« first day (1091 days earlier)      last day (3874 days later) » 

12:00 AM
.au slang is largely british. and scottish. and irish. some american. and lots of local stuff that probably makes no sense to foreigners.
 
no worries is an aussie thing isn't it?
It's become quite popular lately
 
think so.
guess why americans are seppos?
 
I don't think I will get any touch interface for... 5 years, or where they can replicate the keyboard feeling...
 
@Braiam touch is great on some things. Just not fricking everywhere
Even the bleedin' oven has a touch interface now
and you can't use the damn thing with oily hands, that was smart.
 
@terdon - otoh it can bluetooth your fridge and find out if you need to buy milk
coz that's what everyone wants their oven to do
 
12:04 AM
Yeah. I remember reading scifi books with that idea and thinking it was cool
but not in real life :) Just an annoyance
If I need milk I'll get some milk, 9 times out of 10 my fridge will just be pissing me off
 
and then we get Arnold tell us that our son is the hope of the humanity in 30 more years...
 
@Braiam and at that point, there'll be no milk left anyway
 
thats because you burnt it all. with your greasy hands you couldnt turn off the stove.
 
:)
 
@CraigSanders what? our son?
 
slm
12:07 AM
I think it was more canonical than RH
 
@slm fan boy
 
@Braiam i think the midichlorian soup went off
 
and @slm comes and robes the humanity's future, our son's... and the milk
 
slm
the gnome project did the 3.0, to RH's credit they went along with fedora being a vanilla implementation of it, ubuntu went with unity b/c they're bent on controlling everything
imo
RH is much better at participating on the open source projects than ubuntu, they tend not to
 
true
 
slm
12:10 AM
neither is right/wrong just different
 
@slm that's a chicken and egg thing. RH have been trying to control everything for years. ubuntu are doing the same.
 
@CraigSanders yes, but they were contributing quite a bit to the source tree
At least that was my understanding
 
true. doesn't mean i have to like being in the crossfire
 
@terdon who, canonical or RH?
 
slm
RH
 
12:12 AM
both, but especially rh.
 
@Braiam RH yes
Still, much as I don't like canonical they did manage to make the Desktop GNU/Linux popular and I think that'll is a good thing in the long run
 
slm
it's diff. to tease out i agree, in the early days the only ppl contrib. were RH guys, so they're weaved into the projects b/c of this. But they've generally been better at supporting multiple projects even when they were direct competitors, in Ubuntu land they are more like the borg
 
yeah
 
slm
yeah it's all good in that regard, the prob. is that there is too much duplication right now, so it's dilutes the effort
 
Canonical never tried to stomp on Mint did they?
I mean at first Mint was just Ubuntu with codecs and better hardware recognition
as far as I know, Canonical never had an issue with them which is not that borg-like
 
12:14 AM
diversity/dilution is not the problem. deliberate incompatibility and fragmentation are the problen
 
I think that the problem with canonical is that they are too prideful to say they were wrong..
 
To be honest, fragmentation has always been a problem
 
and forks are just the result of fixing things, making a fork instead of Ubuntu...
 
@Braiam wrong about what? It's their whole approach that we object to
 
from canonical's pov they're not wrong - they don't want to be dependant on technology that is controlled by their direct competitor. i can't say that justifies what they're doing but it's understandable.
 
12:17 AM
one thing is not being dependant of the competitor, and another is "heck, our competitor is doing this right, why won't we do the same as they?"
 
this about upstart/systemd?
 
gnome3 isn't "right". systemd certainly isn't right - that's about as wrong as you can get
 
but how is either controlled by canonical?
 
both are controlled by RH.
 
slm
i still don't understand the whole upstart/systemd thing, that seems like a cluster F###
 
12:18 AM
which is why canonical has upstart and unity
 
why controlled?
 
slm
seems like the underlying issue was that the services /etc/init.d couldn't scale up so that services could start up in tandem
 
you mean the lead devs work for the respective companies?
 
slm
+ the interface is old
 
@terdon - who does most of the work on both of them? RH employees.
 
12:20 AM
yeah, ok
 
slm
that's where canonical goes wrong imo. they don't participate on the projects like RH does
 
ok, then, users appart, what is in for Canonical and RH? corporate clients?
 
imo ubuntu would have been better off using standard stuff like xfce
 
how is Gnome not standard?
 
slm
corporate is where the $$$ is at
we spent 300-400 per RHEL seat
for server
desktop is a waste of time from $$ standpoint
look at M$
the OS division is only 3-4billion
 
12:22 AM
Office is the only thing keeps Microsoft afloat...
 
@Braiam - yep. the only reason why RH support fedora is so that the remain relevant to geeks who may end up using RHEL at work. ditto for ubuntu, although there's a less-clear distinction between free ubuntu and supported ubuntu
 
actually that and games are practially the only reason people use Windows...
 
slm
yup
 
gnome is not-standard because they keep deliberately breaking compatibility with standards
 
slm
you'd be surprised, we have a small business licensing for MS at work and it's a complicated beast
they charge a lot for the stuff, and ppl are so apt to pay it
 
12:23 AM
it's becoming more and more difficult to use gnome apps like evince in non-gnome environments like xfce.
 
slm
that's too bad, that was always the strength of gnome over kde
 
the latest UI abombination in evince is about enough for me to drop it entirely.
 
slm
gtk+ apps were very portable, even to windows
really? wow
as i've stated before, i'm waiting for it to settle out
fedora 14, gnome 2.32
 
ok, I have to lol to that question...
 
@CraigSanders that bad?
 
12:26 AM
slm - it aint going to settle out. gnome3 is only going to get worse. if you want something like gnome2 but with a future, switch to xfce. or cinnamon.
 
they wouldn't break gtk on propose right?
 
@CraigSanders what's wrong with evince? I mean it has various problems but it's GUI?
 
slm
During the first quarter of 2012, for example, Business generated $5.8 billion, or 33.4% of Microsoft's total revenue of $17.4 billion. In the same period, the Windows and Windows Live Division raked in $4.6 billion, or 26.6% of the firm's revenue for the quarter.
 
which version is this?
 
@terdon - yeah. latest versions completely ignore my "i want text buttons, not icons" setting that i've had for years. so i have inscrutable hieroglyphics instead of text menus and buttons. and those hieroglyphics are all on the top right side of the "menu" bar (ignoring the theme) rather than the left side where they belong.
 
12:28 AM
Huh?
 
@CraigSanders take a screenshot of the Frank's monster instead..
 
slm
yeah i'd like to see this
what is this?
evince?
 
yeah, with that silly gnome-screenshot thing that sometimes photographs its own selector box
 
which evince are you running. i've got 3.8.3-2
 
12:29 AM
3.4.0
ouch, I've got that to look forward to huh?
 
slm
 
which one's that @slm?
 
slm
2.32 from gnome 2.32
fedora 14
 
slm
wow, what happened?
 
12:32 AM
WTF?
 
I have NFI what those icons mean. i'm essentially illiterate when it comes to icons, i can never figure out what they're supposed to mean.
 
slm
can you change the view icons, view text + icons type of settings?
 
I get search, settings and...?
 
@slm - there used to be a "text buttons" setting, i used to use it until this version of evince. it's gone. there's no settings/preferences menu or dialog now either.
 
is the new default look in all Gnome applications, they will take the Chrome/ium like minimalist GUI
 
12:36 AM
Minimalist I can deal with but making a Linux desktop less configurable is WRONG
 
yep, i've also noticed it in their pretentiously named "The Web Browser" (used to be called epiphany) by the even more pretentiously named "The Web Developers".
 
gnome has been all about making a linux desktop less configurable for years. they know better than you.
 
slm
> Are there any plans to reintroduce customizable toolbars? Any thread
> about this issue worth watching?

No, there aren't plans to allow customize the toolbar at the moment.
 
slm
12:38 AM
Did you raise it upstream?
my thread would seem to indicate no will be the answer when asked
i find it funny that there is this push to enable everything for tablet and disenfranchise the meager 1-10% of the users in the world that are already using the stuff
 
@slm - nope. i learnt years ago that reporting bugs to gnome is a complete waste of time. i have no interest in being told to fuck off, that i'm not the target audience and an idiot besides.
 
slm
i've never done any bug reporting to the large projects either, seems a waste of time
 
> learning a modular
set of re-usable letters is far more efficient than rote-memorizing
thousands of slightly different pictures, especially when the pics
change due to fashion or some designer's whim every few years.
Brilliant!
 
yeah, well, there's a reason why our culture developed alphabetic languages
 
@slm this is a old comment in this Q that result the problem was a bug, should I just do an answer or what? unix.stackexchange.com/q/4992/41104
 
12:43 AM
In their defense, that really is a feature and not a bug. I mean the program is not really broken
it is as far as you're concerned but it will still view pdfs
@Braiam sure, why not.
 
@terdon - i see it as an accessibility issue.
i really do have great difficulty interpreting all but the most obvious icons.
 
Fair enough, and I agree
I just wonder if bad UI design is a bug
 
breaking stuff that used to work is a bug
 
slm
@Braiam - i wouldn't bother at this point, it's moot given the age of the distro, it's no longer actively supported
 
yeah, and if it renders it unusable for you it's a bug
 
12:47 AM
it used to be that i could not care what their stupid icons looked like because I had ticked the "show text buttons" checkbox.
 
slm
@CraigSanders - or you could change them to whatever you wanted
 
actually, lost functionality is a bug...
 
@slm how?
and i don't want other icons, i want text
 
slm
@CraigSanders - change the icons in an app
before
 
things are no good... I don't know how the heck to program a universal remote control... and manual is nowhere to be found...
 
12:49 AM
you mean i could draw my own icons, hack the source and recompile it to use my own set of icons? wow. so thoughtful of gnome devs to give me that option.
 
heh
assuming these are standard icons, you might not need to touch the source
 
my brain will explode if i have to go that deep down the gnome rabbit hole to find out how to do that. if it's even possible which is unlikely because it sounds suspiciously like configurability or an option, and those things are forbidden.
 
(explode with rage, at least - i don't want to have to care about desktop icons and shit)
 
slm
reviews fedora 19
seems like they're moving towards unity
 
12:53 AM
that made me remember this question
 
@slm seriously? RH is going to use unity?
 
I managed to do it... but then the path was enterely off and everything broke down...
 
slm
@terdon - sorry no it looks like it
the ui
 
@CraigSanders did you see this? A perfect example:
1
Q: Disable Cinnamon volume applet's sound when changing volume

terdonI recently updated my Linux Mint Debian Edition to update pack 7. Since then, every time I change the volume by scrolling on the volume applet that is on my panel, an annoying beep is played. Similar to the behavior of OSX when changing volume. I have never understood the point of this, it mean...

 
you should make it flash the screen a dozen times or so as well as beep, just in case you didn't notice that you were changing the volume
 
slm
12:58 AM
@CraigSanders - lol
 
I'd always laughed at the OSX fann boys for that really annoying sound the macs have when changing the volume
and they added it to my desktop!
 
the most annoying thing is that you have to dirty your hands to modify things in the DM...
btw @terdon that should not be hardcoded... :(
 
Oh bugger, sorry, I was thinking about the sound that gnome-screensaver makes, the cinnamon one is irrelevant here
 
the really annoying thing is that hacks like that are not easily reproduced if you work on multiple systems and, worse, they'll get trashed the next time you upgrade cinnamon packages. because hacking code is not configuration.
 
I meant this one:
3
Q: How can I disable the shutter sound of gnome-screenshot?

terdonAfter a recent update of my LMDE, the gnome-screenshot tool started making an annoying camera shutter noise every time a screenshot is taken. This is both annoying and startling (especially if you happen to be wearing earphones when taking the screenshot). I checked the man page of gnome-screens...

@CraigSanders yeah, but at least these things are little javascript scripts
very easy to edit and they're not even part of the cinnamon trunk, they're applets
 
1:02 AM
i'm tempted to put in an answer to that Q saying that gnome devs are just complying with anti-upskirt legislation.
 
The issue with gnome-screenshot is much more annoying
Hah!
anti-upskirt indeed
 
lots of countries have passed laws saying that camers must make a sound when taking a photo
 
hmm, anyone who can manage to sneak my laptop under a girl's skirt deserves the photo!
By the way, any of you guys have any ideas about this one:
0
Q: dual boot windows XP/debian, I can't boot windows

simonaI tried to set up a dual boot windows xp/debian. I installed Debian after windows, and now I can't boot windows xp. I have grub2. I tried to directly modify /boot/grub/grub.cfg with menuentry "WinXP" { set root=(hd0, gpt1) insmod chain chainloader +1 } but I can't make that work. When I sele...

The OP's left a lot of comments but as far as I can tell the issue is that XP won't boot from gpt
 
@terdon the line that reads insmod part_gpt indicates, without doubts, that is a GPT disk...
 
@Braiam so does the fdisk output.
I know, I've tried to tell the OP
 
1:09 AM
don't say "no" just tell that she should use MBR.... some people reacts wrongly when one tells them "no"
 
I've never used GPT so I have no idea how to guide someone with the transition or even how to do it without data loss.
 
the sure kill way, start from scratch....
 
slm
gpt is similar to fdisk's mbr
 
yeah but I've never used it is all
@slm is it me or is there something very weird in that partition table? Look at the start of the windows partition
 
@terdon another pony askubuntu.com/q/353328/169736 ?
I'm believing is the same wuss
 
1:17 AM
:)
I want to know , I also want to know
 
Ubuntu ( ) is an operating system based on the Linux kernel and the Linux distribution Debian, with Unity as its default desktop environment. It is distributed as free and open source software. It is named after the Southern African philosophy of ubuntu (literally, "human-ness"), which often is translated as "humanity towards others" or "the belief in a universal bond of sharing that connects all humanity". According to 2012 online surveys, Ubuntu is the most popular Linux distribution on desktop and laptop personal computers,{{cite web|last=Zachte|first=Eric|title=Wikimedia Traffic A...
 
slm
you mean this line?
/dev/sda4 16128 204796619 102390246 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
 
@slm just the fact that sda4 is actually the first partition. Shouldn't it sda1 be the first?
 
slm
This is stuff that you shouldn't do to a disk in the first place, it's just stupid
 
no, it depends of the order of creation....
 
1:21 AM
well, second actually but anyway, sda1 starts right after sda4
 
I don't have sda6 for example ;)
 
@Braiam the time? Seriously?
 
@terdon read my edit... says "order" :P
 
@Braiam yeah I understood. But she just rewrote the partition table, I would have expected it to name the 1st partition on the disk sda1 and take it from there
 
slm
if it's gpt i don't think you can use fdisk. for one if the partitions are larger then 2tb the numbers start to look weird and make no sense
 
1:22 AM
instead, sda1 begins right after sda4
@slm apparently she has converted back to mbr
 
slm
some fruit is rotten on the vine to begin with and should be left to wither
 
Deserves an upvote anyway, the OP has definitely shown effort
 
@Braiam - heretic!!! the miracle happens before the developers work on the kernel, not after.
 
@terdon again, the order of creation is all that matters, you could create your first partition (sda1) at the end of the disk, and it wouldn't matter
 
@Braiam but if this was all done in the same operation, the first partition to be created would also be the first partition of the disk
 
slm
1:24 AM
what braiams is saying makes some sense, they could've made the extend partition and then gave out space within it
 
not necessarily... I would play with my usb now, if I'm not afraid that the cycles will burns out
 
ok, I'll take you guys' word for it
 
I mean, the sdaX is arbitrary and decided by the order of creation of the partitions, it takes its number from the order in the partition table rather than the physical disk
 
slm
sda4-6 are inside the extended partition if this is mbr
 
that's why fdisk reports "Partition table entries are not in disk order"
 
slm
1:27 AM
hence why the numbers starts overf for sda4
i rarely see this stuff pulled off right and then you get Q's like this, hence why it's just a bad idea
 
does windows get confused by unusual partition order?
linux can cope, but can windows...?
 
slm
i think it get's upset when the mbr's bootloader for the disk isn't the windows one
 
@CraigSanders windows won't boot in a logical partition...
 
slm
this ordering isn't helping things
See i never would've even thought to try that, it's just like playing with fire
 
@slm - nah, it copes with grub in the MBR just fine
@Braiam - sda4 isn't in the extended partition.
 
slm
1:30 AM
you have to do the chainloader+1 to get it working
sda3 is
sda4 is the 1st partition inside it
 
a partition table this messed up takes real effort, it doesn't just happen by accident.
nope. sda4 is from 16128 to 204796619
sda3 (extended) is from 271906814 to 488397167
 
slm
ah you'd be right
you have to do this kinda hoop jumping, it's just stupid wastes of time to me: sousuke.org/wiki/Installing_Windows_on_a_logical_partition
 
i think someone's been playing with gparted without a clue what they're doing.
 
slm
yes you can frankenstein the disk if you want but why?
k I'm stepping away for a while, night
 
frankenstein is not the f verb i'd use in this context.
 
1:34 AM
@CraigSanders isn't suprisily that it fails in other matters...
 
1:49 AM
@CraigSanders yeah, that's what I was referring to before
Anyway, if I remember correctly, XP needs to be in the 1st, primary partition or it won't boot
 
@Braiam wow I don't think I've ever used backspace to go to the previous page in a browser
I don't remember what I did before Alt-left but backspace is for deleting
 
 
13 hours later…
3:15 PM
Can anyone answer my question related to nginx?
0
Q: How To Use User Directories With Nginx

Pradeep GuptaI am using Debian based host and using Nginx and PHP-FPM, I wants to enable user directories in nginx and wants multiuser support also. That means when Alex open www.example.com/rutorrent , This should point to his own version of php script located at /home/alex/www/rutorrent and when Bob will op...

 

« first day (1091 days earlier)      last day (3874 days later) »