No really though, joke aside, that isn't correct at all. Look, I can't comment on the "Bengali" language in India, but I sure can comment on the "Bengali" language in Bangladesh! We went to war for this language, ...
Btw, as we are talking here, a Japanese person corrected someone I said in Japanese. Not on SE, on a Japanese forum
What she had problem with was something I said about Japanese linguistics
But the thing is I have almost 100% confidence in what I said. Yeah, she is a native speaker, but she doesn't seem to know how to Wiki... Just find that really funny
Yeah, so basically "Bangal or Eastern Bengali is the vernacular of Bangladesh and also the Indian state of Tripura. It is considered dialectal; Western Bengali, the language spoken in the Indian state of West Bengal, is considered standard." is incorrect. And that is because, both of the main forms of the language are used in both India and Bangladesh. Bangladeshi people use the "standard" form (called the "running language") every single day ...
The Bangladeshi version therefore isn't non-standard.
@EddieKal The genocide was the tipping point ... But it all started in 1948 with the Bengali language movement ...
> In 1948, Governor-General Muhammad Ali Jinnah declared that "Urdu, and only Urdu" would be the federal language of Pakistan. However, Urdu was historically prevalent only in the north, central, and western region of the subcontinent; whereas in East Bengal, the native language was Bengali, ... The government stand was widely viewed as an attempt to suppress the culture of the eastern wing.
It all starts with the suppression of language ...
The genocide of 1971, called Operation Searchlight, was a very strategic, smart, and brutal operation. It was devised by the best military minds back then.
> It pursued the systematic elimination of nationalist Bengali civilians, students, intelligentsia, religious minorities and armed personnel.
It targeted the biggest source of our knowledge - the University of Dhaka - where they hunted down all intellectuals - mainly scholars.
The effects of that operation still lingers to this day ... Bangladesh would have been far more advanced in the field of education, economic development, and income if the main "brains" were not eliminated ...
> In 1947, in line with the Partition of India, Bengal was partitioned between the Hindu majority west and Muslim majority East. East Bengal became part of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan while West Bengal became part of the Republic of India.
Back then a lot of newly independent countries looked to Russia as an example and leader
Ataturk basically slaughtered the Turkish language, changing the writing system, abandoning tons of words with Arabic roots because Russia had done it (can't remember where, a Muslim majority region/country)
@EddieKal When I was in school, they never taught us about our own fucking history ... but who discovered which region in the west was so much important ...
Okay, so there was a recent basketball game between the Golden State Warriors (GSW) and the Los Angeles Clippers, where GSW — the underdog — came back from a 22-point deficit to beat the Clippers by 10 points. Around the last minute of the game, Steph Curry hit a three-pointer over one of the sta...
I think it means when you go to the drive thru at McDonald's and buy a bagged meal, with fries; some of the fries fall out and end up at the bottom of the bag. After you've finished the meal, and still feel hungry; you are so happy to find those few fries at the bottom.
> Steph Curry ... In his bag — deep — like the fries are at the bottom.
In his bag of tricks, down deep. There is, like the fries at the bottom of the bag, a joyful finding.
@EddieKal Wait actually that had to do with the type of school I went to ... My school was under the UK board ... so basically, the curriculum was in English ... And that is why History was for some reason based on land discovery ... very weird ... I would have even loved to read about WWI and WWII ... none of that stuff ...
So I was really curious about this question, but didn't think it would make much sense when framed as a question.
And I believe there are many questions like this around here.
I was confused about the position of the adverb 'only'.
Are these sentences correct and meaningful like the original question: "There was only standing room in the court." OR "There was standing room in the court only"?
@DhanishthaGhosh Generally, the placement of an adverb indeed has a high degree of latitude.
You can move it around a bit. But it also depends on the semantics--the meaning of the sentence.
So in this case, "There was only standing room in the court." "There was standing room only in the court." "There was standing room in the court only." all mean the same thing, but I would be careful with the last one.
Take for example another sentence, "There was only standing room in that room." If you say ""There was standing room in that room only." the meaning changes.
This is why it is so hard for AI to achieve full human comprehension.
@DhanishthaGhosh Chomsky is an interesting character. He has been political vocal as well. If you are interested, you can look him up on YouTube and watch his talks and interviews on global politics and democracy.