« first day (8 days earlier)      last day (3033 days later) » 

01:43
@chrisaycock Here you go. The noob factor has certainly increased. Wonder if the VBA+Excel guys will be next after the IB crowd...
 
3 hours later…
04:23
@DirkEddelbuettel VBA/Excel? Isn't that your specialty?
@Shane How did you know? With all my Ruby/Javascript covers...
I can't get my head around Quora either. But then again I don't why I help Spolsky build something he will one day sell for a handy sum...
 
2 hours later…
06:18
@DirkEddelbuettel Well, is a web developer helping Google increase its share price? I guess what we're aiming to do is create a discussion for actual quants. We've had enough false starts with Wilmott, Nuclear Phynance, EliteTrader, etc. The only thing that comes close is QuantNet, though that's aimed more at MFE students than working professionals. This is finally a chance at our thing.
Quora is interesting since I can ping someone to answer a question. I got one of the guys from Marketcetera to answer my question about his business model.
I also managed to answer a question about Y Combinator that a YC partner up-voted, which I thought was cool.
But I'm on several sites anyway, including Hacker New and Quantly (from my old boss), so I don't feel like I'm exclusive to just Spolsky.
 
15 hours later…
21:33
I think between "TheBridge", "quant_dev" and "user40" we have a number of dodgy questions and answers. Or am I too picky?
22:06
@DirkEddelbuettel No, you're right. Vote to close and comment on them.
I wish there were a throttle for users who post three or four questions in a row.
I like whoever asked Shane to leave the board alone. :)
@JoshuaUlrich Which one was that?
2
Q: What are the tools fund managers use most?

user40By tools I mean both software and statistical/mathematical tools to help them do their job.

Ah, right.
22:13
I'll follow up in due course with 'Why is the sky blue'.
While Quant.SE is still in its infancy, Shane has been one of the driving forces to define this site. I think we should cut him some slack.
@DirkEddelbuettel Oh, I'll post, "What's a profitable model I can use?"
I was being sarcastic. I agree with Shane's vision for the site.
@JoshuaUlrich Ah, ok. That user (ChloeRadshaw) was the one who posted the question about how banks make money on mortgages. I wish there were a "block all posts from this user" button.
@chrisaycock Yes and all of their questions had been closed, which is why I find it funny that they ask Shane to "leave the board alone".
Wow. Didn't see that one.
Just posted a comment response.
22:20
Drama, I love it!
It's interesting, I'm developing a slightly bad reputation here. Someone maligned me on meta before. Basically, I don't want to allow bad questions. Sue me.
Did the other forums (NP, Wilmott) ever try to get rid of the beginners? How can we avoid turning into those places?
By closing bad questions and telling people these questions aren't on-topic. That's why CrossValidated works.
I don't think that NP/Wilmott do a good job there; there isn't really a mechanism for it.
@Shane Did you have similar growing pains with CV?
How was CrossValidated in its infancy? Did it have a swath of "what's the difference between median and mean?" questions?
22:23
For sure. Lots of stupid/general questions.
This will calm down here as we keep plugging away.
The key is to get a few moderators on the site who have a similar vision.
int rand(void) { return 3; } // why doesn't this work?
2
A little XKCD humour?
Well spotted sir.
@DirkEddelbuettel Because only even numbers are random...
That was impressive.
22:24
I do recall recall an econometrics textbook defining an estimator in the intro as 'always return 42'
I'll give it the first ceremonious star. Like a boss.
Which is awesome. Totally consistent estimator. Unfortinately a tad biased.
Ok; hitting the subway. Talk to you chaps later.
Dirk and Shane, did you guys know each other before from CV and SO? You're the top R users, from what I recall.
I think that we were introduced through SO, actually.
22:26
I will not admit it in public, but yes, I do (virtually) know this man.
Well put, Dirk.
I formed some good connections through CV as well. I'm hoping the same will happen here.
Only time will tell, but we're off to a reasonable start.
Cool.
I'm hoping the same with Quantly. My old boss started that as a "Hacker News for quants" (mostly quant traders in practice). That hasn't been hit with too much beginner cruft, fortunately.
I'll try to think of some answerable, non-MBS questions. I'd like to contribute more.
I look forward to that.
22:31
Don't set your hopes for me too high; you'll likely be disappointed. ;-)
Well, the one question I asked was all set to get a Tumbleweed until I offered a bounty.
ouch, that's unfortunate
@chrisaycock Because it was friggin hard !
I didn't expect a full proof (especially since I didn't give a rigorous definition of what a meta model is), but I thought at least somebody could give some intuition.
I don't know your backgrounds (I'm assuming statistics), but my academic field was founded because of a question about decidability.
In mathematics, the ' (, German for 'decision problem') is a challenge posed by David Hilbert in 1928. The asks for an algorithm that will take as input a description of a formal language and a mathematical statement in the language and produce as output either "True" or "False" according to whether the statement is true or false. The algorithm need not justify its answer, nor provide a proof, so long as it is always correct. Such an algorithm would be able to decide, for example, whether statements such as Goldbach's conjecture or the Riemann hypothesis are true, even though no proof or d...
My background is in economics.
22:40
We are pretenders. Oh, wait, Shane, like a boss, is a real engineer.
I see.
Dirk's a real pretender. I only pretend to pretend.
If you're on LinkedIn, the sort-of minimal bio is there for me too.
I had to get off LinkedIn since I was getting hounded by head hunters.
I was like the hot girl at the bar, apparently.
That's the only reason we're talking to you here too.
22:47
I knew it!
23:08
@chrisaycock can I buy you a beer? ;-)

« first day (8 days earlier)      last day (3033 days later) »