« first day (1053 days earlier)      last day (2480 days later) » 

00:19
Word of the day: labret /ˈleɪbɹɨt/
/ˈleɪbɹɨt/
 
3 hours later…
03:17
0
Q: Adding the feature of 'favorite' or 'followers'

Maulik VWe all have favorite questions and answers on this wonderful platform. Why can't we have 'favorite' users here? For example, I like J.R.'s, StoneyB's, and a few others' answers and want to get notified. This can further be extended to showing the number of 'followers' as we have on most of the ...

 
5 hours later…
Anonymous
08:26
Word of the day: confabulate
3
10:18
@snailboat Noice, I expected it to be "comfortable" + "confusable"
Huh, I wonder if I should be worried about this arbitration stuff
I'm not residing in the US
Heck, I can't buy a chocolate bar from outside the country
Anonymous
10:43
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ I would imagine it's pretty unlikely to affect you.
Anonymous
@CowperKettle I thought it said lab rat at first!
@snailboat yay for lawyery bull crap
0
Q: Adding the feature of 'favorite' or 'followers'

Maulik VWe all have favorite questions and answers on this wonderful platform. Why can't we have 'favorite' users here? For example, I like J.R.'s, StoneyB's, and a few others' answers and want to get notified. This can further be extended to showing the number of 'followers' as we have on most of the ...

Heh, he keeps thinking you can favorite answers
Good nitpicking point in arguments if you disagree with him
@CowperKettle is that like "elaborate"?
OK, I wanna unsee the Google results for that word
Anonymous
11:30
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ I used a dictionary instead of searching on Google.
@snailboat I have MW on android, but I keep forgetting to check it instead of googling
Different story when I'm offline
Hi @Ice
Anonymous
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Hi MAR!
Anonymous
Hello! Welcome to ELL chat!
Anonymous
Are words of the day any random words? Because I just checked out some previous ones, I don't think I would ever use some of them. So, what's the use of having them?
Anonymous
Every SE chat is so welcoming. Good vibes~
Anonymous
11:42
:D
Anonymous
Oh, I wouldn't take the "word of the day" thing too seriously. They're just for fun :-)
Anonymous
Out of the five WOTDs I can see starred right now, I'd say . . .
Anonymous
I posted confabulate when I ran across it in a blog post, and foofaraw when a friend used it in conversation.
Anonymous
Moolah is common enough to be worth knowing, although I don't actually use that word myself.
Anonymous
I like having a lot of these words in my passive vocabulary, even if I don't plan to retain them as part of my active vocabulary.
Anonymous
11:46
In other words, it might be worth understanding them even if I don't plan to use them myself.
Anonymous
As far as labret and Fremdscham, I've never seen those before myself.
Anonymous
The latter is reminiscent of schadenfreude, which I think most speakers are familiar with.
Anonymous
12:01
That's the history of all. Haha. The first statement was self explanatory. '"Just for fun!" I just wanted to know the purpose behind having those words. That was a quite good explanation. Thanks! :D
Anonymous
Word of the day(hour?): fete feɪt/
12:17
The word(s) of the year, sometimes capitalized as "Word(s) of the Year" and abbreviated "WOTY" (or "WotY"), refers to any of various assessments as to the most important word(s) or expression(s) in the public sphere during a specific year. The German tradition, Wort des Jahres was started in 1971. The American Dialect Society's Word of the Year is the oldest English-language version, and the only one that is announced after the end of the calendar year, determined by a vote of independent linguists, and not tied to commercial interest. However, various other organizations also announce Words of...
 
1 hour later…
Anonymous
13:18
By the way, @IceInkberry, if you have a word you want to share, feel free :-) It doesn't have to be rare.
Anonymous
Okay, thanks! :)
Anonymous
Oh! You already did!
Anonymous
Sometimes I'm not very observant.
Anonymous
13:47
Here's where I ran into confabulate: rsbakker.wordpress.com/2017/09/11/…
Anonymous
It's a review of (or perhaps a response to) The Knowledge Illusion. I haven't read the book, but it looks interesting!
Anonymous
15:27
@FumbleFingers Okay, I misunderstood you as implying that a native speaker would somehow know to include the before Taj Mahal even without having heard it before. And yes, Taj Mahal is always preceded by some kind of determining word like the (I'm not trying to argue against that). — userr2684291 2 days ago
Anonymous
@userr2684291 Until I read this comment, it hadn't occurred to me that there might be native speakers who haven't heard of the Taj Mahal before.
Anonymous
I don't know if it's always preceded by the. I know that my ear demands the, and it seems pretty certain about it! But I don't know if everyone everywhere speaks the same way I do.
Anonymous
I can say at least that my expectation is that it's always preceded by a definite article.
15:46
@snailboat We could say “my Taj Mahal” in some circumstances
16:04
That's what I meant by "some kind of determining word like the".
Very vague and amateurish, I know.
Anonymous
@ColleenV Well, you could use all sorts of determiners other than the if they made sense in context. But I wouldn't expect those situations to come up, generally speaking.
Anonymous
@userr2684291 It was fine. My is definite and can function as a Determiner.
Anonymous
You could even make it indefinite in the right context: a second Taj Mahal
Anonymous
How about this example: Thanks to the step by step instructions, students crafted a cardboard Taj Mahal.
16:14
But that's obviously not the same.
Anonymous
Yeah, it's different. Although so is my Taj Mahal.
Anonymous
So I suppose I should have been a little more restrictive about the meaning when I said I always expect to hear the Taj Mahal. When I wrote that, I was really only thinking of the versus zero, actually.
Anonymous
It sounds funny to me if you just remove the.
I mean... it refers to another entity, doesn't it? Both my and the refer to the original one.
The versions with those words I mean.
Anonymous
My is deictic, so we can't discuss which Taj Mahal the phrase refers to without a context.
16:19
Ah yes. I guess so is the in the right context.
Anonymous
For me it's easier to think of contexts where it doesn't refer to the same one, but it could go either way.
Anonymous
@userr2684291 In the same way the moon might not refer to Luna in a science fiction novel set on another planet, but in the large majority of contexts it would.
@userr2684291 I didn’t read through the entire discussion in detail (I’m at work) Sorry if I derailed anyone :)
Right, right.
Anonymous
We're chatting. We started derailed :-)
Anonymous
16:24
@userr2684291 We get a lot of questions about a and the, often without any context at all, so it's often impossible to write a good answer.
Anonymous
Definiteness is pragmatic.
They are different ways of saying the same thing, and neither is "non-standard" nor ungrammatical. — Robusto 3 hours ago
I know it's the same topic we had yesterday but this seems to be upvoted and I'm not sure if it's okay.
I'd classify wish you would've in the same category as wish you had've. I can't google efficiently right now, though.
16:42
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Follow4follow?
Anonymous
@userr2684291 Or at least a closely related topic.
Anonymous
I'm reluctant to call it non-standard.
Anonymous
There's probably an interesting discussion to be had there, though :-)
16:56
3
Q: Is 'had have + past participle' a correct grammatical form?

WS2It has been suggested in some quarters that had have, followed by a past participle, is a regionalism that has no place in standard English grammar. If I had have known you were coming, I would have been prepared, or If I'd have known you were coming, I would have been prepared, mean essentially...

> If Jones would have/ had have/ would’ve/ had’ve/ woulda’/ hada’/ would of / had of taken arsenic, he would have shown some symptoms. [NSSC]
Anonymous
It sounds so weird to me with had.
Of course, what works in a plain if-clause may not in the wish one and vice versa.
Anonymous
I've had discussions about this before, but I don't really remember the conclusions we came to.
(I say the because I'm referring to the corresponding one.)
Anonymous
@userr2684291 The complements of wish need special treatment and have to be described separately in a grammar.
17:00
):
Anonymous
Your sad face is going against the grain.
I'm in the camp a wish clause expands into the corresponding if clause.
Because even would works as a special case of would in the if clause.
But not would have.
Okay I can't talk / type properly right now and I'm annoyed.
Anonymous
@userr2684291 Yay, it's a sailboat!
19:24
@userr2684291 I'd follow you for 10 upvotes and a 50 rep bounty. Take it or leave it
 
4 hours later…
23:12
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ That's... 150 reputatoes, I reckon.
Anonymous
@userr2684291 Mmm, baked reputato.
@snailboat To study late or go to bed and study early? Just a hypothetical... I think the bed-lag isn't worth it, but no review is also kinda bad.
I wonder if there are any papers on that topic.
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Anyway. How about 3 upvotes on any answer you want, and a possibility to earn 500 on a question of your choosing (your answer has to have the highest number of upvotes). If you fail to get that, you sign a little contract and you work for me for the next 25 years under my terms.
I'll give you food and shelter for the first 4 months.
Er, up there it should read 500 rep if that wasn't obvious.
High risk–high reward kinda thing, yunno?

« first day (1053 days earlier)      last day (2480 days later) »