« first day (1100 days earlier)      last day (3586 days later) » 
02:00 - 11:0011:00 - 21:00

11:00
but now I know
@Martin oh nobody's fault :)
yeah, now you know
@santiago Done...Downvoted...Wait...The up arrow means "downvote", right?
yes it does!
Alrighty... nice I got a status-complete :D
11:03
heh
bear it well
@santiago tags look fine, maybe everyday chemistry too, but I don't know, that tag is so broad it can be applied to almost anything
@Martin I'm feeling jealous.
@Martin good thinking!
@santiago Tag it "everynight-chemistry"
@MARamezani NO!
11:05
Or "(applied) radiochemistry"
or omg-that-scared-the-pineapples-out-of-me-chemistry
Or "somedangtag-idon'tcare".
The future is bright, the future is orange ... or $\alpha$
It's already awful enough to keep track of existing nonsense tags
@Martin So let's add some.
11:07
he he he "that-damn-smoke-alarm-beeping-chemistry"
PERFECT LOGIC
I'll burn them without asking ;)
I thought the tags get revised again, and again
What about the tag "chemistry"?
@Buttonwood See that angry guy in his car driving? He does most of the work.
well, the name of the site itself does not imply any about chem?
Oh ... he is one of the chiefs ...
11:08
@Buttonwood Ahh, I think at this moment you need a pro tip:
> Never take MAR seriously, unless he says so.
Maybe it is the first time in this chat room, so I have to learn it. Ok.
I am non of the chiefs, but I like to keep an eye on the tags
Please don't try to summarise your question with tags. For more information, see [meta.se](http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/18878/260760) and the [help].
That's what I use when I encounter dumb tags...
@Martin Sheesh, that's a new one.
There are so many tags, that still have no wiki, not even an excerpt.
hmmm 2 rep each.....
11:11
@Martin I was not aware about this, either.
@Martin When I feel bored, I touch some of them.
I am feeling quite liberal to remove a couple of them, but if they have more than 3 questions, I'll ask on meta first
Alrighty, time to weekend... very looong weekend... until next wednesday... no work
Have fun everyone...
:x
you too
Have fun!
upsi... wrong window
11:12
Save some of it for me...
Haha, I might come on drunk or some...
take care @Martin!
i am creative then...
Okay then...no thanks!
tonight is Karaoke....
so bye, need to food first
11:18
@ManishEarth Then why is MARamezani's comment still out there?
It conveys the same message to santiago.
It was posted after mine.
Or does someone has to flag each comment which he/she feels is obsolete?
@ChemExchange Hullo
I dunno.
@santiago i think i got an answer for the smoke detector thing, posting in a few
@Gowtham awesome!
@Gowtham Way behind your back with downvotes!
@ChemExchange whats been conveyed to me now?
11:28
@santiago You deserve some downvotes because you lol too much.
@ManishEarth And just an off-topic question, do mods have to be online atleast once a week or something? Since F'x is a mod who can't be helpful at all since his profile says that his last seen is 2 months back.
@ChemExchange F'x is most probably busy because she's (I think it's a she) busy with PhD stuff.
@santiago
@ChemExchange And mods don't need to visit.
@MARamezani I had asked santiago why he says this question was HW, and so did your comment. It would have been better had he not used thank you for expressing it politely in his last comment. As if I was rude. — ChemExchange 19 hours ago
11:31
@ChemExchange Did you see my reply?
@ChemExchange His saying that I'm polite doesn't mean you weren't.
sheesh...
SHEESH!
@santiago Please tell me I'm rude!
@Chem is slaughtering us here!
This partly sums it up
2 mins ago, by MARamezani
@ChemExchange His saying that I'm polite doesn't mean you weren't.
@santiago Finish it!
@MARamezani I am not talking about santiago here. Anyway, he was a nice guy, I don't know what happened to him. He started leaving snarky comments too.
11:36
@ChemExchange Hmm?
Examples?
and I just read the last comment, I had just been targetted by another member, and I had also come from physiotherapy that day so was tired
I am just human
@santiago LIAR!
@ChemExchange Let me see.
@ChemExchange Oh, the deleted comment?
Well, let me out it this way:
A homework dropper thinks we should be their servant.
And do their homework for them.
@santiago which last comment?
11:39
"Hah! That site is full of dolts! I just made them do my homework"
And when @san says I'm bothered with their ignorance, he is telling the truth @Chem.
@ChemExchange The last comment on that question.
@ChemExchange i had just read @MARamezani's comment and after being harangued here in chat and after a painful day - I was happy to read a polite message
@ChemExchange ^ That.^
As I said, someone called @santiago a spammer.
Wasn't I polite enough?
he never meant you were rude, is the point
@ChemExchange You were.
11:43
i have a small issue, if i give a link that downloads a pdf to your pc/laptop than going to a link , is that allowed in an answer, cos i cant find the damn paper
The point is, @santiago can't ping two people at the same time.
as I said, I read the last (=latest) comment that was directed at me, I was tired
My original comment was: And why do you think this is homework-like question?
And, his not mentioning you doesn't mean you weren't polite!
I intended to know what was the reason since I didn't know about those type of cases.
And I wonder why the person who flagged my comment didn't flag the rest!
11:44
@ChemExchange He probably dint even read your comment , and did not intend that you were rude , rather someone else was being rude , i dont know why yours was deleted , peace
@ChemExchange Being flagged as obsolete isn't a bad thing.
@Gowtham Wasn't the flagging biased then?
I mean for a comment. :}
does it really matter? My comments go missing all the time (I think @MARamezani takes them and stores them in his nest)
@santiago How else do you think I earned deputy?
11:46
I knew it!
Kidding.
I earned Deputy thanks to ADG.
@ChemExchange I dont know , honestly all i can say is let it go
so guys ,
3 mins ago, by Gowtham
i have a small issue, if i give a link that downloads a pdf to your pc/laptop than going to a link , is that allowed in an answer, cos i cant find the damn paper
@ChemExchange It really doesn't matter. Because it isn't serious,
in this case at least.
@Gowtham It's allowed.
I've seen cases where people did.
@Gowtham perhaps provide a citation to the paper without a link as an option
@Gowtham I thought this message was related to the discussion, and I got confused...
@santiago No, providing the link is fine.
11:48
I don't know who flagged it but whoever did probably didn't know the meaning of obsolete.
@ChemExchange Did you get a mod warning on it?
And having just my comment flagged makes me feel the bias rather clearly.
its like this , i got this pdf from google when searching, its auto download , i searched for the same , i think it may be a conference paper or sth , this is the link
@ChemExchange As I said: In this case it doesn't matter. Even if your comment was flagged as something else. The main reason was its being obsolete.
Then do you have a logical reason for Why did your comment didn't get flagged?
11:51
@ChemExchange No.
Then do you see the bias?
Heh.
WHY DOES IT MATTER?
The flagging didn't do any harm to you.
Not that it will.
comments come and go - they are ephemeral 3rd class and unimportant
comments have no effect on rep, no effect on the site etc
11:57
Well, it might be so for you @santiago. But I just realized that there exists a bias.
No effects on having effects.
@ChemExchange Not everyone is here for pure reasons.
But I'd say all of the active users in this day are nice guys.
But if I take that he indirectly wanted to say that I was rude, then IMO he looks like the biased flagger.
MARamezani has made a change to the feeds posted into this room
0
Q: Density g/cm3 of bleached viscose

user2657I can find in literature what the density is for untreated viscose, but not for viscose that is bleached. Does this change the density? And what is the density for bleached viscose?

0
Q: Why is textile more water absorbent after bleaching?

user2657After a bleaching test the material is more absorbent than before. What is the reason for this?

0
Q: Specify the formula of the product X_n Y_m

MelanieDuring a chemical reaction, equal moles of two diatomic molecules $X$ and $Y$ are allowed to react to form one gaseous compound $X_{n}Y_{m}$. After the reaction is complete, it was observed that the density of the product formed is 1.50 greater than the density of the reactant mixture. Here is ...

2
Q: Which has higher priority according to Cahn-Ingold-Prelog priority rules?

confusedDoes vinyl or secondary butyl have higher priority, and why? According to my textbook, vinyl has higher priority than isopropyl, because an atom which is connected by a double bond can be treated as two identical atoms (one of them is just an imaginary atom). How about vinyl and secondary butyl? ...

3
Q: Resonance structures of N2O

lucy GThere was a question in one of my exam papers to draw the resonance structures for $\ce{N2O}$. But the resonance structures I drew were not given marks. The top 2 structures are the ones I drew and the bottom 3 are the ones in the marking scheme. I have a doubt that whether my structures are un...

@ChemExchange please do not ascribe intention to me
12:06
@ChemExchange You can't assume everything.
Alright @santiago
true @MARamezani
I will say it one more time - I was tired (after all day medical procedures), I looked at the last comment in that comment string saying my name - which was @MARamezani, I had been harangued by a member here in chat - so I was happy to see a polite comment after all the nonsense directed at me in chat.
Hope it works now.
Guys, I just made homework questions to be posted like messages.
So if they need closure, we'll close them immediately. (If we're here)
There is nothing more to it than that, nothing at all - no great conspiracy, no "indirect statements"
12:10
@santiago Are you sure...?
:}
yup, quite sure
Good!
Do mods check out the context before deleting comments? @ManishEarth
@Gowtham awesome answer! I am currently vote capped! lol - I will upvote (as it is a great answer) and read it thoroughly
@santiago tanks
Goodbye guys!
12:21
@ChemExchange cya laters
@Gowtham I shall come back later when @ManishEarth answers those questions and then probably write a meta post. Until then bye.
12:35
@ChemExchange Of course!
@ChemExchange Bye!
ADG
ADG
14:19
@MARamezani MAR
@ADG Hullo!
ADG
ADG
@MARamezani wassup?
@ADG Not much...Getting on with the life.
And studying for the math exam.
ADG
ADG
@MARamezani req any help?
Nah. Thanks. It's just the intro to matrices.
14:30
0
Q: Hybrid orbital is an actual solution of Schrodinger's equation or only a heuristic?

SparklerAccording to Wikipedia's article about orbital hybridisation: [...] today it is considered an effective heuristic for rationalising the structures of organic compounds. [...] Hybrid orbitals are assumed to be mixtures of atomic orbitals, superimposed on each other in various proportions. ...

i could find the answer with a google search: Are hybrid orbitals real , Off-topic ?
ADG
ADG
@Gowtham justahypotheticalconcept
@ADG i mean it shows no effort ..
@Gowtham Sad...Not researched questions don't get closed on chem.SE.
Let's downvote.
ADG
ADG
14:50
very bad.
he just don't understands and wishes for help.
OH! We're on the brink of 8k questions.
@ADG Downvotes aren't threats. They don't hurt. They simply say
> This question doesn't show research effort...
Which it seems so to me.
ADG
ADG
he researched but can't understand.
@ADG No, he just read a sentence of Wikipedia, and then a question burst his mind.
Kay, let's ask this in chem.SE
instead of Googling.
Also, I specifically didn't like to see that question from that user.
ADG
ADG
bye
 
1 hour later…
16:20
unclear ?
0
Q: Fragmentation from mass spectrometry

KlojiTake a look at this spectra: http://sdbs.db.aist.go.jp/sdbs/cgi-bin/direct_frame_top.cgi The second highest peak is at 58 m/e. Where would it come from given the structure?

@Gowtham Homework.
I clicked the link, but never saw no spectra, only bunch of boxes to enter numbers O.o
16:36
@Gowtham Right!
 
2 hours later…
18:44
@ChemExchange We don't always trawl through sister comments to delete things. It wasn't flagged, we might not notice it
@ChemExchange Sometimes mods take a break
@MARamezani F'x is a he :)
@ManishEarth Too bad.
@ChemExchange Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Comments are low priority
@ManishEarth He (?) was taking this whole thing too seriously.
19:30
0
Q: what is the effect of water on acids and bases?

Aya NajjarineIf we are titratin $\ce{HCl}$ with $\ce{NaOH}$ and $\ce{HCl}$ is in the beaker. We added water to $\ce{HCl}$. What is the effect of water present in beaker on volume equivalence and pH equivalence at the equivalence point.

20:08
Hullo @dsolimano!
I surely drag some Tavern guys here!
02:00 - 11:0011:00 - 21:00

« first day (1100 days earlier)      last day (3586 days later) »