« first day (1786 days earlier)      last day (1749 days later) » 

00:34
@AIQ Are you composing a haiku? o.o
AIQ
AIQ
00:55
@M.A.R. lol
no
I am helping everyone
by not requiring their eyes to travel a long distance from left to right
 
2 hours later…
03:13
> That study found that when participants were shown repeating elements in a sequence, such as A-B-C-B, etc., they were automatically sensitive to certain patterns without being explicitly aware that the patterns existed.
03:28
@M.A.R. No the French didn't ban masks. That's a ban on "Islamic" face veils. Gotta love the French for leading the world in "feminist" social changes.
 
3 hours later…
06:51
@EddieKal I knew about that one
Haha yeah, we're forcing you to be free!
AIQ
AIQ
07:29
Oh, so I commented "Are you looking for answers only from native speakers? If yes, why?" -> ell.stackexchange.com/q/246394/77766
And they replied "anyone with good knowledge can answer of course. Natives usually tell what their usual way of speaking is, rather than taking help from books."
hmmm ...
 
1 hour later…
08:51
@AIQ it's a special badge you get, not redeemable and not awarded after birth. Sorry, you're not part of the club.
@AIQ well I literally have to pause for a couple of seconds to get to your next line
AIQ
AIQ
@M.A.R. I take it you are not a fan of two-column journal articles? hmm ... me neither ... but I want to try this
here
AIQ
AIQ
09:12
@M.A.R. Oh no, you have ruined my day ... how could you be so cold ...
AIQ
AIQ
10:10
omg ... one user is repeatedly asking the same kind of questions (which is correct and why) despite some of us suggesting that they add details/research ...
 
2 hours later…
12:00
@AIQ until people stop feeding the bears, this will be a problem.
61
Q: DO NOT FEED THE BEARS

J.R.A question was just asked on ELL, and it needs a lot of work. Here's a screen shot. There are two problems with this question: first, the way the initial question was asked; second, the way a follow-on question was asked in a comment. Error Identification I'll start by addressing the...

If they get their questions answered, why would they change their behavior?
If people feel sorry for them and won’t downvote their questions when they’re low quality, they won’t get throttled
AIQ
AIQ
@ColleenV I know. I am honestly a bit frustrated. We have all these questions in the election about what we would do as mods if a user consistently keeps asking low-quality questions. A very important question is, What are we going to do about established users who persist in answering these low-quality questions.
You suspend them
for repeated low quality contributions
Asking questions here is a privilege, not a right
and I know some people think I’m an asshole, but the site will be buried in garbage if someone doesn’t play the bad guy
and then fewer people get helped
AIQ
AIQ
I will ask a question in Meta about this. I don't like the fact that I keep posting these comments and then someone keeps answering the questions - where does that leave me - a villain
No, you are a guardian of the site
Being nice to people taking advantage of you is not a virtue
Well, letting them have their way
We can be nice even when we’re pushing back
12:35
Word of the day: mouthbrooding parasite
13:05
@AIQ You're just making my eyes go to the next line more frequently, thus pausing my train of thought / reading more often. The overall time stays the same, but my internal reset timer is invoked more often...
I suppose it's more about being used to seeing lines of particular length. It doesn't help that other users don't shorten their lines in the same fashion.
I'd have to look at that paper again, but I'd say carriage returns and line feeds hinder comprehension more than remaining in the same line for as long as possible.
My browser window isn't that wide that I have to turn my head all the way from right to left and vice versa as though I'm watching a game of tennis, and if it were I'd halve it naturally. On my phone all of the text is basically constrained to a small area so no one has any issues with that.
So, yeah, not even marginally butter (thanks, GM Finegold).
AIQ
AIQ
13:23
It was a joke userr - that is, when I gave that reason - of course I had read some discussion on it - but that is not why I broke them up ..
The only way you could actually try to help is by writing boustrophedonically, and I'm sure everyone would appreciate the effort and the opportunity.
The problem with journals is they use this incredibly small font, so it only makes sense to do this. I.e., reading actual newspapers/journals feels like watching a tennis match.
13:39
@AIQ Yeah, I know why you did it, you forgot you weren't conventionally texting your buddies. It's fine. Note how texting apps already have these bubbles, effectively constraining all text to a tiny column to whose width everyone's eyes are accustomed to.
 
3 hours later…
16:57
Hello there.
What is the thing behind "Reinstate Monica "?
I just noticed Fumble and StonyB added that expression to their names on ell.
What idea does that stand for?
17:10
@Cardinal meta.stackexchange.com/a/334417 TL;DR: They fired a mod on a whim and didn't rehire them.
Well, "fired", as in, revoked their privileges. The mod in question hadn't been receiving any money or anything, they were just a mod.
Anonymous
@Cardinal It's complicated, but it's essentially over. Monica reached an agreement with Stack Exchange.
Anonymous
And even if I wanted to, I couldn't really answer the question because not all of the relevant information was ever made public.
Anonymous
But it caused a lot of drama and a lot of users left the site, changed their names, or started behaving adversarially toward Stack Exchange out of solidarity.
@snailcar I leave the site and change my name all the time, even without Monica, LOL.
Anonymous
Unfortunately for the community here, that means we lost a number of invaluable users.
Anonymous
17:19
Well, I'm glad to have you back, Blue Square :-)
AIQ
AIQ
snailcar, you will get your mods in 3 days ...
17:52
@snailcar Whatever info might be missing, what is true is that they hadn't warned them beforehand. It's clear to anyone with a brain that's a wrong way of going about making such a decision, regardless of its justifiability both in the scheme of things (concerning that user's history of behavior), and in that particular instance.
Anonymous
18:13
@AIQ I wasn't just talking about our mods, but users like StoneyB and Araucaria as well.
ell.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5195/… What do you think of this? I think there isn't a good duplicate target because this depends largely on the verb: primarily the one which takes an infinitive or an -ing form, and secondly on the verb that can be "cast" into either of these forms.
Anonymous
@userr2684291 SE definitely messed up, no argument on that. I can't discuss the topic meaningfully, though, since I can't say what I'd need to say, so there's not much point in me typing anything beyond that.
@snailcar Yes, reading the publicly available information already shows me that SE messed up big time.
Not to change the subject, but, well actually that’s exactly what I’m going to do... I see a suggested edit for the comparative tag. Shouldn’t we make that plural for consistency?
We have comparative-constructions as well, are they synonyms?
@ColleenV Do you mean make it comparatives because there is a superlatives tag?
Now there is a superlative tag but with 0 questions.
Maybe you wanna delete that tag?
18:28
No, there was a discussion a while back where we agreed tags should be plural, ie determiners, not determiner
let me see if I can find it
Yup, which is why I said maybe we should delete the superlative tag and just use the superlatives tag.
16
Q: Should we prefer plural in tags?

ЯegDwightEarlier today I tried to tag a question "nouns", and the system wouldn't let me, saying that the tag noun already existed. Just a minute ago, I wanted to tag another question "adjectives", same problem: adjective already exists. I am used to the plural form from other SE sites — ELU, GLU, and L...

@Jasper It may already by synonymized
a lot of singular tags look like they exist, but they just point to the plural
9
Q: Singular tags to pluralize

chosterPer Should we prefer plural in tags?, for consistency with EL&U and other StackExchange sites, I believe the consensus was to use plural tag names for countables. In practice, we have something of a mishmash of singular and plural forms, particularly for terminology related to punctuation, senten...

Maybe it’s time to review that again
@ColleenV Oh I see. I never cared about tags on SE. I only talked about it to have a conversation with you since you mentioned it. =)
Click on “determiner” in that list and it takes you to “determiners”
@Jasper Thank you, it’s nice to not feel like I’m talking to an empty room :)
By the way, I saw Monica's youtube video where she sang a song! Did you guys hear her singing?
That is Monica singing @ColleenV !
 
2 hours later…
20:10
0
Q: Unjustified downvoting even on a question earning three badges, notable question, nice question & popular question

Sandip Kumar MandalI post questions and give answers on ELL & ELU. But serial downvoting on some good questions is really disappointing. A moderator should downvote a question or an answer which, he thinks, is not upto the mark. But, at the same time, he should give comments on what's wrong with that question or an...

20:28
"I do request to the authorities concerned to look into the matter so that learning is achieved in a joyful way." Aw. In a joyful way... Ah... : ) Yes, please look into this kerfuffle, and right those wrongs!
20:49
@Jasper Lol.
@ColleenV Just make it consistent if you can; doesn't matter if you're using a plural or singular form. Also, the two tags (comparatives and comparative-constructions) should be preserved: the former would be more about single words, even though I'd close all such questions as unresearched without even looking at them, and the latter would be about those tricky constructions involving than: He's better than I am (no, he isn't).
Hm, I much prefer youtube.com/watch?v=CcCw1ggftuQ to youtube.com/watch?v=fpmTe3TDdVU. The latter was somehow chosen by YouTube's shoddy algorithm, and I was like, wait a minute, that doesn't sound right. But it kinda did.
The music video is a bit of a... rubbernecking sight, if I may say so. It's weird but you can't look away.
Not sure if rubbernecking is the right word to use there.
On a superficially related note, this also doesn't get old.
I have no idea what he's saying though, just like with most songs. I think that's why I don't know any lyrics ever. I don't ... understand their English on an intuitive level. I wonder how many other learners of English have the same problem.
It's like I understand these songs on a word-by-word basis, never grasping the whole thing.
My brother can learn song lyrics fairly easily. Entire songs... but then again, he's basically a native speaker, lol. A native speaker of TV English.
22:10
@Jasper Neat, I haven’t seen that before.
0
Q: Stacked- are these sentences the word has been used in grammatically correct?

Soumya Ghosh"Look at those tables, stacked one on top of another." "Look at those tables, stacked one of top of the other." "Look at those tables stacked on top of one another." "Look at those tables stacked up." Do all these sentences mean the same thing? Are all of them grammatically correct?


« first day (1786 days earlier)      last day (1749 days later) »