« first day (1101 days earlier)      last day (3583 days later) » 

00:56
1
Q: Strong base, strong acid titration problem

Joshua BenabouHere is a problem: Titrate 1 M sulfuric acid with 50 ml of 1 M sodium hydroxide solution. What volume of sulfuric acid will be required for neutralization. This is a simple problem. My reasoning is since both reactants are strong we will have 0.05 L $\ce{OH-}$ ions and for neutralization ...

 
1 hour later…
02:20
Periodic table
02:40
0
Q: Dimensional Analysis in Chemistry

ringoI was once told on this site that it was incorrect form to use units that specify the chemical being referred to in dimensional analysis. For example: $$150.~\mathrm{g}~~\ce{KNO3} \cdot \frac{1~\mathrm{mol}~~\ce{KNO3}}{101.103~\mathrm{g}~~\ce{KNO3}} \cdot{} \frac{1~\mathrm{mol}~~\ce{C7H4O}}{6~\...

 
3 hours later…
05:35
Hullo everyone!
@santago's gone crazy!
I reviewed like 10 suggested tag wikis yesterday and today.
05:50
is that a bad thing?
Nah, of course not!
cool!
Crazy not as in crazy crazy, but as in I'm-gonna-earn-another-reviewer crazy.
ahhh
 
3 hours later…
08:58
Oooh!
I just found an article written by Fred.
@ManishEarth Then I feel mods should check out the context. How else would one decide whether a comment is obsolete or not.
@ChemExchange As in we do check the context, but not all the comments
Hullo guys!
I bet the deleting moderator saw other comments that made it obsolete and deleted it. Sometimes you have a lot of flags and just breeze through them, not looking for other issues to clean up.
It's comment. We don't give comments much priority, nor do we give their deletion much priority
@ChemExchange For the sake of anything you worship, let. it. go!!!
09:07
If some comments don't get deleted, meh. You're getting too worked up about nothing here.
^That. ^
@ManishEarth That might not be the case here.
Why not?
@ChemExchange so?
let it go
If you're worrying about fairness in comment deletion, let it go.
@MARamezani Since other comments too were obsolete but were not deleted.
09:09
Comment deletion is very low priority and none of the mods worry about fairness there
@ManishEarth I felt a strong bias out there. So I am asking about it.
@ChemExchange So?
Nothing real.
That is why I said:
@ChemExchange Even if the deleting moderator had noticed all the comments and just deleted yours, it wouldn't be a biased situation.
3 mins ago, by ChemExchange
@ManishEarth That might not be the case here.
09:11
Because these are very low priority
as a response to
28 secs ago, by ManishEarth
@ChemExchange Even if the deleting moderator had noticed all the comments and just deleted yours, it wouldn't be a biased situation.
4 mins ago, by ManishEarth
I bet the deleting moderator saw other comments that made it obsolete and deleted it. Sometimes you have a lot of flags and just breeze through them, not looking for other issues to clean up.
SE doesn't care about the longevity of comments.
If some comments are deleted where more should have been, that's no big deal
Bias comes into play when there's something actually important being discussed
@ManishEarth A-ha!
09:13
@ManishEarth Who told the mods are biased?
@ChemExchange you're the one talking of bias
But I never said the mods were biased.
@ManishEarth I think he's saying someone who flagged him was biased.
Then who?
Oh
Bah
The person who flagged was.
09:14
You don't know when it was flagged
But then I said being flagged as obsolete isn't a bad thing.
it could have been flagged before
Yes, that^
Also, sometimes a single comment flag can be used to mean "please look at the whole thread" though we appreciate it better when a custom flag is used
(precisely because of such situations)
@ManishEarth People flag those when they don't think about getting a deputy.
Or Marshal.
Flagged before what?
@ChemExchange It was maybe flagged when you didn't even know it.
Even, there's a possibility that it wasn't flagged.
@Manish can look at the flags I think.
09:19
@MARamezani I asked him whether it was flagged or not.
Maybe Jonsca took a visit and thought two comments questioning the question being homework are noise.
@ChemExchange Flagged before the other comments were seen
So he randomly deleted one of them.
@ManishEarth Jonsca is a he, right?
@ManishEarth I commented. He didn't respond. MARamezani commented. My comment was still there. I left. I came back to see that my comment was deleted.
@MARamezani yes
@ChemExchange hm
09:21
Phew
@ChemExchange A question: Has this bias of some user against you (if exists) harmed you in some way?
Not yet, huh?
If it hasn't, then insisting on the discussion is kinda ya know...Doesn't work.
Because we're gonna keep saying that the whole thing isn't a big deal.
When there was some serious trouble, then you can come here and we can discuss all you want.
@ManishEarth You there?
@ChemExchange okay, you are correct, it was flagged when other comments were there
But with a closer look at the comments, yours was pretty useless after that comment was deleted, but @MARamezani's comment prevented others from voting to close as HW again
Still, it's no big deal. It's not like you're gonna have a flagged comment. "Ooooh, let's panic. My reputation has vanished in the face of mods because I had a comment flagged..." This statement isn't true.
@ManishEarth I'm a savior.
Why was it useless?
@ChemExchange Because both the comments were saying the same thing.
09:27
@ChemExchange santiago had removed his comment. Your comment was questioning a nonexistant comment without making any points of its own
MAR's comment did make an actual point
explaining why it isn't HW
Mine also said that the OP has dug deeper.
It was worth keeping around
for a bit
@ManishEarth It always is.
Btw the reason for my comment was:
22 hours ago, by ChemExchange
I intended to know what was the reason since I didn't know about those type of cases.
(deleted now)
@ChemExchange sure
it was obsolete later
obsolete comments aren't a bad reflection on you
you really should just drop this
09:29
@ChemExchange You didn't ask me? You didn't ask me?
@ManishEarth So it was flagged after santiago deleted his comment?
@ChemExchange i think?
Can you confirm that, if its possible?
yes, confirmed
But again, you're nitpicking far too deeply into this. It's like asking why some other person got two grains of rice more than you did
Nobody cares to that depth
@ManishEarth What? WHO?
Tell me tell me tell me!
09:31
@ManishEarth Atleast I now know that there was little or no bias in it.
Thanks
Again, even if there was bias, we don't care
@ChemExchange Usually, unless you don't make enemies yourself, no one bothers being so.
Why would you care? When it was related to me. @ManishEarth
@ChemExchange He doesn't mean that.
He's a mod.
@ChemExchange No, as in nobody would care even if it was related to them
Also that
And yeah, as a mod I do care about the others :P
09:33
It's his job to attend these kind of internet enemy thingies, if they exist.
not this again
@ManishEarth Hiding
@santiago Welcome back...I'm wondering if you were taking a walk.
@MARamezani pew pew pew
I was riding my bike.
@ManishEarth I can't speak about others.
09:34
@ManishEarth Ducks
@MARamezani sleeping mainly today - new pain meds
@ChemExchange I was basically saying you shouldn't either
@santiago So now you feel like a zombie huh?
@santiago When was it sorted, to start it again? :)
It's a comment. Consider it ephemeral
If it goes, it goes. Don't look deeper into it
If there are consistent patterns of targeting of comment flags, we will look into it
09:36
comments = irrelevant
@santiago Yes. Thats your opinion on this specific issue and you have voiced it before. Thanks.
@ManishEarth Alright. Thanks for your help.
there is no issue here - I was not targetting you, I was not 'biased' towards you in any way
@ChemExchange Usually, as this is internet, no one takes things dead serious, especially if their name starts with an M, followed by AR.
@santiago He didn't mean you were...He thought there was something serious about this...Which isn't...Case closed.
I responded to @MARamezani only because his comment was the first I saw and the only one I paid attention too
Sheesh.
09:39
@santiago Thats the reason why I starred your response.
Get it over with.
@ChemExchange It was interesting, or intersetting in some way.
Good for the transcript.
@santiago Yes. You explained that in the chat message which, if I am not wrong, is starred on the right hand side.
half a dozen of my comments have gone (most likley for @MARamezani building his nest).... I am not worried whatsoever
@santiago I use Martin's comments. His are waterproof.
@santiago The case is closed.
09:41
Yours corrode too fast.
@MARamezani true that
@ChemExchange fantastic! Now lets all make bad jokes
@santiago On another topic, wasn't your comment on chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/29598/… rude? Though frustration would lead most of us on that path :)
@santiago Bad chem jokes?
@ChemExchange -6 says it wasn't.
@ChemExchange to be honest, I do not remember
09:45
Forget it then. And concentrate on my poor joke.
1 min ago, by ChemExchange
@santiago Bad chem jokes?
1 min ago, by ChemExchange
Na
sodium and chlorine went into a bar and got into a fight, they were charged with assault
hahhahaha
Is this original? @santiago
lol.....haha.
Timing man!!
often I get no reaction to the joke, or people just dissolve into laughter
09:48
> What is the chemical formula for a banana? BaNa2
I'm having a hard time laughing.
I'm too awesome to laugh at chem jokes.
I was once called Copper Telluride, I blushed
[Emoticon for bragging]
@santiago Really Copper Telluride?
@santiago Didn't get this one.
chemical symbols CuTe
I don't know any properties of that compound
09:50
@ChemExchange You think jokes dig that deep?
lol....good one. @santiago
what do the chemical symbols spell?
> What did one charged atom say to the other? I've got my ion you.
Don't trust atoms, they make up everything.
LOL
Why was the proton jealous of the neutron?
09:52
Haha...This was a nice one:
> What is the name of agent 007's Eskimo cousin? Polar Bond.
Are we all googling chem jokes -_-
@ChemExchange I already did.
Wait a sec
not me
googling? NEVER!!!!! I am already chemically imbalanced
Are you expecting me to make them up?!!!!!!
09:53
@Freddy I don't trust you.
@ChemExchange No one trusts that face.
@MARamezani No, but I expect @santiago to make them up.
@ChemExchange His leg broke, not his brain.
@ChemExchange I am googling it I am copying that from bookmark page
@santiago Why?
09:54
@ChemExchange beause they both bought drinks and the bartender said to the neutron that there was no charge
@santiago Heh.
Jokes need to contain bars.
or columns
that is from my link
09:56
Hmm...Who just left?!
I did not get it tough
there are ample opportunities to swear with the periodic table
My pic is the real element of surprise.
09:58
what a load of carbon-radon-phosphorous
(removed)
lol what was that @santiago
Oh...The american version of the element of surprise:
of course, one could go.... fluorine uranium carbon potass.....
(Because Americans are very polite)
@santiago o.O
(removed)
10:00
@MARamezani symbols man! SYMBOLS
hahahaha
@santiago That was exactly the reason of my O.Oing.
I am flaggin that.
I went a bit deeper than you all did.
never completed it
10:01
@ChemExchange BTW what is your home country?
We all know where we come from.
I'll kick mute you if you don't tell me you nationality.
((removed))
@santiago I am flagging since you did not complete it :p
it would be worse if I ended it with oxygen fluorine fluorine
one could say that I am taking the phosphorous iodine disulphide
StackExchange @MARamezani
But I was expecting fluorine uranium carbon (removed)
@ChemExchange Great place to live
10:04
lol
Ttyl. Bye.
@ChemExchange Hmm...Let me test you.
@ChemExchange Nooo!
I wanted to test you!
Later anyways.
hmmm, if I say "phosphorous iodine disulphide oxygen difluoride to a chemist, would I get a slap to the face?
catch ya @ChemExchange
Slaps @santiago
Bwahahahaha
10:07
o.o
Slaps deserve evil laughs?
kinky..
lol
and no one expects the Spanish inquisition!
hmmm weird...
i think I have another question for you to downvote, @MARamezani
@santiago ?
just found out that "Helium is the only element that cannot be solidified by lowering the temperature at ordinary pressures"
I might ask about this
what you reckon @MARamezani?
10:21
Googling
@santiago I can't think of a reason. ASK IT! ASK IT! I NOW REALLY WANT TO DOWNVOTE AND FAVORITE THAT QUESTION. WAIT...WHY AM I SHOUTING?
2
LOL
what tags should I use?
posted!
@MARamezani!
10:52
Sorry, was eating lunch.
@santiago Downvoted.
 
6 hours later…
16:30
From what i have read from physics chat and in the internet, there is no concept of "reality " in quantum mechanics ,right ?
 
3 hours later…
19:17
@Gowtham I think so.

« first day (1101 days earlier)      last day (3583 days later) »