@Federico I didn't mean to intend you deliberately obfuscated the claim. I only meant the result was obscure. I read the question, and I had absolutely zero idea what field the question was about. I had to hunt that down for myself.
I'm not sure what you meant by "disappeared". I haven't gone anywhere. I even followed up when you deleted the question.
I don't recall MadScientist's comment; I
'd have to check what he said.
@Federico I can't find the @mad-scientist comment, sorry.
Also do ALL sources have to be credible?
For example, there are evidences that may be weak by it self. However, combined with other strong evidences it qualifies.
Should all the weak evidences be gone?
Is strong evidence the only criteria for "sources"?
Can we add our own analysis on top of t...
Just putting this here for later: A thread of common hurricane-disaster photos that are attributed to every storm that comes along:
Let's go ahead and get these out of the way BEFORE #Florence hits...
1 - The shark on the flooded road pic is fake.
2 - Soldiers standing guard at Tomb of the Unknown Soldier is real, but not during hurricane.
3 - The WonderWorks restaurant in Myrtle is already upside down.
Also do ALL sources have to be credible?
For example, there are evidences that may be weak by it self. However, combined with other strong evidences it qualifies.
Should all the weak evidences be gone?
Is strong evidence the only criteria for "sources"?
Can we add our own analysis on top of t...
Hub of Reason
Hub of Reason