« first day (1342 days earlier)      last day (2191 days later) » 

00:39
There's been a couple today which I suppose could have been downvoted by supporters of Victorian-invented grammar rules.
Actually, one was probably just for me being labyrinthine and roundabout, excessively verbose, but that's me.
This is the one that surprised me: ell.stackexchange.com/questions/197416/…
(someone objects to the word "periphrastic", you'd think they could say so)
 
2 hours later…
02:37
@SamBC If the down-vote is unexplained, and I’m happy that my answer is well-written and supported, I like to make up own stories for how the DV happened. It could be a series of coincidences, secret messages being passed, or just someone having a bad day if I’m feeling uncreative.
3
@SamBC If it jumps out at you as something off-putting about your answer, you may want to think about ways to make it more accessible. You could link a definition. Some folks think that it’s the rarer words that give learners trouble; I think it’s more likely the ones with 50 different definitions, but any time folks spend worrying about your word choice is time not spent understanding your point.
 
5 hours later…
07:24
@SamBC Unexplained and undeserved downvotes can happen frequently on SE.
@ColleenV Someone having a bad day can happen frequently in this case. For some people, every day can be quite bad, so they cast downvotes.
 
3 hours later…
10:41
Thanks all
11:34
I would like to know any idiom for a player who on debut shocked everyone and did the unexcepted, as most people thought that he won't be able to perform
 
2 hours later…
13:59
@RajatAudichya Have you posed this question on the main site?
Anyhow, against all odds / expectations come to mind.
14:37
@RajatAudichya This student donald-trumped everyone!
 
1 hour later…
15:40
This isn't about generic NPs at all (I can't edit this out now).
> However what thing that comes up, again and again, is the pluralizing of nouns, confused by the fact that the noun is generic.
I'm not sure if this is grammatical though.
> i.e., should be "The Component form's fields..." is always written "The Components' forms fields...".
Do English-speaking people speak like this?
(I'm asking about the parts in bold.)
English people, English people, please reply
@snailboat, I haven't seen you in a moonmoon
Come here, ladle your wisdom by the spoonspoon
16:05
@userr2684291 I do not speak like that. I would say what comes up again and again, not what thing that comes up again and again.
@userr2684291 Not sure what he intends there, but I also don't speak like that. Maybe he means what should be XXX is instead written YYY.
@userr2684291 Generally, the whole post is terribly written and quite incomprehensible.
Thank you for your insight.
@CowperKettle I like to wave pom poms.
@Jasper Pom-poms is normally hyphenated or spelled as a single orthographic word without the hyphen.
@userr2684291 Yes, thank you.
Sure thing.
16:15
Words go through 3 stages: X Y, X-Y, XY.
I am not sure if it is now ice cream, ice-cream, or icecream.
The first one looks the most normal to me.
I think what most style guides will tell you is consult the dictionary to see what the current standard form is for a particular combination.
For example, Chicago Manual of Style will tell you to consult Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, while Associated Press Style will tell you to consult Webster's New World College Dictionary.
@CowperKettle I can tell you that Xiao Yue Yue literally is translated as Little Moon Moon.
( :
@CowperKettle Did you intend moon to mean "month"?
@userr2684291 Yue means both moon and month in Chinese.
16:36
@RajatAudichya The first thing that came to mind for me was dark horse
2
@userr2684291 "However the thing that comes up over and over..."
@userr2684291 i.e. what should be X is often written Y
@userr2684291 No, that whole question is kind of in broken English.
Word of the eve: mine flail (a vehicle-mounted device that makes a safe path through a mine-field by deliberately detonating land mines in front of the vehicle that carries it)
@Jasper Used to in English as well. I mean, moon meant moon and month. Still does sometimes, poetically.
@SamBC Aha! I will see you in three moons, something like that!
> Enormous moon, that rise behind these hills
Heavy and yellow in a sky unstarred
And pale, your girth by purple fillets barred
Of drifting cloud, that as the cool sky fills
With planets and the brighter stars, distills
To thinnest vapor and floats valley-ward, —
You flood with radiance all this cluttered yard,
The sagging fence, the chipping window sills!
> Grateful at heart as if for my delight
You rose, I watch you through a mist of tears,
Thinking how man, who gags upon despair,
Salting his hunger with the sweat of fright
Has fed on cold indifference all these years,
Calling it kindness, calling it God's care.
16:49
@Jasper Yep. Or "many moons have passed".
@SamBC I see you study Latin. I don't, haha. But in case you are interested, I think the best Latin dictionary now is the two volume Oxford Latin Dictionary, but it costs a lot.
@Jasper Not formally. I dabble. I dabble in a lot.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
17:30
😆
18:14
> In the United States, scientists recently found the population of monarch butterflies fell by 90 percent in the last 20 years, a loss of 900 million individuals; the rusty-patched bumblebee, which once lived in 28 states, dropped by 87 percent over the same period.
The Holocene extinction, otherwise referred to as the Sixth extinction or Anthropocene extinction, is a current event, and is one of the most significant extinction events in the history of the Earth. This ongoing extinction of species coincides with the present Holocene epoch (approx. 11,700 years), and is mainly a result of human activity. This large number of extinctions spans numerous families of plants and animals, including mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles and arthropods. With widespread degradation of highly biodiverse habitats such as coral reefs and rainforests, as well as other areas...
@ColleenV LOL, the dodo bird is my favourite bird!
 
1 hour later…
19:49
@userr2684291: thanks for catching all those typos of mine...
20:27
Np.
Anonymous
Gotta catch 'em all.
22:04
1
Q: "Such level of shade for her age" - meaning of "level of shade" in a YouTube comment on an actress taking part in a talk show

Andrew TobilkoI watched this video (a very young urbane actress being interviewed on a late-night TV show) and came across the comment that I couldn't understand: Such level of shade for her age... I see great things in her future. Is it a poorly constructed sentence or does "shade" convey any other subt...

Interesting q
Yay! I was first to see a @snailboat today! A sign of luck!

« first day (1342 days earlier)      last day (2191 days later) »