (3504 days later) »