Code Review Moderator Election 2015

You and Jamal have my votes - you because you were (and are) so patient with me on RD, I know you'd make a good mod, and Jamal because he's proven himself.

200 has been around, but hasn't nominated himself.

Mat's Mug

3:43 AM

has 200 gone public about a decision?

Hosch250

I don't know, but from what he said about it not being fair before, I think he is waiting to see who runs/not decided.

@Mat'sMug Not as far as I know.

I still have one free vote, and I'm waiting to see the answers to the questions to choose.

Mast

8:32 AM

@Hosch250 You already decided on which candidates to spend the other 3?

RubberDuck

9:41 AM

@Hosch250 I've not decided one way or the other yet.

And no @Mat'sMug I've not seen a nomination from 200 yet.

Which... makes me sad. I hope he decides to stay. It would suck to lose 2 of our mods. It'd be nice to have some continuinity.

Mast

@RubberDuck He was in chat earlier today, so he knows the sentiment.

Mast

9:58 AM

3 more candidates before we need preliminaries.

I think we'll manage that.

RubberDuck

Who was @Mast? 200?

And I guess I should go ahead and explain why I've not made a decision yet. I've kind of been keeping it to myself.

I have a couple of reasons not to run actually...

Mast

@RubberDuck Yes.

RubberDuck

I am starting a new job next week, so I am likely to be pre-occupied during and directly following the election. That's a biggie.

But I also would feel obligated to be around here if I were to be elected.

Vogel612

^ that's the number one reason to not go for it

Mast

Indeed.

Vogel612

10:04 AM

It's supposed to be (and remain) fun, "even" when becoming a mod

RubberDuck

I'm here all the time because I love CR. I edit and moderate within my current privileges because I like to. I'm not certain I want to feel a responsibility for it.

2

Yes @Vogel612 it is, but I'm not certain it would remain fun for me if I was a moderator. Hence, no decision yet.

Mast

I'm simply not running because I think I miss the experience. There are way better candidates out there.

@RubberDuck If that's how you think about it, you shouldn't do it.

RubberDuck

There are lots of great candidates.

There are good reasons for me to run though too. I'm already a very active user, been part of growing a tag community from two users to almost daily questions from many, I care about the tags and good edits... I'd be good at it I think. And, obviously, at least some others think I would be too. Or I wouldn't be here explaining myself.

Mast

There's that.

RubberDuck

Regardless, nominations don't close for another few days. I suspect I'll make a decision soon.

There are a few names that I'd like to see added to the nominees. If they don't show up, I'll likely step up and run.

Mast

10:15 AM

@RubberDuck That's a tactic I haven't considered yet.

RubberDuck

Yeah. Don't get me wrong, there are several people if out my trust in there already.

There's just one or two I would like to see there more. If they're not up for it, then I'll toss my hat in the ring.

Mast

I think Simon is avoiding us.

RubberDuck

Perhaps. We've all let him know how we feel. Best to let it lie now and let him decide.

Simon André Forsberg

@RubberDuck So you mean that you won't nominate yourself if I (and others) nominate ourselves?

@Mast I think Simon is starring you.

RubberDuck

@SimonAndréForsberg You do happen to be one of those people I find to be uniquely qualified.

Mast

10:23 AM

@SimonAndréForsberg I think the effect you're looking for is startling

Simon André Forsberg

I have my cousin visiting until Friday so I don't spend all day here.

RubberDuck

Basically, it's a matter of comfort. If I feel things are in good hands, I won't run. If I feel like the talent pool is missing something, then I will.

Right now, it's missing something.

Like a fish and a Simon...

Simon André Forsberg

@RubberDuck One could say I have the same reasons for not running as you do. Although I don't have a job at the moment, I hope to get one soon, and I have no idea how much time I will have on that job. I am also here a lot because I love CR, and am not certain it would be as fun if I would be a moderator.

That said, I am writing up my nomination at the moment.

3

RubberDuck

...... so am I. I think I talked myself into it this morning.

Simon André Forsberg

12 mins ago, by RubberDuck

Right now, it's missing something.

It's missing a duck!

Vogel612

10:38 AM

It's interesting how everybody wants everybody else to run

2

Mast

@Vogel612 That's how convinced we are of each others capabilities.

RubberDuck

That ^

Simon André Forsberg

I did have an idea about how we could all nominate each other, and no one would nominate themselves. Like if I would nominate @Mat'sMug and @Mat'sMug would nominate me.

Turns out that wasn't possible though.

RubberDuck

I do kind of wish it was actual nominations. Nominate a candidate then they have to accept the nomination if they wish to run.

Simon André Forsberg

Agreed

Mast

10:57 AM

Agreed.

I was also under the impression it would work like that.

If it would have, we would've had at least 15 candidates by now.

Simon André Forsberg

@Mast perhaps that is the reason why it doesn't work like that :)

2

Mast

I was thinking the same thing the moment I wrote it down.

RubberDuck

Well, that makes ten. I'm predicting the first beta primary in the history of SE.

Mast

@RubberDuck You'll need >10 for that.

RubberDuck

@Mast right. I'm thinking we'll get at least one more candidate. At least, I'm hoping.

There's still someone missing....

Mast

11:09 AM

@RubberDuck You 'nominated' Heslacher, any idea if he'll accept or not? I haven't heard him about the elections IIRC

Simon André Forsberg

any reason why it's not possible to upvote the comments on the nominations? (@Pops?)

Vogel612

@Mast he's lurking in the 2nd monitor.

probably still thinking.

RubberDuck

@Mast no clue at all. He got the ping. Hopefully he considers it. I think he'd be a great mod. Quiet.. unobtrusive, but he does a great deal of moderation here already. I just don't think anyone notices.

Which is exactly how a mod should be IMO.

Mast

We currently have three moderators. One with lightning fast reflexes, one always available in chat with a load of experience and a quiet one doing very much hard work in the background (generalized, a lot).

You want Heslacher for the 3rd role, don't you?

RubberDuck

More or less, yes.

Simon André Forsberg

11:19 AM

@Mast Who's who?

Jamal with reflexes, rolfl in chat, and 200 in the background?

Mast

Not?

Mat's Mug

@SimonAndréForsberg so, you're in? :D

race you to mod seat

3

Oooh nice!! Both @SimonAndréForsberg and @RubberDuck are in!

Vogel612

okay so we got 10 nominees now.

200 is not in yet from what I see

Mat's Mug

Any more than that and we'll have a preliminary round!

Vogel612

this definitely looks like there will be a preliminary

Simon André Forsberg

11:31 AM

@Mat'sMug ~~No, I just accidentally wrote up a nomination and misclicked on "Save edits"~~ ;)

4

Mat's Mug

11:49 AM

This is awesome :-)

2

nhgrif

12:07 PM

So, @RubberDuck, you're the only candidate (and site member for that matter) who joined after me but also has more rep than me.

RubberDuck

Really?

What about Heslacher? Could have sworn he came around after me.

Maybe he only got active after I did.

nhgrif

But does he have more rep than you?

Oh yeah, just barely

He joined 7 months before you.

And I joined 2 months before you.

RubberDuck

Oh. Okay. Maybe I just wasn't paying attention.

Mat's Mug

7 months ...a blink of an eye

nhgrif

0

Q: Layered Neural Network in Swift

I am designing a very basic layered neural network in Swift as an exercise. I currently got the network evaluating the response for a given stimulus by propagating the stimulus forwards through the layers and collecting the response at the output layer, which is assumed to be a single neuron. ...

oops

RubberDuck

12:11 PM

Wrong room?

nhgrif

yea

Mat's Mug

@nhgrif it's ok, ~~we'll hold it against you~~

RubberDuck

It's hard to not star everything.

4

Dan Pantry

Any vimmers here?

monking

wait. this isn't the 2nd monitor...

2

nhgrif

This is The 1st Monitor.

4

Donald.McLean

12:43 PM

We're up to 10 nominations.

RubberDuck

Yup. We'll miss @rolfl, but I'm confident he's leaving things in good hands.

rolfl

thanks, and that^^^ and I won't be going far.

Monking all.

RubberDuck

Eh. I know, but you know what I meant.

Simon André Forsberg

12:57 PM

@Donald.McLean now we just need you and then we can have preliminaries

Malachi

I am still the oldest person running for moderator ..... (in terms of join date)

Simon has me on Rep and Moderation Badges, I wonder which Moderation badges I am missing....., Marshal is probably one of them.

Ethan Bierlein

Morning!

Malachi

1:13 PM

monking

Mat's Mug

Monking!

Ethan Bierlein

Monking!

Malachi

@Jamal ▲▲▲

my record on Spam flags in 80% and the other was Eric Lipperts Post that one time. so I think we can say that was my freebie, Right?

I have a few Declined and Disputed flags there at the top, but I think we can write that off to me being new, back in the day. but I am also at 80% Helpful with them as well.

Mat's Mug

1:41 PM

I have 1 declined moderator attention flag

Malachi

@Mat'sMug shut up....

lol

Donald.McLean

@SimonAndréForsberg There are already more reasonably good candidates than I can vote for.

Mat's Mug

...was my very first flag actually

I need to flag more

RubberDuck

2:09 PM

I've got a few declined flags. Mostly comments I thought were obsolete, but weren't I guess.

Mat's Mug

2:19 PM

Got 4 of those

rolfl

2:32 PM

Comment flags are real fluff... I regularly decline things that are flagged "wrong", and delete things anyway ;0 Like, why flag something as "not constructive" when it is "obsolete".

I do that with post flags too... most commonly with mod-attention flags like: "I have included the code in the question now, please reopen." ....

decline the flag, reopen anyway ;0

2

Mat's Mug

2:45 PM

picks up jaw on the floor

@rolfl your guest has arrived in the 2nd monitor

nhgrif

@rolfl Hmm, perhaps if you're going to do this, there should be clarification on the meta as to which type of flag to use with which type of comment. It's not always clear. What sort of flag should be used with "Thanks" comments?

rolfl

too chatty

Malachi

@rolfl thought you were talking about me behind my back there for a second, then realized you were answering @nhgrif

nhgrif

@rolfl So if it were flagged as "not constructive", you'd decline the flag? If it were flagged as obsolete (the person that was thanked recognized it already), you'd decline the flag?

rolfl

3:07 PM

"not constructive" is the one that I most often decline. The others are more fuzzy.

Not constructuve has a sentiment behind it that is "this user is being an ass".

nhgrif

I thought that's what "rude/offensive" was for?

rolfl

If I disagree with that, that the user is not being an ass, then I decline the flag

Malachi

@nhgrif that carries more weight

nhgrif

I certainly don't think anyone is being an ass when I use the not constructive flag. I've never used that flag with that in mind.

rolfl

@nhgrif And, how many of your not-constructive flags have been declined.

If the comment is not constructive, then I "helpful" the flag.

if the comment is obsolete, or too chatty, but someone flagged it as "not constructive", then I decline.

All I am saying, is use the right flags for the right purpose.

3

You seem to have been doing fine ;0

Malachi

3:10 PM

@rolfl what about me? ;)

Hosch250

@Mast AFAIK, we only get three votes, even though there are four positions.

Mast

@Hosch250 Oh, yea, probably.

I forgot.

How could I forget that...

Hosch250

I don't know if we can vote for ourselves.

Vogel612

@Hosch250 that's not quite correct

the voting system is Meek STV

Mast

@Hosch250 One shouldn't be allowed, but hey...

Malachi

3:12 PM

@Hosch250 no you can't.

Vogel612

STV -> Single Transferrable Vote

so you get one vote and that can be transferred around :)

Mast

@Vogel612 Yea, it works with first choice, second choice and third choice.

Malachi

you get 3 choices

Mast

But it's still one vote.

Malachi

is there a post about whether they are going to give up 4 choices now because of there being 4 spots open?

Vogel612

3:13 PM

@Malachi I think the system doesn't work that way

Hosch250

I'm 99% sure they won't, because I'm sure I've seen another election with 4/5 candidates and 3 votes.

rolfl

@nhgrif - you have one delcined comment flag - it was a "other" flag - for mod attention.

(I declined it a while ago).

Hosch250

I have a couple.

Should we nominate Donald McLean?

Malachi

I think that @Donald.McLean should nominate himself, he is a moderator on other sites that may deter him from being a mod here as well, time stuff you know.

Mast

@Malachi I don't think that's the problem in this case.

I asked him why he wasn't running.

His reply was he lost his shoes.

4

rolfl

3:18 PM

Well, that is logical

Donald.McLean

When I work from home, I generally just wear slippers.

Mast

in The 2nd Monitor, 23 hours ago, by Donald.McLean

@Mast Ok, then. I'm not going to run because I'm not wearing any shoes.

Malachi

oh I get it now

Hosch250

Oh, you don't need shoes, you just need a mod hat and a diamond.

Mast

@Hosch250 Thats after the election, not during the running part.

Hosch250

3:20 PM

OK.

I'm running barefoot, if anybody is interested.

Donald.McLean

In truth, it seems like we already have a perfectly adequate slate of candidates.

Mast

They're aiming for preliminaries.

rolfl

No, not just because preliminaries...

Hosch250

I hope Heslacher runs.

And mjolka.

rolfl

Aiming for the best field of mod candidates, and this site is capable of doing that.

Hosch250

3:32 PM

0

A: 2015 Community Moderator Election - Nomination Requests

I think mjolka would be a good candidate. From my experience, he is helpful and friendly, and he lives on the other side of the world, so we could have a moderator around at 3:00 AM in the morning (CST/CDT).

rolfl

→ 6 messages moved to CRap

Hosch250

LOL.

Vogel612

@rolfl wat,,,

nhgrif

Where is the post for questions to ask the moderators?

Hosch250

3:47 PM

20

Q: 2015 Moderator Election Q&A - Question Collection

In connection with the moderator elections, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here's how it'll work: During the nominati...

discussion featured election

Pops

@SimonAndréForsberg I don't remember the details, but I think they were disabled one or two Stack Overflow elections ago. Not because voting was bad, but because there was some issue with flagging, and disabling one meant disabling the other.

Malachi

0

A: 2015 Community Moderator Election - Nomination Requests

I think that @JeroenVannevel would be a good Moderator as well. he has more than once been there to help me understand coding aspects and also had the patience to explain things to me through chat.

Vogel612

@Pops probably because both are the same db table and accordingly the same API call...

or some other reason like that

anyways I'm out for today, have fun :D

Hosch250

@nhgrif You just pinged me there, not Quill.

While I agree with the nomination request, I think @Duga is pretty irrelevant to the conversation. Obviously, Duga works whether or not Simon is a mod. — nhgrif 38 secs ago

nhgrif

Okay.

rolfl

4:28 PM

@Pops - are you aware of if anyone has ever complained about the layout of the election nomination page?

I think the comments are "outdented" instead of indented.

For example, we have:

But we should have:

it makes it hard to tell what the nomination post is vs. the comments, and it reverses the significance of them

Pops

Not off the top of my head. I'd search on Meta SE and post there if you don't find anything.

rolfl

I did search meta.se ... (should have said that), but these things often crop up on site-specific metas too ....

nhgrif

@rolfl That might be intentional?

(reversing the significance)

rolfl

I will post a meta.se anyway.

nhgrif

> Comments are active during the length of the nomination phase – please comment freely, particularly if there is any way a nominee introduction can be improved or refined to be more clear.

rolfl

4:32 PM

It's odd because comments on regular site posts are "indented".

Pops

My first thought was "that's a weird design but not necessarily wrong" but then I decided (without reading rolfl's logic) that it did look wrong, for the reasons rolfl said.

rolfl

back in 2011 it was "right"

1

A: Why are "history" and "add comment" spaced so far apart on the /election page?

My apologies for original response That being said, It appears to be the difference of the parent table that used to hold the vote column. With that being absent (but presumably brought back during the second stage) things should align. But for now, the mismatch amount looks to be a <td class="v...

(that's a meta post for a different thing).

rolfl

4:45 PM

0

Q: Comments on election nominations are out-dented, not indented

In a site election page, there are nominations, and there can be comments on the nominations. The comments on these nominations are "outdented" instead of indented. In searching meta.se for a duplicate (which I could not find), I found this other post about comments on nominations: Why are “hist...

bug design election-page

Mat's Mug

5:23 PM

seen this one?

codereview.stackexchange.com/election/1#post-95252

Jamal

I think many (popular) elections will attract some... interesting nominations. Unless someone withdraws, we'll be going to the primary phase.

Marc-Andre

It looks like the indentation is created by the space taken for voting and flagging.

Malachi

@Mat'sMug wow

Ethan Bierlein

@Mat'sMug Methinks it's a joke.

Mat's Mug

mehopes it's a joke...

Ethan Bierlein

5:38 PM

Me too

Oh man, you should see the comment that guy left on his nomination.

rolfl

Once there are more than 30 nominations, the low-scoring rep ones drop out... ;-)

Ethan Bierlein

Ah. Automatically, or they just do it?

Hosch250

> @Malachi, I'm not entirely sure. – TessellatingHeckler 1 min ago

Automatically.

They only let 30 continue to the primary.

Ethan Bierlein

Oh, yikes.

Hosch250

I rather doubt we'll get that far, though.

Ethan Bierlein

5:48 PM

Which means I'd be second to go after Quill.

Hosch250

At least I'm on the first page.

Ethan Bierlein

There's only one page.

Hosch250

Not quite #30, but getting close.

I mean, total users sorted by rep.

Ethan Bierlein

About 1/3 of the way. Yikes.

And wow.

Mat's Mug

Would you trust "the 2nd highest contributor" to really be hands-off?

@Hosch250 I believe it's by candidate score, not by rep

Oh nm I missed a part of the conversation

Hosch250

5:51 PM

I hope to have the gold flag badge and 9k before we end.

Ethan Bierlein

I hope to have either 4K or 5K reputation before the end.

Hosch250

It should be easy to get 9k before we end here - just about 150 away.

RubberDuck

6:09 PM

> I am terribly estatic to see a member of "the silent majority" running! You have a reasonable amount of reputation elsewhere on SE, but haven't been very active here. What I would like to know is, what makes you believe that you know enough about our community to moderate it? We're quite a bit different from sites like SO and Serverfault. – RubberDuck 35 secs ago

Jamal

No reviews or Meta activity, though.

Ethan Bierlein

And none of the badges.

I wish we could upvote comments on nominations.

RubberDuck

I might be baiting a bit. I'm genuinely curious about this user. Could provide some valuable insight from the silent majority.

nhgrif

> This post is a bit confusing and not quite clear to me. If you're elected a moderator, can we count on your meta posts, chat messages, and other interactions with the community to be this muddled and unclear?

Ethan Bierlein

That ^^

Jamal

6:29 PM

It was just withdrawn.

Ethan Bierlein

Yup.

Jamal

So, no primary so far.

Ethan Bierlein

Bah.

RubberDuck

So, one thing that concerns me, should y'all vote me in, is that moderators don't vote, they decide. That'll be quite an adjustment for me.

Any thoughts on the topic from the other nominees?

nhgrif

I think that explains everything I wrote in my nomination, right?

RubberDuck

6:31 PM

Awww. No primary... Yet.

Ethan Bierlein

@RubberDuck I don't think it'll be too much of a change for me. I think it'll just be odd for a couple of days where changes are applied instantly, rather than waiting for them.

Hosch250

I'm still hoping mjolka and Heslacher run.

Yes, it will be an adjustment. But, I think I can do it.

Mat's Mug

@RubberDuck save that for the Q&A session :)

RubberDuck

Eh, it's not really a question yet. I was just wondering if anyone else felt the same.

Like, I just used a custom close reason, I don't think I would have done that if it was binding.

I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is not requesting a code review, but is instead asking for an explanation of behavior. While it is an interesting question, I don't believe it is in scope as defined in the help center. — RubberDuck 6 mins ago

Mat's Mug

for close votes, IMO mods should be last to vote. Single-handledly mod-closing should be seldom, in low-activity times.

> power to the community

2

nhgrif

6:37 PM

Which, again, the sentiment I (attempted) to express exactly in my nomination post.

RubberDuck

I agree. It would just be an adjustment.

Okay, now it's a question for the Q&A

Brb

Ethan Bierlein

Hmm, what happens during primaries?

nhgrif

I downvote everyone.

3

Looks like that 11th guy withdrew?

Hosch250

We vote on each other's posts.

Ethan Bierlein

@nhgrif Harsh

Hosch250

6:41 PM

Yeah.

@nhgrif Just watch out, or everyone might downvote you.

Here you go, @RubberDuck:

1

A: 2015 Moderator Election Q&A - Question Collection

Moderators don't vote. They decide. Making binding decisions instead of voting will be a paradigm shift for nearly all of the nominees. How to you plan on making this adjustment?

Simon André Forsberg

7:06 PM

@Pops disabling one meant disabling the other, it sounds like your system is a bit too tightly coupled. You know there's a site these days where you can get your code reviewed and improved, right?

6

@Mat'sMug @RubberDuck Who was the 11th guy?

rolfl

TessellatingHeckler

311 8

python algorithm beginner chess file machine-learning python-2.7

janos

Thanks @Simon !

monking btw :)

rolfl

Hey janos ;-) Monking!

Is there a way to determine whether a nomination was self-removed or CM removed?

Mat's Mug

hey @janos! are you our 11th candidate? :)

janos

if I can finish writing it on time, I might be ;-)

Ethan Bierlein

7:21 PM

@janos Wow, it's taking you a long time to write it.

There is a pretty strict character limit though.

janos

I like the length limit. I find that a really great idea

Ethan Bierlein

brb

RubberDuck

@rolfl Any chance you could add elections as a feed here? I think it could be useful.

rolfl

Let me look in to it

rolfl

8:37 PM

I can't find a feed for it.

janos

aaaaand I'm the 11th

5

Malachi

and @janos is the only person running for mod that is older than me (join date wise)

@Jamal and I are the only ones with the Copy Editor Badge that are running. I think that makes him and I the only one with all the noteworthy badges....

rolfl

8:52 PM

@Malachi Interesting, no new Copy Editors since last July, almost a year.....

I wonder if that is a Jamalification-effect?

Malachi

could be, he has a ridiculous number of edits.

@200 trails him by 10k edits, all time

Mat's Mug

@rolfl http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/feeds/tag?tagnames=election&sort=newes‌t

Feeds

rolfl has made a change to the feeds posted into this room

rolfl

No real idea of what that will give, but I don't believe that will add the nomination posts.

Mat's Mug

it won't, it's a questions feed

janos

8:59 PM

@Vogel612

1

A: 2015 Community Moderator Election - Nomination Requests

@Vogel612 Vogel612 knows the SE network very well, and has a very good sense to guide off-topic posts to the right places. This should come handy when we start getting more traffic (which we surely will). He's a great reviewer too, and taught me quite a few new tricks. Over the year or so that I...

I'm exhausted

rolfl

Introspection is tough

You can save a few characters by removing "itself".

Oh, that's your vogel-nom, not your nomination....

janos

I'll try to write for @Gareth, @Flambino @Palacsint (yes!) tomorrow

and @skiwi .... ok I could go about this on and on....

Stack Exchange

16

Q: 2015 Community Moderator Election

The 2015 Community Moderator Election is now underway! Community moderator elections have three phases: Nomination phase Primary phase Election phase Most elections take between two and three weeks, but this depends on how many candidates there are. Please visit the official election page a...

discussion moderators election

23

Q: 2015 Moderator Election Q&A - Question Collection

In connection with the moderator elections, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here's how it'll work: During the nominati...

discussion featured election

13

Q: 2015 Community Moderator Election - Nomination Requests

In the light of the currently running nomination phase of the 2015 Community Moderator Election, I want to add this question as a place for the community to nudge candidates on the edge into actually nominating themselves. This seems to be customary around the network: Some sites like to hos...

discussion election

Mat's Mug

I gotta say I'm pretty proud of the community we've built. 11 nominees in 24 hours... we're awesome!

3

janos

it feels really weird to not be able to vote on anything on the nomination page

rolfl

9:06 PM

it is worst that we have to be patient.... we have to wait a week!!!! ????

Mat's Mug

^^^

nhgrif

@rolfl Once you give your two week notice, time passes much more slowly, eh?

2

rolfl

No kidding.,.... I am in limbo... I don't know how to respond to some things.... I have to stay away from saying good things, or bad things about anyone, etc.

Also, I am very aware that any mess I make now will have to be cleaned by others... I've got to be careful ;-)

Mast

Was somebodies nomination retracted?

I'm missing a candidate.

Simon André Forsberg

@janos agreed, I wish we could upvote comments

5

2 hours ago, by rolfl

TessellatingHeckler

311 8

python algorithm beginner chess file machine-learning python-2.7

Mast

9:17 PM

@SimonAndréForsberg Yes, that guy.

He never answered my question...

Did he retract voluntarily?

Mat's Mug

@nobody knows

Hosch250

9:37 PM

@Janos IIRC, Vogel already declined.

Vogel612

9:56 PM

@Hosch250 I'd say tentatively declined :/

Around this month is probably either the worst or the best time for me personally for the elections to happen....

But it feels really good to see such a strong nudge from this community

2

Anyways I'll grab some desperately needed sleep, niters

Stack Exchange

10:33 PM

0

Q: How do election primaries work?

As of right now, there are 11 moderator candidates. If there are more than 10, a primary is held, but what is a primary? How does it work? Is it basically the same as the election itself, but instead of selecting our 4 moderators, we select X number of candidates to move on? How many candidates g...

support election

rolfl

10:47 PM

@Pops - as an FYI, the election-phase sidebar says: Each community member has 3 votes. Please cast your votes in order of preference, starting with the most desirable candidate first. .... which is sort of Exactly wrong ... members have exactly 1 vote, and it is transferable, which is why it is called STV - single-transferable-vote.... That wording needs some attention.

4

Simon André Forsberg

@rolfl What people doesn't know doesn't hurt them?

rolfl

Well, sort of, but the STV for most SE folk is complicated enough, and misinformation like that is not helpful

Having serious net lag at the moment... time for dinner!

RubberDuck

...idk. It's kind of "tell me like I'm 5" isn't it?

rolfl

> We use the Single Transferable Vote system.... first, you get 3 votes .....

5

RubberDuck