(to be fair to the link, there are others of its kind scattered throughout the page. The community bulletin usually has a couple)
@LordStryker What do you think of a topic of the week sorta thing? Space Exploration and Astronomy are doing it, and it seems like a good way to make the site more fun and increase interest.
Topic of the week is a week where we make an effort to ask and answer more questions around a specific tag, this brings more attention to the topic which in turn should bring us more views and users who are interested in those areas.
Topic of the week helps us flesh out topics that look like the...
this is going to be difficult to do being the very small community that we are. I'm surprised how Astronomy is even smaller than us in terms of activity yet they are doing TOW.
@LordStryker not rep based, actually. For pro temp mods you need to have a working knowledge of the subject, then either understand how the network works or show a lot of enthusiasm and initiative in the site or just be an expert. Of course, for Chem the pro temp mods have been chosen (though new ones may be added per request, and if one of us decides to step down a replacement will be picked)
@Ell "Random fluctuations in molecular motions occasionally (about once every 10 hours per water molecule[8]) produce an electric field strong enough to break an oxygen–hydrogen bond, resulting in a hydroxide (OH−) and hydronium ion (H3O+);"
Its not a very fast process. However, this statement considers 1 water molecule. When you have billions of billions, then it happens a lot.
Also, it takes about 1 picosecond for the proton to be snapped up by another water molecule.
It still blows my mind that we can even measure something like that....
@Ell This would make for a good question. You should post it. @ManishEarth can write up a good answer. Then we can start handing out rep :)
I have three screens (two of them are of my laptop, one of a department computer), and I'm sitting on two swivel chairs (one is a footrest), with a blanket. This is the life :D
I would like to know the possible alternative available in chemistry software I've found very useful the big list like TeX or StackOverflow I would like have something similar to find the best chemical software for general propose like drawing structure and simple calculation. Is it possible?
@LordStryker What do you think of a topic of the week sorta thing? Space Exploration and Astronomy are doing it, and it seems like a good way to make the site more fun and increase interest.
I don't see any reason why they should not be permitted, and judged by the same measure as all questions. If they are a good fit for the site (which probably requires that they be realistic), they add value and should be allowed!
Moreover, I don't think you can prevent them efficiently. There'...
asking many questions, assuming multiple identities…
@F'x So, we used to be the only site with three di-diamonds. Now we have two di-diamonds, two uni-diamonds, and a net of three past diamonds. Confusing.
@F'x nice!
I think the difference there is that idle curiosity should be separated from a practical, likely circumstance
I find the SE sites, especially Math.SE, MathOverflow and CompSci.SE, extremely useful for solving specific problems I encounter during my research. But I have one concern: if I ask a question in an SE site, and then describe the same question in a paper (whether I got an answer or not), then thi...
My problem is the following: I teach an honors course in an engineering discipline at a small university. (It is not exactly that, but "teaching an honors course" is a good approximation to what I do). Large US companies sometimes ask me to recommend the best students for an interview, and they ...
Proofreading documents for orthography is a pain. I consider that I am decent at writing in my native language (on the grammar and orthography side), but proofreading for typos and whatnots is a time-consuming pain. I’d much prefer to have someone else do it for me, but it's a pain to bother othe...
Recently, I became aware by own experiences and friend's stories that some international statistical journals (whose names I prefer to omit) are rejecting papers because they do not include a reference of the journal in question. This is, if you do not cite a paper from journal X, then you cannot...
Can a very extroverted person, for example, be more favored than a very quiet person? Or is this not ethical? Can someone who is psychopathic be barred from admission?