it is hard to get me on a novice level on JS, all together I see ray of hope fading and while I wanna give shot at my mother business (as she is turning old) I am confused
the problem isn't jobs, its me. I realized it. I am sensitive by nature., In start my colleagues envyed me coz I knew what they didn't and we never saw eye to eye and when I intrdrouced jQuery they made a group and my manager saw it and pressed me which let me quit
when I was in 2nd one, they fired me coz I couldnt do wordpress and was slow
so I went freelance, I did wordpress project to a point I was mastered in it as was doing wordpress themes (CSS and layout) in hours. so I went to uk and there I found a job, which I was doing and this guy who was putting all wordpress things on me I was on breaking point, so I again annoyed and wrote a email to manager which had HD involved and I was laid off
8 months of recruitment hell coz I had php on my cv and all recruiter put me for php or fill stack roles but I couldnt get hired and then when I got hired it was short lived coz I was wrong guy for the job (no suprise), then I had the job where the manager was a hole (when I joined the chat)
it was second ever job I had that was long enough but u know my manager annoyed me to a point where I said I need to move on (I was doing CSS, RWD and wordpress there and I was a king but my mind was being tortunred)
then the last one, who gave me a lot respect, showed me a lot of things my personality was missing but that too didn't last coz I wasn't good enough for the role even after extensive support.
I know you put yourself under a lot of pressure then, you were working and then being at home studying a lot. Sometimes you need to have some relaxing family time so that your mind can rest.
my mind would actively think even before me waking up from bed
e.g "Oh I need to develier X today and I didn't do it. let call in sick today" or "Oh it is dark outside and I cannot do abultion coz I am scared of shower heads"
@DarkCygnus I got into a long discussion about that on my mod Q&A, and got 2 more downvotes lol. I guess I could have done a better edit, but it didn't occur to me when I made the edit.
I don't think the votes on the Meta Q&A mean an awful lot, as always it's just a "meta regulars" popularity thing. A lot more people will be voting properly. Having an endorsement from a currently serving moderator is a bigger swing than the Meta Q&S score.
@Snow I am not concerned by the downvotes, I just found it a bit amusing. I also went ahead and defended another mod candidate on his questionnaire, which was also a factor I think.
By the way, @MisterPositive, you were right, we at roughly the same level. I see we have been consistently picking downvotes together on the mod Q&A. We are both at -3 now lol.
It is good to talk about controversial topics that affect the site. One way or the other we will make some incremental progress towards a somewhat useful and consistent policy on dealing with them. Pushing it under the carpet because it leads to disagreement doesn't help achieve anything.
I read that too quickly. I thought you said "As one of my managers used to fondle me, they tell me "someone has hot to deal with the tough problems, so why not you?"
I'm trying for sometime this week. What little I've read indicates they've attempted to raise the game rather than rehash the first one (which was excellent in itself).
I keep wondering whether Deadpool would have been able to survive Thanos' cull.
I'm a manager of a development team. They have historically followed a very waterfall methodology and have been resistant to change. I'm a huge proponent of agile, so I hired a scrum master and said that we would be following scrum. I've stressed to the team the benefits of self-organizing tea...
I've edited the title of the question. It's probably not less HQN now, but at least it has the core question in the title (for those people who only bother reading the question title before hitting the VTC button).
I think that's a fair edit. It seems ripe to draw a lot of discussion that focuses on the SCRUM decision and not on the real issue (this manager apparently has no control over his own staff)
To be fair, he should have thought about the consequences of his actions. It's like a chess player sacrificing a piece, only to find that it placed him into checkmate.
There's been too many answers there with too many upvotes to add another answer, but my obvious one would be "yeah, that's fine" and then continue to manage the team. Take control of the projects and be a project manager, not just a scrum leader.
This question (Supervisor without relevant technical knowledge does not communicate project objectives clearly) was closed for lacking a goal we could address. (I was one of the close voters.) The OP has since edited the question to describe his situation more clearly and also included a goal.
...
I just read that question now and my first reaction was :facepalm:. Now look, I understand you are the manager, but you can't just barge in to the team and tell, "whatever you guys were doing until now is s***, I have this cool buzzword here, and this is what you will do from now on."
I think I had written this in on of my answers, using your authority to manage the team should be your last resort, not the first. (maybe not in exactly these words).
@dwizum Sounds like the team pulled off Hoist By His Own Petard. I can totally relate to this because I did something like this recently with my seagull manager. ;)
Long story short, my seagull manager introduced additional "processes" to improve productivity micromanage better. We racked our brains together and turned the game on its head. We started asking for his "guidance" on things that he had no clue about. Effectively giving him more micromanagement than he could handle.
So it sounds to me like the team were upset at the manager bringing in a "scrum master" without discussing it with anyone, and decided to "wholeheartedly adopt scrum" to the extent where the manager was not required any more.
@Snow Not really. We didn't go that far, or rather we didn't need to.
For example, one "process" introduced was to write a daily update into the bugtracker for every one of your tasks, regardless of whether you have made any progress or not. So we went ahead and did exactly that. "Didn't work on task #123 today as I was busy with task #456."
Using Obfuscating Stupidity also helped, because we just claimed that we didn't really understand what he meant, and if it caused any issues, we would gladly rectify it in future if we have some more clarity on what is expected.
Any relationship, upwards or downwards on the corporate ladder, has to be based on trust and respect in order to function well. The problem with questions like this one, is that it's like asking "Should I keep a fire extinguisher in my home?" when, in fact, your home has already caught fire and burnt to the ground. We can talk all we want about what fire extinguisher to buy, but there's nothing to save
@Crossedtheriverstyx Voraciously reading tvtropes is how I came up with the idea, particularly Hoist by His Own Petard, Gone Horribly Right and Obfuscating Stupidity.
@Snow I've been railed at a couple of times when I suggest that passive aggression can be a good option at times. :)
@dwizum It makes sense though. It's accountability. It gives people a chance to say, "why is this the first I'm hearing about it? because they know you've had an opportunity every morning to say something.
@ChrisE Yeah. I think some users seem to hunt and call out any passive-aggressive answer and pounce on it claiming that it's the height of rudeness. If someone interrupts my headphone time, I'll give them a passive-aggressive look every single time (especially if it's Pink Floyd).
While passive aggression isn't good for interpersonal relationships, in the workplace, sometimes subtlety is need and passive aggression can be just that. You get to make a point without anyone saying that you did something wrong.
As an interesting aside, some societies with extremely violent histories honed passive aggression to the level of an art form. It does serve the purpose of providing an outlet to more murderous alternatives.
And that's my point. An example was the question where OP asked what to do about a manager (not his) running everywhere and it's distracting. I suggested passive aggression (such a s a checkered flag) which to me is a lot better than just snapping.
It's less acceptable to people who pontificate on the internet, but in reality passive aggression is commonplace. sprinkle it with a little non-insulting humor (subtlety is the key) and it's great.
One of the questions selected for the most recent moderator election Q&A is
This site has been dominated by the IT industry. What can we do to encourage more diversity? How can we be welcoming to blue collar and other workers who are not considered "professionals" or office workers?
One pr...
@MackM I'm thinking about your post on meta. I'm wondering why it hasn't "worked itself out" yet. In other words, do people with questions about the restaurant or factory (or other non-office space) as a workplace already go somewhere else?
@Crossedtheriverstyx That's about what I was thinking. My radio face goes along well with my silent-movie vocal capabilities.
@dwizum I doubt that they go elsewhere. But the answers to the factory worker were more... white collar than helpful for a blue collar worker. I've been from the mop to the top, then to the mop again, now on my way back up.
That is specific to a type of workplace, and the answers are excellent. They are coming from people with extensive, related, and personal experience on the issue. Answers like that are why this site is so great.
I think some of the bias is natural to the medium. Techie people are more likely to be sitting at a keyboard (and ready to answer questions) than factory workers.
@Crossedtheriverstyx By elsewhere, I meant literally elsewhere - not just to another SE - like, they talk it over at the bar after work, or they ask their union, or whatever. I'm generalizing here but I hope you get the point.
@dwizum Well, I think most of us got here through SO, thus the IT heavy balance. I was always a geek, so even as a laborer, I went online when I got home back in the ancient days of the usenet.
Most of us didn't hang out in bars though. Bars are expensive.
These days though, access to the interwebs is almost ubiquitous. Even when I was homeless, I could go into the library
It's interesting to see what the perception of blue collar is among white collar people though.
This question is regarding a manager who has been "fired" by their team. They note that they cannot seem to turn to anyone else, because their supervisor and the succeeding supervisor are both away for months, and neither of them has a replacement.
The next person in the chain of command appear...