« first day (1690 days earlier)      last day (3263 days later) » 

4:59 AM
it's a basic question, but -3 is very low by U&L standards
This one, on the other hand…
no, I did not install any particular thing. My friend also had such problems connecting from his machine, but he could finally manage to establish an ssh connection to the server. I have this problem since "port knocking" has been applied by the company. — Saman 1 min ago
so he has SSH troubles since port knocking was added, and he didn't think of mentioning that in his question‽
 
 
3 hours later…
8:22 AM
@Gilles That downvoting does seem rather aggressive. And the question is perfectly coherent, albeit elementary.
@Gilles I don't think I had previously registered that a filesystem is allocated a fixed number of inodes. ext4, at any rate. What happens if they run out?
 
 
4 hours later…
12:41 PM
@FaheemMitha well, you can't create more files
 
@Braiam Oh
 
@Gilles I found the question was poorly worded and too verbose. Because of some of the content and OPs reaction to other commentors on the post I did not feel that an outright improving edit would be received gracefully. I commented (and tried to keep it constructive) and voted down (I retracted that after the OP edited the post to fix most of the issues I had with it). The other one was closed before I did see it.
 
 
1 hour later…
1:53 PM
Little question: I have this string: "22-33": does anyone know how I can easily substract the 22 and the 33 and put them in 2 separate variables?
(It's a parameter, so $1): Something like: ${1#*-} for the first one?
 
2:30 PM
Nvm, solved
 
 
2 hours later…
4:29 PM
@Kryptonous If you think the solution is interesting, you could post a question and then self-answer it. Though I'm no judge whether shell questions are intereresting.
 
4:43 PM
@FaheemMitha V="$1"; echo "< ${V%-} > and < ${V#-} >" would work. But the only interesting part is that (AFAIK) it's not possible to perform substitutions on numbered arguments
 
@roaima oh, ok.
 
@roaima uh? It is.
 
It's missed the asterisks; are those editing characters in chat?
 
@roaima yes: italics
 
V="22-23"; echo "< ${V%-*} > and < ${V#*-} >"
 
4:44 PM
chat markup is approximately the same as comment markup
 
Yes, sorry. Not used to chat.
 
asterisks = italics, double asterisks = bold, backticks = code
 
Yup, looks like comment markup. I'll remember that. Thanks.
 
 
3 hours later…
7:27 PM
Can I post links to my own questions here? (I hope so)
0
Q: Who's crashing my kernel?

That Brazilian GuySuddenly, a message saying "A problem in the kernel package has been detected" started appearing after I login upon boot. A new message is shown every second, incessantly. I haven't updated the kernel in the last 12 days (3.19.7-200.fc21.x86_64). I have installed 5 new packages today: subversi...

 
 
3 hours later…
10:37 PM
@terdon, curious why you've removed linux tag from unix.stackexchange.com/questions/205727/… ? (to differentiate from Mac, say)
 
8
A: Why is there a linux tag?

Steven DI think it is good to have the linux tag for posts that are linux-specific. That is, the linux tag should be used when the answer applies to linux but not other unices such as Solaris.

Damn, sorry about the triple ping.
This whole site is about Linux and Unix. >70% of all questions are about Linux (closer to 90%, really), so adding the tag makes little sense unless the question is specifically about Linux and is not applicable to any other *nix.
Usually, the tag is used for things like kernel development or Linux history/standards.
 
I'm happy to defer, just curious. I can see why you knocked out the distro specific tags - at least at this stage
 
Same goes for the distro-specific tags. The fact that the OP is using distroX is no reason to tag with . That should be used only of the question is specific to that distro and wouldn't be relevant to any other.
@roaima You're not supposed to defer, you're supposed to be convinced! :)
 
yeah. agree completely. it's amazing how many "ubuntu" questions (elsewhere - not on SE particularly) are actually linux/unix/shell questions
i'm not convinced :-)
 
That's the community's take on these, by the way, not my own. I just happen to agree with it.
@roaima Oh. OK, in that case, you'll have to defer :P
The Linux tag is almost never appropriate, really. Only very rarely. We kinda know your question is about Linux (or, sometimes Unix) else you wouldn't be posting here in the first place.
 
10:43 PM
so ... does that mean that "linux" really means (as you seem to imply) "linux-kernel"?
and no, I'm not up for mooting a tag name change. yet.
 
@terdon that question is specific to Linux.
 
@Gilles Dunno. It sounds more like a hardware issue to me.
 
The underlying issue may be with the hardware, but hibernation goes through the OS, so it's a combination of the Linux kernel and some userland power management layer.
 
I certainly don't see any benefit to tagging it with Linux and that's not how we've been using the tag.
 
It's also a wild goose chase. I'm not sure about closing it, maybe someone who's very familiar with PM frameworks can offer generic debugging advice
 
10:46 PM
But do you really think it needs the tag?
 
@terdon yes
 
Hmmm. I don't see why but feel free to put it back.
I wouldn't be surprised if the same issue occurs in Windows on the same machine as well.
That certainly is not how I've understood the use of the Linux tag.
 
It's unlikely to act like that in Windows because otherwise the machine wouldn't have passed Windows Compatible (or whatever it's called) so wouldn't be selling. But it is possible, I suppose.
 
@terdon Kernel development is off-topic. Kernel configuration is on-topic and specific to Linux. So are many other topics, such as just about anything that has to do with hardware other than via X, many storage topics (mounting, LVM, RAID, …), namespaces, networking setup, etc.
We do have a lot of questions that abuse and distribution tags. Please edit them away. This isn't one however.
 
Development might have been a bad choice of words, kernel hacking/configuration is what I would use it for. And history.
 
I admit that and are becoming red flags for me, they are being used way too much, but I won't argue the point. If both you and @roaima feel it should be tagged as , go for it.
 
@Gilles Hey, I'm not that far behind you!
But OK, tag added.
 
Someone making you a joke by putting a script that makes the system go to hibernation when you log in, perhaps? — Braiam 1 min ago
as far as it goes, it can be anything
 
Given the amount of detail in the question, yes that's equally possible
 
10:51 PM
@Braiam Heh, Occam's razor.
 
I have a bunch more tag disambiguation meta posts queued up, by the way
 
@Gilles Great, bring them on. I'm waiting for a consensus on the three you posted today. Or was it yesterday? Anyway, I'm keeping an eye on them.
Funny how I could tell who had posted them just by reading the titles. You had fun with those didn't you? :)
Maybe you should start pinging Pops.
 
@terdon it's kind of a tradition from MSO
 
I know. It's a nice one.
 
@terdon when that doesn't work I vote to close
little cute gif i.imgur.com/U0iADj9.gif
 
11:00 PM
@terdon here's another example: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/205744/… is not about . It's about Ubuntu's recovery mode.
@Braiam Do you know what Ubuntu's recovery mode does these days?
Is that close to the sysvinit-style runlevel 1?
Or does it run a GUI nowadays?
 
@Gilles Not that I know of. It should be runlevel 1. It's a shell interface anyway. Why is that question specific to Ubuntu?
 
@terdon because what Ubuntu calls “recovery mode” may not be the same as what another distribution calls “recovery mode”
Ubuntu 15.04 uses systemd, so there's no such thing as “runlevel 1”
 
@Gilles I'm pretty sure it is though. Am I wrong?
> My question is: will booting in recovery mode use a default keyboard layout, so that in the event I mess up my xkb settings again I can just fix them?
Are you saying that different distros will behave differently at that level? He'd still be logging in as root so, presumably, his settings will be ignored.
 
@terdon if he boots to a console shell, yes
but is it still what Ubuntu calls “recovery mode” these days?
 
Pretty sure it is, yes.
 
11:04 PM
wiki.ubuntu.com/RecoveryMode suggests so, but it hasn't been updated in a while and there's a lot that's out of date on that site
 
@Gilles no, I have no idea, now they start NM and D-bus for gods knows why bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/vivid/…
 
@Gilles The question mentions the OP is running Ubuntu, I don't see why the tag is needed. I'm sure I may have removed some tags wrongly since any Q tagged with is posted in the AU chat room and I tend to see them and remove them.
Some mistakes are bound to get through. I don't really think that's one of them though.
 
@terdon I searched a bit and apparently Ubuntu recovery mode gives you a choice of a console shell or launching X
So the question does depend on running Ubuntu. That boot-time choice is an Ubuntu configuration.
 
Huh. OK, fair enough, I stand corrected.
 
so, using the "recovery mode" in Ubuntu, executes this unit bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/vivid/…
I think it should use the same configurations as the TTY defaults
 
11:22 PM
@Gilles thanks for the edit, I thought that some were being ignored but you're quite right, it lists all of them.
 

« first day (1690 days earlier)      last day (3263 days later) »