Probably not, actually, but a hundred years ago I think people talked that way more often.

@userr2684291 It's all in the section on catenative verbs.

See pages 1228 and 1231.

Hate and love are different from go.

Although go can be followed by a to-infinitival constituent, in that case it's an adjunct of purpose rather than a catenative complement.

@userr2684291 That's a great question! There are some different ways you can approach distinguishing the plain form of a verb from its plain present tense form. One is to make the subject third person and singular, so if it's the plain present, it should become the third person singular present form instead.

If it doesn't change form, then it might not really be a tensed form, since it doesn't show the attributes of a tensed form (changing form to agree with the subject in number and person).

Another way is to change the verb to be, since it has a special plain form, although it always work. For example, if you're looking for the complement of do in a do-support construction, it's kind of tricky since be is an auxiliary already in most uses.

But we can try lexical be, as in Don't be mean!

Sometimes you want to look at a range of examples like that to make a conclusion, because you can come up with patterns. When does be show up?

We find that there are very few constructions with consecutive finite forms. You brought up an example, which is the quasi-serial verb construction (go + verb), but that seems to be pretty exceptional.